BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in CrossRef
For: Lucas M. Conflicts of interest in nutritional sciences: The forgotten bias in meta-analysis. World J Methodol 2015; 5(4): 175-178 [PMID: 26713276 DOI: 10.5662/wjm.v5.i4.175]
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v5/i4/175.htm
Number Citing Articles
1
Melissa Mialon, Alice Fabbri, Gary Fooks. Reply to the article: “What principles should guide interactions between population health researchers and the food industry? Systematic scoping review of peer‐reviewed and grey literature”Obesity Reviews 2019; 20(10): 1504 doi: 10.1111/obr.12905
2
Ernie Kunneke, Rina Swart, Nico Nortjé. African Perspectives on Ethics for Healthcare ProfessionalsAdvancing Global Bioethics 2018; 13: 91 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-93230-9_7
3
Saadia Albane, Hachem Slimani, Hamamache Kheddouci. A graph grammar and $$K_{4}$$-type tournament-based approach to detect conflicts of interest in a social networkKnowledge and Information Systems 2021; 63(2): 497 doi: 10.1007/s10115-020-01525-5
4
Lukas Schwingshackl, Sven Knüppel, Carolina Schwedhelm, Georg Hoffmann, Benjamin Missbach, Marta Stelmach-Mardas, Stefan Dietrich, Fabian Eichelmann, Evangelos Kontopanteils, Khalid Iqbal, Krasimira Aleksandrova, Stefan Lorkowski, Michael F Leitzmann, Anja Kroke, Heiner Boeing. Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition ResearchAdvances in Nutrition 2016; 7(6): 994 doi: 10.3945/an.116.013052
5
Katherine Cullerton, Jean Adams, Nita Forouhi, Oliver Francis, Martin White. What principles should guide interactions between population health researchers and the food industry? Systematic scoping review of peer‐reviewed and grey literatureObesity Reviews 2019; 20(8): 1073 doi: 10.1111/obr.12851