Systematic Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Meta-Anal. May 31, 2019; 7(5): 234-248
Published online May 31, 2019. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v7.i5.234
Table 1 Clinical demographics of the patients who underwent liver resection for malignant tumors in the no liver dysfunction group (n = 78) and liver dysfunction group (n = 8)
Clinical variables / characteristicsTotal values (n = 86)No liver dysfunction (n = 78)Liver dysfunction (n = 8)P-values
Age (yr)67.0 ± 10.366.8 ± 10.568.7 ± 9.3NS
BSA (cm2)1.61 ± 0.181.60 ± 0.181.65 ± 0.18NS
Albumin (g/dL)4.0 ± 0.44.0 ± 0.43.8 ± 0.4NS
Bilirubin (mg/dL)0.7 ± 0.30.6 ± 0.30.8 ± 0.4NS
PT (%)93.4 ± 11.993.9 ± 12.188.4 ± 9.7NS
ICGR15 (%)9.0 ± 4.68.4 ± 4.314.9 ± 2.5< 0.001
HH150.578 ± 0.0790.575 ± 0.0780.617 ± 0.010NS
LHL150.940 ± 0.0270.940 ± 0.0280.935 ± 0.024NS
ATIII (%)94.9 ± 17.296.0 ± 17.383.9 ± 13.40.036
Intraoperative bleeding (mL)481.2 ± 468.5455.8 ± 472.4675.0 ± 430.0NS
Operative time (min)404.5 ± 135.2390.8 ± 129.3525.9 ± 140.90.014
Sex (male:female)49:3744:345:3NS
Background (HCC: meta or CCC)57:2949:298:00.047
Hr (0/S:1:2/3)53:17:1649:16:134:1:3NS
Sapporo score13.2 ± 2.413.4 ± 2.511.0 ± 3.20.037
MELD score7.6 ± 1.67.6 ± 1.77.8 ± 0.70.103
Child-Pugh score3.2 ± 0.43.2 ± 0.43.4 ± 0.50.119
Total liver volume (cc)1137.8 ± 222.91136.2 ± 228.51153.5 ± 221.4NS
Reduction in liver volume (%)19.0 ± 13.017.6 ± 12.132.8 ± 15.00.006
Residual liver volume (%)85.1 ± 14.486.0 ± 13.775.4 ± 17.90.039
Table 2 Sapporo scores for liver resection of malignant tumors
FactorsScores
4321
ICGR15 (%)≤ 1010-1920-29≥ 30
ATIII (%)≥ 9080-8970-79≤ 69
HH15≤ 0.550.56-0.590.60-0.64≥ 0.65
LHL15≥ 0.950.90-0.940.85-0.89≤ 0.84
Table 3 Formulae for the calculation of standard liver volume based on height and weight
AuthorsJournalsFormulaeICC
Height and weightOgiu et al[22]Health Phys, 1997LV = 576.9 × H + 8.9 × BW – 159.7 (males); LV = 674.3 × H + 6.5 × BW – 214.5 (females)0.73
Lin et al[23]Hepatogastroenterology, 1998LV = 133 × H + 12 × BW – 15300.78
Yu et al[24]Liver Transpl, 2004LV = 21.585 × BW0.7322 × H0.2250.77
Chandramohan et al[25]Indian J Gastroenterol, 2007LV = 18.51 × BW + 191.800.77
Fu-Gui et al[26]Transplant Proc, 2009LV = 11.508 × BW + 334.0240.71
Poovathumkadavil et al[27]Transplant Proc, 2010LV = 12.26 × BW + 555.650.72
Herden et al[28]Transpl Int, 2013LV = −143.062973 + 4.274603051 × H + 14.78817631 × BW (Age: 0-1); LV = −20.2472281 + 3.339056437 × H + 13.11312561 × BW (Age: 1-16)0.76
Table 4 Formulae for the calculation of standard liver volume based on body surface area
AuthorsJournalsFormulaeICC
BSADeLand et al[29]Radiology, 1968LV = 1020 × BSA – 2200.77
Urata et al[30]Hepatology, 1995LV = 706.2 × BSA + 2.40.71
Murry et al[31]Drug Metab Dispos, 1995LV = 710 × BSA0.71
Heinemann et al[32]Liver Transpl Surg, 1999LV = 1072.8 × BSA – 345.70.78
Vauthey et al[33]Liver Transpl, 2002LV = 1267.28 × BSA – 794.410.78
Yoshizumi et al[34]Transplant Proc, 2003LV = 772 × BSA0.74
Yu et al[24]Liver Transpl, 2004LV = 1145.4 × BSA − 506.1 (adults)0.78
Hashimoto et al[35]J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2006LV = 961.3 × BSA – 404.80.77
Chandramohan et al[25]Indian J Gastroenterol, 2007LV = 1267.28 × BSA – 794.410.78
