Published online Sep 18, 2023. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i5.264
Peer-review started: June 28, 2023
First decision: August 4, 2023
Revised: August 17, 2023
Accepted: September 4, 2023
Article in press: September 4, 2023
Published online: September 18, 2023
Processing time: 78 Days and 8.9 Hours
Infections, including invasive fungal infections (IFIs), are among the leading causes of mortality in liver transplant recipients during the first year post-transplantation.
To investigate the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, risk factors, treatment outcomes, and mortality rate of post-liver transplantation invasive aspergillosis (IA).
In this case-control study, 22 patients with IA were identified by reviewing the archived and electronic medical records of 850 patients who received liver transplants at the Imam Khomeini Hospital complex in Tehran, Iran, between 2014 and 2019. The control group comprised 38 patients without IA infection matched for age and sex. The information obtained included the baseline characteristics of liver transplant patients, operative reports, post-transplantation characteristics of both groups and information about the fungal infection of the patient group.
The prevalence rate of IA among liver transplant recipients at Imam Khomeini Hospital was 2.7%. The risk factors of IA among studied patients included high serum creatinine levels before and post-transplant, renal replacement therapy, antithymocyte globulin induction therapy, post-transplant bile leakage, post-transplant hepatic artery thrombosis, repeated surgery within 30 d after the transplant, bacterial pneumonia before the aspergillosis diagnosis, receiving systemic antibiotics before the aspergillus infection, cytomegalovirus infection, and duration of post-transplant hospitalization in the intensive care unit. The most prevalent form of infection was invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, and the most common chest computed tomography scan findings were nodules, pleural effusion, and the halo sign. In the case group, prophylactic antifungal therapy was administered more frequently than in the control group. The antifungal therapy response rate at 12 wk was 63.7%. The 3- and 12- mo mortality rates of the patients with IA were 36.4% and 45.4%, respectively (compared with the mortality rate of the control group in 12 mo, which was zero).
In this study, the prevalence of IA among liver transplant recipients was relatively low. However, it was one of the leading causes of mortality following liver transplantation. Targeted antifungal therapy may be a factor in the low incidence of infections at our facility. Identifying the risk factors of IFIs, maintaining an elevated level of clinical suspicion, and initiating early antifungal treatment may significantly improve the prognosis and reduce the mortality rate of liver transplant recipients.
Core Tip: In our center, invasive aspergillosis had a low incidence but a high mortality rate among liver transplant recipients. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis was the most prevalent form of infection. Nodules, pleural effusion, and halo signs were the most commonly observed findings on chest computed tomography scans. Antifungal prophylaxis was more prevalent in the case group than in the control group. At week 6 of antifungal treatment, more than 60% of patients experienced complete recovery or relative response to therapy.
- Citation: Farahani A, Ghiasvand F, Davoudi S, Ahmadinejad Z. Invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients, an infectious complication with low incidence but significant mortality. World J Transplant 2023; 13(5): 264-275
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v13/i5/264.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v13.i5.264
Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is one of the most common invasive fungal infections (IFIs) following solid organ transplants (SOT) and the leading cause of mortality and morbidity among transplant recipients. Several studies have reported rates of IA in organ transplant recipients between 1% and 15%[1-4]. In the TRANSNET study, an extensive cohort study on the prevalence of IFI in SOT recipients, the annual incidence rate of IA was 0.65%, second only to candidiasis[5].
IA typically develops 1 to 3 mo after a transplant[6]. However, delayed IA (6 mo after transplant) has recently been reported[7]. In a Swiss Transplant cohort study, the incidence of IA among liver transplant recipients was significantly lower than among recipients of other organ transplants[8]. In immunocompromised hosts, Aspergillus can infect every organ; however, sinopulmonary involvements are more common. Involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) and multiple organs is more prevalent in liver transplants than in other SOT[9].
The mortality rate of IA among recipients of liver transplants has not fallen over the past 15 years (compared with other SOTs). The 90-day mortality rate of liver transplant recipients with IA is higher than that of recipients of other organ transplants (85.7% vs 15.9%)[8,10].
Early diagnosis and proper treatment of IA are associated with a more favorable prognosis. Noninvasive modalities (such as imaging and antigen detection) aid in antifungal treatment initiation and duration. However, aggressive diagnostic approaches, such as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), should be considered for patients with imaging findings suggestive of IA[11,12].
Investigations revealed that BAL culture has a sensitivity of 50% in focal pulmonary lesions[13]. In such instances, a definitive diagnosis necessitates aggressive procedures, such as a thoracoscopic biopsy. Invasive diseases are strongly predicted by isolating Aspergillus species from sputum or BAL samples[14]. In the early stages of IA, single or multiple nodules are the most frequent finding on computed tomography (CT) scans[15]. Halo sign with peri-nodular haziness is a reliable indicator of IA[16]. In serial CT scan studies, the halo sign decreases during the first week, while the air crescent sign (another radiologic marker of pulmonary IA) increases[17]. Despite the clinical response to antifungal therapy, pulmonary lesions increase in size during the first week of treatment.
Positive serum and BAL galactomannan (GM), in conjunction with IA predisposing factors of the host, clinical and imaging findings consistent with IA, eliminate the need for invasive procedures in diagnosing IA[18]. The GM sensitivity decreases in the case of simultaneous use of active antimold agents[19]. Historically, Piperacillin-Tazobactam has been linked to false positive GM results[20]. Blood[21,22] and BAL[23,24] Aspergillus PCR are used for initial IA diagnosis. However, further prospective studies are required to investigate the combination of diagnostic modalities in the early IA stages.
Voriconazole is more effective than amphotericin B in the early treatment of IA and significantly improves survival (71% vs 58%)[25]. Voriconazole improved the prognosis of CNS involvements[26], which in most cases resulted in high mortality rates[27]. Accordingly, it is recommended as the treatment of choice for IA. There are no clinical trials involving echinocandins as a first-line treatment for IA. Recent attention has been drawn to a combination of echinocandin and amphotericin B or azoles, and in vitro, studies have confirmed the synergistic effect of this combination[28,29].
In probable aspergillus cases, a combination of echinocandin with amphotericin B was associated with 40%-60% prognosis improvement[30,31]. Marr et al[32] reported survival improvement by combining voriconazole and echinocandin (compared with voriconazole alone). However, further studies are required to investigate the advantages of combination therapy in IA. Patients who recovered a single episode of IA are at higher risk of re-infection during immunosuppressive therapy. Therefore, effective antifungal prophylaxis is recommended, particularly in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) group[33,34].
