|
1
|
Meyer D, Jatana S, Birch DW, Switzer NJ, Karmali S, Mocanu V. Trends of Drain Placement During Revisional Bariatric Surgeries and Its Association with 30-Day Morbidity: An MBSAQIP Analysis of 64,495 Patients. J Clin Med 2025; 14:2456. [PMID: 40217904 PMCID: PMC11989530 DOI: 10.3390/jcm14072456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2025] [Revised: 03/29/2025] [Accepted: 04/01/2025] [Indexed: 04/14/2025] Open
Abstract
Background: Drains are often placed during bariatric procedures; however, their use in conversional or revisional bariatric surgery (CRBS) has not been thoroughly explored. Our study sought to identify the frequency of drain placement in CRBS, and characterize factors associated with drain placement and their influence on 30-day serious complications. Methods: Patients undergoing CRBS between 2020 and 2022 were included from the MBSAQIP database. Patients were placed into drain placed (DP) versus no drain (ND) cohorts and baseline characteristics and complication rate were compared. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of drain placement and complications. Results: of 64,495 included patients, drains were placed in 19.1% in 2020; this was down to 14.4% in 2022. Drain placement was associated with increased risk of multiple complications such as hemorrhage, readmission, surgical site infection, and gastrointestinal bleeding. On multivariate analysis, drain placement was an independent predictor of serious complications (aOR 1.45, p < 0.001), anastomotic leak (aOR 2.25, p < 0.001), organ space infection (aOR 2.12, p < 0.001), and reoperation (aOR 1.37, p < 0.001), as well as excess LOS (aOR 2.06, p < 0.001). Predictors of drain placement include older age, higher BMI, smoking status, history of venous thromboembolism, and procedural factors, such as undergoing non-sleeve revisional surgery or having an intraoperative leak test. Conclusions: Drain placement during CRBS surgical procedures is common and more likely in higher risk patients and anastomotic revisional procedures. Though the reasons for drain placement were not available, these data suggest that surgeons should be judicious in selecting patients for drain placement due to its association with increased LOS and postoperative morbidity in CRBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Meyer
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada; (D.M.)
| | - Sukhdeep Jatana
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada; (D.M.)
| | - Daniel W. Birch
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada; (D.M.)
- Centre for Advancement of Surgical Education and Simulation (CASES), Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Noah J. Switzer
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada; (D.M.)
- Centre for Advancement of Surgical Education and Simulation (CASES), Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Shahzeer Karmali
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada; (D.M.)
- Centre for Advancement of Surgical Education and Simulation (CASES), Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Valentin Mocanu
- Digestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Lin H, Baker JW, Meister K, Lak KL, Martin Del Campo SE, Smith A, Needleman B, Nadzam G, Ying LD, Varban O, Reyes AM, Breckenbridge J, Tabone L, Gentles C, Echeverri C, Jones SB, Gould J, Vosburg W, Jones DB, Edwards M, Nimeri A, Kindel T, Petrick A. American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery: intra-operative care pathway for minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2024; 20:895-909. [PMID: 39097472 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical care pathways help guide and provide structure to clinicians and providers to improve healthcare delivery and quality. The Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Committee (QIPS) of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) has previously published care pathways for the performance of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and pre-operative care of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). OBJECTIVE This current RYGB care pathway was created to address intraoperative care, defined as care occurring on the day of surgery from the preoperative holding area, through the operating room, and into the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). METHODS PubMed queries were performed from January 2001 to December 2019 and reviewed according to Level of Evidence regarding specific key questions developed by the committee. RESULTS Evidence-based recommendations are made for care of patients undergoing RYGB including the pre-operative holding area, intra-operative management and performance of RYGB, and concurrent procedures. CONCLUSIONS This document may provide guidance based on recent evidence to bariatric surgeons and providers for the intra-operative care for minimally invasive RYGB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Lin
- Department of Surgery, Signature Healthcare, Brockton, Massachusetts.