Saeki et al[36]Pediatr Transplant, 2012LV = 689.9 × BSA − 24.70.70
Our studyLV = 822.7 × BSA – 183.20.74
Table 5 Formulae for the calculation of standard liver volume based on age, gender, or radiological findings
AuthorsJournalsFormulaeICC
OthersTakahashi et al[37]Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2000LV = 15 × (4.6 × Age + 19.8), Age: 1-18; LV = 15 × (0.31 × Age + 97.8), Age: 30-40; LV = 15 × (–0.91 × Age + 149), Age: ≥ 410.39
Kanamori et al[38]Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2002LV = 67.3 × Age + 229.8−0.39
Choukèr et al[39]Liver Transpl, 2004LV=452 + 16.34 × BW + 11.85 × Age – 166 × Gender (Age: 16–50, M: 0, F: 1); LV=1390 + 15.94 × BW – 12.86 × Age (Age: 51–70)0.79
Chan et al[40]World J Gastroenterol, 2006LV = 218 + BW × 12.3 + Gender × 51 (F: 0, M: 1)0.74
Yuan et al[41]Transplant Proc, 2008LV = 949.7 × BSA − 48.3 × Age − 247.4 (Age: 1: < 40, 2: 41–60, 3: > 60)0.77
Kokudo et al[42]J Hepatol, 2015LV = 203.3 − 3.61 × Age + 58.7 × Thoracic width − 463.7 × Race (Asian: 1, Caucasian: 0)0.66
Ma et al[43]Liver Transpl, 2017LV = (2 × Depth) + (10 × BW) + 1900.75
Table 6 Characteristics of the patients and simple standard liver volume formulae based on a mean body surface area of 1.61
AuthorsMean age ± SD (range)BSASimple formulae (tentative mean BSA = 1.61)ICCClusters
DeLand et al[29]NDNDLV = 883 × BSA0.75B
Urata et al[30]11.1 ± 8.81.078 ± 0.528 (0.248–1.935)LV = 707 × BSA0.71A
Murry et al[31]9.7 (3.3–18.8)Median: 1.37 (0.57–2.0)LV = 710 × BSA0.71A
Heinemann et al[32]50.6±18.9NDLV = 858 × BSA0.75B
Vauthey et al[33]Mean: 54, Median: 56 (14-90)Median: 1.82 (1.32–2.90)LV = 770 × BSA0.74B
Yoshizumi et al[34]38.6 ± 20.6 (0–87) for males; 47.0 ± 19.7 (0–85) for females1.86 ± 0.36 (0.24-2.88); 1.68 ± 0.28 (0.28-2.38)LV = 772 × BSA0.74B
Yu et al[24]42.4 ± 16.51.65 ± 0.26LV = 831 × BSA0.74B
Hashimoto et al[35](17-66)1.67 ± 0.18 (1.25-2.56)LV = 710 × BSA0.71A
Chandramohan et al[25]46.5 (10-70)Median: 1.60 (0.88-2.25)LV = 774 × BSA0.73B
Saeki et al[36]5.8 (0 d-15)NDLV = 675 × BSA0.70A
Our study67.0 ± 10.31.61 ± 0.18LV = 709 × BSA0.71A
Table 7 Minimum residual liver volume based on various functional assessments
AuthorsPublicationsFunctional assessmentsMinimum residual LV
Mortality
NLCH, liver injuryLC
Shirabe et al[49]J Am Coll Surg, 1999Pathology (HCC, HB, or HC)250 mL/m2 (40%)8.8% (180 d)
Shoup et al[50]J Gastrointest Surg, 2003Pathology (NL, CRC metastasis alone)25%--ND
Schindl et al[51]Gut, 2005Pathology (NL, 99% metastasis)26.6%--ND
Ferrero et al[17]World J Surg, 2007Pathology (NL, liver injury)26.5%31%-0.8% (60 d)
van den Esschert et al[52]J Gastrointest Surg, 2009Pathology (CH, LC)-40%50%ND
Kishi et al[53]Ann Surg, 2009Pathology (NL)20%--2.0% (30 d) 4.7% (60 d) 6.0% (90 d)
Suda et al[54]Am J Surg, 2009Pathology (NL, HCCa, GBCa, ICCa)40%--8.1% (ND)
Vauthey et al[55]HPB, 2010Pathology (NL, liver injury, LC)20%30%40%ND
Gulielmi et al[56]Dig Surg, 2012Pathology (NL, steatosis, LC)20%30%40%ND
Hwang et al[16]J Gastrointest Surg, 2015Pathology (CH, LC)-35%30%0.8% (90 d)
Ribero et al[57]J Am Coll Surg, 2016Pathology (NL, HCCa alone)30%--11% (90 d)
Our seriesHepatogastroenterolo-gy (in press)ATIII, ICG15, GSA35%-95%2.3% (90 d)