Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2025; 13(21): 103841
Published online Jul 26, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i21.103841
Table 1 Comparison of clinicopathological features and immunohistochemical expression of endometrioid endometrial carcinoma between the two groups, n (%)

MELF EEC (n = 60)
No MELF EEC (n = 145)
P value
Age0.002
≤ 509 (15) 52 (35.86)
> 5051 (85) 93 (64.14)
Tumor size0.000
≤ 2 cm10 (16.67)67 (46.21)
> 2 cm50 (83.33)78 (53.79)
Tumor grade
122 (36.67)89 (61.38)0.000
236 (60.00)39 (26.90)
32 (3.33)17 (11.72)
2023 FIGO staging
I33 (55.00) 105 (72.41) 0.011
II16 (26.67) 29 (20.00)
III11 (18.33) 8 (5.52)
IV0 (0) 3 (2.07)
Myometrial invasion0.020
< 1/233 (55.00) 104 (71.72)
≥ 1/227 (45.00) 41 (28.28)
Cervical stromal involvement
Negative49 (81.67) 127 (87.59) 0.278
Positive11 (18.33) 18 (12.41)
LNM
Negative47 (78.33) 138 (95.17) 0.000
Positive13 (21.67) 7 (4.83)
Micrometastasis 71
Macrometastasis66
LVSI
Absent31 (51.67) 125 (91.04) 0.000
Present29 (48.33) 20 (8.96)
< 5/slice18 (30.00) 14 (9.66)
≥ 5/slice11 (18.33) 6 (4.14)
ER0.988
≤ 50%22 (36.67) 53 (36.55)
> 50%38 (63.33) 92 (63.45)
PR0.204
≤ 50%18 (30.00) 57 (39.31)
> 50%42 (70.00) 88 (60.69)
CXCR4/
Negative0145 (100.00)
Positive60 (100.00)0
Table 2 Comparison of immunohistochemical expression in different regions of endometrioid endometrial carcinoma with microcystic, elongated, and fragmented infiltration, n (%)

Cases
High expression of CXCR4
High expression of ER
High expression of PR
EEC main area6011 (18.33) 38 (63.33) 42 (70.00)
MELF invasion area6049 (81.67) 22 (36.67) 18 (30.00)
P value0.0000.000