1
|
Masson-Lecomte A, Birtle A, Pradere B, Capoun O, Compérat E, Domínguez-Escrig JL, Liedberg F, Makaroff L, Mariappan P, Moschini M, Rai BP, van Rhijn BWG, Shariat SF, Smith EJ, Teoh JYC, Soukup V, Wood R, Xylinas EN, Soria F, Seisen T, Gontero P. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Summary of the 2025 Update. Eur Urol 2025; 87:697-716. [PMID: 40118741 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2025] [Accepted: 02/26/2025] [Indexed: 03/23/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE We present a summary of the 2025 update for the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The aim is to provide practical recommendations on the clinical management of UTUC with a focus on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. METHODS For the 2025 guidelines on UTUC, new and relevant evidence was identified, collated, and appraised via a structured assessment of the literature. Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Recommendations within the guidelines were developed by the panel to prioritise clinically important care decisions. The strength of each recommendation was determined according to a balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies, the quality of the evidence (including the certainty of estimates), and the nature and variability of patient values and preferences. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Key recommendations emphasise the importance of thorough diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for patients with UTUC. The guidelines stress the importance of appropriate treatment taking into account patient values and preferences. Key updates in the 2025 UTUC guidelines include: significant changes to the recommendations for UTUC diagnosis; complete revision of the sections addressing risk stratification, ureteroscopy, and the surgical approach for radical nephroureterectomy; addition of four new recommendations, two related to kidney-sparing management of localised low-risk UTUC and a further two related to management of high-risk nonmetastatic UTUC; a review and adaptation of recommendation for UTUC follow-up; and addition of a new section addressing quality indicators for UTUC management. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS This overview of the 2025 EAU guidelines on UTUC offers valuable insights into risk factors, diagnosis, classification, treatment, and follow-up for UTUC. The guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to the current best evidence and are designed for effective integration in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alison Birtle
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, UROSUD, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Otakar Capoun
- Department of Urology, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Lydia Makaroff
- Fight Bladder Cancer, Chinnor, UK; World Bladder Cancer Patient Coalition, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paramananthan Mariappan
- Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Bhavan P Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Emma J Smith
- Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Jeremy Y C Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Viktor Soukup
- Department of Urology, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Robert Wood
- Patient representative, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Evanguelos N Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Sorbonne University, Paris, France; Department of Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu Y, Song Y, Li J, Rui C, Qin C, Xu T. Comparative efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy after radical surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2025:S1078-1439(25)00125-5. [PMID: 40414745 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2025] [Accepted: 03/24/2025] [Indexed: 05/27/2025]
Abstract
To evaluate the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and adjuvant immunotherapy (AI) on the prognosis of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using studies identified from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to September 2024. We performed pair-wise and network meta-analyses to evaluate survival outcomes, focusing on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival, and metastasis-free survival. A total of 43 studies involving 13,132 patients were included. Pair-wise meta-analysis showed that AC significantly improved OS (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.86, P = 0.0001), CSS (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.90, P < 0.00001), and DFS (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.51-0.75, P < 0.00001). A pooled analysis of three RCTs with 384 UTUC patients showed that AI did not significantly improve DFS (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.87-1.64, P = 0.28) or OS (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.81-2.03). Network meta-analysis suggested that combining AC with AI could offer better DFS than AC alone, with AC outperforming AI. Ranking analysis indicated that MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) was the most effective for OS and CSS improvement, followed by GC (gemcitabine and cisplatin). AC improves the prognosis of UTUC patients, whereas the results with AI are less promising. AC shows better outcomes than AI after RNU. Preliminary evidence suggests that combining AC with AI may enhance DFS, but further research is needed to confirm its effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuxuan Song
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jincong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Rui
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Caipeng Qin
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sazuka T. Editorial Comment to "Differential Risk Factors for Early Intravesical Recurrence After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Carcinoma According to the History of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer". Int J Urol 2025; 32:575. [PMID: 40033787 DOI: 10.1111/iju.70028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2025] [Accepted: 02/18/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Tomokazu Sazuka
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shindo T, Ueki Y, Muranaka I, Kobayashi G, Miyamoto S, Kunishima Y, Sato S, Okada M, Kato S, Kato R, Adachi H, Matsukawa M, Takayanagi A, Ito N, Wanifuchi A, Maehana T, Kyoda Y, Hashimoto K, Kobayashi K, Tanaka T, Masumori N. Differential Risk Factors for Early Intravesical Recurrence After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Carcinoma According to the History of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Int J Urol 2025; 32:567-574. [PMID: 39945120 PMCID: PMC12022740 DOI: 10.1111/iju.70009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2024] [Revised: 01/30/2025] [Accepted: 02/04/2025] [Indexed: 04/26/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the preoperative risk factors for early intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) according to the history of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). METHODS We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent RNU for UTUC between 2012 and 2022 at 14 hospitals. Early recurrence was defined as intravesical pathologically confirmed recurrence within 1 year after RNU. Patients who received single-dose immediate intravesical instillation (IVI) as prevention for intravesical recurrence were excluded. Using preoperative factors, we examined the risk factors for early intravesical recurrences in patients with and without a history of NMIBC. Death from any cause within 1 year after RNU was regarded as a competitive risk. RESULTS We included 504 UTUC patients who were treated with RNU. Among these patients, 126 (25.0%) had a history of NMIBC, whereas 378 (75%) did not. According to multivariate analysis, the presence of macrohematuria, positive cytology in self-voided urine, and performing diagnostic ureteroscopy prior to RNU were risk factors in patients without a history of NMIBC. On the other hand, an NMIBC diagnosis within 1 year prior to RNU and an extravesical approach for bladder cuff management were risk factors in RNU-treated patients with a history of NMIBC. CONCLUSIONS Early intravesical recurrence risk factors differ between UTUC patients with and without a history of NMIBC. Different stratification may be needed to predict intravesical recurrence risk in these two types of UTUC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuya Shindo
- Department of UrologySapporo Medical University School of MedicineSapporoJapan
| | - Yohei Ueki
- Department of UrologyJapan Community Health Care Organization Hokkaido HospitalSapporoJapan
| | - Ippei Muranaka
- Department of UrologyJapanese Red Cross Kushiro HospitalKushiroJapan
| | - Genki Kobayashi
- Department of UrologyHakodate Goryoukaku HospitalHakodateJapan
| | - Shintaro Miyamoto
- Department of UrologyJapanese Red Cross Asahikawa HospitalAsahikawaJapan
| | | | - Shunsuke Sato
- Department of UrologyOji General HospitalTomakomaiJapan
| | - Manabu Okada
- Department of UrologyHokkaido Social Work Association Obihiro HospitalObihiroJapan
| | - Shuichi Kato
- Department of UrologySteel Memorial Muroran HospitalMuroranJapan
| | - Ryuichi Kato
- Department of UrologyMuroran City General HospitalMuroranJapan
| | - Hideki Adachi
- Department of UrologySaiseikai Otaru HospitalOtaruJapan
| | | | - Akio Takayanagi
- Department of UrologyJapan Community Health Care Organization Hokkaido HospitalSapporoJapan
| | - Naoki Ito
- Department of UrologyNTT East Medical Center SapporoSapporoJapan
| | - Atsushi Wanifuchi
- Department of UrologyJapanese Red Cross Kushiro HospitalKushiroJapan
| | - Takeshi Maehana
- Department of UrologyNational Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical CenterSapporoJapan
| | - Yuki Kyoda
- Department of UrologySapporo Medical University School of MedicineSapporoJapan
| | - Kohei Hashimoto
- Department of UrologySapporo Medical University School of MedicineSapporoJapan
| | - Ko Kobayashi
- Department of UrologySapporo Medical University School of MedicineSapporoJapan
| | - Toshiaki Tanaka
- Department of UrologySapporo Medical University School of MedicineSapporoJapan
| | - Naoya Masumori
- Department of UrologySapporo Medical University School of MedicineSapporoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Doeveren T, Remmers S, Boevé ER, Cornel EB, van der Heijden AG, Hendricksen K, Cauberg ECC, Jacobs R, Kroon BK, Leliveld AM, Meijer RP, van Melick H, Merks B, Oddens JR, Pradere B, Roelofs LAJ, Somford DM, de Vries P, Wijsman B, Windt WAKM, Yska M, Zwaan PJ, Aben KKH, van Leeuwen PJ, Boormans JL. Intravesical Instillation of Chemotherapy Before Radical Surgery for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: The REBACARE Trial. Eur Urol 2025; 87:444-452. [PMID: 39843302 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2024] [Revised: 12/09/2024] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Intravesical instillation of chemotherapy (IIC) after radical surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) reduces the risk of intravesical recurrence (IVR). However, compliance is low because of possible extravesical leakage after bladder cuff excision. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative IIC in reducing the risk of IVR. METHODS In this prospective, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 clinical trial, 190 chemonaïve patients with primary UTUC without prior or concurrent bladder cancer received a single intravesical instillation of mitomycin C for 1-2 hr within 3 h before surgery. The primary endpoint was the 2-yr histologically confirmed IVR rate, with a target reduction of >40% (from 33.2% according to literature data to <20%). A historical cohort of 247 patients with UTUC who did not receive perioperative IIC served as the reference. Secondary endpoints included compliance, toxicity, and IVR-free survival, which was analyzed via multivariable Cox regression and stratified by previous diagnostic ureteroscopy (d-URS). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS The 2-yr IVR rate was 24% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18-31%) on intention-to-treat analysis and 23% (95% CI 13-32%) on per-protocol analysis. Multivariable analysis revealed that d-URS was associated with higher IVR risk. In the REBACARE cohort, patients without d-URS had threefold lower IVR risk (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.87) in comparison to the reference cohort. Compliance with preoperative instillation was 96% and no grade >2 toxicity occurred. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Preoperative IIC with mitomycin C was feasible and well tolerated and significantly reduced IVR risk for patients without d-URS. These findings suggest that preoperative IIC is a viable strategy for this subset of UTUC patients and that d-URS should be performed judiciously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas van Doeveren
- Department of Urology Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.
