Peer-review started: July 25, 2021
First decision: November 11, 2021
Revised: November 29, 2021
Accepted: February 10, 2022
Article in press: February 10, 2022
Published online: March 25, 2022
Processing time: 239 Days and 8.7 Hours
Vaccinations for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) have begun more than a year before, yet without specific treatments available. Rifampicin, critically important for human medicine (World Health Organization’s list of essential medicines), may prove pharmacologically effective for treatment and chemoprophylaxis of healthcare personnel and those at higher risk. It has been known since 1969 that rifampicin has a direct selective antiviral effect on viruses which have their own RNA polymerase (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), like the main mechanism of action of remdesivir. This involves inhibition of late viral protein synthesis, the virion assembly, and the viral polymerase itself. This antiviral effect is dependent on the administration route, with local application resulting in higher drug concentrations at the site of viral replication. This would suggest also trying lung administration of rifampicin by nebulization to increase the drug’s concentration at infection sites while minimizing systemic side effects. Recent in silico studies with a computer-aided approach, found rifampicin among the most promising existing drugs that could be repurposed for the treatment of COVID-19.
Core Tip: Rifampicin may prove pharmacologically effective, supplying a possible and cost-effective solution to the global battle against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, not only for treatment but also for chemoprophylaxis of those at higher risk. It is also possible to administer rifampicin by nebulization. The publications describing the in vitro mechanisms and providing proof of clinical efficacy of rifampicin against RNA viruses with their own RNA polymerase have emerged since 1969-1971. Recent in silico studies using a computer-aided approach, found rifampicin among the most promising existing drugs that can be repurposed for the treatment of coronavirus disease-2019.
- Citation: Panayiotakopoulos GD, Papadimitriou DT. Rifampicin for COVID-19. World J Virol 2022; 11(2): 90-97
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3249/full/v11/i2/90.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v11.i2.90
The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presents a puzzling challenge without specific treatment yet[1], and while vaccinations have been initiated more than a year before[2], there is still a long way to go before herd immunity can be achieved, even in the developed countries[3]. In the critically ill patients, plasma transfusions from recovered patients have been tried[4] and specific severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) memory T cells could also treat mode
Rifampicin, discovered in 1965, was marketed in Italy in 1968, and approved in the United States in 1971. It is on the World Health Organization's (WHO) list of essential medicines, classified by the WHO as critically important for human medicine. Made by the soil bacterium Amycolatopsis rifamycinica, rifampicin is widely available as a generic medication with an extremely low cost compared to any other modern antiviral medication. It belongs to the Rifamycins, characterized as antiviral drugs which inhibit transformation of cells by viruses[10]. While in the fourth wave of this pandemic, without specific medications available yet, along with the ongoing computational analysis of potential drugs[11], it becomes clearer that - at least for now and beyond active immunization - we still need to rely on one hand on the enhancement of our immune system and on the other hand on the known anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of some antibacterials and the emerging antiviral effects of old but precious drugs, such as rifampicin. For the first task, which is to strengthen our immunity, adding zinc sulphate increased patients’ discharges, decreasing the need for ventilation, intensive care unit admissions, and mortality[12]. Increased intracellular zinc concentrations seem to inhibit RNA-dependent polymerases, helping to support robust immune responses and modulating immune cell activity. For that task, researchers have tried high doses of vitamin C[13]. And last but not least, proper supplementation[14,15] or even adjunctive therapy with vitamin-D[16], to capitalize on its extra-skeletal immunomodulatory properties, may also prove valuable, playing a crucial role in enhancing and coordinating the immune system’s response to SARS-CoV-2 infection[17,18]. For that purpose, personalized immunotherapy approaches with agents/monoclonal antibodies that block receptors for interleukin-1/6 have been initiated, aiming to control the macrophage activation syndrome which has been suggested as a major mechanism of lung impairment in COVID-19[19]. Monoclonal antibodies have shown promising results, with prompt administration though being a key issue to exert their benefit[20]. Bamlanivimab, a neutralizing monoclonal antibody against SARS-CoV-2, reduced the incidence of COVID-19[21].