| | - John W Baker
- Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | | | - Kathleen L Lak
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - April Smith
- Department of Pharmacy, Creighton University School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Omaha, Nebraska
| | | | - Geoffrey Nadzam
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lee D Ying
- Department of Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Oliver Varban
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Angel Manuel Reyes
- Department of General Surgery, St. Michael Medical Center, Silverdale, Washington
| | - Jamie Breckenbridge
- Department of General Surgery, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, Virginia
| | - Lawrence Tabone
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Charmaine Gentles
- Department of Surgery, Northshore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York
| | | | - Stephanie B Jones
- Department of Anesthesiology, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Jon Gould
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Wesley Vosburg
- Department of Surgery, Grand Strand Medical Center, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
| | - Daniel B Jones
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | | | - Abdelrahman Nimeri
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tammy Kindel
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Anthony Petrick
- Department of Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Aragone L, Thibaud F, Tóffolo M, Mihura M, Pirchi DE. Abdominal Drains After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Should They Be Used? JOURNAL OF METABOLIC AND BARIATRIC SURGERY 2024; 13:27-33. [PMID: 38974894 PMCID: PMC11224003 DOI: 10.17476/jmbs.2024.13.1.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024]
Abstract
Purpose Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide for the treatment of morbid obesity. Blake-type drains are widely used in this procedure despite the lack of clear evidence regarding their benefits in the diagnosis and treatment of common postoperative complications such as gastric suture line leak (GSLL) and postoperative bleeding (PB). Materials and Methods A retrospective descriptive study with prospective case registry was conducted, analyzing all patients who underwent LSG between January 2012 and December 2022 at a high-volume center. Our primary outcome was to evaluate the role of drains for diagnosis and treatment of GSLL and PB in LSG. Our secondary outcome was to determine drain related surgical site infection (DRSSI) rate. Results A total of 335 LSG were performed in the studied period. In all patients one abdominal drain was placed during surgery. Six GSLL (1.79%) and 5 PB (1.49%) were recorded. Drain placement did not prove to ensure early diagnosis or conservative management of GSLL or PB after LSG. Furthermore, an incidence of DRSSI of 4.1% (14 patients) was found. Conclusion In our study, no clear diagnostic or therapeutic benefits of the systematic use of drains for GSLL or PB in LSG was found; but drain use did show a considerable rate of DRSSI, which must be taken into consideration prior to considering drain systematic use. While no randomized prospective trials have been performed, the retrospective data does not support drain systematic use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucía Aragone
- Department of General Surgery, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Francisco Thibaud
- Department of General Surgery, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Mariana Tóffolo
- Department of General Surgery, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Matías Mihura
- Department of General Surgery, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Daniel E. Pirchi
- Department of General Surgery, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Bao F, Wu L, Shang J, Deng Z, Xiang C. The Impact of Drain Placement on Postoperative Complications in Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am Surg 2024; 90:270-278. [PMID: 37772778 DOI: 10.1177/00031348231204906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
Obesity in individuals can have consequences ranging from metabolically healthy obesity to serious morbidities and reduce the quality and duration of life. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the role of abdominal drainage on postoperative complications after bariatric surgery. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for eligible studies. The results revealed that abdominal drainage was associated with surgical complications, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.70 (P < .001), but not associated with wound infection (OR: 1.04; P = .762). Associations with surgical complications were mainly detected from retrospective cohort studies. The use of abdominal drainage showed associations with death (OR: 1.68; P < .001) and reoperation (OR: 1.49; P < .001). These findings revealed that abdominal drainage during bariatric surgery was associated with surgical complications, death, and reoperation. These results should be taken with caution since randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies were analyzed together.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Bao
- Department of General Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, China
| | - Lirong Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, China
| | - Jianying Shang
- Department of General Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, China
| | | | - Chunhua Xiang
- Department of General Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