| | - Sebastiaan Remmers
- Department of Urology Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Egbert R Boevé
- Department of Urology Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Erik B Cornel
- Department of Urology Ziekenhuis Groep Twente Hengelo The Netherlands
| | | | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | | | - Rens Jacobs
- Department of Urology Zuyderland Medical Center Heerlen The Netherlands
| | - Bin K Kroon
- Department of Urology Rijnstate Medical Center Arnhem The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie M Leliveld
- Department of Urology University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Richard P Meijer
- Department of Oncological Urology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Harm van Melick
- Department of Urology St. Antonius Ziekenhuis Nieuwegein The Netherlands
| | - Bob Merks
- Department of Urology Haaglanden Medical Center Leidschendam The Netherlands
| | - Jorg R Oddens
- Department of Urology Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology La Croix du Sud Hospital Quint-Fonsegrives France
| | - Luc A J Roelofs
- Department of Urology Treant Zorggroep Emmen The Netherlands
| | - Diederik M Somford
- Department of Urology Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | - Peter de Vries
- Department of Urology Zuyderland Medical Center Heerlen The Netherlands
| | - Bart Wijsman
- Department of Urology Elisabeth-Tweesteden Medical Center Tilburg The Netherlands
| | | | - Marit Yska
- Department of Urology Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Peter J Zwaan
- Department of Urology Gelre Ziekenhuis Apeldoorn The Netherlands
| | - Katja K H Aben
- Department of Research and Development Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization Utrecht The Netherlands; IQ Health Science Department Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Masson-Lecomte A. Bladder Cancer Recurrence Following Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Balancing Prevention and Iatrogenicity. Eur Urol 2025; 87:453-454. [PMID: 39843303 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2025] [Revised: 01/07/2025] [Accepted: 01/13/2025] [Indexed: 01/24/2025]
|
7
|
Messing EM, Malshy K. Intravesical instillation of chemotherapy before surgery for upper tract urothelial cancer. Bladder Cancer 2025; 11:23523735251332755. [PMID: 40342811 PMCID: PMC12059432 DOI: 10.1177/23523735251332755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2025] [Accepted: 03/13/2025] [Indexed: 05/11/2025]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kamil Malshy
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Doeveren T, Aben KKH, van Leeuwen PJ, Boormans JL. Reply to Alexandra Masson-Lecomte. Bladder Cancer Recurrence Following Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Balancing Prevention and Iatrogenicity. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.01.004. Eur Urol 2025:S0302-2838(25)00151-4. [PMID: 40102112 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2025] [Accepted: 02/20/2025] [Indexed: 03/20/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas van Doeveren
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Katja K H Aben
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands; IQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Suzuki T, Kanematsu A, Tanaka S, Kanamaru S, Yamasaki T, Kawakita M, Yamamoto S. The long-term impact of single intraoperative instillation of pirarubicin after radical nephroureterectomy on local and systemic cancer control: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. World J Urol 2025; 43:168. [PMID: 40080123 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-05557-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2025] [Indexed: 03/15/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although the preventive effect against intravesical recurrence (IVR) has been established for single instillation of chemotherapy during or after radical surgery of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), there has been no research on the long-term outcome. This study aims to investigate the IVR and long-term survival outcome of a single intraoperative instillation of pirarubicin during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS In this prospective, multicenter, randomized trial, 97 patients undergoing RNU between August 2012 and January 2019 were randomly assigned either to receive a single intraoperative pirarubicin instillation or to serve as the controls. RESULTS A total of 80 patients were analyzed, including 42 in the pirarubicin group and 38 in the control group. The median follow-up period was 58.5 months and 62 months in the pirarubicin and the control groups, respectively. In patients who did not experience IVR, the median follow-up period was 59 months and 61 months in the pirarubicin and the control groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in OS between the two groups, although the IVR rate was significantly lower in pirarubicin group (p = 0.044). Multivariable analyses revealed that the pirarubicin instillation was the only independent factor for IVR. CONCLUSIONS The present trial demonstrated that a single intraoperative instillation of pirarubicin resulted in a significant and long-term reduction of IVR, although there was no significant difference in OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Takarazuka City Hospital, 4-5-1 Kohama, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 665-0827, Japan.
| | - Akihiro Kanematsu
- Department of Urology, Hyogo Medical University Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Shiro Tanaka
- Clinical Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Sojun Kanamaru
- Department of Urology, Kobe City Nishi-Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Japan
| | - Toshinari Yamasaki
- Department of Urology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Mutsushi Kawakita
- Department of Urology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Shingo Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Hyogo Medical University Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Moretto S, Piccolini A, Gallioli A, Contieri R, Buffi N, Lughezzani G, Breda A, Baboudjian M, van Rhijn BW, Roupret M, Uleri A, Pradere B. The role of intravesical chemotherapy following nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2025; 43:191.e1-191.e12. [PMID: 39592361 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2024] [Revised: 10/20/2024] [Accepted: 10/29/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intravesical recurrence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy occurs in 22% to 47%. Intravesical chemotherapy is still underused due to concerns about its efficacy and safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravesical chemotherapy regimens in reducing the risk of intravesical recurrence following radical nephroureterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature search was conducted using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify reports published until March 2024. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. The outcomes measured were intravesical recurrence rates and complications in patients treated with different intravesical instillation chemotherapy and timing after radical nephroureterectomy. Sub-analyses were performed on randomized controlled trials and studies involving patients with no history of bladder cancer. RESULTS Eighteen studies met our inclusion criteria, and data from 2,483 patients were reviewed. Intravesical chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of intravesical recurrence at 12 months (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.33-0.65; P < 0.001;) and at 24 months (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.28-0.61; P < 0.001). Notably, no association was found when confronting intra and postoperative instillations (OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.34-1.28; P = 0.2), nor single vs. multiple instillation (OR = 1.37; 95% CI: 0.75-2.50; P = 0.3). The pooled rate for minor and major complications was 9% and 0.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that intravesical chemotherapy significantly reduces intravesical recurrence rates after radical nephroureterectomy at 12 and 24 months. Additionally, it underscores the favorable safety profile of intravesical chemotherapy, with a low incidence of major complications. The ideal instillation scheme and chemotherapy agent should be further defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Moretto
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrea Piccolini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicolomaria Buffi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, North Academic Hospital, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - Bas Wg van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Alessandro Uleri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, North Academic Hospital, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li J, Lv Y, Xue S, Li W, Zhang X. Ailanthone inhibits bladder cancer tumor and cell proliferation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and activation of the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling pathway. Cytojournal 2025; 22:16. [PMID: 40134568 PMCID: PMC11932951 DOI: 10.25259/cytojournal_166_2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2024] [Accepted: 12/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective Ailanthone (AIL), a medicinal component with antitumor properties, was distilled from Ailanthus altissima. The aim of this work was to probe the cancer-fighting effect of AIL on bladder cancer (BC) cells and the molecular basis of this effect. Material and Methods We developed a subcutaneous BC mouse model and then administered AIL treatment. The effects of AIL on tumor tissue integrity and apoptosis were analyzed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) staining methods. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of AIL on the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (JAK/STAT3) pathway and associated proteins through quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis. Various concentrations of AIL were applied to BC cells, and its effects on cell survival, motility, and apoptosis were detected through cell counting kit-8 assay, Transwell assay, and flow cytometry. In addition, we examined the influence of AIL on apoptosis-related proteins and epithelialmesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins in BC cells through Western blot analysis. Results AIL significantly suppressed the growth and migration of 5637 and T24 cells while promoting apoptosis (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001). In addition, AIL increased the levels of cell death-associated proteins (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001) and reversed EMT in BC cells. In vivo, AIL treatment reduced tumor growth and lowered the transcriptional levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, and IL-23, which are activation factors in the JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway. It also decreased the phosphorylation levels of JAK1, JAK2, and STAT3 in tumor tissues (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). Conclusion AIL exhibits multiple anticancer effects, such as BC cell growth suppression, apoptosis enhancement, reversion of EMT reversion, tumor growth, and JAK/STAT3 pathway activation suppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui Province, China
| | - You Lv
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui Province, China
| | - Sheng Xue
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui Province, China
| | - Wenyong Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui Province, China
| | - Xiaole Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Basile G, Bandini M, Li R, Poch MA, Necchi A, Spiess PE. Gold standard nephroureterectomy, chemoprophylaxis and surveillance in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Curr Opin Urol 2024:00042307-990000000-00208. [PMID: 39529478 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to summarize the most recent evidence on surgical management, strategies to reduce tumor recurrence, and surveillance regimens in patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and elected for radical treatment. RECENT FINDINGS Minimally invasive surgery is gaining momentum in the surgical management of UTUC. Chemoprophylaxis is still the gold standard to reduce intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Novel surveillance strategies have been proposed to adapt follow-up regimens to patients' characteristics. SUMMARY Minimally invasive surgery has been associated with comparable oncological outcomes to the open approach while improving postoperative morbidity. In these cases, bladder cuff excision (BCE) is mostly performed by an extravesical approach, that demonstrates a noninferiority compared to the intravesical one in terms of oncological outcomes. Although lymphadenectomy is recommended in patients with high-risk tumors, its benefits are still unclear. Currently, there is a lack of recent prospective trials on chemoprophylaxis to reduce intravesical recurrence post RNU, making single-dose postoperative chemotherapy instillation the standard treatment. Although novel risk stratification models were released by international urological guidelines, their validity is mainly nonevidence-based. Risk-adapted follow-up strategies incorporating cystoscopy and cross-sectional imaging accounting for individual patient factors should be implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Basile
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Bandini
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Michael A Poch
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Roumiguié M, Seisen T, Masson-Lecomte A, Prost D, Allory Y, Xylinas E, Leon P, Bajeot AS, Pradère B, Marcq G, Neuzillet Y, Thibault C, Audenet F, Rouprêt M. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102722. [PMID: 39581669 DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to propose an update of the French guidelines from the national committee ccAFU on upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). METHODS A systematic Medline search for epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment options and follow-up of UTUC was performed between 2022 and 2024 to evaluate available references and their levels of evidence. RESULTS UTUC is a rare malignancy with specific risk factors, including exposure to aristolochic acid and Lynch syndrome. Its diagnosis is based on the use of computed tomography urography and ureterorenoscopy with biopsies. A prognostic classification has been proposed to discriminate low- and high-risk lesions mainly on the basis of tumour grade (low/high) and imaging aspects (non-invasive/invasive). Tumour size (<2/≥2cm), focality (uni-/multifocal), and hydronephrosis (absent/present) are more relative risk factors. The standard of care for low-risk patients is currently conservative treatment involving ureterorenoscopy laser ablation, whereas radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is advised for those with high-risk disease. Adjuvant treatments after RNU include intravesical instillation of chemotherapy to decrease the risk of bladder recurrence and delivery of platinum-based chemotherapy in pT2-T4 and/or pN+ patients. First-line treatment for metastatic UTUC is based on the combination of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab. For unfit patients, platinum-based chemotherapy plus nivolumab followed by maintenance nivolumab or platinum-based chemotherapy followed by maintenance avelumab in those with at least stable disease can be proposed. The surveillance regimen and schedule depend on the disease stage. CONCLUSION These updated guidelines will contribute to improving the management of patients diagnosed with UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Roumiguié
- Urology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, University of Toulouse UT3, Toulouse, France.