Herein, we discuss the possibility of repurposing rifampicin for COVID-19, and we call for immediate coordinated - international if possible - collaboration[22] in in vitro studies, open-label pilot trials, and definitive phase 3 clinical trials.
Careful analysis of the COVID-19 clinical characteristics and computed tomography scans indicates that the pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease, in which azithromycin and rifampicin are among first line treatment options, seems to share a striking analogy with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia[23]. Going back to 1969, a conventional antibacterial of proved pharmacological acceptability in man, rifampicin (or rifampin: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/Label/2018/050420s077,050627s020Lbl.pdf), was found to have a direct antiviral effect in some mammalian viruses as poxviruses including the causative agent of smallpox and mainly on viruses which have their own RNA polymerase[24], which is the case for SARS-CoV-2 and the main mechanism of action of remdesivir. Initially developed against Ebola, remdesivir raised hope, as it incorporates into nascent viral RNA chains and results in premature termination of viral replication. Remdesivir showed higher recovery and hospital discharge rates, but no significant reduction in mean time to clinical improvement or mortality[25].
Regarding large DNA viruses, the antiviral activity of rifampicin arises from its binding to the F-ring, highly conserved across mammalian poxviruses, which cannot mutate in response to rifampicin inhibition and thus provide a potential base for the development of broad-spectrum inhibitors against infectious poxviruses species in animals and humans[26]. However, the efficacy of rifampicin against viruses with their own RNA polymerase shares the same mechanism with its antibacterial activity against microbial RNA polymerases. The inhibitory mechanism of rifampicin on the RNA polymerases is a simple steric block of transcription elongation due to its ability to bind tightly to non-conserved parts of the structure, disrupting a critical RNA polymerase function[27]. The rifampicin molecule is a condensation product of 3-formyl rifamycin SV and 1-amino 4-methyl piperazine with the antiviral activity existing in the rifamycin part of the molecule. Its antiviral effect is reversible as removal of the drug late in the virus cycle leads to a mature and infectious virus even within 1 h. This would mean that careful monitoring of rifampicin levels may assure effectiveness. The selective antiviral effect of rifampicin involves inhibition of late viral protein synthesis[28], virion assembly[29], and the viral polymerase itself[30].
Table 1 summarizes the studies on the possible antiviral properties of rifampicin against SARS-CoV-2 presenting their main findings.
Ref. | Year | Findings |
Becker[10] | 1976 | Rifampicin belongs to the rifamycins, characterized as antiviral drugs which inhibit transformation of cells by viruses |
[24] | 1969 | Rifampicin has a direct antiviral effect in mammalian viruses as poxviruses including the causative agent of smallpox and on viruses which have their own RNA polymerase |
Campbell et al[27] | 2001 | The inhibition mechanism of rifampicin to the RNA polymerases is a simple steric block of transcription elongation due to its ability to bind tightly to non-conserved parts of the structure, disrupting a critical RNA polymerase function |
Ben-Ishai et al[28], Moss et al[29], McAuslan et al[30] | 1969 | Rifampicin inhibits the late viral protein synthesis, the virion assembly, and the viral polymerase itself |
Moshkowitz et al[31] | 1971 | Rifampicin’s antiviral effect is dependent on the administration route, with local application resulting in higher concentrations at the site of viral replication |
Tewes et al[32] | 2008 | Administration of rifampicin by nebulization is possible using aerosolized rifampicin-loaded polymeric microspheres |
And et al[36] | 1980 | Intracellular rifampicin concentrations exhibit effective antiviral activity against: Influenza virus A, African swine fever virus and cytomegalovirus |
Dardiri et al[37] | 1971 | |
Halsted et al[38] | 1972 |
Studies in volunteers have also shown a dependence of rifampicin’s antiviral effect on administration route, with local application resulting in higher concentrations of the drug at the site of viral replication[31]. This would suggest trying lung administration of rifampicin by nebulization[32], increasing the drug’s concentration at infection sites while minimizing systemic side effects. This approach, using aerosolized rifampicin-loaded polymeric microspheres, reduced most measures of tuberculosis infection in experimental animals[33]. However, since the major cell entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2 is the metallocarboxyl peptidase angiotensin receptor 2[34], whose expression is very low in the lung, the approach of lung administration may not exhibit the expected systemic antiviral effects of rifampicin and requires further investigation.
