Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 6, 2022; 10(25): 8906-8921
Published online Sep 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i25.8906
Published online Sep 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i25.8906
Figure 1 Flowchart of the study selection.
MR: Magnetic resonance.
Figure 2 Risk-of-bias and applicability concerns graph.
A: Studies for 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy vs liver biology and other imaging methods in measuring hepatic fat content; B: Studies for in-phase and out-of-phase imaging vs liver biology and other imaging methods in measuring hepatic fat content; C: Studies for multiple-point Dixon imaging vs liver biology and other imaging methods in measuring hepatic fat content.
- Citation: Li YW, Jiao Y, Chen N, Gao Q, Chen YK, Zhang YF, Wen QP, Zhang ZM. How to select the quantitative magnetic resonance technique for subjects with fatty liver: A systematic review. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(25): 8906-8921
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i25/8906.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i25.8906