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | | | - Doriane Prost
- Urology Department, Paris Saint Joseph Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Y Allory
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Urology Department, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Anne Sophie Bajeot
- Urology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, University of Toulouse UT3, Toulouse, France
| | - Benjamin Pradère
- UROSUD Urology Department, Clinique Croix Du Sud, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Urology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, University Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris Saclay, Suresnes, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou AP-HP centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - François Audenet
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yong C, Slaven JE, Wu Z, Margulis V, Djaladat H, Antonelli A, Simone G, Bhanvadia R, Ghoreifi A, Moghaddam FS, Ditonno F, Tuderti G, Bronimann S, Dhanji S, Eilender B, Franco A, Finati M, Tozzi M, Helstrom E, Mendiola DF, Amparore D, Porpiglia F, Moon SC, Rais-Bahrami S, Derweesh I, Mehrazin R, Autorino R, Abdollah F, Ferro M, Correa A, Singla N, Gonzalgo ML, Sundaram CP. The impact of bladder cuff excision on outcomes after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: An analysis of the ROBUUST 2.0 registry. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:373.e1-373.e7. [PMID: 39112105 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to determine whether bladder cuff excision and its technique influence outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS AND MATERIALS A multicenter, international, retrospective analysis using the ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer Study (ROBUUST) 2.0 registry identified 1,718 patients undergoing RNU for UTUC between 2015 and 2023 at 17 centers across the United States, Europe, and Asia. Data was gathered on (1) whether bladder cuff excision was performed and (2) what technique was used, including formal excision or other techniques (pluck technique, stripping/intussusception technique) and outcomes. Multivariate and survival analyses were performed to compare the groups. RESULTS Most patients (90%, 1,540/1,718) underwent formal bladder cuff excision in accordance with EAU and AUA guidelines. Only 4% (68/1,718) underwent resection using other techniques, and 6% (110/1,718) did not have a bladder cuff excised. Median follow up for the cohort was 24 months (IQR 9-44). When comparing formal bladder cuff excision to other excision techniques, there were no differences in oncologic or survival outcomes including bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), or cancer-specific survival (CSS). However, excision of any kind conferred a decreased risk of bladder-specific recurrence compared to no excision. There was no difference in RFS, MFS, OS, or CSS when comparing bladder cuff excision, other techniques, and no excision. CONCLUSIONS Bladder cuff excision improves recurrence-free survival, particularly when considering bladder recurrence. This benefit is conferred regardless of technique, as long as the intramural ureter and ureteral orifice are excised. However, the benefit of bladder cuff excision on metastasis-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival is unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Yong
- Indiana University Department of Urology, Indianapolis, IN
| | - James E Slaven
- Indiana University Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Changhai Hospital Naval Medical University Department of Urology, Shanghai, China
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Department of Urology, Dallas, TX
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Giuseppe Simone
- IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute Department of Urology, Rome, Italy
| | - Raj Bhanvadia
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Department of Urology, Dallas, TX
| | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Gabriele Tuderti
- IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute Department of Urology, Rome, Italy
| | - Stephan Bronimann
- Department of Urology, The Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sohail Dhanji
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine Department of Urology, La Jolla CA
| | - Benjamin Eilender
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital Department of Urology, New York, NY
| | | | - Marco Finati
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Marco Tozzi
- European Institute of Oncology (IEO)-IRCCS Division of Urology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Dinno F Mendiola
- Department of Urology, Desai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, University of Turin San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, University of Turin San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Sol C Moon
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL; Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - Ithaar Derweesh
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine Department of Urology, La Jolla CA
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital Department of Urology, New York, NY
| | | | - Firas Abdollah
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Matteo Ferro
- European Institute of Oncology (IEO)-IRCCS Division of Urology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Nirmish Singla
- Departments of Urology and Oncology, The Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- Department of Urology, Desai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tsuboi I, Matsukawa A, Kardoust Parizi M, Klemm J, Schulz RJ, Cadenar A, Mancon S, Chiujdea S, Fazekas T, Miszczyk M, Laukhtina E, Kawada T, Katayama S, Iwata T, Bekku K, Wada K, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Teoh J, Singla N, Araki M, Shariat SF. Differential effect of surgical technique on intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. World J Urol 2024; 42:488. [PMID: 39162743 PMCID: PMC11335797 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05185-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff resection is the standard treatment in patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). However, it is unclear which specific surgical technique may lead to improve oncological outcomes in term of intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with UTUC. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU in reducing IVR in UTUC patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Three databases were queried in January 2024 for studies analyzing UTUC patients who underwent RNU. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of IVR among various types of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Thirty-one studies, comprising 1 randomized controlled trial and 1 prospective study, were included for a systematic review and meta-analysis. The rate of IVR was significantly lower in RNU patients who had an early ligation (EL) of the ureter compared to those who did not (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94, p = 0.02). Laparoscopic RNU significantly increased the IVR compared to open RNU (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06-1.54, p < 0.001). Intravesical bladder cuff removal significantly reduced the IVR compared to both extravesical and transurethral bladder cuff removal (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51-0.83, p = 0.02 and HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.15-2.34, p = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS EL of the affected upper tract system, ureteral management, open RNU, and intravesical bladder cuff removal seem to yield the lowest IVR rate in patients with UTUC. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to conclusively elucidate the optimal surgical technique in the setting of single post-operative intravesical chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ichiro Tsuboi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Robert J Schulz
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Cadenar
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancon
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Sever Chiujdea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Spitalul Clinic Judetean Murures, University of Medicine, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Pharmacy, Mures, Romania
| | - Tamás Fazekas
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Marcin Miszczyk
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Collegium Medicum - Faculty of Medicine, WSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takehiro Iwata
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Koichiro Wada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, PARIS, F- 75013, France
| | - Jeremy Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Park 213, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia, Czechia.
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yanagi M, Kiriyama T, Akatsuka J, Endo Y, Takeda H, Hamasaki T, Nishimura T, Kondo Y. Preoperative analysis of factors associated with prolonged pneumoretroperitoneum time during retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. BMC Urol 2024; 24:155. [PMID: 39075503 PMCID: PMC11285617 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01538-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prolonged laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) for upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) can increase the frequency of intravesical recurrence after surgery. Therefore, it is important for urological surgeons to have knowledge on preoperative risk factors for prolonged LNU. However, few studies have investigated the risk factors for prolonged LNU. We hypothesized that the quantity of perirenal fat affects the pneumoretroperitoneum time (PRT) of retroperitoneal LNU (rLNU). This study aimed to investigate the preoperative risk factors for prolonged PRT during rLNU. METHODS We reviewed the data of 115 patients who underwent rLNU for UTUC between 2013 and 2021. The perirenal fat thickness (PFT) observed on preoperative computed tomography (CT) images was used to evaluate the perinephric fat quantity. Preoperative risk factors for PRT during rLNU were analyzed using logistic regression models. The cutoff value for PRT was determined based on the median time.The cutoff values for fat-related factors influencing PRT were defined according to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS The median PRT for rLNU was 182 min (interquartile range, 155-230 min). The cutoff values of posterior, lateral, and anterior PFTs were 15 mm, 24 mm, and 6 mm, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that a posterior PFT ≥ 15 mm (odds ratio [OR], 2.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-7.08; p = 0.0410) was an independent risk factor for prolonged PRT. CONCLUSIONS Thick posterior PFT is a preoperative risk factor for prolonged PRT during rLNU. For patients with UTUC and thick posterior PFT, surgeons should develop optimal surgical strategies, including the selecting an expert surgeon as a primary surgeon and the selecting transperitoneal approach to surgery or open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masato Yanagi
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
| | - Tomonari Kiriyama
- Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Jun Akatsuka
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Yuki Endo
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Hayato Takeda
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Hamasaki
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-396, Kosugimachi, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki-City, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan
| | - Taiji Nishimura
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Kondo
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lee JH, Lee CU, Chung JH, Song W, Kang M, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Sung HH. Single Early Intravesical Instillation of Epirubicin for Preventing Bladder Recurrence after Nephroureterectomy in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat 2024; 56:877-884. [PMID: 38271926 PMCID: PMC11261194 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2023.1219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess the effectiveness of early single intravesical administration of epirubicin in preventing intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent radical nephroureterectomy between November 2018 and May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Intravesical epirubicin was administered within 48 hours if no evidence of leakage was observed. Epirubicin (50 mg) in 50 mL normal saline solution was introduced into the bladder via a catheter and maintained for 60 minutes. The severity of adverse events was graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. We compared intravesical recurrence rate between the two groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors of bladder recurrence following radical nephroureterectomy. RESULTS Epirubicin (n=55) and control (n=116) groups were included in the analysis. No grade 1 or higher bladder symptoms have been reported. A statistically significant difference in the intravesical recurrence rate was observed between the two groups (11.8% at 1 year in the epirubicin group vs. 28.4% at 1 year in the control group; log-rank p=0.039). In multivariate analysis, epirubicin instillation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20 to 0.93; p=0.033) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.65; p=0.003) were independently predictive of a reduced incidence of bladder recurrence. CONCLUSION This retrospective review revealed that a single immediate intravesical instillation of epirubicin is safe and can reduce the incidence of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy. However, further prospective trials are required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Hoon Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chung Un Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Chung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wan Song
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Minyong Kang
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hwang Gyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chou SF, Lin WC, Chang H, Huang CP. Safety and oncological outcome of early intraoperative intravesicle mitomycin C vs. deferred instillation in patients receiving robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy. Front Surg 2024; 11:1366982. [PMID: 38726470 PMCID: PMC11079113 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1366982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Radical nephroureterectomy with concurrent bladder cuff excision (RNUBCE) is the gold standard surgical approach for high-risk primary upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Given the notably high incidence of bladder tumor recurrence following this procedure, this study aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of intraoperative mitomycin-C (MMC) instillation vs. deferred instillation on overall oncological outcomes following robot-assisted RNUBCE. Methods This is a retrospective chart review study. Patients with non-invasive (N0, not T3/T4) UTUC who underwent robotic RNUBCE combined an intraoperative MMC instillation or a deferred MMC instillation after surgery at a medical center in Taiwan between November 2013 and June 2020 were eligible for inclusion. Patients with prior bladder UC, carcinomas of other origins, received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and had undergone kidney transplantation were excluded. All surgeries were executed by a single surgical team under the guidance of the same surgeon. The primary outcomes was the risk of bladder tumor recurrence between patients received intraoperative (IO) vs. deferred MMC instillation postoperatively (PO) during one-year follow-up. The secondary outcome was postoperative adverse events assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the associations between study variables and the outcomes. Results A total of 54 patients were included in the analysis. 12 (22.2%) patients experienced a bladder tumor recurrence during follow-up (IO: 7.7%, PO: 35.7%, p < 0.021). After adjustment in the multivariable, intraoperative MMC instillation was significantly associated with lower risk of bladder recurrence [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03-0.81, p = 0.028]. No MMC-related Clavien-Dindo Grade III-IV adverse events were found in either group. Conclusion IIntraoperative MMC instillation is safe and associated with a lower bladder tumor recurrence risk in patients undergoing robotic RNUBCE for UTUC than deferred instillation. Future large, prospective studies are still warranted to confirm the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng-Feng Chou