An effective intracellular concentration of rifampicin without serious toxicity seems possible and probable, given its pharmacokinetic profile, suitable also for chemoprophylaxis (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Rifampicin#section=Drug-Classes). Current studies have evaluated intravenous rifampicin 20 mg/kg for 2 wk followed by high dose oral formulation (35 mg/kg for 6-8 wk) for improved survival from adult tuberculous meningitis[35]. Data concerning intracellular rifampicin concentrations to exhibit effective antiviral activity against influenza virus A[36], African swine fever virus[37], and cytomegalovirus[38] have been already available.
The above finding may have just been verified by a recent in silico study using a computer-aided drug designing approach: Rifampicin was the most promising existing drug that could be repurposed for the treatment of COVID-19[39]. Moreover, using a comprehensive drug repurposing and molecular docking approach, prediction of potential inhibitors for RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of SARS-CoV-2 revealed that rifabutin could be an effective drug for COVID-19, having the lowest binding energy compared to the positive control remdesivir[40]. Rifabutin, however, belongs to the rifamycins (rifampicin, rifapentine, and rifabutin), but with rifampicin being the most used[41]. In silico virtual screening within the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs targeting the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, which is the critical enzyme for coronavirus replication, also placed rifampicin among the five most potent potential anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics[42]. Virtual screening of FDA-approved drugs targeting not only the main protease of SARS-CoV-2 but also TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β, which are the key molecules involved in the 'cytokine storm' occurring in COVID-19, indicated rifampicin as one of the most promising drugs for the treatment of COVID-19, together with letermovir[43]. These were systematic docking studies, further confirmed by molecular dynamics simulations and molecular calculations; however, such studies are prone to the high probability of artifacts needing experimental verification.
The SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (nsp12) catalyzes the replication of RNA from RNA templates. Changes in the virus life cycle are exhibited by the fixation of specific ligands in the active site of this crucial enzyme. A recent study found the highly conserved nsp12 motifs (A-G), and discovered the interactions with rifabutin and rifampicin, among other ligands. Both of them interacted with at least two nsp12 motifs, indicating that they could be both used as inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 nsp12 protein[44]. Another in silico docking approach also found that rifampicin has good binding affinity with the COVID-19 protease[45], proposing its use as therapeutic treatment as well as prophylaxis.
Of course, all the above findings require further validation by in vitro studies and clinical trials. Table 2 summarizes the in silico studies indicating effectiveness of rifampicin against SARS-CoV-2.
