The variability of vascular anatomy of the pancreas underlines the difficulty of its transplantation. Research regarding the consistency of anatomical variations shows splenic arterial dominance in most cases. This can significantly improve transplantation success. A systematic literature review was performed according to the quality standards described in the AMSTAR measurement tool and the PRISMA guidelines. We valuated existing literature regarding the vascularization and blood perfusion patterns of the pancreas in terms of dominance and variability. The collected data was independently analyzed by two researchers. Variance of vascular anatomy was seen to be underreported in literature, though significant findings have been included and discussed in this study, providing valuable insight into the dynamics of pancreatic perfusion and feasibility of transplantation on several different supplying arteries. The splenic artery (SA) has a high percentage of consistency in all found studies (over 90%). High frequency of anastomoses between arterial pools supplying the pancreas can mediate sufficient blood supply through a dominant vessel, such as the SA, which is present in most cases. Pancreatic transplantation with isolated SA blood supply can provide sufficient arterial perfusion of the pancreas for stable transplant viability due to high anatomical consistency of the SA and vast communications with other arterial systems.

Quantitative imaging studies of the pancreas have often targeted the three main anatomical segments, head, body, and tail, using manual region of interest strategies to assess geographic heterogeneity. Existing automated analyses have implemented whole-organ segmentation, providing overall quantification but failing to address spatial heterogeneity.

To develop and validate an automated method for pancreas segmentation into head, body, and tail subregions in abdominal MRI.

Retrospective.

One hundred and fifty nominally healthy subjects from UK Biobank (100 subjects for method development and 50 subjects for validation). A separate 390 UK Biobank triples of subjects including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) subjects and matched nondiabetics.

A 1.5 T, three-dimensional two-point Dixon sequence (for segmentation and volume assessment) and a two-dimensional axial multiecho gradient-recalled echo sequence.

Pancreas segments were annotated by four raters on the validation cohort. Intrarater agreement and interrater agreement were reported using Dice overlap (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC]). A segmentation method based on template registration was developed and evaluated against annotations. Results on regional pancreatic fat assessment are also presented, by intersecting the three-dimensional parts segmentation with one available proton density fat fraction (PDFF) image.

Wilcoxon signed rank test and Mann-Whitney U-test for comparisons. DSC and volume differences for evaluation. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Good intrarater (DSC mean, head: 0.982, body: 0.940, tail: 0.961) agreement and interrater (DSC mean, head: 0.968, body: 0.905, tail: 0.943) agreement were observed. No differences (DSC, head: P = 0.4358, body: P = 0.0992, tail: P = 0.1080) were observed between the manual annotations and our method's segmentations (DSC mean, head: 0.965, body: 0.893, tail: 0.934). Pancreatic body PDFF was different between T2DM and nondiabetics matched by body mass index.

The developed segmentation's performance was no different from manual annotations. Application on type 2 diabetes subjects showed potential for assessing pancreatic disease heterogeneity.

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

A novel method is proposed to establish the pancreatic cancer classifier. Firstly, the concept of quantum and fruit fly optimal algorithm (FOA) are introduced, respectively. Then FOA is improved by quantum coding and quantum operation, and a new smell concentration determination function is defined. Finally, the improved FOA is used to optimize the parameters of support vector machine (SVM) and the classifier is established by optimized SVM. In order to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, SVM and other classification methods have been chosen as the comparing methods. The experimental results show that the proposed method can improve the classifier performance and cost less time.

Central pancreatectomy (CP) is a parenchyma-sparing surgical procedure. The aims are to clarify the history and the development of CP and to give credits to those from whom it came. Ehrhardt, in 1908, described segmental neck resection (SNR) followed, in 1910, by Finney without reconstructive part. In 1950 Honjyo described two cases of SNR combined with gastrectomy for gastric cancer infiltrating the neck of the pancreas. Guillemin and Bessot (1957) and Letton and Wilson (1959) dealt only with the reconstructive aspect of CP. Dagradi and Serio, in 1982, performed the first CP including the resective and reconstructive aspects. Subsequently Iacono has validated it with functional endocrine and exocrine tests and popularized it worldwide. In 2003, Baca and Bokan performed laparoscopic CP and, In 2004, Giulianotti et al performed a robotic assisted CP. CP is performed worldwide either by open surgery or by using minimally-invasive or robotic approaches. This confirms that the operation does not belong to whom introduced it but to everyone who carries out it; however credit must be given to those from whom it came.