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ching Lin
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Han Chang
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mori K, Hatakeyama S, Enokida H, Miyake H, Kikuchi E, Nishiyama H, Ichikawa T, Kamai T, Kaji Y, Kume H, Kondo T, Matsuyama H, Masumori N, Kawauchi A, Takenaka A, Uemura H, Eto M, Nonomura N, Fujii Y, Hinotsu S, Ohyama C. Summary of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma 2023 by the Japanese Urological Association. Int J Urol 2024; 31:194-207. [PMID: 38113344 PMCID: PMC11524111 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
This article is an English translation of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (2nd edition) published in June 2023. The Japanese Urological Association's (JUA) Guidelines Committee on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) created a 2023 update guideline to support clinicians' current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate its recommendations into clinical practice. The new guideline adhered as closely as possible to the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2020 ver. 3.0. Findings related to epidemiological, pathological, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up were reviewed. In addition, seven clinical questions (CQs) were set to determine the grade of recommendation and level of evidence. Preconceptions and biases were removed from the preparation process, the overall evidence was evaluated appropriately, and recommendations were made after fully considering the balance between benefits and harms. Although the evidence is still insufficient to be taken up as a CQ, the latest important information is described in seven columns, and clinical issues that should be resolved in the future related to the CQ are described as recommendations for tomorrow. We hope that these guidelines will help medical professionals, patients, and their families involved in the treatment of UTUC in their decision-making, and hope that a critical review of these guidelines will lead to further refinements in the next edition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuyuki Mori
- Department of UrologyHirosaki University Graduate School of MedicineHirosakiAomoriJapan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of UrologyHirosaki University Graduate School of MedicineHirosakiAomoriJapan
| | - Hideki Enokida
- Department of UrologyGraduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima UniversityKagoshimaKagoshimaJapan
| | - Hideaki Miyake
- Department of UrologyHamamatsu University School of MedicineHamamatsuShizuokaJapan
| | - Eiji Kikuchi
- Department of UrologySt. Marianna University School of MedicineKawasakiKanagawaJapan
| | - Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaIbarakiJapan
| | - Tomohiko Ichikawa
- Department of UrologyGraduate School of Medicine, Chiba UniversityChibaChibaJapan
| | - Takao Kamai
- Department of UrologyDokkyo Medical UniversityMibuTochigiJapan
| | - Yasushi Kaji
- Department of RadiologyShimane University Faculty of MedicineIzumoShimaneJapan
| | - Haruki Kume
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoBunkyoTokyoJapan
| | - Tsunenori Kondo
- Department of UrologyTokyo Women's Medical University, Adachi Medical CenterAdachiTokyoJapan
| | - Hideyasu Matsuyama
- Department of UrologyJA Yamaguchi Kouseiren Nagato General HospitalNagatoYamaguchiJapan
| | - Naoya Masumori
- Department of UrologySapporo Medical UniversitySapporoHokkaidoJapan
| | | | - Atsushi Takenaka
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of MedicineTottori UniversityYonagoTottoriJapan
| | - Hirotsugu Uemura
- Department of UrologyKindai University Faculty of MedicineOsakasayamaOsakaJapan
| | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of UrologyGraduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu UniversityFukuokaFukuokaJapan
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of UrologyOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineSuitaOsakaJapan
| | - Yasuhisa Fujii
- Department of UrologyTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityBunkyoTokyoJapan
| | - Shiro Hinotsu
- Department of Biostatistics and Data ManagementSapporo Medical UniversitySapporoHokkaidoJapan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of UrologyHirosaki University Graduate School of MedicineHirosakiAomoriJapan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hu H, Lai S, Wang M, Tang X, Lai CH, Xu K, Xu T, Hu H. Effect of subsequent bladder cancer on survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients post-radical nephroureterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol 2023; 23:212. [PMID: 38129811 PMCID: PMC10734187 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01387-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the primary treatment strategy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, the intravesical recurrence occurs in 20-50% of all patients. The specific effect of subsequent bladder cancer (SBCa) on survival remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the effect of SBCa following RNU in patients with UTUC. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were exhaustively searched for studies comparing oncological outcomes between SBCa and without SBCa. Standard cumulative analyses using hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed using Review Manager (version 5.3). RESULTS Five studies involving 2057 patients were selected according to the predefined eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) revealed no significant differences between the SBCa and non-SBCa groups. However, subgroup analysis of pT0-3N0M0 patients suggested that people with SBCa had worse CSS (HR = 5.13, 95%CI 2.39-10.98, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR = 4.00, 95%CI 2.19-7.31, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS SBCa appears to be associated with worse OS in patients with early stage UTUC. However, caution must be taken before recommendations are made because this interpretation is based on very few clinical studies and a small sample size. Research sharing more detailed surgical site descriptions, as well as enhanced outcome data collection and improved reporting, is required to further investigate these nuances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haopu Hu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shicong Lai
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mingrui Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xinwei Tang
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chin-Hui Lai
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kexin Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Hu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gallioli A, Baboudjian M, Diana P, Moschini M, Xylinas E, Del Giudice F, Laukhtina E, Soria F, Mari A, Subiela JD, Rouy M, Territo A, Basile G, Palou J, Pradere B, Breda A. Perioperative and oncological outcomes of distal ureter management during nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:672-682. [PMID: 38126282 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05448-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The best approach of the bladder cuff (i.e., transvesical, extravesical, endoscopic) during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains an unsolved question. The aim of this review is to compare the oncological and perioperative outcomes among three different approaches of the distal ureter during RNU. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature search was conducted through June 2022 using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. The primary outcome was bladder recurrence-free survival and secondary outcomes included: perioperative outcomes, metastasis-free survival, and cancer-specific survival. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 19 non-randomized studies comprising 6581 patients met our inclusion criteria. The risk of bladder recurrence, metastasis and cancer-related death did not differ significantly between each approach (all P>0.05). In subgroup analysis excluding patients with history of bladder cancer, the risk of bladder recurrence remained similar between each approach (all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in terms of operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications between each approach (all P>0.05). The main limitation is the retrospective design of 18/19 included studies. CONCLUSIONS The present systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the lack of high-level evidence on distal ureter management during RNU. On the basis of the available data, the present review supports the equivalence of different techniques of bladder cuff excision during RNU. The extravesical approach seems non-inferior to the transvesical approach in terms of oncological and perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Urology, APHM, North Academic Hospital, Marseille, France
- Department of Urology, APHM, La Conception Hospital, Marseille, France
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Pietro Diana
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Sapienza University, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Angelo Territo
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Basile
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain -
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang Z, Shi H, Xu Y, Fang Y, Song J, Jiang W, Xia D, Wu Z, Wang L. Intravesical Therapy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5020. [PMID: 37894387 PMCID: PMC10605447 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) poses unique challenges in diagnosis and treatment. This comprehensive review focuses on prophylactic intravesical therapy for UTUC, summarizing key aspects of intravesical therapy in various clinical scenarios, including concurrent with or following radical nephroureterectomy, kidney-sparing surgery, ureteroscopy-guided biopsy. The incidence of intravesical recurrence in UTUC after surgical treatment is significant, necessitating effective preventive measures. Intravesical therapy plays a vital role in reducing the risk of bladder recurrence following UTUC surgery. Tailoring timing, drug selection, dosage, and frequency is vital in optimizing treatment outcomes and reducing intravesical recurrence risk in UTUC. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the history, clinical trials, guideline recommendations, and clinical applications of intravesical therapy for UTUC. It also discusses the future directions based on current clinical needs and ongoing trials. Future directions entail optimizing dosage, treatment duration, and drug selection, as well as exploring novel agents and combination therapies. Intravesical therapy holds tremendous potential in improving outcomes for UTUC patients and reducing the risk of bladder recurrence. Although advancements have been made in UTUC treatment research, further refinements are necessary to enhance efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| | - Haoqing Shi
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| | - Yifan Xu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| | - Yu Fang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| | - Jiaao Song
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| | - Wentao Jiang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| | - Demeng Xia
- Department of Pharmacy, Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200137, China;
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Luo Z, Jiao B, Huang T, Zhao H, He W, Bo Y, Ding Z, Zhang G. Development and external validation of a novel nomogram to predict intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy: a multicenter study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:11223-11231. [PMID: 37355502 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05016-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to establish and validate nomograms to predict the probability of intravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper urinary tract epithelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS Clinical data of 528 patients with UTUC after RNU were collected from two medical centers between 2009 and 2020. We used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to select variables for multivariable Cox regression analysis in the training cohort and included independent risk factors into nomogram models predicting IVR-free survival (IVRFS). Another center was applied as the external cohort to validate the predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram by performing area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), consistency index (C-index), and calibration curve. RESULTS History of bladder cancer, tumor size, preoperative urine cytology, postoperative instillation, Ki-67, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were identified as independent risk factors for IVR. The prognosis model including these predictors demonstrated excellent discriminatory performance in both the training cohort (C-index, 0.814) and external validation cohort (C-index, 0.748). The calibration plots of the nomogram revealed good consistency in both cohorts. Finally, patients could be classified into two risk groups based on scores obtained from the nomogram, with significant differences in IVRFS. CONCLUSION Our study provided a reliable nomogram for predicting the probability of IVR in patients with UTUC after RNU. Risk stratification based on this model may assist urologists make optimal clinical decisions on the management of UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenkai Luo
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 9 Dongdan Santiao, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Nanli, Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Binbin Jiao
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Tao Huang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300. Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Hang Zhao
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong an Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong an Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Weifeng He
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Yuxuan Bo
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Zhenshan Ding
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
| | - Guan Zhang
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Shigeta K. Editorial Comments to "Preoperative risk classification for intravesical recurrence after laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in a multi-institutional cohort". Int J Urol 2023; 30:859. [PMID: 37395269 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Keisuke Shigeta
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhang JQ, Duan Y, Wang K, Zhang XL, Jiang KH. Metachronous urothelial carcinoma in the renal pelvis, bladder, and urethra: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:3062-3069. [PMID: 37215428 PMCID: PMC10198092 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i13.3062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a common malignancy of the urinary system that can occur anywhere from the renal pelvis to the proximal urethra. Most UCs are in the bladder and have multifocal growth. Upper urinary tract UC (UTUC), which occurs in the renal pelvis or ureter, accounts for only 5% to 10% of UCs.
CASE SUMMARY In March 2015, a 70-year-old male who initially presented to a local hospital with a complaint of painless hematuria was diagnosed with UTUC of the right renal pelvis. The doctors administered radical nephroureterectomy and bladder cuff excision. Although the doctors recommended intravesical chemotherapy and regular follow-up, he rejected this advice. In December 2016, the patient presented at our hospital with dysuria. We identified UC in the residual bladder and administered radical cystectomy and left cutaneous ureterostomy. In November 2021, he presented again with urethral bleeding. We detected urethral UC as the cause of urethral orifice bleeding and administered radical urethrectomy. Since then, he has visited regularly for 6-mo follow-ups, and was in stable condition as of December 2022.