Ref. | Year | Findings |
Mishra et al[39] | 2020 | Using a computer-aided drug designing approach, rifampicin was the most promising existing drug that could be repurposed for the treatment of COVID-19 |
Parvez et al[40] | 2020 | Using a comprehensive drug repurposing and molecular docking approach, prediction of potential inhibitors for RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of SARS-CoV-2 revealed that rifabutin could be an effective drug for COVID-19, having the lowest binding energy compared to the positive control remdesivir |
Forrest et al[41] | 2010 | Rifabutin belongs to the rifamycins (rifampicin, rifapentine and rifabutin); rifampicin is the most used |
Pokhrel et al[42] | 2020 | In silico virtual screen within the United States Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs targeting the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, which is the critical enzyme for coronavirus replication, placed rifampicin among the five most potent potential anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics |
Pathak et al[43] | 2021 | A similar approach, by targeting the main protease of SARS-CoV-2 but also TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, revealed rifampicin as one of the most promising drugs |
Elkarhat et al[44] | 2020 | The SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (nsp12) catalyzes the replication of RNA from RNA templates. Changes in the virus life cycle are exhibited by the fixation of specific ligands in the active site of this crucial enzyme. A recent study found the highly conserved nsp12 motifs, and discovered the interactions with rifabutin and rifampicin, concluding that both could function as inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 nsp12 protein |
Soni et al[45] | 2020 | An in silico docking approach also found that rifampicin has good binding affinity with the COVID-19 protease, proposing its use as therapeutic treatment as well as prophylaxis |
Experience from coadministration of antitubercular use of rifampicin with antiretroviral therapy may, however, be complicated by drug-to-drug interactions concerning drug metabolism and transport[46], which warrants caution in clinical trials designed to test the efficacy of rifampicin against SARS-CoV-2 in case of co-administration with other drugs that are also metabolized in the liver. A plan is needed to treat COVID-19 in the special group of patients with advanced liver disease[47], as rifampicin is an agonist of the nuclear pregnane nuclear receptor that regulates CYP3A4[48,49], a part of cytochrome P450 enzymes that metabolizes 60% of prescribed drugs. Thus, rifampicin can cause serious drug-to-drug interactions in combination with other medications for COVID-19 treatment. Also, it should be noted that concerning rifampicin, therapeutic drug monitoring is needed when extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is to be used as a life-saving system for critically ill patients with cardiac and/or respiratory failure[50]. The co-administration of plant-derived compounds such as gallic acid and tannic acid, which are effective potentiators resulting in a 4-fold increase in the potency of rifampicin, warrants further study[51]. A known infrequent occurrence, with few cases reported in the literature, of rifampicin-induced pneumonitis mimicking acute respiratory distress syndrome and requiring SARS-CoV-2 testing[52], merits caution. Because of an uncommon immuno-allergic reaction, following intermittent rifampin administration, with disseminated intravascular coagulation including fever, hypotension, abdominal pain, and vomiting within hours of ingestion[53], awareness is warranted for COVID-19 patients suffering from the life-threatening cytokine storm syndrome[54]. Hence, even in the latter case, as in an allergic reaction to rifampicin, apart from targeted anti-cytokine therapy[55], broadly immunosuppressive glucocorticoids would be of value.
Rifampicin is not the only antibiotic that could be repurposed for COVID-19. Quinupristin, for example, is an antibiotic in clinical use for two decades now with minor side effects and has also proven in silico potentially effective against SARS-CoV-2[42]. However, the knowledge and clinical experience as well as the safety profile of rifampicin even in neonates, infants[56], and pregnant woman[57] make a compelling case where alternative therapeutic options are limited. Last, but not least in this instance, the particularly low cost and the potential for worldwide availability of rifampicin as a generic medication may prove a worthy solution, for early intervention protocols against SARS-CoV-2.
A recent case report described the favorable outcome under treatment with chloroquine and rifampin of an unusual association of COVID-19, pulmonary tuberculosis, and human immunodeficiency virus infection[58], attributed either to rifampicin inhibiting the formation of mRNA of SARS-CoV-2 and/or the possible synergistic effect of chloroquine and rifampin, despite that anti-tubercular drugs such as rifampicin are powerful enzyme inducers that can reduce the effectiveness of chloroquine. Up to now, there are no clinical studies available on the treatment of COVID-19 patients with rifampicin. Anecdotally, experienced pediatricians have also successfully treated neonates and infants[59] found positive for SARS-CoV-2 with rifampicin, clearly aiming for their protection with their parents suffering overt COVID-19 with an eventful clinical course.
Timely administration, though, is important for all current regimens on trial: It must not be too late when treatment starts. Specifically, rifampicin interferes with the viral replication, and thus, early administration after diagnosis of COVID-19 could make a significant difference to its presumed effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Similarly, for rifampicin’s use for postexposure prophylaxis to people exposed to index cases of invasive meningococcal infection, pre-exposure together with post-exposure prophylaxis could also be a potential strategy, at least for unvaccinated people[60]. The WHO proposed a similar approach for people at elevated risk for infection, before or after exposure, during the influenza pandemic.