This study examined the prevalence, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, risk factors, antifungal therapy response, and prognosis of IA infection in liver transplant recipients.
The study population consisted of liver transplant recipients in the Imam Khomeini Hospital complex between 2014 and 2019. This hospital is a major referral and educational hospital and the second-largest center of liver transplants in Iran, with over 100 transplants per year.
The study included all patients who received a liver transplant between 2014 and 2019 and were diagnosed with probable/proven IA.
Multi-organ transplant recipients were excluded from the study.
Patients without IFI after the liver transplant. The following formula was utilized to determine the sample size of the control group:
Z tests-Correlations: Two independent Pearson r's; Analysis: A priori: Compute required sample size; Input: Tail (s) = One; Effect size q = 0.84; α err probability = 0.05; Power (1-β err probability) = 0.90; Allocation ratio N2/N1 = 2.
Critical z = 1.6448536; Sample size group 1 (case) = 21; Sample size group 2 (control) = 42; Total sample size = 63; Actual power = 0.9037178.
A questionnaire containing the necessary information was created and filled out using data from liver transplant recipients' electronic and non-electronic medical records. The pre-transplant information included: Age, sex, underlying diseases, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization before the transplant, ventilator support during the week before the transplant, fungal colonization or infection within three months before the transplant, dialysis within the month before the transplant, diabetes mellitus, bacteremia within a month before the transplant, bacterial peritonitis before the transplant, cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology, and creatinine level before the transplant.
The peri-transplant information included: The date of transplant, transplant type (from deceased or living donor), type of anastomosis (duct to duct or Roux-en-Y), cold ischemia time (measured by minutes), and the number of transfused blood units (packed cells) during the operation.
The post-transplant information of the patients included: Induction therapy, type of antifungal prophylaxis after transplant, repeated surgery within 30 d after the transplant, ICU admission duration, mechanical ventilation after the transplant, bacteremia and pneumonia within 2 wk before IA diagnosis, creatinine level at the time of diagnosis, CMV viremia or disease within one month before the diagnosis, transplant rejection requiring treatment within three months before the diagnosis of IA.
Aspergillus information included: The time of infection, proven or probable diagnosis, the involved organ, the result of fungus culture, GM, pathology, PCR, radiologic findings, type of antifungal treatment, response to treatment at weeks 6 and 12, death within 12 mo of diagnosis, repeated transplant within 3 mo of diagnosis, and transplant rejection requiring treatment within three months of diagnosis. Proven and probable diagnoses of IA were defined according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria[35].
The surgical methods, preventative measures, and immunosuppressive regimen utilized at our center are described in another article[36]. However, since 2018, the antifungal prophylaxis method has been changed from universal to targeted prophylaxis, and since 2020, the diagnosis of CMV infection has been based on PCR rather than CMVPP65 Ag detection.
The Institutional Review Board of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences approved the study with the file number (IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1399.874). The patients' information was registered anonymously in questionnaires. Due to the study's retrospective nature, no written consent was obtained from the patients.
The data was analyzed using SPSS version 26. The data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) to present quantitative variables with normal distribution and frequency (%) for qualitative variables. The qualitative variables were analyzed by chi-squared test, and continuous quantitative variables with normal distribution were analyzed with Student's t-test. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Multiple logistic regression analyses (both multivariate and bivariate) were performed.
Between 2014 and 2019, 850 patients received a liver transplant at the Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex in Tehran, Iran. Investigations of these patients' medical records revealed 22 cases of IA. To examine the risk factors of IA, 38 liver transplant recipients without a history of IA who matched the case group regarding age and sex were selected as the control group and enrolled in the study. Table 1 summarizes both groups' demographic and pretransplant information (cases and controls).
Covariate | Case | Control | P value | OR (95%CI) |
Gender (Male) | 18 (81.8%) | 31 (81.6%) | 0.9 | - |
Gender (Female) | 4 (18.2%) | 7 (18.4%) | 0.9 | - |
Age mean (SD) | 45.27 (14.85) | 47.21 (12.03) | 0.58 | - |
MELD score (SD) | 21.05 (6.78) | 20.24 (5.54) | 0.62 | - |
Pretransplant ICU stay | 1.95 (0.22) | 1.97 (0.16) | 0.9 | - |
Duration of pretransplant ICU stay | 2 (1) | 1 (0) | 0.27 | - |
Pretransplant creatinine | 1.74 (1.03) | 1.22 (0.47) | 0.04 | 0.34 (0.13-0.87) |
Pretransplant ventilator within 1 wk | - | 1 (2.6%) | 0.9 | - |
Pretransplant dialysis within 1 mo | - | 1 (2.6%) | 0.9 | - |
Pretransplant diabetes mellitus | 12 (54.5%) | 15 (39.5%) | 0.26 | - |
Fulminant hepatic failure | 6 (27.3%) | 2 (5.3%) | 0.18 | - |
Immunosuppressive agents (steroids) | 2 (9.1%) | 6 (15.8%) | 0.08 | - |
Immunosuppressive agent (antimetabolites) | 1 (4.5%) | 1 (2.6%) | 0.08 | - |
Immunosuppressive agent (steroids & antimetabolites) | 1 (4.5%) | 0 | 0.08 | - |
Immunosuppressive agent (steroids & calcineurin inhibitors) | 1 (4.5%) | 0 | 0.08 | - |
Immunosuppressive agent (no) | 12 (54.5%) | 31 (81.6%) | 0.08 | - |
The pretransplant episode of documented bacterial peritonitis | 3 (13.6%) | 5 (13.2%) | 0.9 | - |
Previous systemic antibiotic use of more than 14 consecutive days | 5 (22.7%) | 6 (15.8%) | 0.51 | - |
Re transplantation | 5 (22.7%) | 3 (7.9%) | 0.13 | - |
Of 22 patients with IA infection, 18 (81.8%) were male, and 4 (18.2%) were female. The mean ± SD age of the patients was 45.27 ± 14.85 years. In the control group, 31 (81.6%) were male, and the mean age of the control group was 47.21 (SD = 12.03). The mean number of MELD scores in the case and control groups was similar (21.05 vs 20.24). The blood creatinine level in the case group before the transplant was significantly higher than in the control group [1.74 mg/dL vs 1.22 mg/dL, P value 0.04, odds ratio (OR): 0.34; confidence interval (CI): 0.13-0.87)]. There were no statistically significant differences between the proportions of fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) patients in the patient and control groups [P value = 0.18; 27.3% (n = 6) and 5.3% (n = 2), respectively]. A higher percentage of IA patients were re-transplants [22.7% (n = 5) vs 7.9% (n = 3), P = 0.13], but the difference was not statistically significant. The mean time between liver transplantation and occurrence of IA was 313 ± 337.64 d (range 15-1350 d).