CONCLUSION UTUC is prone to seeding and recurrence. Adjuvant instillation therapy and intense surveillance are crucial for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Qing Zhang
- Department of Urology, Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital, Guiyang 550002, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Yu Duan
- Department of Urology, Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital, Guiyang 550002, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Kun Wang
- Department of Urology, Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital, Guiyang 550002, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Xiao-Li Zhang
- Department of Biomedicine, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Ke-Hua Jiang
- Department of Urology, Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital, Guiyang 550002, Guizhou Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rouprêt M, Seisen T, Birtle AJ, Capoun O, Compérat EM, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Gürses Andersson I, Liedberg F, Mariappan P, Hugh Mostafid A, Pradere B, van Rhijn BWG, Shariat SF, Rai BP, Soria F, Soukup V, Wood RG, Xylinas EN, Masson-Lecomte A, Gontero P. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2023 Update. Eur Urol 2023; 84:S0302-2838(23)02652-0. [PMID: 36967359 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 257] [Impact Index Per Article: 128.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines panel on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has updated the guidelines to aid clinicians in evidence-based management of UTUC. OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The recommendations provided in these guidelines are based on a review of the literature via a systematic search of the PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Data were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, (neo)adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, metastatic, immunotherapy, and survival. The results were assessed by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Even though data are accruing, for many areas there is still insufficient high-level evidence to provide strong recommendations. Patient stratification on the basis of histology and clinical examination (including imaging) and assessment of patients at risk of Lynch syndrome will aid management. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk UTUC and two functional kidneys. In particular, for patients with high-risk or metastatic UTUC, new treatment options have become available. In high-risk UTUC, platinum-based chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy, and adjuvant nivolumab for unfit or patients who decline chemotherapy, are options. For metastatic disease, gemcitabine/carboplatin chemotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients. Patients with PD-1/PD-L1-positive tumours should be offered a checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab or atezolizumab). CONCLUSIONS These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to the current best evidence. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen according to the risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY Cancer of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, timely and appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France.
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Alison J Birtle
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Otakar Capoun
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva M Compérat
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris
| | | | | | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Paramananthan Mariappan
- Department of Urology, Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bhavan P Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Viktor Soukup
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Evanguelos N Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Clinical Characteristics and Current Status of Treatment for Recurrent Bladder Cancer after Surgeries on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13051004. [PMID: 36900148 PMCID: PMC10000489 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13051004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively rare, but highly malignant, disease with an estimated annual incidence of 2 cases per 100,000 people. The main surgical treatment modalities for UTUC are radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff resection. After surgery, intravesical recurrence (IVR) can occur in up to 47% of patients, and 75% of them present with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, there are few studies focused on the diagnosis and treatment of postoperatively recurrent bladder cancer for patients with previous UTUC history (UTUC-BC), and many of the influencing factors are still controversial. In this article, we performed a narrative review of the recent literature, mainly summarizing the factors influencing postoperative IVR in patients with UTUC and discussing the subsequent prevention, monitoring, and treatment tools for it.
Collapse
|
28
|
Blackmur JP, Chew E, Trail M, Brodie K, Santoni N, Rodger F, Hamilton D, Gaba F, Randall S, Nalagatla S, Little B, Janjua K, Sweeney C, Martindale A, Qureshi K, Riddick A, O'Connor K, McNeill SA, Phipps S, Cutress ML, Mains EAA, Dunn I, Reid S, Stewart GD, Lamb G, Aslam MZ, Leung S, Clark R, Wilson I, Oades G, Chapman A, Laird A. Assessment of association between lower ureteric excision technique and oncological outcomes for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: retrospective analysis from the Scottish Renal Cancer Consortium. World J Urol 2023; 41:757-765. [PMID: 36692533 PMCID: PMC10082697 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04283-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Nephroureterectomy(NU) remains the gold-standard surgical option for the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma(UTUC). Controversy exists regarding the optimal excision technique of the lower ureter. We sought to compare post-UTUC bladder tumour recurrence across the Scottish Renal Cancer Consortium(SRCC). METHODS Patients who underwent NU for UTUC across the SRCC 2012-2019 were identified. The impact of lower-end surgical technique along with T-stage, N-stage, tumour location and focality, positive surgical margin, pre-NU ureteroscopy, upper-end technique and adjuvant mitomycin C administration were assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression. The primary outcome was intra-vesical recurrence-free survival (B-RFS). RESULTS In 402 patients, the median follow-up was 29 months. The lower ureter was managed by open transvesical excision in 90 individuals, transurethral and laparoscopic dissection in 76, laparoscopic or open extra-vesical excision in 31 and 42 respectively, and transurethral dissection and pluck in 163. 114(28.4%) patients had a bladder recurrence during follow-up. There was no difference in B-RFS between lower-end techniques by Kaplan-Meier (p = 0.94). When all factors were taken into account by adjusted Cox-regression, preceding ureteroscopy (HR 2.65, p = 0.001), lower ureteric tumour location (HR 2.16, p = 0.02), previous bladder cancer (HR 1.75, p = 0.01) and male gender (HR 1.61, p = 0.03) were associated with B-RFS. CONCLUSION These data suggest in appropriately selected patients, lower ureteric management technique does not affect B-RFS. Along with lower ureteric tumour location, male gender and previous bladder cancer, preceding ureteroscopy was associated with a higher recurrence rate following NU, and the indication for this should be carefully considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Peter Blackmur
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
- Department of Urology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Etienne Chew
- Department of Urology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- College of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | | | - Flora Rodger
- Department of Urology, NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Ayr, UK
| | | | - Fortis Gaba
- Department of Urology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sophie Randall
- Department of Urology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
- College of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Brian Little
- Department of Urology, NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Ayr, UK
| | | | | | | | - Khaver Qureshi
- Department of Urology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Antony Riddick
- Department of Urology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kevin O'Connor
- Department of Urology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Urology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Republic of Ireland
| | | | - Simon Phipps
- Department of Urology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Ian Dunn
- Department of Urology, NHS Lanarkshire, Airdrie, UK
| | - Sarah Reid
- Department of Urology, NHS Lanarkshire, Airdrie, UK
| | - Grant D Stewart
- Department of Urology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gavin Lamb
- Department of Urology, NHS Forth Valley, Larbert, UK
| | | | - Steve Leung
- Department of Urology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ross Clark
- Department of Urology, NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Ayr, UK
| | - Ian Wilson
- Department of Urology, NHS Highland, Inverness, UK
| | - Grenville Oades
- Department of Urology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Alexander Laird
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Urology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
A 6-month maintenance schedule of mitomycin C after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma for the prevention of intravesical recurrence: a retrospective, single center study. World J Urol 2023; 41:1077-1083. [PMID: 36790518 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04316-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To show the effect of a 6-month (4 times weekly followed by 5 times monthly) maintenance mitomycin C regimen on the prevention of intravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS A total of 119 patients undergoing a RNU between 2007 and 2021 in a single center hospital were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 66 patients were eligible for further analysis. 27 patients received no post-operative MMC (median follow-up: 110 months) and 39 patients received a 6-month (4 times weekly, 5 times monthly) maintenance regimen of MMC (median follow up: 48 months). The primary outcome was the 1-, 2- and 5-year bladder recurrence free survival (BRFS). RESULTS There was a significant difference (p = 0.001) in BRFS between the two groups. The 1-, 2, and 5-year BRFS for the MMC- group was 67%, 63% and 43%, respectively. The 1-, 2- and 5-year BRFS for the MMC + group was 95%, 86% and 86%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed no other potential prognostic factors that had a significant effect on the BRFS. CONCLUSION A 6-month maintenance schedule of MMC is effective at significantly reducing the risk of IVR after RNU for UTUC. We could not find any other significant prognostic factors to predict IVR.
Collapse
|
30
|
Shimura S, Matsumoto K, Ikeda M, Moroo S, Koguchi D, Taoka Y, Hirayama T, Murakami Y, Utsunomiya T, Matsuda D, Okuno N, Irie A, Iwamura M. A multi-institutional retrospective study of open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy focused on the intravesical recurrence. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2023; 19:71-78. [PMID: 35404494 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
AIM Intravesical recurrence (IVR) after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is relatively frequent, occurring in about 30-50% of patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences of the prognosis and IVR between open and laparoscopic surgery and to elucidate the risk factor of IVR. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 403 patients with UTUC treated with laparoscopic or open nephroureterectomy at six affiliated hospitals between 1990 and 2015. The clinicopathological factors of each group were examined using Kaplan-Meier plots, and univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS There was no difference in recurrence and cancer-specific mortality between open and laparoscopic surgery in univariate and multivariate analyses. There was no significant difference in IVR rate between the laparoscopic and open groups (p = .22). Among the patients with IVR, 84% of patients relapsed within 2 years. Univariate analysis of IVR showed a significant increase in patients with low-grade (p = .03, HR = 1.64) or low-stage urothelial carcinoma (pT1 or lower, p = .006, HR = 1.77) with no lymph node involvement (p = .002, HR = 10.3) or lymphovascular invasion (p = .009, HR = 1.79). Surgical modality was not an independent factor. In multivariate analysis, there was no independent predictive factor for IVR. CONCLUSIONS There was no difference in recurrence, cancer-specific mortality, and IVR between open and laparoscopic surgery. On the other hand, our results suggested that the low malignant potential tumor may be a risk factor for IVR. This finding provides insight into IVR, which may help with the development of personalized prevention and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soichiro Shimura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Masaomi Ikeda
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Shigenori Moroo
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Dai Koguchi
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, Kitamoto, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Taoka
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, Kitamoto, Japan
| | - Takahiro Hirayama
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Yasukiyo Murakami
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Prefectural Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Takuji Utsunomiya
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Prefectural Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Daisuke Matsuda
- Department of Urology, Higashiyamato Hospital, Higashiyamato, Japan
| | - Norihiko Okuno
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Akira Irie
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Iwamura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mertens LS, Sharma V, Matin SF, Boorjian SA, Houston Thompson R, van Rhijn BW, Masson-Lecomte A. Bladder Recurrence Following Upper Tract Surgery for Urothelial Carcinoma: A Contemporary Review of Risk Factors and Management Strategies. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 49:60-66. [PMID: 36793750 PMCID: PMC9922921 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Bladder recurrences have been reported in 22-47% of patients after surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This collaborative review focuses on risk factors for and treatment strategies to reduce bladder recurrences after upper tract surgery for UTUC. Objective To review the current evidence on risk factors and treatment strategies for intravesical recurrence (IVR) after upper tract surgery for UTUC. Evidence acquisition This collaborative review is based on a literature search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and currently available guidelines on UTUC. Relevant papers on bladder recurrence (etiology, risk factors, and management) after upper tract surgery were selected. Special attention has been paid to (1) the genetic background of bladder recurrences, (2) bladder recurrences after ureterorenoscopy (URS) with or without a biopsy, and (3) postoperative or adjuvant intravesical instillations. The literature search was performed in September 2022. Evidence synthesis Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that bladder recurrences after upper tract surgery for UTUC are often clonally related. Clinicopathologic risk factors (patient, tumor, and treatment related) have been identified for bladder recurrences after UTUC diagnosis. Specifically, the use of diagnostic ureteroscopy before radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is associated with an increased risk of bladder recurrences. Further, a recent retrospective study suggests that performing a biopsy during ureteroscopy may further worsen IVR (no URS: 15.0%; URS without biopsy: 18.4%; URS with biopsy: 21.9%). Meanwhile, a single postoperative instillation of intravesical chemotherapy has been shown to be associated with a reduced bladder recurrence risk after RNU compared with no instillation (hazard ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.82). Currently, there are no data on the value of a single postoperative intravesical instillation after ureteroscopy. Conclusions Although based on limited retrospective data, performing URS seems to be associated with a higher risk of bladder recurrences. Future studies are warranted to assess the influence of other surgical factors as well as the role of URS biopsy or immediate postoperative intravesical chemotherapy after URS for UTUC. Patient summary In this paper, we review recent findings on bladder recurrences after upper tract surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S. Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Corresponding author. Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel. +31 20 512 2553.