de Oliveira VL, Bestetti AM, Trasolini RP, de Moura EGH, de Moura DTH. Choosing the best endoscopic approach for post-bariatric surgical leaks and fistulas: Basic principles and recommendations. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:1173-1193. [PMID: 36926665 PMCID: PMC10011956 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i7.1173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Post-surgical leaks and fistulas are the most feared complication of bariatric surgery. They have become more common in clinical practice given the increasing number of these procedures and can be very difficult to treat. These two related conditions must be distinguished and characterized to guide the appropriate treatment. Leak is defined as a transmural defect with communication between the intra and extraluminal compartments, while fistula is defined as an abnormal communication between two epithelialized surfaces. Traditionally, surgical treatment was the preferred approach for leaks and fistulas and was associated with high morbidity with significant mortality rates. However, with the development of novel devices and techniques, endoscopic therapy plays an increasingly essential role in managing these conditions. Early diagnosis and endoscopic therapy initiation after clinical stabilization are crucial to success since clinical success rates are higher for acute leaks and fistulas when compared to late and chronic leaks and fistulas. Several endoscopic techniques are available with different mechanisms of action, including direct closure, covering/diverting or draining. The treatment should be individualized by considering the characteristics of both the patient and the defect. Although there is a lack of high-quality studies to provide standardized treatment algorithms, this narrative review aims to provide a summary of the current scientific evidence and, based on this data and our extensive experience, make recommendations to help choose the best endoscopic approach for the management of post-bariatric surgical leaks and fistulas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Lira de Oliveira
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403010, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Moraes Bestetti
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403010, Brazil
| | - Roberto Paolo Trasolini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 021115, United States
| | - Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403010, Brazil
| | - Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403010, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Safety and efficacy of using prophylactic drainage after intra-abdominal surgeries: An umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis studies. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY OPEN 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijso.2022.100545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
|
7
|
Marinari G, Foletto M, Nagliati C, Navarra G, Borrelli V, Bruni V, Fantola G, Moroni R, Tritapepe L, Monzani R, Sanna D, Carron M, Cataldo R. Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery: an Italian consensus statement. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7171-7186. [PMID: 35953683 PMCID: PMC9485178 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09498-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS) is an approach developed to improve outcomes in obese surgical patients. Unfortunately, it is not evenly implemented in Italy. The Italian Society for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases and the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care joined in drafting an official statement on ERABS. Methods To assess the effectiveness and safety of ERABS and to develop evidence-based recommendations with regard to pre-, intra-, and post-operative care for obese patients undergoing ERABS, a 13-member expert task force of surgeons and anesthesiologists from Italian certified IFSO center of excellence in bariatric surgery was established and a review of English-language papers conducted. Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Grade Definitions were used to grade the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations, respectively. The supporting evidence and recommendations were reviewed and discussed by the entire group at meetings to achieve a final consensus. Results Compared to the conventional approach, ERABS reduces the length of hospital stay and does not heighten the risk of major post-operative complications, re-operations, and hospital re-admissions, nor does it increase the overall surgical costs. A total of 25 recommendations were proposed, covering pre-operative evaluation and care (7 items), intra-operative management (1 item, 11 sub-items), and post-operative care and discharge (6 items). Conclusions ERABS is an effective and safe approach. The recommendations allow the proper management of obese patients undergoing ERABS for a better outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Marinari
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mirto Foletto
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Carlo Nagliati
- Department of Surgery, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Gorizia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Navarra
- Department of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Bruni
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Fantola
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, ARNAS, G. Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Roberto Moroni
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, Policlinico Sassarese, Sassari, Italy
| | - Luigi Tritapepe
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Monzani
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University Milan, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Sanna
- Emergency Department, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, ARNAS, G. Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Michele Carron
- Department of Medicine-DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padua, Via V. Gallucci, 13, 35121, Padua, Italy.
