Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 16, 2021; 9(32): 9835-9846
Published online Nov 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i32.9835
Table 1 General information of biliary-type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction patients
Characteristic
Type I, n = 29
Type IIa, n = 6
Type IIb, n = 44
Sex (male/female)8/214/215/29
Age [mean (SD), yr]59.10 ± 17.3656.00 ± 19.0358.84 ± 11.14
With FH (n)104
With IBS (n)002
With FD (n)113
ALT [M (IQR), U/L]209.90 (121.55-361.39)170.02 (110.25-203.36)25.65 (16.75-66.50)
AST [M (IQR), U/L]194.66 (75.90-345.50)136.78 (48.81-175.61)28.00 (22.32-360.06)
TBIL [M (IQR), mg/dL]4.52 (3.13-8.13)6.09 (4.24-11.23)1.69 (1.15-3.12)
ALP [M (IQR), U/L]199.44 (155.73-311.78)354.70 (201.68-470.88)98.20 (78.20-117.40)
Bile duct diameter [M (IQR), cm]1.20 (1.00-1.50)0.80 (0.78-0.80)1.50 (1.10-2.00)
Table 2 Verbal rating scale-5 scoring system
0 points
No pain
1 pointMild pain that is tolerable with normal life and sleep
2 pointsModerate pain that can interfere with proper sleep and requires analgesics
3 pointsSevere pain and disturbed sleep that require anesthesia and analgesics
4 pointsSevere pain causing severe interference with sleep accompanied by other symptoms or passive posture
Table 3 Verbal rating scale-5 scores before endoscopic sphincterotomy in biliary-type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction patients
Biliary-type SOD
0 points
1 point
2 points
3 points
4 points
Type I, n000263
Type II, n000437
Total, n0006910
Table 4 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography intraoperative situation
Successful intubation rate
n = 79
EST79
With ENBD66
With EPBD21
With ERBD8
With ERPD4
The average CBD in cm1.4 (range: 1.0-1.8)
The average EST incision length in cm0.52 ± 0.16
Table 5 Comparison of serum index results before and after endoscopic sphincterotomy in biliary-type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction patients
Serum index1
Biliary-type SOD
P value
Pre-EST
Post-EST
ALT [M (IQR), U/L]70.00 (24.10-190.03)29.22 (18.00-58.00)< 0.001
AST [M (IQR), U/L]61.51 (26.08-157.79)30.59 (22.00-64.00)< 0.001
TBIL [M (IQR), mg/dL]2.98 (1.49-5.02)2.00 (1.14-3.03)0.004
ALP [M (IQR), U/L]129.00 (91.50-220.91)7.60 (3.70-12.30)< 0.001
Table 6 Comparison of verbal rating scale-5 before and after endoscopic sphincterotomy in sphincter of Oddi dysfunction patients
Biliary-type SOD
Period
0 points
1 point
2 points
3 points
4 points
P value
Type I (n)Pre-EST000263< 0.001
Post-EST245000
Type II (n)Pre-EST000437< 0.001
Post-EST431240
Table 7 Comparison of verbal rating scale-5 before and after endoscopic sphincterotomy in Type IIa/b sphincter of Oddi dysfunction patients
Biliary-type SOD
Period
0 points
1 point
2 points
3 points
4 points
P value
Type IIa (n)Pre-EST00060< 0.001
Post-EST60000
Type IIb (n)Pre-EST000377< 0.001
Post-EST371240
Table 8 Curative effect of biliary-type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction patients
Biliary-type SOD
Obviously effective
Effective
Ineffective
Total, n
Overall effectiveness, %
0 points
1 point
2 points
3 points
4 points
Type I, n24500029100.0
Type II, n4312405092.0
Table 9 Curative effect of Type IIa/b sphincter of Oddi dysfunction patients
Biliary-type SOD
Obviously effective
Effective
Ineffective
Total, n
Overall effectiveness, %
0 points
1 point
2 points
3 points
4 points
Type IIa, n600006100
Type IIb, n3712404490.9
Table 10 Comparison of verbal rating scale-5 scores of biliary-type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction patients (with/without functional gastrointestinal disorders) before and after endoscopic sphincterotomy
Period
Case
0 points, n
1 point, n
2 points, n
3 points, n
4 points, n
P value
Pre-ESTWith FGID0001020.271
Without FGID000598
Post-ESTWith FGID10074< 0.001
Without FGID661000