| | - Vidit Sharma
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Surena F. Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Bas W.G. van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Herout R, Baunacke M, Flegar L, Borkowetz A, Reicherz A, Koch R, Kraywinkel K, Thomas C, Groeben C, Huber J. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Germany: epidemiological data and surgical treatment trends in a total population analysis from 2006 to 2019. World J Urol 2023; 41:127-133. [PMID: 36445373 PMCID: PMC9849285 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04219-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report contemporary epidemiological data and treatment trends for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in Germany over a 14-year period. METHODS We analyzed data from the nationwide German hospital billing database and the German cancer registry from 2006 to 2018/2019. The significance of changes over time was evaluated via regression analysis. Survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS There was a non-significant increase in the age-standardized incidence rate from 2.5/100,000 in 2006 to 2.9/100.000 in 2018. 13% of patients presented with lymph node metastasis and 7.6% of patients presented with distant metastasis at primary diagnosis. The 5-year overall survival was estimated at 45% and the 10-year overall survival at 32%. Endoscopic biopsies of the renal pelvis and ureter as well as ureteroscopies with excision/destruction of UTUC all increased significantly over the study period. The number of radical nephroureterectomies (RNU) for UTUC steadily increased from 1643 cases in 2006 to 2238 cases in 2019 (p < 0.005) with a shift from open surgery towards minimally invasive surgery. Complex reconstructive procedures like ileal ureter replacement or autotransplantation are rarely performed for urothelial carcinoma of the ureter. CONCLUSION Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for UTUC have increased and minimally invasive nephroureterectomy is the predominant approach concerning radical surgery in 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Herout
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Martin Baunacke
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Luka Flegar
- grid.10253.350000 0004 1936 9756Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Angelika Borkowetz
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alina Reicherz
- grid.459734.80000 0000 9602 8737Department of Urology, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Marien Hospital Herne, Herne, Germany
| | - Rainer Koch
- grid.10253.350000 0004 1936 9756Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kraywinkel
- grid.13652.330000 0001 0940 3744National Center for Cancer Registry Data, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Thomas
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christer Groeben
- grid.10253.350000 0004 1936 9756Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Huber
- grid.10253.350000 0004 1936 9756Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jiang Y, Peng Y, Ding S, Zheng Y, He Y, Liu J. Kidney‐sparing surgery for distal high‐risk ureteral carcinoma: Clinical efficacy and preliminary experiences in 22 patients. Cancer Med 2022; 12:7835-7843. [PMID: 36533431 PMCID: PMC10134309 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several groups proved kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) had equivalent oncological outcomes compared with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for the low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients. Whereas, the clinical efficacy of KSS for high-risk UTUC, especially for distal high-risk ureteral carcinoma, remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of KSS for patients with distal high-risk ureter cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Our study included 22 patients who diagnose the distal high-risk ureter cancer and underwent KSS between May 2012 and July 2021 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Overall survival (OS), confirmed as the primary endpoint of present study, was assessed by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC). The secondary endpoints included the postoperative SF-36 (the short form 36 health survey questionnaire) score, progression-free survival (PFS), postoperative complications, and so on. RESULTS Overall, 17 (77.3%) and 5 (22.7%) patients underwent segmental ureterectomy (SU) and endoscopic ablation (EA), respectively. By the cut-off date, the mean OS was 76.3 months (95% Cl: 51.3-101.1 months) and the mean PFS was 47.0 months (95% Cl: 31.1-62.8 months), respectively. And the SF-36 score in a majority of patients was >300 (90.9%). CONCLUSION This is a daring endeavor to explore the clinical efficacy of KSS in distal high-risk ureter cancer based on the high-risk UTUC criteria, which shows satisfactory results in the long-term prognosis and operation-associated outcomes. However, future randomized or prospective multicenter studies are necessary to validate our conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Jiang
- Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Yueqiang Peng
- Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Siwei Ding
- Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Yongbo Zheng
- Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Yunfeng He
- Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Jiayu Liu
- Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Neuzillet Y, Seisen T, Traxer O, Allory Y, Audenet F, Leon P, Loriot Y, Pradère B, Roumiguié M, Xylinas E, Masson-Lecomte A, Roupret M. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: Upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). Prog Urol 2022; 32:1164-1194. [PMID: 36400481 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim was to propose an update of the French Urology Association Cancer Committee (ccAFU) Recommendations on the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UC). METHODS A systematic Medline search was performed between 2020 and 2022, taking account of the diagnosis, treatment options and follow-up of UUT-UC, while evaluating the references with their levels of evidence. RESULTS The diagnosis of this rare pathology is based on CTU acquisition during excretion and flexible ureterorenoscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment. Nevertheless conservative treatment can be discussed for low risk lesions: tumour of low-grade, with no infiltration on imaging, unifocal<2cm, eligible for full treatment therefore requiring close endoscopic surveillance by flexible ureteroscopy in compliant patients. After RNU, postoperative instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrence in the bladder. Adjuvant chemotherapy has shown clinical benefits compared to surveillance after RNU for tumours (pT2-T4 N0-3 M0). CONCLUSION These updated recommendations should contribute to improving not only patients' level of care, but also the diagnosis and decision-making concerning treatment for UUT-UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Neuzillet
- Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, Université Paris Saclay, Suresnes, France.
| | - T Seisen
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | - O Traxer
- Sorbonne Université, GRC#20 Lithiase Urinaire et EndoUrologie, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Y Allory
- Service d'anatomopathologie, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - F Audenet
- Service d'urologie, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - P Leon
- Service d'urologie, clinique Pasteur, Royan, France
| | - Y Loriot
- Service d'oncologie médicale, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - B Pradère
- Service d'urologie UROSUD, Clinique Croix Du Sud, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Toulouse, UPS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Service d'urologie, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Service d'urologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - M Roupret
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kenigsberg AP, Carpinito G, Gold SA, Meng X, Ghoreifi A, Djaladat H, Minervini A, Jamil M, Abdollah F, Farrow JM, Sundaram C, Uzzo R, Ferro M, Meagher M, Derweesh I, Wu Z, Porter J, Katims A, Mehrazin R, Mottrie A, Simone G, Reese AC, Eun DD, Bhattu AS, Gonzalgo ML, Carbonara U, Autorino R, Margulis V. Practice trends for perioperative intravesical chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Low but increasing utilization during minimally invasive nephroureterectomy. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:452.e17-452.e23. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
36
|
Chien AL, Chua KJ, Doppalapudi SK, Ghodoussipour S. The role of endoscopic management and adjuvant topical therapy for upper tract urothelial cancer. FRONTIERS IN UROLOGY 2022; 2:916259. [PMID: 38855025 PMCID: PMC11160966 DOI: 10.3389/fruro.2022.916259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has traditionally been managed with radical nephroureterectomy, and while this approach remains the gold standard for high-risk disease, endoscopic, kidney-sparing management has increasingly been adopted for low-risk disease as it preserves kidney function without compromising oncologic outcomes. Ureteroscopy and percutaneous renal access not only provide diagnoses by tumor visualization and biopsy, but also enable treatment with electrocautery or laser ablation. Several modalities exist for laser ablative treatments including thulium:YAG, neodymium:YAG, holmium:YAG, and combinations of the preceding. Furthermore, due to high recurrence rates after endoscopic management, adjuvant intracavitary instillation of various agents such as mitomycin C and bacillus Calmette-Guerin have been used given benefits seen in non-muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer. Other formulations also being studied include gemcitabine, anthracyclines, and immunotherapies. More recently, Jelmyto, a mitomycin reverse thermal gel, has been developed to allow for adequate drug delivery time and potency since urine flow could otherwise dilute and washout topical therapy. In this article, the authors review techniques, indications, best practices, and areas of current investigation in endoscopic management and adjuvant topical therapy for UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin L. Chien
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Kevin J. Chua
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Sai Krishnaraya Doppalapudi
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Saum Ghodoussipour
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ferraris F, Raman JD, Yaber F. Bladder Chemoprophylaxis Following Ureterorenoscopy in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1253-1255. [PMID: 34340945 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Kidney-sparing procedures for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) have evolved from imperative to elective indications for management of low-risk disease. Ureterorenoscopy is the most common procedure for the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of UTUC. A notable consideration following ureterorenoscopy is the higher risk of downstream bladder seeding. Here we review the importance of and scientific evidence for chemoprophylaxis after ureterorenoscopy. PATIENT SUMMARY: For patients with low-risk cancer of the upper urinary tract, a procedure called ureterorenoscopy (URS) involving insertion of a thin telescope through the ureter and into the kidney is increasingly used for biopsy. URS increases the risk of cancer seeding in the bladder. We review evidence on the benefit of prophylactic bladder chemotherapy after URS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jay D Raman
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State Health, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Fabian Yaber
- Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Soria F, Pradere B, Hurle R, D'Andrea D, Albisinni S, Diamand R, Laukhtina E, Di Trapani E, Aziz A, Krajewski W, Teoh J, Mari A, Moschini M, Chiancone F, Autorino R, Porreca A, Marchioni M, Liguori G, Lucarelli G, Busetto G, Foschi N, Antonelli A, Bove P, Russo G, Crisan N, Borghesi M, Boeri L, Veccia A, Greco F, Longo N, De Cobelli O, Shariat S, Gontero P, Ferro M. Radical Nephroureterectomy Tetrafecta: A Proposal Reporting Surgical Strategy Quality at Surgery. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 42:1-8. [PMID: 35911084 PMCID: PMC9334825 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Standardized methods for reporting surgical quality have been described for all the major urological procedures apart from radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Objective To propose a tetrafecta criterion for assessing the quality of RNU based on a consensus panel within the Young Association of Urology (YAU) Urothelial Group, and to test the impact of this tetrafecta in a multicenter, large contemporary cohort of patients treated with RNU for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Design, setting, and participants This was a retrospective analysis of 1765 patients with UTUC treated between 2000 and 2021. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis We interviewed the YAU Urothelial Group to propose and score a list of items to be included in the “RNU-fecta.” A ranking was generated for the criteria with the highest sum score. These criteria were applied to a large multicenter cohort of patients. Kaplan-Meier curves were built to evaluate differences in overall survival (OS) rates between groups, and a multivariable logistic regression model was used to find the predictors of achieving the RNU tetrafecta. Results and limitations The criteria with the highest score included three surgical items such as negative soft tissue surgical margins, bladder cuff excision, lymph node dissection according to guideline recommendations, and one oncological item defined by the absence of any recurrence in ≤12 mo. These items formed the RNU tetrafecta. Within a median follow-up of 30 mo, 52.6% of patients achieved the RNU tetrafecta. The 5-yr OS rates were significantly higher for patients achieving tetrafecta than for their counterparts (76% vs 51%). Younger age, lower body mass index, and robotic approach were found to be independent predictors of tetrafecta achievement. Conversely, a higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, higher clinical stage, and bladder cancer history were inversely associated with tetrafecta. Conclusions Herein, we present a “tetrafecta” composite endpoint that may serve as a potential tool to assess the overall quality of the RNU procedure. Pending external validation, this tool could allow a comparison between surgical series and may be useful for assessing the learning curve of the procedure as well as for evaluating the impact of new technologies in the field. Patient summary In this study, a tetrafecta criterion was developed for assessing the surgical quality of radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Patients who achieved tetrafecta had higher 5-yr overall survival rates than those who did not.