Head dorsal pancreatectomy (HDP) is a segmental pancreatic resection, conservative variant of total dorsal pancreatectomy, applied to preserve the functional pancreatic parenchyma as an alternative to pancreaticoduodenectomy in not enucleable benign or low-grade malignant lesions. The absences of biliary and gastrointestinal resection/reconstruction are the other advantages of the technique.

We reported a case of HDP performed in a female 39-year-old patient for a neuroendocrine tumour of the dorsal portion of the pancreatic head.

The superior mesenteric vein was dissected from the pancreatic neck. The pancreas was transected at the left margin of the superior mesenteric vein. After identification and mobilisation of gastroduodenal artery and the anterior superior pancreatico-duodenal artery, the head dorsal segment was dissected stepwise from the duodenal wall toward the common bile duct plane; the dissection of the pancreatic parenchyma was completed along the anterior surface of the common bile duct. An end-to-side duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy was performed. The main pancreatic duct in the ventral segment on the dissection parenchymal surface was ligated. With the inclusion of this case, there are a total of 3 cases involving resection of the dorsal portion of the pancreatic head reported in the literature.

HDP seems to be technically feasible and safe for not enucleable benign or low-grade malignant neoplasms involving the dorsal pancreatic head. However, due to the singularity of the indications and the few cases reported in the literature, further studies are needed to validate the technique.

Postoperative pancreatic fistula remains a major complication after pancreatic surgeries. To prevent pancreatic fistula, one of the employed management strategies is pancreatic duct stenting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative pancreatic stenting to prevent pancreatic fistula after surgery.

Subjects comprised 18 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic surgeries. Patients were divided into 2 groups: stenting group (n=7); and non-stenting group (n=11). Complications after stent placement were analyzed. Compared parameters between groups included background, incidence and grading of pancreatic fistula as judged by international study group of pancreatic fistula (ISGPF) criteria, duration until drain removal, and mean maximum level of drain amylase.

Two patients displayed mild pancreatitis with high serum amylase levels after stenting. No significant differences in background or any other compared parameters to assess drainage effect were identified between stenting and non-stenting groups. Complications related to placement of the stent tube occurred in 4 patients with tube occlusion or cholestasis.

Although drainage effect in the stenting group was compared with that in the non-stenting group, no obvious effect was obtained. This procedure seems to require further investigation on indications for postoperative drainage to decrease the incidence of pancreatic fistula.

Limited resection of the pancreas is recommended for low-grade malignancies such as mucin-producing tumors. We propose a system of segmentation of the pancreas for the purposes of limited resection. The proposed system has an anatomical and embryological basis, and divides the pancreas into four segments, namely the anterior head, posterior head, body and tail. These segments are based on the conventional anatomical division of the pancreas, identification of the originating primordium, and distribution of the ventral and dorsal pancreas.

Non-inflammatory cystic lesions of the pancreas are increasingly recognized. Two distinct entities have been defined, i.e., intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN). Ovarian-type stroma has been proposed as a requisite to distinguish MCN from IPMN. Some other distinct features to characterize IPMN and MCN have been identified, but there remain ambiguities between the two diseases. In view of the increasing frequency with which these neoplasms are being diagnosed worldwide, it would be helpful for physicians managing patients with cystic neoplasms of the pancreas to have guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of IPMN and MCN. The proposed guidelines represent a consensus of the working group of the International Association of Pancreatology.

The aim of this study was to assess the imaging findings of pathologically proven intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas and the natural history of follow-up cases, and to optimize the therapeutic management of patients with these tumors according to their imaging findings. All nine patients with main duct type tumors were histologically diagnosed as having adenocarcinoma or adenoma, with no hyperplastic lesion. The images failed to discriminate between the two histologic types. In 26 patients with branch duct type tumors, all but one with intraductal mural nodules or tumors of > or = 30 mm had adenocarcinoma or adenoma, regardless of the caliber of the main duct. Of the nine patients with tumors < 30 mm and no mural nodules. three had adenoma, and six had hyperplasia. All of four patients had hyperplasia, with the additional caliber of the main duct being < 6 mm. In a series of 23 cases in which the patient was followed-up, no apparent progression was found in 17 patients who had no mural nodules and tumors of < 30 mm. Given these results, patients with main duct type tumors, and those with branch duct type tumors showing mural nodules or a tumor diameter of > or = 30 mm, are at high risk of developing neoplasms, including adenocarcinoma, for which surgical resection should be considered, whereas those patients with tumors < 30 mm and no mural nodules can be followed.