Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Nephrol. May 6, 2017; 6(3): 123-131
Published online May 6, 2017. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v6.i3.123
Table 1 Advantages and limitations of renal imaging techniques
Clinical relevanceAdvantagesLimitations
Bidimensional ultrasonographyMorphological evaluation (dimensions; echogenicity; corticomedullary ratio)Fast; highly feasible in clinical practice; excludes obstructive uropathy and some parenchymal abnormalitiesNonspecific
Arterial RI (Doppler)Indirect evaluation of arterial hemodynamics (resistances and vascular compliance) and parenchymal alterationsFast; highly feasible in clinical practice; prognostic valueInfluenced by renal obstructive arterial disease; lower accuracy with irregular rhythms
Venous pattern (Doppler)Indirect evaluation of venous congestion, right atrial function and parenchymal complianceFast; highly feasible in clinical practice; prognostic valueLack of standardization
Computed tomographyEvaluation of GFR through measurement of contrast wash-outHigh spatial resolutionNephrotoxicity of contrast media; radiation exposure
Nuclear imagingGFR and RBF estimation through DTPA and MAG3 99mTC labelled uptake intensity measurementLow radiation doseRadiation exposure
MRINo radiation exposureTime consuming; expensive
Phase-contrast MRIEvaluation of RBFNo use of GadoliniumBreathing movement artefacts
Dynamic MRIEvaluation of GFR through measurement of signal attenuationReliableParticularly time consuming (> 70 min)
BOLD MRIEvaluation of renal parenchymal oxygenation exploiting superparamagnetic properties of desoxyHbNo use of Gadolinium; unique method to assess this parameterLack of standardization; low signal change of BOLD effect; no clinical applications
MRI detectable nanoparticlesEvaluation of single-glomerulus volume and structural changesNo use of Gadolinium; unique method to image renal parenchyma at microscopic levelProne to movement artefacts; possible toxicity of nanoparticles; no clinical applications