The most prevalent symptom of IA was pulmonary aspergillosis. Of the 22 cases of IA, nine patients had confirmed IA, and 13 had probable IA. Amphotericin B was the primary antifungal treatment (empirical therapy) for 72.6% of the patients. Nodular lesions and halo signs were the most common radiographic findings among the patients (50% and 45.5%, respectively). At week 6 of antifungal therapy, complete recovery and response to treatment were observed in 10 patients (45.5%), and relative response to treatment was observed in 4 patients (18.2%). The mortality rate after the study period was 36.4%. (8 patients). Table 2 presents the patients' information regarding IA.
Covariate | Number (percent) |
Diagnosis (proven) | 9 (40.9%) |
Diagnosis (probable) | 13 (59.1%) |
Site of diagnosis (isolated pulmonary) | 19 (86.4%) |
Site of diagnosis (isolated sinusitis) | 2 (9.1%) |
Site of diagnosis (peritonitis) | 1 (4.5%) |
Positive galactomannan (serum) | 5 (22.7%) |
Positive galactomannan (BAL) | 8 (36.4%) |
Positive galactomannan (N/A) | 9 (40.9%) |
PCR (positive) | 8 (36.4%) |
PCR (negative) | 3 (13.6%) |
PCR (N/A) | 11 (50%) |
Pathology (positive) | 2 (9.1%) |
Pathology (negative) | 4 (18.2%) |
Pathology (N/A) | 16 (72.7%) |
Fungal culture (positive) | 10 (45.5%) |
Fungal culture (negative) | 2 (9.1%) |
Fungal culture (N/A) | 10 (45.5%) |
Site of positive culture (sputum) | 2 (9.1%) |
Site of positive culture (BAL) | 6 (27.3%) |
Site of positive culture (sinus biopsy) | 4 (18.2%) |
Site of positive culture (pulmonary biopsy) | 1 (4.5%) |
Site of positive culture (peritonitis) | 1 (4.5%) |
CT scan findings (nodules) | 11 (50%) |
CT scan findings (ground glass opacity) | 2 (9.1%) |
CT scan findings (halo sign) | 10 (45.5%) |
CT scan findings (consolidation) | 5 (22.7%) |
CT scan findings (cavity) | 3 (13.6%) |
CT scan findings (pleural effusion) | 7 (31.8%) |
Treatment response at 6 & 12 wk (cure) | 10 (45.5%) |
Treatment response at 6 & 12 wk (partial response) | 4 (18.2%) |
Treatment response at 6 & 12 wk (stable) | - |
Treatment response at 6 & 12 wk (progression) | - |
Treatment response at 6 & 12 wk (death) | 8 (36.4%) |
12- month mortality | 10 (4.45%) |
Among the variables related to the peritransplant period, four variables, including induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) [case no = 8 (36.4%), control no = 6 (15.8%), P value < 0.001, OR: 0.08, CI: 0.02-0.41] biliary leakage (case no = 9 [40.9%], control no = 0, P value < 0.001]), reoperation within 30 d of the transplant [case no = 12 (54.5%), control no = 5 (13.2%), P value < 0.001, OR = 7.92, CI: 2.25-27.94], and hepatic artery thrombosis [case no = 8 (36.4%), control no = 1 (2.6%), OR = 21.14, CI: 2.42-184.79], were significantly higher among patients with IA (Table 3).
Covariate | Case | Control | P value | OR (95%CI) |
Type of anastomosis (duct to duct) | 16 (72.7%) | 30 (78.9%) | 0.53 | - |
Type of anastomosis (Roux-en-Y) | 6 (27.3%) | 8 (21.1%) | 0.53 | - |
Cold ischemic time (h) | 283.95 (66.58) | 300.37 (58.39) | 0.32 | - |
Underlying disease (NASH) | 6 (27.3%) | 6 (15.8%) | 0.74 | - |
Underlying disease (PSC) | 3 (13.6%) | 8 (21.1%) | 0.74 | - |
Underlying disease (HBV) | 3 (13.6%) | 5 (13.2%) | 0.74 | - |
Underlying disease (HCV) | 2 (9.1%) | 1 (2.6%) | 0.74 | - |
Underlying disease (AIH) | 1 (4.5%) | 3 (7.9%) | 0.74 | - |
Underlying disease (AIH & HCC) | 1 (4.5%) | 1 (2.6%) | 0.74 | - |
Underlying disease (HCV & NASH) | 1 (4.5%) | - | 0.74 | - |
Underlying disease (PBC) | 1 (4.5%) | - | 0.74 | - |
Underlying disease (Others) | 4 (18.1%) | 5 (13.2%) | 0.74 | - |
Underlying disease (ASH) | - | 2 (5.3%) | 0.74 | - |
Underlying disease (HCV & HCC) | - | 2 (5.3%) | 0.74 | - |
Underlying disease (NASH & HCC) | - | 2 (5.3%) | 0.74 | - |
Underlying disease (NASH & PSC) | - | 1 (2.6%) | - | - |
Underlying disease (HBV & HCC) | - | 1 (2.6%) | - | - |
Underlying disease (Wilson) | - | 1 (2.6%) | - | - |
Intraoperative blood transfusion | 3.45 (3.05) | 2.5 (2.57) | 0.2 | - |
Induction therapy (ATG) | 8 (36.4%) | 6 (15.8%) | < 0.001 | 0.08 (0.02-0.41) |
Induction therapy (methyl prednisolon) | 14 (63.6%) | 32 (84.2%) | < 0.001 | 0.05 (0.01-0.25) |
Biliary leak post-transplant | 9 (40.9%) | - | < 0.001 | - |
Reoperation within 30 d of transplant | 12 (54.5%) | 5 (13.2%) | < 0.001 | 7.92 (2.25-27.94) |
Hepatic artery thrombosis post-transplant | 8 (36.4%) | 1 (2.6%) | < 0.001 | 21.14 (2.42-184.79) |
Within 2 wk before the IA diagnosis, the immunosuppressive regimen included tacrolimus and mycophenolate in over 80% of patients and the control group. Nineteen patients in the case group (86.4%) and 18 patients in the control group (47.4%) received antifungal prophylaxis (40.9% of the patients' group and 13.1% of the control group received voriconazole). Bacterial pneumonia was diagnosed in 13 individuals in the case group (59.1%) and four individuals in the control group (10.5%) within 2 wk of the fungal infection diagnosis (P value < 0.001).