| | - Rita Cataldo
- Unit of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Stenberg E, Dos Reis Falcão LF, O'Kane M, Liem R, Pournaras DJ, Salminen P, Urman RD, Wadhwa A, Gustafsson UO, Thorell A. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: A 2021 Update. World J Surg 2022; 46:729-751. [PMID: 34984504 PMCID: PMC8885505 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06394-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 212] [Impact Index Per Article: 70.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Background This is the second updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline, presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in bariatric surgery and providing recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS® protocol. Methods A principal literature search was performed utilizing the Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases and ClinicalTrials.gov through December 2020, with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies. Selected studies were examined, reviewed and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. After critical appraisal of these studies, the group of authors reached consensus regarding recommendations. Results The quality of evidence for many ERAS interventions remains relatively low in a bariatric setting and evidence-based practices may need to be extrapolated from other surgeries. Conclusion A comprehensive, updated evidence-based consensus was reached and is presented in this review by the ERAS® Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Stenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
| | | | - Mary O'Kane
- Dietetic Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Ronald Liem
- Department of Surgery, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, Netherlands.,Dutch Obesity Clinic, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Dimitri J Pournaras
- Department of Upper GI and Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Bristol, UK
| | - Paulina Salminen
- Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Richard D Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anupama Wadhwa
- Department of Anesthesiology, Outcomes Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, USA
| | - Ulf O Gustafsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Thorell
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Gimeno-Moro AM, Errando CL, Escrig-Sos VJ, Laguna-Sastre JM. Analysis of the 'Evaluation Indicators' of an Enhanced Recovery After Bariatric Surgery Pathway in the First Six Months After Implementation. Obes Surg 2021; 31:2551-2566. [PMID: 33840012 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05274-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The implementation of a clinical pathway in bariatric surgery (BS) might facilitate systemic care. Focusing on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs may also improve surgical outcomes depending on the degree of adherence achieved. We hypothesized that the implementation of an ERAS clinical pathway in BS (ERABS) improves clinical outcomes compared to traditional treatment in a tertiary care hospital. The main objective was to assess the degree of adherence to the ERABS program. Secondary objectives were to evaluate compliance with the quality indicators of the Spanish Society for Obesity Surgery (SECO) and overall patients' satisfaction. A retrospective observational study was designed. Data from patients who underwent BS into an ERABS context were reviewed and compared with traditionally treated patients. Process and outcomes indicators adapted from RICA (Recuperación Intensificada en Cirugía Abdominal) pathway, degree of compliance with SECO quality indicators and patients' satisfaction were analyzed. Forty-three patients were included per group. Indicators' compliance rate per patient was 83.23%. Differences were found in postoperative bleeding, immediate morbidity and overall morbidity, but not in severity of complications. No patient felt dissatisfied or unsatisfied. Average compliance with indicators of process and outcome was 90.45%. Overall morbidity in ERABS group did not differ from that recommended by SECO, but traditional group did show significant increase. Adherence was 83.63% and overall incidence of complications was 7%. Our study shows improved clinical outcomes in ERABS group with a high degree of adherence. Quality indicators were met, improving overall morbidity with no difference in the severity of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana M Gimeno-Moro
- Service of Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Av. Benicassim, 128, 12004, Castellón, Spain.
| | - Carlos L Errando
- Service of Anesthesiology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Vicente J Escrig-Sos
- Service of General Surgery, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
- Jaume I University, Castellón, Spain
| | - José M Laguna-Sastre
- Jaume I University, Castellón, Spain
- Service of General Surgery, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Gray EC, Dawoud F, Janelle M, Hodge M. Drain Placement During Bariatric Surgery, Helpful or Harmful? Am Surg 2020; 86:971-975. [PMID: 32833495 DOI: 10.1177/0003134820942168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Routine drain placement is still widely used in both sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux en Y gastric bypass (REYGB). There is mounting evidence that drains may increase complication risk without preventing reoperation or other complications. METHODS Data from 2017 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Participant Use File was evaluated for drain use during laparoscopic REYGB and SG. Primary outcomes were superficial and deep surgical site infections (SSI), reintervention/reoperation, and readmission. Preoperative patient risk factors were also compared to evaluate for association with drain placement. RESULTS A total of 148 260 patients fit the inclusion criteria. Drains were used in 23 190 (15.6%) cases and not used in 125 070 (84.4%). Drain placement during surgery was