Facing this unprecedented global emergency and given the experience, safety, and knowledge behind rifampicin, we call for international collaboration proposing in vitro studies, open-label pilot trials, and definite phase 3 clinical trials for testing treatment and chemoprophylaxis efficacy of rifampicin against COVID-19. With all the above compelling evidence, rifampicin merits evaluation against COVID-19.
Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.
Peer-review model: Single blind
Specialty type: Virology
Country/Territory of origin: Greece
Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification
Grade A (Excellent): 0
Grade B (Very good): B
Grade C (Good): 0
Grade D (Fair): 0
Grade E (Poor): 0
P-Reviewer: Wang CY S-Editor: Zhang H L-Editor: Wang TQ P-Editor: Zhang H
1. | Pagliano P, Scarpati G, Sellitto C, Conti V, Spera AM, Ascione T, Piazza O, Filippelli A. Experimental Pharmacotherapy for COVID-19: The Latest Advances. J Exp Pharmacol. 2021;13:1-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Williams J, Degeling C, McVernon J, Dawson A. How should we conduct pandemic vaccination? Vaccine. 2021;39:994-999. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Ghaffari A, Meurant R, Ardakani A. COVID-19 Point-of-Care Diagnostics That Satisfy Global Target Product Profiles. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Mandel M, Gurevich M, Mandelboim M, Amital H, Achiron A. Convalescent Whole Blood Donors Screening Strategies for Providing Efficient and Safe COVID-19 Survivors' Plasma and Other Blood Components. Isr Med Assoc J. 2021;23:7-10. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
5. | Ferreras C, Pascual-Miguel B, Mestre-Durán C, Navarro-Zapata A, Clares-Villa L, Martín-Cortázar C, De Paz R, Marcos A, Vicario JL, Balas A, García-Sánchez F, Eguizabal C, Solano C, Mora-Rillo M, Soria B, Pérez-Martínez A. SARS-CoV-2-Specific Memory T Lymphocytes From COVID-19 Convalescent Donors: Identification, Biobanking, and Large-Scale Production for Adoptive Cell Therapy. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:620730. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Singh A, Gupta V. SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics: how far do we stand from a remedy? Pharmacol Rep. 2021;73:750-768. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Tahiri Joutei Hassani R, Bennis A. Hydroxychloroquine as antiviral prophylaxis for exposed caregivers to Covid-19: An urgent appraisal is needed. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13:865-867. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Neagu M. The bumpy road to achieve herd immunity in COVID-19. J Immunoassay Immunochem. 2020;41:928-945. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Shim E. Projecting the Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Variants and the Vaccination Program on the Fourth Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in South Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Becker Y. Antiviral Drugs which Inhibit Transformation of Cells by Viruses. Monogr Virol. 1976;11. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] |
11. | Murugan NA, Kumar S, Jeyakanthan J, Srivastava V. Searching for target-specific and multi-targeting organics for Covid-19 in the Drugbank database with a double scoring approach. Sci Rep. 2020;10:19125. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 33] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43] [Article Influence: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Carlucci PM, Ahuja T, Petrilli C, Rajagopalan H, Jones S, Rahimian J. Zinc sulfate in combination with a zinc ionophore may improve outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. J Med Microbiol. 2020;69:1228-1234. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 109] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 101] [Article Influence: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Zhang J, Rao X, Li Y, Zhu Y, Liu F, Guo G, Luo G, Meng Z, De Backer D, Xiang H, Peng Z. Pilot trial of high-dose vitamin C in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2021;11:5. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 158] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 154] [Article Influence: 51.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
14. | Papadimitriou DT, Vassaras AK, Holick MF. Association between population vitamin D status and SARS-CoV-2 related serious-critical illness and deaths: An ecological integrative approach. World J Virol. 2021;10:111-129. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in CrossRef: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Papadimitriou DT. The Big Vitamin D Mistake. J Prev Med Public Health. 2017;50:278-281. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Lakkireddy M, Gadiga SG, Malathi RD, Karra ML, Raju ISSVPM, Ragini, Chinapaka S, Baba KSSS, Kandakatla M. Impact of daily high dose oral vitamin D therapy on the inflammatory markers in patients with COVID 19 disease. Sci Rep. 2021;11:10641. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 43] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57] [Article Influence: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