During the 2 wk preceding the infection, 16 patients (72.7%) received antibiotics, whereas 39% (no = 15) of patients in the control group received antibiotics during the same period (P value < 0.01). The maximum creatinine level at the time of IA diagnosis was 1.87 mg/dL (SD = 1.1) in the case group vs 1.21 (SD = 1.43) in the control group. CMV viremia was significantly higher in IA patients [case no = 9 (40.9%), control no = 4 (10.5%), P value=0.009]. Transplant rejection requiring treatment within 3 mo before the IA diagnosis occurred in 13 patients in the case group (59.1%) and 10 patients in the control group (26.3%) (P value = 0.01; OR: 4.04; CI: 1.33-12.34).
The mean lengths of stay in the ICU at the time of transplantation were 4.1 d for the case group and 1.8 d for the control group (P value = 0.008). The number of patients in the IA group who underwent dialysis was greater [7 (31.8%) cases vs 4 (10.5%)] controls; P value = 0.08), but the difference was not statistically significant. The results pertaining to post-transplant factors are summarized in Tables 4 and 5.
Covariate | Case | Control | P value | OR (95%CI) |
Antifungal prophylaxis after transplant (Fluconazole) | 10 (45.5%) | 13 (34.2%) | 0.003 | 0.20 (0.05-0.85) |
Antifungal prophylaxis after transplant (voriconazole) | 9 (40.9%) | 5 (13.1%) | 0.08 (0.02-0.43) | |
Antifungal prophylaxis after transplant (no) | 3 (13.6%) | 20 (52.7%) | - | |
Bacteremia within 2 wk before diagnosis | 3 (13.6%) | 4 (10.5%) | 0.70 | - |
Pneumonia within 2 wk before diagnosis | 13 (59.1%) | 4 (10.5%) | < 0.001 | 0.08 (0.02-0.31) |
Systemic antibacterial within 2 wk before diagnosis | 16 (72.7%) | 15 (39.5%) | < 0.001 | 4.09 (1.31-12.81) |
Dialysis requirement | 7 (31.8%) | 4 (10.5%) | 0.08 | |
CMV viremia before diagnosis | 9 (40.9%) | 4 (10.5%) | 0.009 | 5.89 (1.54-22.47) |
CMV diseases before diagnosis | 3 (13.6%) | 2 (5.3%) | 0.35 | |
Length of ICU stay at the time of transplant | 4.05 (3.59) | 1.75 (1.20) | 0.008 | 0.56 (0.38-0.82) |
Duration of mechanical ventilation at the time of transplant | 1.25 (0.55) | 1.12 (0.41) | 0.34 | |
Creatinine at the day of diagnosis (highest value) | 1/87 (SD:1/1) | 1/21 (SD:1/43) | - | - |
Covariate | Case | Control | P value | OR (95%CI) |
Rejection requiring treatment within 3 mo before diagnosis | 13 (59.1%) | 10 (26.3%) | 0.01 | 4.04 (1.33-12.34) |
Rejection required treatment after diagnosis | 4 (18.2%) | 4 (10.5%) | 0.45 | - |
The case group had a significantly lower 12-month survival rate than the control group (56.4% vs 100%) (P value < 0.001) (Tables 1 and 2).
The epidemiology of IFIs (including aspergillosis) among transplant recipients has changed during the last two decades. The incidence rate of IA has significantly reduced (from 40% to less than 10%), and most cases now occur more than 90 d after the transplant[37].
The prevalence of IA in liver transplant recipients was 2.7% in the present study. Other studies have reported incidence rates between 1% and 8%[4,38]. The lower incidence of IA is attributable to several factors, including improvements in surgical techniques, immunosuppressive regimens, and targeted antifungal prophylaxis in patients at moderate to high risk for fungal infection[37]. There was no significant difference between the two groups' underlying liver disease and MELD scores (case and control groups). In earlier studies, however, a MELD score greater than 30 was associated with an increased risk of fungal infection[38].
Several studies have investigated the risk factors associated with IA in transplant recipients. Among the identified risk factors are longer duration of surgery, severe blood loss during the operation, reoperation, steroid-resistant rejection, renal failure (especially when dialysis is required), CMV infection, diabetes, and long-term use of broad-spectrum antibiotics[39-41]. Fortún et al[40] (2002) found that positive GM, in addition to reoperation and post-transplant dialysis, was a risk factor for aspergillus infection in 13 patients with IA and 38 patients without IA (control group).
Due to epidemiological changes in IFIs among liver transplant recipients, antifungal prophylaxis for the low-risk group is no longer recommended. The American Society of Transplantation and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) reserves antifungal prophylaxis against candidiasis in moderate-risk patients (patients with complicated surgeries, anastomosis of choledochojejunostomy and candida colonization before transplantation), and anti-mold prophylaxis for high-risk patients (repeated liver transplant, repeating the surgery, and post-transplant renal replacement therapy)[42-44].
Our facility has also implemented a targeted prevention strategy since 2018. In our study, over 80% of patients with IA received antifungal prophylaxis, compared to less than 50% of patients in the control group.
ATG induction therapy was more common among patients with IA than the control group. Given that administering this medication as induction therapy in our facility is primarily reserved for patients with renal dysfunction, renal function may influence this relationship. However, the immunosuppressive therapy type is a known risk factor for IA[45,46]. CMV reactivation, an additional risk factor for delayed IA, is one of the most common side effects of anti-thymocyte globulin therapy. In addition, an increased dose of immunosuppressives for the treatment of rejection episodes (such as administration of corticosteroid pulses) was more prevalent in the case group than in the control group (59.1% vs 26.3%)[46-49].