associated with increased odds of superficial SSI, deep incisional SSI, and organ space SSI. Patients with drains were found to have increased odds of requiring at least 1 reoperation or intervention within 30 days of surgery. Preoperative risk factors associated with drain placement included diabetes mellitus, a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and oxygen dependence. Smokers were slightly less likely to have a drain placed. There was no significant association with chronic steroid and immunosuppressant usage. CONCLUSION There is mounting data against drain placement during bariatric surgery. Prior studies using MBSAQIP data have shown an increased complication rate with drains, and our data set supports the idea that drains may increase complications after surgery. While no randomized prospective trials have been performed looking at drain usage in bariatric surgery, the growing retrospective data certainly inform against the regular use of drains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Gray
- 4154 Department of Surgery, East Tennessee State University - Quillen College of Medicine, Mountain Home, TN, USA
| | - Fakhry Dawoud
- 4154 Department of Surgery, East Tennessee State University - Quillen College of Medicine, Mountain Home, TN, USA
| | - Meredith Janelle
- 4154 Department of Surgery, East Tennessee State University - Quillen College of Medicine, Mountain Home, TN, USA
| | - Michael Hodge
- 4154 Department of Surgery, East Tennessee State University - Quillen College of Medicine, Mountain Home, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Peña ME, Schlottmann F, Laxague F, Sadava EE, Buxhoeveden R. Usefulness of Abdominal Drain in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020; 30:538-541. [PMID: 32013717 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2019.0783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most common procedures to treat morbid obesity. Abdominal drains are often placed during the operation to detect complications earlier. The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of routine drain placement during laparoscopic RYGB. Materials and Methods: A consecutive series of patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB between 2017 and 2018 was analyzed. The sample was randomized before the procedure into two groups: with abdominal drain (G1) and without abdominal drain placement (G2). Patients with intraoperative complications were excluded from the randomization. Postoperative complications and pain (visual analogue scale) were compared between groups. Results: A total of 84 patients were included; 45 belonged to G1 and 39 to G2. Mean age (G1 44 years versus G2 48 years) and body mass index (G1 43 kg/m2 versus G2 44 kg/m2) were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences between groups in preoperative comorbidities. Mean operative time was 92 minutes in both groups. Mean pain score at postoperative day 0 was similar in both groups (G1 3.2 versus G2 3.5, P = .58), but was higher in G1 at postoperative day 1 (G1 3.1, G2 1.1, P = .02). Postoperative Clavien-Dindo I-II complications were similar in both groups (G1 9% versus G2 1%, P = .37). No major complications, reoperations, or 30-day mortality occurred in the entire cohort. Conclusions: Drain placement in laparoscopic RYGB was associated with greater postoperative pain and did not show benefits in early detection of postoperative complications. Routine placement of abdominal drain in laparoscopic RYGB might not be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María E Peña
- Department of General Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Francisco Schlottmann
- Department of General Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Francisco Laxague
- Department of General Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Rudolf Buxhoeveden
- Department of General Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
[Still no evidence for drains in bariatric surgery]. Chirurg 2020; 91:670-675. [PMID: 32313967 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-020-01171-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Registry data show that placement of a drain during bariatric surgery is still the normal practice in many surgical departments. Retrospective studies and a review article could show that the routine placement of a drain in bariatric surgery is useless and also potentially dangerous. Due to the lack of randomized controlled studies there is insufficient evidence on this topic in the literature. OBJECTIVE In order to further question the use of drains in bariatric interventions, the prospective in-house databank of patients who received a gastric sleeve (SG) or a Roux-en‑Y gastric bypass (RYGB) between January 2010 and June 2016 was retrospectively evaluated. SETTING A German university hospital. METHODS During the investigation period a total of 361 operations (219 gastric bypasses and 142 gastric sleeve operations) were carried out. A change in the internal treatment pathway with respect to the placement of drains in 2013 led to the formation of two groups: one where a drain was routinely placed in operations (n = 166) and a second group where a drain was not routinely placed (n = 195). The demographic data were statistically adjusted between the two groups using multiple regression analysis. The results of the operation and the 30-day morbidity were compared. Complications were evaluated according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS In the group with no drain, complications occurred in seven patients. In the group with drainage there were 6 complications. The insufficiency and reoperation rates were not statistically significantly different between the two groups. The average postoperative hospital stay was 1.3 days longer in patients with a drain. Multivariate analysis showed that the placement of a drain was the greatest risk factor for a longer hospital stay. CONCLUSION Placement of a drain during bariatric interventions should only be considered on an individual basis. The routine placement should be discouraged.