17. | Morabia A, Costanza MC. Vitamin D as in different. Prev Med. 2010;51:195-196. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
18. | Maghbooli Z, Sahraian MA, Ebrahimi M, Pazoki M, Kafan S, Tabriz HM, Hadadi A, Montazeri M, Nasiri M, Shirvani A, Holick MF. Vitamin D sufficiency, a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at least 30 ng/mL reduced risk for adverse clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0239799. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 202] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 164] [Article Influence: 41.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Iqubal A, Hoda F, Najmi AK, Haque SE. Macrophage Activation and Cytokine Release Syndrome in COVID-19: Current Updates and Analysis of Repurposed and Investigational Anti-Cytokine Drugs. Drug Res (Stuttg). 2021;71:173-179. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
20. | Tuccori M, Ferraro S, Convertino I, Cappello E, Valdiserra G, Blandizzi C, Maggi F, Focosi D. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies: clinical pipeline. MAbs. 2020;12:1854149. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 120] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73] [Article Influence: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
21. | Cohen MS, Nirula A, Mulligan MJ, Novak RM, Marovich M, Yen C, Stemer A, Mayer SM, Wohl D, Brengle B, Montague BT, Frank I, McCulloh RJ, Fichtenbaum CJ, Lipson B, Gabra N, Ramirez JA, Thai C, Chege W, Gomez Lorenzo MM, Sista N, Farrior J, Clement ME, Brown ER, Custer KL, Van Naarden J, Adams AC, Schade AE, Dabora MC, Knorr J, Price KL, Sabo J, Tuttle JL, Klekotka P, Shen L, Skovronsky DM; BLAZE-2 Investigators. Effect of Bamlanivimab vs Placebo on Incidence of COVID-19 Among Residents and Staff of Skilled Nursing and Assisted Living Facilities: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021;326:46-55. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 123] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 141] [Article Influence: 47.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
22. | Bowen AC, Tong SY, Davis JS. Australia needs a prioritised national research strategy for clinical trials in a pandemic: lessons learned from COVID-19. Med J Aust. 2021;215:56-58.e1. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
23. | Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, Wang B, Xiang H, Cheng Z, Xiong Y, Zhao Y, Li Y, Wang X, Peng Z. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323:1061-1069. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 14113] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14504] [Article Influence: 3626.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
25. | Al-Abdouh A, Bizanti A, Barbarawi M, Jabri A, Kumar A, Fashanu OE, Khan SU, Zhao D, Antar AAR, Michos ED. Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021;101:106272. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 63] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 55] [Article Influence: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
26. | Garriga D, Headey S, Accurso C, Gunzburg M, Scanlon M, Coulibaly F. Structural basis for the inhibition of poxvirus assembly by the antibiotic rifampicin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:8424-8429. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
27. | Campbell EA, Korzheva N, Mustaev A, Murakami K, Nair S, Goldfarb A, Darst SA. Structural mechanism for rifampicin inhibition of bacterial rna polymerase. Cell. 2001;104:901-912. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 999] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 976] [Article Influence: 42.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
28. | Ben-Ishai Z, Heller E, Goldblum N, Becker Y. Rifampicin and poxvirus replication. Nature. 1969;224:29-32. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 46] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
29. | Moss B, Rosenblum EN, Katz E, Grimley PM. Rifampicin: a specific inhibitor of vaccinia virus assembly. Nature. 1969;224:1280-1284. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 168] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 167] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
30. | Mcauslan BR. Rifampicin inhibition of vaccinia replication. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1969;37:289-295. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 43] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 45] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
31. | Moshkowitz A, Goldblum N, Heller E. Studies on the antiviral effect of rifampicin in volunteers. Nature. 1971;229:422-424. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 20] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
32. | Tewes F, Brillault J, Couet W, Olivier JC. Formulation of rifampicin-cyclodextrin complexes for lung nebulization. J Control Release. 2008;129:93-99. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 71] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 74] [Article Influence: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