In the case group, post-transplant ICU stays were significantly longer than in the control group (4.1 vs 1.8). This statistically significant difference in ICU admission length reflects the critical illness of the case group (which requires intensive care) and their increased susceptibility to opportunistic infections[45].
A creatinine level equal to or higher than 2 mg/dL is suggested as a risk factor for IA[5]. Renal dysfunction, renal replacement therapy, and dialysis after transplantation are known factors associated with the incidence of IFIs in organ transplant recipients[2,8,40,46]. In the current study, most patients with IA underwent dialysis; however, the difference was not statistically significant, which may be due to the low sample size and lower mean creatinine level before IA diagnosis.
According to previous studies[8,46] and the current investigation, any local or systemic infection requiring IV antibiotics for more than 3-14 d is associated with further disruption of the normal microbial flora, the predominance of opportunistic pathogens, and an increased risk of IA. The incidence of bacterial pneumonia was significantly higher in IA cases two weeks before diagnosis (59.1% in the case group compared with 10.5% in the control group). The proportion of IA patients receiving systemic antibiotics two weeks before diagnosis was also greater than that of the control group (P = 0.01).
CMV is one of the immunosuppressive viruses known to cause various complications in organ transplant recipients due to cytokine dysregulation. CMV infection has been associated with increased susceptibility to IFIs due to dysfunction of the host's neutrophils and macrophages, which play a crucial role in aspergillosis defense. According to our study, CMV viremia was four times higher in IA patients than in the control group (40.9% vs 10.5%). Previous research shows CMV viremia is one of the most prominent predictors of IA (mostly the late form of IA)[10,40].
According to previous studies[47,49,50], type of anastomosis (Roux-en-y choledochojejunostomy), repeated transplant, FHF, antibiotics, and immunosuppressive medications before the transplant are among the reported risk factors for post-liver transplant aspergillosis. However, our study did not observe a significant difference between the two groups regarding these factors, which may be due to the low sample size of the present study.
In the past two decades, the rate of late IA (more than 90 d after transplant) has increased with intervals ranging from 22 to 1117 d[9,10,40,46]. An average of 313 d elapsed between the time of liver transplantation and the occurrence of IA, according to the present study (range 15-810 d). This shift in the onset of IA infection may be attributable to improvements in the early management of high-risk patients, advances in surgical techniques, or delayed risk factors (including CMV infection).
Statistically significant differences were also observed between patients with IA and controls regarding biliary leakage after transplant (40.9% vs 0%) and hepatic artery thrombosis (36.4% vs 2.6%). It is necessary to consider these factors when determining the risk of IFIs. However, no similar findings were reported in the published literature.
Lungs were this study's most common site of IA (86.4%). This finding was consistent with other studies, which indicated that pulmonary aspergillosis (66% to 79%) was the most prevalent form of IA[4,46]. Environmental exposure to Aspergillus and inhalation of spores will result in airway colonization, which can progress to infection and disease development following transplant-induced immunodeficiency[4,46]. Elevated GM levels at any time after transplantation are an independent factor associated with aspergillosis, which may be a suitable predictor of IA prognosis[40]. In addition to a positive culture or positive PCR of secretions, GM serum antigen > 0.5 or BAL GM > 1 with a sensitivity of 22% and specificity of 84% aids in the diagnosis of IA[51].
In our study, GM was detected in 59.1% of cases, most of which were in the BAL. This finding is consistent with previous research indicating that BAL GM is more sensitive[18,52]. Due to the absence of GM measurement in the control group, the sensitivity and specificity of this test for IA diagnosis cannot be calculated.
In the present study, the most common CT scan findings were lung nodules (50%), halo sign (45.5%), and pleural effusion (31.8%). According to previous research, imaging-specific findings are ground glass opacities, cavities, and the nodule (with or without a halo sign)[15-17]. Halo sign, a typical and early finding of IA in HSCT and neutropenic patients, is rarely observed in SOT patients[53,54]. The high frequency of halo signs in the present study may be due to early diagnosis of this infection and conducting lung CT scan in our center as a primary diagnostic action for each patient with changes in general conditions, with or without pulmonary symptoms.
According to the most recent IDSA guidelines, voriconazole is the drug of choice for IA[55]. Isavuconazole and liposomal amphotericin B are alternatives. In our study, liposomal amphotericin B was administered to most patients with a high probability of fungal infection. After the diagnosis was confirmed, the treatment was changed to voriconazole. Those who received voriconazole had a higher recovery and survival rate than those who received amphotericin B[25]. In our study, the response to treatment, defined as complete and partial recovery within 12 wk of initiating antifungal treatment, was 45.5% and 18.2%, respectively. The overall treatment response rate of 63.7% was consistent with previous studies[9,42].
Overall, 16.9% of the mortality during the first year post-transplant is due to IA. The highest mortality rate is observed in CNS involvements and disseminated aspergillosis[10]. However, due to the increased rate of late-onset IA, the mortality has been reduced from 65%-92% to 22% (the higher mortality rate was related to the studies before 2000)[56]. Nevertheless, the mortality rate of IA in liver transplant patients remains high[8]. According to our study, the 12-week mortality rate was 36.4%. A study by Nagao et al[7] (2016) on five IA patients reported a mortality rate of 80%. The one-year survival rate of aspergillosis patients in this study was 54.6%. In contrast, the entire control group population survived one year after the transplant. A study by Barchiesi et al[4] revealed a 35% one-year survival rate. After the year 2000, the survival of patients who received voriconazole improved in the absence of renal failure.
Considering the study's retrospective nature, it was impossible to investigate several factors (including the role of GM and β-d-glucan in the IA diagnosis). In addition, due to the absence of invasive diagnostic procedures, most IA patients were not diagnosed.
Despite the significant decline in the incidence of IA at our center, this disease has a negative impact on the survival of transplant recipients. Early diagnosis based on clinical symptoms and imaging modalities, as well as identification of factors related to the incidence of IA, is of significant importance. The imaging findings of aspergillosis, including nodule and halo signs, continue to play a crucial role in diagnosing this lethal invasive infection.