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Prabhakaran S, Misra S, Magila M, Kumar SS, Kasthuri S, Palanivelu C, Raj PP. Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Standard Recovery Pathways in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2020; 30:3273-3279. [DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04585-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
|
14
|
Buchwald H, Buchwald JN. The benefits of metabolic/bariatric surgery on diabetes mellitus. TRANSPLANTATION, BIOENGINEERING, AND REGENERATION OF THE ENDOCRINE PANCREAS 2020:229-240. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-814831-0.00016-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
|
15
|
Ruiz-Tovar J, Sanchez-Santos R, Martín-García-Almenta E, García Villabona E, Hernandez AM, Hernández-Matías A, Ramírez JM. Rehabilitación multimodal en cirugía bariátrica. Cir Esp 2019; 97:551-559. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2019.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Revised: 03/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
|
16
|
Liu Y, Li MY, Zhang ZT. Role of abdominal drainage in bariatric surgery: Report of six cases. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7:2336-2340. [PMID: 31531328 PMCID: PMC6718775 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i16.2336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2019] [Revised: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abdominal drainage allows for timely detection of hemorrhage, but it cannot prevent hemorrhage. Whether routine abdominal drainage is needed during bariatric procedures remains controversial. Few reports describe the role of abdominal drainage in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal hemorrhage in bariatric surgery.
CASE SUMMARY Six cases of hemorrhage after bariatric surgery were described, including three cases with and three without abdominal drainage during the first surgery. The hemorrhage in five of the six cases was controlled by conservative treatment. Abdominal hemorrhage was found through the drainage tube on the day of the operation in the three patients with abdominal drainage during the first surgery. Emergency treatment was initiated, and their conditions gradually stabilized within 48 h. No patients required a reoperation. Abdominal hemorrhage was found later in the patients without abdominal drainage. Although the hemorrhage was controlled by conservative treatment in two cases (1 and 2), reoperation and percutaneous drainage were performed for abdominal infection and pelvic hemorrhage. An obsolete encapsulated effusion that may require treatment in the future was left in the abdominal cavity of a patient (Case 1).
CONCLUSION The possibility of controlling abdominal hemorrhage after bariatric/metabolic surgery by conservative treatment is high. When hemorrhage occurs, abdominal drainage can reduce the probability of reoperation by reducing the formation of blood clots behind the stomach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Meng-Yi Li
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Zhong-Tao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Buchwald H, Buchwald JN. Metabolic (Bariatric and Nonbariatric) Surgery for Type 2 Diabetes: A Personal Perspective Review. Diabetes Care 2019; 42:331-340. [PMID: 30665965 DOI: 10.2337/dc17-2654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
: Metabolic surgery can cause amelioration, resolution, and possible cure of type 2 diabetes. Bariatric surgery is metabolic surgery. In the future, there will be metabolic surgery operations to treat type 2 diabetes that are not focused on weight loss. These procedures will rely on neurohormonal modulation related to the gut as well as outside the peritoneal cavity. Metabolic procedures are and will always be in flux as surgeons seek the safest and most effective operative modality; there is no enduring gold standard operation. Metabolic bariatric surgery for type 2 diabetes is more than part of the clinical armamentarium, it is an invitation to perform basic research and to achieve fundamental scientific knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Buchwald
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN .,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Jane N Buchwald
- Division of Scientific Research Writing, Medwrite Medical Communications, Maiden Rock, WI
| |
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Gundogan E, Kayaalp C, Aktas A, Saglam K, Sansal M, Gokler C, Cicek E, Uylas U, Sumer F. Influence of Drain Placement on Postoperative Pain Following Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: Randomized Controlled Trial. Obes Surg 2018; 28:3499-3504. [PMID: 29971581 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-018-3374-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is currently no evidence to support the routine use of an abdominal drain following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Our aim was to investigate drain use in laparoscopic RYGB and its effects on postoperative pain. METHODS Sixty-six patients were randomly divided into two groups as no-drain (n = 36) and with-drain (n = 30). Intraoperative (time, blood loss, complications) and postoperative outcomes (morbidities, pain scores, hospital stay) were compared. RESULTS Demographics of both groups were comparable. Three patients in the no-drain group required a drain (8.3%). Median visual analog scale scores for days 1-3 for with-drain and no-drain groups were 4.5 (2-9) vs. 3 (0-8) (p = 0.02), 3 (0-7) vs. 2 (0-7) (p = 0.10), and 2 (0-7) vs. 0 (0-4) (p = 0.0004), respectively. There was no difference between the groups in terms of complications and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION Drain use increased the postoperative pain following laparoscopic RYGB. Drain placement following laparoscopic RYGB should be selective instead of a routine application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ersin Gundogan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Inonu University, 44315, Malatya, Turkey.
