Review
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Transplant. Dec 24, 2012; 2(6): 84-94
Published online Dec 24, 2012. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v2.i6.84
Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy
Cristina Costa, Rossana Cavallo
Cristina Costa, Rossana Cavallo, Virology Unit, University Hospital San Giovanni Battista di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
Author contributions: Costa C wrote the manuscript; Cavallo R reasonable for the supervision and discussion of this manuscript.
Correspondence to: Cristina Costa, MD, PhD, Virology Unit, University Hospital San Giovanni Battista di Torino, Via Santena 9,10126 Turin, Italy. cristina.costa@unito.it
Telephone: +39-11-6705630 Fax: +39-11-6705648
Received: July 14, 2011
Revised: August 14, 2012
Accepted: October 31, 2012
Published online: December 24, 2012
Abstract

Polyomaviruses BK and JC are ubiquitous viruses with high seroprevalence rates in general population. Following primary infection, polyomaviruses BK and JC persist latently in different sites, particularly in the reno-urinary tract. Reactivation from latency may occur in normal subjects with asymptomatic viruria, while it can be associated to nephropathy (PVAN) in kidney transplantat recipients. PVAN may occur in 1%-10% of renal transplant patients with loss of the transplanted organ in 30% up to 80% of the cases. Etiology of PVAN is mainly attributable to BK virus, although approximately 5% of the cases may be due to JC. Pathogenesis of PVAN is still unknown, although viral replication and the lack of immune control play a major role. Immunosuppression represents the condicio sine qua non for the development of PVAN and the modulation of anti-rejection treatment represents the first line of intervention, given the lack of specific antiviral agents. At moment, an appropriate immunemodulation can only be accomplished by early identification of viral reactivacation by evaluation of polyomavirus load on serum and/or urine specimens, particularly in the first year post-trasplantation. Viro-immunological monitoring of specific cellular immune response could be useful to identify patients unable to recover cellular immunity posttransplantation, that are at higher risk of viral reactivation with development of PVAN. Herein, the main features of polyomaviruses BK and JC, biological properties, clinical characteristics, etiopathogenesis, monitoring and diagnosing of PVAN will be described and discussed, with an extended citation of related relevant literature data.

Keywords: Polyomavirus, Kidney transplantation, Immunosuppressive therapy, Virological monitoring, Cellular immune response