Furthermore, according to our study, the level of creatinine before the transplant, the creatinine level after the transplant, or patients who require renal replacement therapies after transplantation, induction therapy with ATG, ICU length of stay after the transplant, pneumonia 2 wk before the IA diagnosis, CMV viremia within one month before the IA diagnosis, receiving systemic antibiotics more than three days within the two weeks before the IA diagnosis, treatment-required transplant rejection within three months before the IA diagnosis, repeated surgery within 30 d after the transplant were the risk factors associated with increased risk of IA. We also hypothesize that biliary leakage and hepatic artery thrombosis after the transplant are two potential risk factors for IA.
During the past two decades, the incidence rate and onset time of invasive fungal infections (IFIs), such as aspergillosis, have changed in liver transplant recipients.
Determining the new risk factors and treatment outcomes of early and late-onset invasive aspergillosis (IA) in high-volume centers for liver transplants is essential. It may have a key role in improving the prognosis of these patients.
This study sought to determine the prevalence, risk factors, treatment outcomes, and prognosis of IA infection among liver transplant recipients at our institution. We also investigated the study patients' major clinical, laboratory, and radiologic manifestations of IA.
To determine the prevalence of IA, we analyzed the data of 850 patients who received a liver transplant at the Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex in Tehran, Iran, between 2014 and 2019, and recorded the study variables for patients with an IA diagnosis. In addition, we devised a case-control study to identify the risk factors for IA and compare the prognoses of patients with and without IA.
Our center's IA rate was 2.7%. Pulmonary aspergillosis was the most common presentation of the patients with IA. In most of our patients, imaging findings indicative of aspergillosis, including nodule and halo signs, were detected. The high level of creatinine before and after the transplant, renal replacement therapy after transplantation, induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin, longer duration of intensive care unit admission after the transplant, pneumonia 2 wk before the IA diagnosis, cytomegalovirus viremia within 1 mo before the IA diagnosis, receiving systemic antibiotics for more than three days within the 2 wk before the IA diagnosis, treatment-required transplant rejection within three months before the IA diagnosis, receiving systemic antibiotics for longer than three months before the IA diagnosis, repeated surgery within 30 d after the transplant, biliary leakage after the transplant and hepatic artery thrombosis were the risk factors associated with increased risk of IA.
In this study, the prevalence of IA among liver transplant recipients was relatively low. However, it was one of the leading causes of mortality following liver transplantation. Identifying and addressing risk factors for IA, early diagnosis and prompt treatment of this fatal disease may improve the prognosis and decrease the mortality rate of liver transplant recipients.
The primary risk factors of IA in liver transplant recipients should be determined through a large, multicenter study. Moreover, we must investigate the role of noninvasive and rapid diagnostic tests in diagnosing patients suspected of IFI early.
The authors of the present study would like to thank all the staff who contributed to this research. The authors also would like to appreciate the support and constructive comments of the methodologist research development office, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran, Iran.
Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.
Peer-review model: Single blind
Specialty type: Transplantation
Country/Territory of origin: Iran
Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification
Grade A (Excellent): 0
Grade B (Very good): B
Grade C (Good): C, C
Grade D (Fair): 0
Grade E (Poor): 0
P-Reviewer: Dabbous H, Egypt; Mucenic M, Brazil S-Editor: Lin C L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhang XD
1. | Singh N, Husain S; AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Invasive aspergillosis in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9 Suppl 4:S180-S191. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 99] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 98] [Article Influence: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Neofytos D, Treadway S, Ostrander D, Alonso CD, Dierberg KL, Nussenblatt V, Durand CM, Thompson CB, Marr KA. Epidemiology, outcomes, and mortality predictors of invasive mold infections among transplant recipients: a 10-year, single-center experience. Transpl Infect Dis. 2013;15:233-242. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 102] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 107] [Article Influence: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Romero FA, Razonable RR. Infections in liver transplant recipients. World J Hepatol. 2011;3:83-92. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 115] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 96] [Article Influence: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (2)] |
4. | Barchiesi F, Mazzocato S, Mazzanti S, Gesuita R, Skrami E, Fiorentini A, Singh N. Invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients: epidemiology, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes in 116 cases. Liver Transpl. 2015;21:204-212. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 54] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58] [Article Influence: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Pappas PG, Alexander BD, Andes DR, Hadley S, Kauffman CA, Freifeld A, Anaissie EJ, Brumble LM, Herwaldt L, Ito J, Kontoyiannis DP, Lyon GM, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Park BJ, Patterson TF, Perl TM, Oster RA, Schuster MG, Walker R, Walsh TJ, Wannemuehler KA, Chiller TM. Invasive fungal infections among organ transplant recipients: results of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET). Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:1101-1111. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1047] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1084] [Article Influence: 77.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Singh N, Husain S; AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Aspergillosis in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13 Suppl 4:228-241. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 151] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 134] [Article Influence: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Nagao M, Fujimoto Y, Yamamoto M, Matsumura Y, Kaido T, Takakura S, Uemoto S, Ichiyama S. Epidemiology of invasive fungal infections after liver transplantation and the risk factors of late-onset invasive aspergillosis. J Infect Chemother. 2016;22:84-89. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Neofytos D, Chatzis O, Nasioudis D, Boely Janke E, Doco Lecompte T, Garzoni C, Berger C, Cussini A, Boggian K, Khanna N, Manuel O, Mueller NJ, van Delden C; Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. Epidemiology, risk factors and outcomes of invasive aspergillosis in solid organ transplant recipients in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. Transpl Infect Dis. 2018;20:e12898. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 41] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67] [Article Influence: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Husain S, Silveira FP, Azie N, Franks B, Horn D. Epidemiological features of invasive mold infections among solid organ transplant recipients: PATH Alliance® registry analysis. Med Mycol. 2017;55:269-277. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Singh N, Avery RK, Munoz P, Pruett TL, Alexander B, Jacobs R, Tollemar JG, Dominguez EA, Yu CM, Paterson DL, Husain S, Kusne S, Linden P. Trends in risk profiles for and mortality associated with invasive aspergillosis among liver transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:46-52. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 193] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 174] [Article Influence: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Lehrnbecher T, Hassler A, Groll AH, Bochennek K. Diagnostic Approaches for Invasive Aspergillosis-Specific Considerations in the Pediatric Population. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:518. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Segal BH, Walsh TJ. Current approaches to diagnosis and treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:707-717. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 226] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 208] [Article Influence: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Levine SJ. An approach to the diagnosis of pulmonary infections in immunosuppressed patients. Semin Respir Infect. 1992;7:81-95. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