| | - Cuneyt Kayaalp
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Inonu University, 44315, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Aydin Aktas
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Inonu University, 44315, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Kutay Saglam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Inonu University, 44315, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Mufit Sansal
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Inonu University, 44315, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Cihan Gokler
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Inonu University, 44315, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Egemen Cicek
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Inonu University, 44315, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Ufuk Uylas
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Inonu University, 44315, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Fatih Sumer
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Inonu University, 44315, Malatya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Thorell A, MacCormick AD, Awad S, Reynolds N, Roulin D, Demartines N, Vignaud M, Alvarez A, Singh PM, Lobo DN. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. World J Surg 2017; 40:2065-83. [PMID: 26943657 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3492-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 359] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the last two decades, an increasing number of bariatric surgical procedures have been performed worldwide. There is no consensus regarding optimal perioperative care in bariatric surgery. This review aims to present such a consensus and to provide graded recommendations for elements in an evidence-based "enhanced" perioperative protocol. METHODS The English-language literature between January 1966 and January 2015 was searched, with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies. Selected studies were examined, reviewed and graded. After critical appraisal of these studies, the group of authors reached a consensus recommendation. RESULTS Although for some elements, recommendations are extrapolated from non-bariatric settings (mainly colorectal), most recommendations are based on good-quality trials or meta-analyses of good-quality trials. CONCLUSIONS A comprehensive evidence-based consensus was reached and is presented in this review by the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Society. The guidelines were endorsed by the International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) and based on the evidence available in the literature for each of the elements of the multimodal perioperative care pathway for patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Thorell
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Hospital & Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, 116 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - A D MacCormick
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Surgery, Counties Manukau Health, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - S Awad
- The East-Midlands Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK.,School of Clinical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - N Reynolds
- The East-Midlands Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK
| | - D Roulin
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - N Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - M Vignaud
- Département d'anesthésie reanimation Service de chirurgie digestive, CHU estaing 1, place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - A Alvarez
- Department of Anesthesia, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires University, 1179, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - P M Singh
- Department of Anesthesia, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India
| | - D N Lobo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Doumouras AG, Maeda A, Jackson TD. The role of routine abdominal drainage after bariatric surgery: a metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2017; 13:1997-2003. [PMID: 29079385 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Revised: 08/05/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of drains has long been debated in bariatric surgery. Drains may provide some theoretical benefits to early detection of anastomotic leaks and potential nonoperative treatment; however, there has never been data to support the practice. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of drain placement after bariatric surgery. SETTING This retrospective cohort study includes all hospitals in the United States that participated in the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. METHODS Only patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass were included for the analysis. The main outcomes of interest were anastomotic leak, reoperation, all-cause morbidity, readmission, and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of abdominal drainage on the outcomes of interest. RESULTS A total of 142,631 patients were identified in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. After adjustment for major clinical variables, the odds of anastomotic leaks increased by 30% with the placement of a drain (odds ratio: 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.57, P = .01) while the odds of reoperation increased by 17% (95% CI: 1.06-1.30, P = .01). The odds of all cause morbidity increased 19% (95% CI: 1.14-1.25, P<.01), and odds of readmission were significantly higher (odds ratio:1.12, 95% CI:1.06-1.19, P<.01). The odds of mortality did not change significantly with the placement of a drain. CONCLUSIONS Using a large observational cohort, this study provided no evidence that routine drainage is beneficial to patients, but rather may increase major morbidity. Our findings suggest that the use of routine abdominal drainage should be restricted to very select, high-risk cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Azusa Maeda
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy D Jackson
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
Khorgami Z, Andalib A, Schauer PR. Comment on: Technical factors associated with anastomotic leak after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2015; 11:1408. [PMID: 26237997 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2015] [Revised: 06/19/2015] [Accepted: 06/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Zhamak Khorgami
- Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Amin Andalib
- Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Philip R Schauer
- Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
|
23
|
Kim J, Azagury D, Eisenberg D, DeMaria E, Campos GM. ASMBS position statement on prevention, detection, and treatment of gastrointestinal leak after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, including the roles of imaging, surgical exploration, and nonoperative management. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2015; 11:739-48. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|