Collapse
|
39
|
Assessment of Therapeutic Benefit and Option Strategy on Intravesical Instillation for Preventing Bladder Cancer Recurrence after Radical Nephroureterectomy in Patients with Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:1755368. [PMID: 35677889 PMCID: PMC9170511 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1755368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC) is a very aggressive disease, characterized by 22%–50% of patients suffering from subsequent bladder recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Although the therapy of intravesical instillation is reported to be effective in preventing bladder recurrence, no study had been reported in Northeast China. The findings relating to the clinical effectiveness of intravesical instillation after RNU are somewhat controversial, and the best efficacy and least adverse effects of instillation drugs have not been widely accepted. Here, we aimed at evaluating the efficacy of intravesical instillation for the prevention intravesical recurrence systematically. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, from October 2006 to September 2017, 158 UUT-UC patients underwent RNU were divided into 4 groups: epirubicin (EPB) instillation group, hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) instillation group, bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG) instillation group, and noninstillation group. Cox univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to identify the risk factors for intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS). The nomogram model was also applied to predict patient outcomes. Subsequently, to evaluate the clinical significance of intravesical instillation comprehensively, several databases including PubMed, Ovid, and Embase were searched and data from published studies with our results were combined by direct meta-analysis. Moreover, a network meta-analysis comparing instillation therapies was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy of different instillation drugs. Results In our retrospective cohort study, the Kaplan–Meier survival curve demonstrated noninstillation groups were associated with worsened IVRFS. Meanwhile, multivariate analysis indicated that intravesical instillation was independent protective factors for IVRFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.731). Moreover, calibration plots, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC) values, and the C-index showed the priority of nomogram's predictive accuracy. Next, direct meta-analysis including 19 studies showed that intravesical instillation could prevent the recurrence of bladder cancer with a pooled risk ratio (RR) estimate of 0.53. Subgroup analysis by study type, year of intravesical recurrence, first instillation time, and instillation times also confirmed the robustness of the results. Moreover, intraoperative instillation was associated with a decrease in the risk of bladder recurrence compared with postoperative instillation. Then, a network meta-analysis including 7 studies indicated that pirarubicin (THP) (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.2%) is the most effective therapy to reduce the risk of bladder recurrence, followed by BCG (SUCRA = 83.5%), mitomycin C (MMC) (SUCRA = 53.6%), EPB (SUCRA = 52.6%), and HCPT (SUCRA = 5.1%) after the analysis of the value ranking. Conclusions A maintenance schedule of intravesical instillation prevents the recurrence of bladder cancer after RNU in UUT-UC patients effectively. Large, prospective trials are needed to further confirm its value. Compared with other chemotherapy regimens, THP may be a promising drug with favorable efficacy to prevent bladder recurrence. As included studies had moderate risk of bias, the results of network meta-analysis should be applied with caution.
Collapse
|
40
|
Saini S, Pathak RA, Hemal AK. Robotic nephroureterectomy in the management of upper tract urothelial cancer: inching toward standard of care? Int Urol Nephrol 2022; 54:1777-1785. [PMID: 35610528 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03225-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma is a relatively rare malignancy. Current guidelines strongly recommend radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision and template-based lymph node dissection for all high-risk upper-tract urothelial carcinomas. Although the open approach is still considered the standard of care, evolution of minimally invasive approaches especially the robotic-assisted approach, has been found to be oncologically equivalent. Since its initial description in 2006, the surgical technique as well as the robotic surgical system has gone through a major evolution. With well-established advantages of the minimally invasive approach, robotic radical nephroureterectomy also has the ability to address both upper and lower urinary tract simultaneously without the need of patient repositioning, standardized single docking technique, ease of performing crucial steps like excision of ureterovesical junction and bladder cuff with watertight cystotomy closure, allowing perioperative instillation of intra-vesical chemotherapy. Robot-assisted radical nephro-ureterectomy and template-based lymph node dissection is gradually emerging as the current standard of care to achieve the best possible oncologic and functional outcomes. In this review article we are focusing on the evolution of this approach in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma along with a review of oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumit Saini
- Department of Urology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Ram Anil Pathak
- Department of Urology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Ashok Kumar Hemal
- Department of Urology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Trend Analysis of Utilization and a Comparative Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102497. [PMID: 35626101 PMCID: PMC9139386 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the perioperative outcomes and oncological results of open, laparoscopic, and robotic radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and to analyze trends in the utilization of RNU. Methods: From 2017 to 2020, the records of 61, 185, and 119 patients who underwent open, laparoscopic, and robotic RNU, respectively, were reviewed. Results: Baseline characteristics were not significantly different among the three groups. Robotic RNU has recently started to increase from 9% in 2017 to 67% in 2021. Operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and 90-day complications were not different between the three groups. The three-year overall survival (OS) rates for open, laparoscopic, and robotic RNU were 91.8%, 90.4%, and 92.1%, respectively (p > 0.05). No differences in the progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and OS were observed according to the surgical approach in the Kaplan−Meier survival analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that surgical approach was not an independent predictor of PFS, CSS, and OS. Conclusion: The use of robotic RNU in patients with UTUC has been starting to increase and replace open and laparoscopic RNU. Perioperative outcomes, 90-day complications, and oncological outcomes of robotic RNU were not inferior to those of open and laparoscopic RNU.
Collapse
|
42
|
Pentafecta for Radical Nephroureterectomy in Patients with High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Proposal for Standardization of Quality Care Metrics. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071781. [PMID: 35406553 PMCID: PMC8997024 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Measuring quality of care indicators is important for clinicians and decision making in health care to improve patient outcomes. Objective: The primary objective was to identify quality of care indicators for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and to validate these in an international cohort treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The secondary objective was to assess the factors associated with failure to validate the pentafecta. Design: We performed a retrospective multicenter study of patients treated with RNU for EAU high-risk (HR) UTUC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Five quality indicators were consensually approved, including a negative surgical margin, a complete bladder-cuff resection, the absence of hematological complications, the absence of major complications, and the absence of a 12-month postoperative recurrence. After multiple imputations and propensity-score matching, log-rank tests and a Cox regression were used to assess the survival outcomes. Logistic regression analyses assessed predictors for pentafecta failure. Results: Among the 1718 included patients, 844 (49%) achieved the pentafecta. The median follow-up was 31 months. Patients who achieved the pentafecta had superior 5-year overall- (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared to those who did not (68.7 vs. 50.1% and 79.8 vs. 62.7%, respectively, all p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, achieving the pentafecta was associated with improved recurrence-free survival (RFS), CSS, and OS. No preoperative clinical factors predicted a failure to validate the pentafecta. Conclusions: Establishing quality indicators for UTUC may help define prognosis and improve patient care. We propose a pentafecta quality criteria in RNU patients. Approximately half of the patients evaluated herein reached this endpoint, which in turn was independently associated with survival outcomes. Extended validation is needed.