14. | Yu VL, Muder RR, Poorsattar A. Significance of isolation of Aspergillus from the respiratory tract in diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Results from a three-year prospective study. Am J Med. 1986;81:249-254. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 190] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 200] [Article Influence: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Greene R. The radiological spectrum of pulmonary aspergillosis. Med Mycol. 2005;43 Suppl 1:S147-S154. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 76] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Kuhlman JE, Fishman EK, Burch PA, Karp JE, Zerhouni EA, Siegelman SS. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in acute leukemia. The contribution of CT to early diagnosis and aggressive management. Chest. 1987;92:95-99. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 114] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 117] [Article Influence: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
17. | Caillot D, Couaillier JF, Bernard A, Casasnovas O, Denning DW, Mannone L, Lopez J, Couillault G, Piard F, Vagner O, Guy H. Increasing volume and changing characteristics of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis on sequential thoracic computed tomography scans in patients with neutropenia. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:253-259. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 449] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 402] [Article Influence: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
18. | Ascioglu S, Rex JH, de Pauw B, Bennett JE, Bille J, Crokaert F, Denning DW, Donnelly JP, Edwards JE, Erjavec Z, Fiere D, Lortholary O, Maertens J, Meis JF, Patterson TF, Ritter J, Selleslag D, Shah PM, Stevens DA, Walsh TJ; Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer; Mycoses Study Group of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: an international consensus. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:7-14. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1840] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1778] [Article Influence: 80.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Marr KA, Laverdiere M, Gugel A, Leisenring W. Antifungal therapy decreases sensitivity of the Aspergillus galactomannan enzyme immunoassay. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:1762-1769. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 354] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 354] [Article Influence: 18.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
20. | Sulahian A, Touratier S, Ribaud P. False positive test for aspergillus antigenemia related to concomitant administration of piperacillin and tazobactam. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2366-2367. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 191] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 195] [Article Influence: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
21. | Pham AS, Tarrand JJ, May GS, Lee MS, Kontoyiannis DP, Han XY. Diagnosis of invasive mold infection by real-time quantitative PCR. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119:38-44. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
22. | Hebart H, Löffler J, Reitze H, Engel A, Schumacher U, Klingebiel T, Bader P, Böhme A, Martin H, Bunjes D, Kern WV, Kanz L, Einsele H. Prospective screening by a panfungal polymerase chain reaction assay in patients at risk for fungal infections: implications for the management of febrile neutropenia. Br J Haematol. 2000;111:635-640. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 72] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 85] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
23. | Buchheidt D, Baust C, Skladny H, Ritter J, Suedhoff T, Baldus M, Seifarth W, Leib-Moesch C, Hehlmann R. Detection of Aspergillus species in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage samples from immunocompromised patients by means of 2-step polymerase chain reaction: clinical results. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:428-435. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 120] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 119] [Article Influence: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
24. | Kawazu M, Kanda Y, Goyama S, Takeshita M, Nannya Y, Niino M, Komeno Y, Nakamoto T, Kurokawa M, Tsujino S, Ogawa S, Aoki K, Chiba S, Motokura T, Ohishi N, Hirai H. Rapid diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis by quantitative polymerase chain reaction using bronchial lavage fluid. Am J Hematol. 2003;72:27-30. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
25. | Herbrecht R, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Bennett JE, Greene RE, Oestmann JW, Kern WV, Marr KA, Ribaud P, Lortholary O, Sylvester R, Rubin RH, Wingard JR, Stark P, Durand C, Caillot D, Thiel E, Chandrasekar PH, Hodges MR, Schlamm HT, Troke PF, de Pauw B; Invasive Fungal Infections Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Global Aspergillus Study Group. Voriconazole vs amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:408-415. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2434] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2182] [Article Influence: 99.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
26. | Schwartz S, Ruhnke M, Ribaud P, Corey L, Driscoll T, Cornely OA, Schuler U, Lutsar I, Troke P, Thiel E. Improved outcome in central nervous system aspergillosis, using voriconazole treatment. Blood. 2005;106:2641-2645. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 287] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 252] [Article Influence: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
27. | Holding KJ, Dworkin MS, Wan PC, Hanson DL, Klevens RM, Jones JL, Sullivan PS. Aspergillosis among people infected with human immunodeficiency virus: incidence and survival. Adult and Adolescent Spectrum of HIV Disease Project. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:1253-1257. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 89] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 80] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
28. | Kirkpatrick WR, Perea S, Coco BJ, Patterson TF. Efficacy of caspofungin alone and in combination with voriconazole in a Guinea pig model of invasive aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:2564-2568. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 236] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 242] [Article Influence: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
29. | Luque JC, Clemons KV, Stevens DA. Efficacy of micafungin alone or in combination against systemic murine aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:1452-1455. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 76] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
30. | Aliff TB, Maslak PG, Jurcic JG, Heaney ML, Cathcart KN, Sepkowitz KA, Weiss MA. Refractory Aspergillus pneumonia in patients with acute leukemia: successful therapy with combination caspofungin and liposomal amphotericin. Cancer. 2003;97:1025-1032. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 186] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 189] [Article Influence: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
31. | Kontoyiannis DP, Hachem R, Lewis RE, Rivero GA, Torres HA, Thornby J, Champlin R, Kantarjian H, Bodey GP, Raad II. Efficacy and toxicity of caspofungin in combination with liposomal amphotericin B as primary or salvage treatment of invasive aspergillosis in patients with hematologic malignancies. Cancer. 2003;98:292-299. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 229] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 230] [Article Influence: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
32. | Marr KA, Boeckh M, Carter RA, Kim HW, Corey L. Combination antifungal therapy for invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:797-802. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 471] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 483] [Article Influence: 24.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
33. | Offner F, Cordonnier C, Ljungman P, Prentice HG, Engelhard D, De Bacquer D, Meunier F, De Pauw B. Impact of previous aspergillosis on the outcome of bone marrow transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:1098-1103. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 133] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 123] [Article Influence: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