33. | Garcia-Contreras L, Sethuraman V, Kazantseva M, Godfrey V, Hickey AJ. Evaluation of dosing regimen of respirable rifampicin biodegradable microspheres in the treatment of tuberculosis in the guinea pig. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58:980-986. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 42] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43] [Article Influence: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
34. | Scialo F, Daniele A, Amato F, Pastore L, Matera MG, Cazzola M, Castaldo G, Bianco A. ACE2: The Major Cell Entry Receptor for SARS-CoV-2. Lung. 2020;198:867-877. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 129] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 288] [Article Influence: 72.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
35. | Cresswell FV, Ssebambulidde K, Grint D, Te Brake L, Musabire A, Atherton RR, Tugume L, Muzoora C, Lukande R, Lamorde M, Aarnoutse R, Meya D, Boulware DR, Elliott AM. High dose oral and intravenous rifampicin for improved survival from adult tuberculous meningitis: a phase II open-label randomised controlled trial (the RifT study). Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:83. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
36. | Hamzehei M, Ledinko N. Inhibition of influenza A virus replication by rifampicin and selenocystamine. J Med Virol. 1980;6:169-174. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
37. | Dardiri AH, Bachrach HL, Heller E. Inhibition by rifampin of African swine fever virus replication in tissue culture. Infect Immun. 1971;4:34-36. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
38. | Halsted CC, Minnefor AB, Lietman PS. Inhibition of cytomegalovirus by rifampin. J Infect Dis. 1972;125:552-555. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
39. | Kumar A, Mishra DC, Angadi UB, Yadav R, Rai A, Kumar D. Inhibition Potencies of Phytochemicals Derived from Sesame Against SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease: A Molecular Docking and Simulation Study. Front Chem. 2021;9:744376. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
40. | Parvez MSA, Karim MA, Hasan M, Jaman J, Karim Z, Tahsin T, Hasan MN, Hosen MJ. Prediction of potential inhibitors for RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of SARS-CoV-2 using comprehensive drug repurposing and molecular docking approach. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;163:1787-1797. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 51] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47] [Article Influence: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
41. | Forrest GN, Tamura K. Rifampin combination therapy for nonmycobacterial infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23:14-34. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 161] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 168] [Article Influence: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
42. | Pokhrel R, Chapagain P, Siltberg-Liberles J. Potential RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors as prospective therapeutics against SARS-CoV-2. J Med Microbiol. 2020;69:864-873. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 48] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 39] [Article Influence: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
43. | Pathak Y, Mishra A, Choudhir G, Kumar A, Tripathi V. Rifampicin and Letermovir as potential repurposed drug candidate for COVID-19 treatment: insights from an in-silico study. Pharmacol Rep. 2021;73:926-938. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
44. | Elkarhat Z, Charoute H, Elkhattabi L, Barakat A, Rouba H. Potential inhibitors of SARS-cov-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase protein: molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations and MM-PBSA analyses. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2022;40:361-374. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
45. | Soni H, Gautam D, Sharma S, Malik J. Rifampicin as potent inhibitor of COVID-19 main protease: in-silico docking approach. Saudi Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2020;588. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] |
46. | Semvua HH, Kibiki GS, Kisanga ER, Boeree MJ, Burger DM, Aarnoutse R. Pharmacological interactions between rifampicin and antiretroviral drugs: challenges and research priorities for resource-limited settings. Ther Drug Monit. 2015;37:22-32. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 32] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35] [Article Influence: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
47. | Hanafy AS, Abd-Elsalam S. Challenges in COVID-19 drug treatment in patients with advanced liver diseases: A hepatology perspective. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26:7272-7286. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in CrossRef: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