Collapse
|
43
|
Liedberg F, Kjellström S, Lind AK, Sherif A, Söderkvist K, Falkman K, Thulin H, Aljabery F, Papantonio D, Ströck V, Öfverholm E, Jerlström T, Sandzen J, Verbiene I, Ullén A. Swedish National Guidelines on Urothelial Carcinoma: 2021 update on non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Scand J Urol 2022; 56:137-146. [DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2041086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Anna-Karin Lind
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Amir Sherif
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | - Karin Falkman
- Department of Urology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Helena Thulin
- Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Firas Aljabery
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | - Viveka Ströck
- Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Tomas Jerlström
- Department of Urology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Johan Sandzen
- Department of Oncology, Karlstad County Hospital, Karlstad, Sweden
| | - Ingrida Verbiene
- Department of Oncology, Uppsala Akademiska Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anders Ullén
- Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Cinque A, Capasso A, Vago R, Floris M, Lee MW, Minnei R, Trevisani F. MicroRNA Signatures in the Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Scenario: Ready for the Game Changer? Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:2602. [PMID: 35269744 PMCID: PMC8910117 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents a minor subgroup of malignancies arising in the urothelium of the renal pelvis or ureter. The estimated annual incidence is around 2 cases per 100,000 people, with a mean age at diagnosis of 73 years. UTUC is more frequently diagnosed in an invasive or metastatic stage. However, even though the incidence of UTUC is not high, UTUC tends to be aggressive and rapidly progressing with a poor prognosis in some patients. A significant challenge in UTUC is ensuring accurate and timely diagnosis, which is complicated by the non-specific nature of symptoms seen at the onset of disease. Moreover, there is a lack of biomarkers capable of identifying the early presence of the malignancy and guide-tailored medical treatment. However, the growing understanding of the molecular biology underlying UTUC has led to the discovery of promising new biomarkers. Among these biomarkers, there is a class of small non-coding RNA biomarkers known as microRNAs (miRNAs) that are particularly promising. In this review, we will analyze the main characteristics of UTUC and focus on microRNAs as possible novel tools that could enter clinical practice in order to optimize the current diagnostic and prognostic algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Cinque
- Biorek S.r.l., San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Anna Capasso
- Department of Medical Oncology Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78723, USA;
| | - Riccardo Vago
- Urological Research Institute, Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery,, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Floris
- Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, G. Brotzu Hospital, 09134 Cagliari, Italy; (M.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Michael W. Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology and Medical Education, Dell Medical School, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78723, USA;
| | - Roberto Minnei
- Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, G. Brotzu Hospital, 09134 Cagliari, Italy; (M.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Francesco Trevisani
- Biorek S.r.l., San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
- Urological Research Institute, Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
- Unit of Urology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Li Z, Xu H, Gong Y, Chen W, Zhan Y, Yu L, Sun Y, Li A, He S, Guan B, Wu Y, Xiong G, Fang D, He Y, Tang Q, Yao L, Hu Z, Mei H, He Z, Cai Z, Guo Y, Li X, Zhou L, Huang W. Patient-Derived Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Organoids as a Platform for Drug Screening. ADVANCED SCIENCE (WEINHEIM, BADEN-WURTTEMBERG, GERMANY) 2022; 9:e2103999. [PMID: 34914855 PMCID: PMC8811809 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202103999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) are rare entities that are usually diagnosed at advanced stages. Research on UTUC pathobiology and clinical management has been hampered by the lack of models accurately reflecting disease nature and diversity. In this study, a modified organoid culture system is used to generate a library of 25 patient-derived UTUC organoid lines retaining the histological architectures, marker gene expressions, genomic landscapes, and gene expression profiles of their parental tumors. The study demonstrates that the responses of UTUC organoids to anticancer drugs can be identified and the model supports the exploration of novel treatment strategies. This work proposes a modified protocol for generating patient-derived UTUC organoid lines that may help elucidate UTUC pathophysiology and assess the responses of these diseases to various drug therapies in personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhichao Li
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
- Department of UrologyShenzhen Institute of Translational MedicineShenzhen Second People's HospitalThe First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen UniversityInternational Cancer Center of Shenzhen UniversityShenzhen518039China
| | - Haibo Xu
- Department of UrologyShenzhen Institute of Translational MedicineShenzhen Second People's HospitalThe First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen UniversityInternational Cancer Center of Shenzhen UniversityShenzhen518039China
| | - Yanqing Gong
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of UrologyShenzhen Institute of Translational MedicineShenzhen Second People's HospitalThe First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen UniversityInternational Cancer Center of Shenzhen UniversityShenzhen518039China
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Systems Biology and Synthetic Biology for Urogenital TumorsShenzhen518035China
| | - Yonghao Zhan
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
| | - Lei Yu
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Systems Biology and Synthetic Biology for Urogenital TumorsShenzhen518035China
- Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic BiologyShenzhen Institutes of Advanced TechnologyChinese Academy of SciencesShenzhen518055China
| | - Yangyang Sun
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Systems Biology and Synthetic Biology for Urogenital TumorsShenzhen518035China
- Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic BiologyShenzhen Institutes of Advanced TechnologyChinese Academy of SciencesShenzhen518055China
| | - Aolin Li
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
| | - Shiming He
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
| | - Bao Guan
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
| | - Yucai Wu
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
| | - Gengyan Xiong
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
| | - Dong Fang
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
| | - Yuhui He
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
| | - Qi Tang
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
| | - Lin Yao
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
| | - Zheng Hu
- Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic BiologyShenzhen Institutes of Advanced TechnologyChinese Academy of SciencesShenzhen518055China
| | - Hongbing Mei
- Department of UrologyShenzhen Institute of Translational MedicineShenzhen Second People's HospitalThe First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen UniversityInternational Cancer Center of Shenzhen UniversityShenzhen518039China
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Systems Biology and Synthetic Biology for Urogenital TumorsShenzhen518035China
| | - Zhisong He
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
| | - Zhiming Cai
- Department of UrologyShenzhen Institute of Translational MedicineShenzhen Second People's HospitalThe First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen UniversityInternational Cancer Center of Shenzhen UniversityShenzhen518039China
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Systems Biology and Synthetic Biology for Urogenital TumorsShenzhen518035China
- Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic BiologyShenzhen Institutes of Advanced TechnologyChinese Academy of SciencesShenzhen518055China
| | - Yinglu Guo
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
| | - Weiren Huang
- Department of UrologyPeking University First HospitalNational Urological Cancer CenterBeijing100034China
- Department of UrologyShenzhen Institute of Translational MedicineShenzhen Second People's HospitalThe First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen UniversityInternational Cancer Center of Shenzhen UniversityShenzhen518039China
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Systems Biology and Synthetic Biology for Urogenital TumorsShenzhen518035China
- Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic BiologyShenzhen Institutes of Advanced TechnologyChinese Academy of SciencesShenzhen518055China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Olson KM, Faraj KS, Singh P, Tyson MD. Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89891-5_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
47
|
Nadler N, Oedorf K, Jensen JB, Azawi N. Intraoperative Mitomycin C Bladder Instillation During Radical Nephroureterectomy Is Feasible and Safe. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 34:41-46. [PMID: 34934966 PMCID: PMC8655381 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bladder recurrence after radical treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) is frequent, and patients are required to undergo surveillance cystoscopies following surgery. The use of intravesical adjuvant chemotherapy is an accepted method to prevent bladder recurrence, but the timing of this method is not standardized and the concept of intraoperative use is unexplored. Objective The objective of the study is to examine the feasibility and safety of intraoperative intravesical mitomycin C (MMC) instillation using a closed-circuit system following bladder cuff excision and bladder closure. Design setting and participants All patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC at the Department of Urology of Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark from 2017 to 2020 were identified. Patient complications within 30 d and data regarding oncological outcome were registered. Outcome measurements and statistical ana lysis Clavien-Dindo grade for complications and descriptive statistics were used. Results During the study period, 64 patients underwent RNU. Of these patients, 49 received bladder instillation of MMC during RNU. Complications were observed in 11 patients (21.4%), where four patients (8.2%) had Clavien-Dindo complication grade (CD) I, four patients (8.2%) had CD II, one patient (2%) had CD III, and one patient (2%) had CD IIIa. None of the complications were suspected to be related to MMC. Five of the 15 patients (33%) who did not receive MMC experienced complications. There were no significant differences in complication rates between patients who received MMC and those who did not. Study limitations include a small sample size and a single-center study. Conclusions Intraoperative vesical instillation of MMC is feasible and was, in the present study, not associated with an increased complication rate. Patient summary Bladder recurrence after radical treatment of upper urinary tract cancer is frequent. The present study findings indicate that intraoperative bladder irrigation with the chemotherapeutic mitomycin C during surgery does not lead to excessive complications and could be a method to reduce the risk of bladder recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Nadler
- Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kimie Oedorf
- Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Nessn Azawi
- Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yanagi M, Hamasaki T, Akatsuka J, Endo Y, Takeda H, Kondo Y. Risk factor analysis of intravesical recurrence after retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. BMC Urol 2021; 21:167. [PMID: 34856960 PMCID: PMC8638342 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-021-00932-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background One of the major concerns of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with nephroureterectomy is intravesical recurrence (IVR). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the predictive risk factors for IVR after retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC. Methods Clinicopathological and surgical information were collected from the medical records of 73 patients treated with RNU for non-metastatic UTUC, without a history of or concomitant bladder cancer. The association between IVR after RNU and clinicopathological and surgery-related factors, including preoperative urine cytology and pneumoretroperitoneum time, was analyzed using the Fisher exact test. Results During the median follow-up time of 39.1 months, 18 (24.7%) patients had subsequent IVR after RNU. The 1- and 3-year IVR-free survival rates were 85.9% and 76.5%, respectively. The Fisher exact test revealed that prolonged pneumoretroperitoneum time of ≥ 210 min was a risk factor for IVR in 1 year after RNU (p = 0.0358) and positive urine cytology was a risk factor for IVR in 3 years after RNU (p = 0.0352). Conclusions In UTUC, the occurrences of IVR in 1 and 3 years after RNU are highly probable when the pneumoretroperitoneum time is prolonged (≥ 210 min) and in patients with positive urine cytology, respectively. Strict follow-up after RNU is more probable recommended for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masato Yanagi
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
| | - Tsutomu Hamasaki
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-396, Kosugityo, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki city, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan
| | - Jun Akatsuka
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Yuki Endo
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Hayato Takeda
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Kondo
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Tumor distribution affects bladder recurrence but not survival outcome of multifocal upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy. Sci Rep 2021; 11:19059. [PMID: 34561545 PMCID: PMC8463529 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98696-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor multifocality and location are prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, confounding effects can appear when these two factors are analyzed together. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of tumor distribution on the outcomes of multifocal UTUC after radical nephroureterectomy. From the 2780 UTUC patients in the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group, 685 UTUC cases with multifocal tumors (defined as more than one tumor lesion in unilateral upper urinary tract) were retrospectively included and divided into three groups: multiple renal pelvic tumors, multiple ureteral tumors, and synchronous renal pelvic and ureteral tumors included 164, 152, and 369 patients, respectively. We found the prevalence of carcinoma in situ was the highest in the synchronous group. In multivariate survival analyses, tumor distribution showed no difference in cancer-specific and disease-free survival, but there was a significant difference in bladder recurrence-free survival. The synchronous group had the highest bladder recurrence rate. In summary, tumor distribution did not influence the cancer-specific outcomes of multifocal UTUC, but synchronous lesions led to a higher rate of bladder recurrence than multiple renal pelvic tumors. We believe that the distribution of tumors reflects the degree of malignant involvement within the urinary tract, but has little significance for survival or disease progression.
Collapse
|
50
|
Lenfant L, Breda A, Xylinas E, Babjuk M, Moschini M, Rouprêt M. Current Evidence and Future Perspectives in the Management of Nonmetastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5:464-471. [PMID: 34561205 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
This case-based discussion describes the management of a 66-yr-old man who presented to the emergency department with gross hematuria. His urine cytology was benign, and computed tomography (CT) with nephrographic phase revealed a 2.5 cm filling defect within the left renal pelvis and luminal narrowing in the right proximal ureter with hydronephrosis. CT showed no lymphadenopathy and no sign of metastatic disease. Cystoscopy was normal. In a progressive case-based discussion fashion, we will discuss the diagnostic and treatment options with two different perspectives: (1) guidelines-based current standard of care and (2) an outlook on future perspectives using the latest scientific advances that may soon become the standard of care. PATIENT SUMMARY: This presentation of a real-life clinical scenario will be useful in describing the current standard of care and future perspectives regarding the diagnosis and treatment of upper urinary tract tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Lenfant
- Urology, GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Breda
- Fundació Puigvert, Department of Urology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Evangelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine and Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marco Moschini
- Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology, GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|