Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Psychiatr. Dec 22, 2015; 5(4): 366-378
Published online Dec 22, 2015. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v5.i4.366
Table 1 Descriptions of studies conducted in support of theoretical model
nTreatmentsDiagnosisResponse rates
Avoidance model
Integrative therapy24CBT + SL vs CBT + I/EPGADCBT + SL = 66.7%
Newman et al[16]14 sessionsCBT + I/EP = 83.3%
Intolerance of uncertainty model
Ladouceur et al[81]26CBT vs wait listGADCBT = 77%
Metacognitive model
Wells and King[19]10MCTGAD87.5%
MCT = 80%
Wells et al[20]20MCT vs ARGADAR = 10%
Acceptance based model
Roemer et al[23]31ABBT vs wait listGADABBT = 78%
Wait list = 17%
TDCRP
Elkin et al[34]50CBTCBT = 40%; 58%
56IPTMDDIPT = 47%; 60%
49IMI-CMIMI = 49%; 61%
50PLA-CMPLA = 26%; 50%
Cognitive model
Thoma et al[28] (meta-anlaysis)29CBT vs wait listMDD/minor depression/dysthymiaES = 0.90
18CBT vs TAUES = 0.40
26CBT vs other1ES = 0.05
23CBT vs medicationES = 0.10
Behavioral activation
Dimidjian et al[31]45CTHigh severity
43BAMDDCT = 56%; 48%
100ADMBA = 60%; 76%
53PLAHigh and low severityADM = 40%, 49%
Interpersonal psychotherapy model26 wk
Peeters et al[37]63CTMDDCT = 41%; ES = 1.3
56IPTNonrandomized trialIPT = 39%; ES = 1.5
34CT-PHTCT-PHT = 35%; ES = 1.0
21IPT-PHTIPT-PHT = 33%; ES = 1.0