34. | Fukuda T, Boeckh M, Guthrie KA, Mattson DK, Owens S, Wald A, Sandmaier BM, Corey L, Storb RF, Marr KA. Invasive aspergillosis before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: 10-year experience at a single transplant center. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004;10:494-503. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 99] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 104] [Article Influence: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
35. | De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, Pappas PG, Maertens J, Lortholary O, Kauffman CA, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Maschmeyer G, Bille J, Dismukes WE, Herbrecht R, Hope WW, Kibbler CC, Kullberg BJ, Marr KA, Muñoz P, Odds FC, Perfect JR, Restrepo A, Ruhnke M, Segal BH, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC, Viscoli C, Wingard JR, Zaoutis T, Bennett JE; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1813-1821. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 3656] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3888] [Article Influence: 243.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
36. | Ebrahimi A, Dashti H, Mohammadpour Z, Ahmadinejad Z. Invasive Fungal Infections With Good Survival Following Liver Transplant: A Single-Center Experience From a Developing Country. Exp Clin Transplant. 2020;18:196-200. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
37. | Eschenauer GA, Kwak EJ, Humar A, Potoski BA, Clarke LG, Shields RK, Abdel-Massih R, Silveira FP, Vergidis P, Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Targeted vs universal antifungal prophylaxis among liver transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:180-189. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 53] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 62] [Article Influence: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
38. | Steinbach WJ, Marr KA, Anaissie EJ, Azie N, Quan SP, Meier-Kriesche HU, Apewokin S, Horn DL. Clinical epidemiology of 960 patients with invasive aspergillosis from the PATH Alliance registry. J Infect. 2012;65:453-464. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 236] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 211] [Article Influence: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
39. | Gavalda J, Len O, San Juan R, Aguado JM, Fortun J, Lumbreras C, Moreno A, Munoz P, Blanes M, Ramos A, Rufi G, Gurgui M, Torre-Cisneros J, Montejo M, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Pahissa A; RESITRA (Spanish Network for Research on Infection in Transplantation). Risk factors for invasive aspergillosis in solid-organ transplant recipients: a case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:52-59. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 238] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 219] [Article Influence: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
40. | Fortún J, Martín-Dávila P, Moreno S, De Vicente E, Nuño J, Candelas A, Bárcena R, García M. Risk factors for invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2002;8:1065-1070. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 144] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 144] [Article Influence: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
41. | Phoompoung P, Herrera S, Pérez Cortés Villalobos A, Foroutan F, Orchanian-Cheff A, Husain S. Risk factors of invasive fungal infections in liver transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Transplant. 2022;22:1213-1229. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
42. | Liu X, Ling Z, Li L, Ruan B. Invasive fungal infections in liver transplantation. Int J Infect Dis. 2011;15:e298-e304. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 47] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
43. | Giannella M, Bartoletti M, Morelli M, Cristini F, Tedeschi S, Campoli C, Tumietto F, Bertuzzo V, Ercolani G, Faenza S, Pinna AD, Lewis RE, Viale P. Antifungal prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients: one size does not fit all. Transpl Infect Dis. 2016;18:538-544. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 28] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33] [Article Influence: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
44. | Osawa M, Ito Y, Hirai T, Isozumi R, Takakura S, Fujimoto Y, Iinuma Y, Ichiyama S, Tanaka K, Mishima M. Risk factors for invasive aspergillosis in living donor liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:566-570. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 33] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
45. | Baddley JW. Clinical risk factors for invasive aspergillosis. Med Mycol. 2011;49 Suppl 1:S7-S12. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 108] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 116] [Article Influence: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
46. | Kusne S, Torre-Cisneros J, Mañez R, Irish W, Martin M, Fung J, Simmons RL, Starzl TE. Factors associated with invasive lung aspergillosis and the significance of positive Aspergillus culture after liver transplantation. J Infect Dis. 1992;166:1379-1383. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 150] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 128] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
47. | Rosenhagen M, Feldhues R, Schmidt J, Hoppe-Tichy T, Geiss HK. A risk profile for invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients. Infection. 2009;37:313-319. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 40] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
48. | Singh N, Limaye AP, Forrest G, Safdar N, Muñoz P, Pursell K, Houston S, Rosso F, Montoya JG, Patton P, Del Busto R, Aguado JM, Fisher RA, Klintmalm GB, Miller R, Wagener MM, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP, Husain S. Combination of voriconazole and caspofungin as primary therapy for invasive aspergillosis in solid organ transplant recipients: a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Transplantation. 2006;81:320-326. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 266] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 227] [Article Influence: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
49. | Singh N, Arnow PM, Bonham A, Dominguez E, Paterson DL, Pankey GA, Wagener MM, Yu VL. Invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients in the 1990s. Transplantation. 1997;64:716-720. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 142] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 140] [Article Influence: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
50. | Briegel J, Forst H, Spill B, Haas A, Grabein B, Haller M, Kilger E, Jauch KW, Maag K, Ruckdeschel G. Risk factors for systemic fungal infections in liver transplant recipients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995;14:375-382. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 88] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 82] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
51. | Scolarici M, Jorgenson M, Saddler C, Smith J. Fungal Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients. J Fungi (Basel). 2021;7. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
52. | Botterel F, Farrugia C, Ichai P, Costa JM, Saliba F, Bretagne S. Real-time PCR on the first galactomannan-positive serum sample for diagnosing invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2008;10:333-338. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
53. | Qin J, Fang Y, Dong Y, Zhu K, Wu B, An Y, Shan H. Radiological and clinical findings of 25 patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: retrospective analysis of 2150 Liver transplantation cases. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:e429-e435. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
54. | Levesque E, Rizk F, Noorah Z, Aït-Ammar N, Cordonnier-Jourdin C, El Anbassi S, Bonnal C, Azoulay D, Merle JC, Botterel F. Detection of (1,3)-β-d-Glucan for the Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22] [Article Influence: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
55. | Patterson TF, Thompson GR 3rd, Denning DW, Fishman JA, Hadley S, Herbrecht R, Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Nguyen MH, Segal BH, Steinbach WJ, Stevens DA, Walsh TJ, Wingard JR, Young JA, Bennett JE. Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:e1-e60. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1320] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1693] [Article Influence: 211.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
56. | Wróblewska M, Sulik-Tyszka B, Figiel W, Niewiński G, Zieniewicz K. Invasive Aspergillosis in Transplant Recipients. In: Selim Sozen. Surgical Recovery. London: IntechOpen, 2019. [Cited in This Article: ] |