Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Transplant. Jun 24, 2016; 6(2): 291-305
Published online Jun 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.291
Massive haemorrhage in liver transplantation: Consequences, prediction and management
Stuart Cleland, Carlos Corredor, Jia Jia Ye, Coimbatore Srinivas, Stuart A McCluskey
Stuart Cleland, Carlos Corredor, Jia Jia Ye, Coimbatore Srinivas, Stuart A McCluskey, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
Stuart Cleland, Carlos Corredor, Jia Jia Ye, Coimbatore Srinivas, Stuart A McCluskey, Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
Author contributions: All authors contributed to the conception and design of the review as well as giving final approval of the final version; Cleland S, Corredor C and Ye JJ performed the literature review as well as drafting of initial version and subsequent revisions up to final version; Srinivas C and McCluskey SA provided critical revision and editing of initial and all subsequent versions.
Supported by Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management academic program support.
Conflict-of-interest statement: No potential conflicts of interest. No financial support.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Stuart A McCluskey, MD, PHD, FRCPC, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, EN3-438, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada. stuart.mccluskey@uhn.ca
Telephone: +1-416-3405164 Fax: +1-416-3403698
Received: November 10, 2015
Peer-review started: November 12, 2015
First decision: February 2, 2016
Revised: March 22, 2016
Accepted: April 7, 2016
Article in press: April 11, 2016
Published online: June 24, 2016
Abstract

From its inception the success of liver transplantation has been associated with massive blood loss. Massive transfusion is classically defined as > 10 units of red blood cells within 24 h, but describing transfusion rates over a shorter period of time may reduce the potential for survival bias. Both massive haemorrhage and transfusion are associated with increased risk of mortality and morbidity (need for dialysis/surgical site infection) following liver transplantation although causality is difficult to prove due to the observational design of most trials. The blood loss associated with liver transplantation is multifactorial. Portal hypertension secondary to cirrhosis results in extensive collateral circulation, which can bleed during hepatectomy particular if portal pressures are increased. Avoiding volume loading and maintenance of a low central venous pressure together with the use of vasopressors have been shown to reduce blood loss and transfusion during liver transplantation, but may increase the risk of renal impairment post-operatively. Coagulation defects may be present pre-transplant, but haemostasis is often re-balanced due to a deficit in both pro- and anti-coagulation factors. Further derangement of haemostasis may develop in the anhepatic and neohepatic phases due to absent hepatic metabolic function, hyperfibrinolysis and platelet sequestration in the donor liver. Point-of-care tests of coagulation such as the viscoelastic tests rotation thromboelastometry/thromboelastometry allow and more accurate and rapid assessment of these derangements in coagulation and guide the use of factor replacement and antifibrinolytics. Transfusion protocols guided by these tests have been shown to reduce transfusion rates compared with conventional coagulation tests, but have not shown improvements in mortality or morbidity. Pre-operative factors associated with massive transfusion include previous surgery, re-do transplantation, the aetiology and severity of liver disease. Intra-operatively the use of piggy-back technique and avoiding veno-veno bypass has been shown to reduced blood loss.

Keywords: Liver transplantation, Massive transfusion, Coagulopathy

Core tip: The management of bleeding during liver transplantation requires an understanding of the unique coagulopathy of liver failure and the ability to recognize the risk factors for massive transfusion. By avoiding massive haemorrhage and transfusion, patients’ outcomes after transplantation are likely to benefit.