BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Sep 19, 2026; 16(9): 118955
Published online Sep 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.118955
Table 1 Impact of general data on nutritional risk among patients

Risk group (n = 81)
Non-risk group (n = 93)
χ2/t
P value
NRS20023.59 ± 0.611.18 ± 0.3931.55< 0.0001
Gender0.3330.564
    Male4143
    Female4050
Age (years)48.09 ± 6.6549.41 ± 6.471.3280.186
BMI (kg/m2)22.37 ± 2.9423.24 ± 3.301.8210.070
Educational level10.6220.005
    Junior high school or below2932
    Senior high school/technical secondary school3826
    College and above1435
Personal monthly income (RMB)4.2780.039
    ≤ 30005144
    > 30003049
Marital status1.5470.461
    Unmarried2228
    Married4341
    Divorced/widowed1624
Occupational status2.5490.280
    Unemployed2734
    Employed3041
    Retired2418
Disease perception9.3040.002
    Good3056
    Poor5137
Table 2 Impact of clinical data on nutritional risk in patients

Risk group (n = 81)
Non-risk group (n = 93)
χ2/t
P value
Disease type0.5040.478
    Leukemia lymphocytic3747
    Myelocytic leukaemia4445
Disease stage2.8670.090
    Initial treatment4742
    Consolidation3451
Diabetes mellitus0.5840.445
    Yes2129
    No6064
Hypertension0.1400.709
    Yes2430
    No5763
Number of chemotherapy cycles (n)6.7450.009
    ≤ 32648
    > 35545
Lowest hemoglobin level (g/ L)12.8720.002
    < 603719
    60-902952
    > 901522
White blood cell count (× 109/L)13.20 ± 4.6314.30 ± 5.431.4290.155
Neutrophil count (× 109/L)2.64 ± 0.772.87 ± 0.931.7720.078
Table 3 Multivariate analysis of factors influencing nutritional risk in acute leukemia patients
Variable
β
SE
Wald
P value
HR
95%CI
Constant-0.4350.5680.5870.4430.647-
Educational level (0: Junior high school or below)--7.3280.026--
1: Senior high school/technical secondary school0.3820.4040.8940.3451.4640.664-3.230
2: College and above-0.9220.4663.9120.0480.3980.159-0.992
Personal monthly income (0: > 3000 yuan, 1: ≤ 3000 yuan)0.1420.3650.1500.6981.1520.563-2.357
Disease perception (0: Poor, 1: Good)-0.71003524.0780.0430.4920.247-0.979
Number of chemotherapy cycles (0: ≤ 3 cycles, 1: > 3 cycles)0.7750.3465.0030.0252.1701.101-4.278
Lowest hemoglobin level (0: > 90 g/L)--11.7410.003--
1: 60-90 g/L-0.2970.4470.4400.5070.7430.309-1.786
2: < 60 g/L1.0610.4735.0260.0252.8901.143-7.307
Table 4 Anxiety and depression scores in acute leukemia patients

Total score (n = 174)

Score
t
P value
SAS score50.8 ± 8.08Risk group (n = 81)52.64 ± 6.922.7540.007
Non-risk group (n = 93)49.68 ± 8.61
SDS score52.59 ± 10.09Risk group (n = 81)56.15 ± 8.625.610< 0.0001
Non-risk group (n = 93)50.36 ± 9.15
Table 5 Patient psychological resilience scores
Item
Total score (n = 174)
Risk group (n = 81)
Non-risk group (n = 93)
t
P value
Total score of psychological resilience69.59 ± 11.3963.32 ± 8.9575.04 ± 10.487.872< 0.0001
Tenacity dimension37.17 ± 8.1533.81 ± 7.5740.10 ± 7.515.482< 0.0001
Self-reliance dimension21.25 ± 5.4519.38 ± 4.8122.88 ± 5.474.451< 0.0001
Optimism dimension11.16 ± 2.8710.12 ± 2.9112.06 ± 2.534.707< 0.0001
Table 6 Correlation between patient Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 scores and psychological status
Characteristic
NRS2002
r
P value
SAS0.1700.025
SDS0.372< 0.0001
Tenacity dimension-0.430< 0.0001
Self-reliance dimension-0.2810.0002
Optimism dimension-0.315< 0.0001
Total score of psychological resilience-0.521< 0.0001
Table 7 Multivariate analysis of psychological status on nutritional risk occurrence in patients
Variable
β
SE
Wald
P value
HR
95%CI
Constant0.4982.2640.0480.8261.646-
SAS0.0680.0286.1530.0131.0711.014-1.130
SDS0.1130.02519.6970.0001.1191.065-1.176
Tenacity dimension-0.1060.02814.5920.0000.9000.852-0.950
Self-reliance dimension-0.1350.04210.5300.0010.8740.806-0.948
Optimism dimension-0.3030.08014.3040.0000.7380.634-0.864


Write to the Help Desk