48. | Chen J, Raymond K. Roles of rifampicin in drug-drug interactions: underlying molecular mechanisms involving the nuclear pregnane X receptor. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2006;5:3. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 152] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 195] [Article Influence: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
49. | Li T, Chiang JY. Rifampicin induction of CYP3A4 requires pregnane X receptor cross talk with hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha and coactivators, and suppression of small heterodimer partner gene expression. Drug Metab Dispos. 2006;34:756-764. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 90] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 96] [Article Influence: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
50. | Hahn J, Choi JH, Chang MJ. Pharmacokinetic changes of antibiotic, antiviral, antituberculosis and antifungal agents during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critically ill adult patients. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017;42:661-671. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 32] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37] [Article Influence: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
51. | Sadeer NB, Mahomoodally MF. Antibiotic Potentiation of Natural Products: A Promising Target to Fight Pathogenic Bacteria. Curr Drug Targets. 2021;22:555-572. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
52. | Ata F, Shaher Mousa Hussein M, Mismar AY, Sharma R, Bozom IAM, Alsiddig Ali Ibrahim Z, Ibrahim WH. Rifampicin-Induced Pneumonitis Mimicking Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia Infection. Am J Case Rep. 2020;21:e927586. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
53. | Sadanshiv M, George AA, Mishra AK, Kuriakose CK. Rifampicin-induced immune allergic reaction. Trop Doct. 2018;48:156-159. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
54. | Cron RQ, Caricchio R, Chatham WW. Calming the cytokine storm in COVID-19. Nat Med. 2021;27:1674-1675. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 92] [Article Influence: 30.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
55. | Kyriazopoulou E, Poulakou G, Milionis H, Metallidis S, Adamis G, Tsiakos K, Fragkou A, Rapti A, Damoulari C, Fantoni M, Kalomenidis I, Chrysos G, Angheben A, Kainis I, Alexiou Z, Castelli F, Serino FS, Tsilika M, Bakakos P, Nicastri E, Tzavara V, Kostis E, Dagna L, Koufargyris P, Dimakou K, Savvanis S, Tzatzagou G, Chini M, Cavalli G, Bassetti M, Katrini K, Kotsis V, Tsoukalas G, Selmi C, Bliziotis I, Samarkos M, Doumas M, Ktena S, Masgala A, Papanikolaou I, Kosmidou M, Myrodia DM, Argyraki A, Cardellino CS, Koliakou K, Katsigianni EI, Rapti V, Giannitsioti E, Cingolani A, Micha S, Akinosoglou K, Liatsis-Douvitsas O, Symbardi S, Gatselis N, Mouktaroudi M, Ippolito G, Florou E, Kotsaki A, Netea MG, Eugen-Olsen J, Kyprianou M, Panagopoulos P, Dalekos GN, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ. Early treatment of COVID-19 with anakinra guided by soluble urokinase plasminogen receptor plasma levels: a double-blind, randomized controlled phase 3 trial. Nat Med. 2021;27:1752-1760. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 330] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 343] [Article Influence: 114.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
56. | Smith PB, Cotten CM, Hudak ML, Sullivan JE, Poindexter BB, Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Boakye-Agyeman F, Lewandowski A, Anand R, Benjamin DK Jr, Laughon MM; Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act—Pediatric Trials Network Steering Committee. Rifampin Pharmacokinetics and Safety in Preterm and Term Infants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
57. | Bothamley G. Drug treatment for tuberculosis during pregnancy: safety considerations. Drug Saf. 2001;24:553-565. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 101] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 78] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
58. | Bouaré F, Laghmari M, Etouche FN, Arjdal B, Saidi I, Hajhouji F, Ghannane H, Amro L, Tassi N, Benali SA. Unusual association of COVID-19, pulmonary tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus, having progressed favorably under treatment with chloroquine and rifampin. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;35:110. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
59. | Zimmermann P, Curtis N. COVID-19 in Children, Pregnancy and Neonates: A Review of Epidemiologic and Clinical Features. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020;39:469-477. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 257] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 230] [Article Influence: 57.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
60. | Mitjà O, Clotet B. Use of antiviral drugs to reduce COVID-19 transmission. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8:e639-e640. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 129] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 104] [Article Influence: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |