Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2020; 8(18): 4051-4058
Published online Sep 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.4051
Table 1 Siegel’s criteria[7]
Treatment efficiencyFinal PTAs/dBMean hearing gains/dB
CR< 25/
PR25-45> 15
SR> 45≥ 15
NR> 75≤ 15
Table 2 Baseline clinical information of patients and the results after treatment
CaseAge/yrAffected sideOnset/dConcomitant symptomsGestation wkNumber of pregnancyApgar scoresOnset PTA/dBPTA after treatment/dBPostpartum PTA/dBOutcome
T131L1N151980.835.835.8PR
T224L1TF2211081.732.530.8PR
T333L0VTF28110103.370.869.2SR
T430R0VT2711095.055.855.0SR
T532R2T3011073.343.341.7PR
T636R2T2611065.022.520.8CR
T735R2TF162978.345.845.8SR
C135R1TF27110102.599.297.5NR
C229R3TF2721065.842.540.8PR
C332R1T333967.558.358.3NR
C426L1TF35110100.8100.8100.0NR
Table 3 Audiology data before and after therapy in treatment and control groups
GroupPre-treatment PTAs/ dBPost-treatment PTAs/dBPostpartum PTAs/dBMean hearing gains/dBCurative rates
Treatment82.5 ± 12.943.8 ± 15.942.7 ± 16.038.7 ± 7.357.1%
Control84.2 ± 20.275.2 ± 29.474.2 ± 29.313.3 ± 17.025.0%
P value0.870.040.040.006/