Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Sep 19, 2025; 15(9): 107534
Published online Sep 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.107534
Published online Sep 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.107534
Table 1 Comparison of general information of the patients
Number of cases | Gender | Age (years) (mean ± SD) | Disease course (months) (mean ± SD) | Patient Health Questionnaire-9 | ||
Male | Female | |||||
Control group | 85 | 30 | 55 | 61.96 ± 12.86 | 37.46 ± 5.36 | 12.14 ± 3.88 |
Observation group | 86 | 35 | 51 | 59.53 ± 13.27 | 39.04 ± 5.90 | 11.97 ± 4.03 |
χ2/t | 0.530 | 1.209 | 0.185 | 0.118 | ||
P value | 0.467 | 0.229 | 0.854 | 0.907 |
Table 2 Comparison of self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale scores
Group | Number of examples | Self-rating anxiety scale | Self-rating depression scale | ||
Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | ||
Control group | 85 | 59.12 ± 3.86 | 52.57 ± 3.55a | 64.30 ± 4.89 | 50.57 ± 3.59a |
Observation group | 86 | 58.77 ± 3.91 | 48.57 ± 3.19a | 64.47 ± 5.17 | 47.57 ± 4.04a |
t value | 0.590 | 7.919 | 0.162 | 5.239 | |
P value | 0.556 | < 0.001 | 0.871 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of visual analog scale scores
Group | Number of cases | Before intervention | 12 hours after intervention | 24 hours after intervention | 48 hours after intervention |
Control group | 85 | 6.94 ± 1.16 | 3.57 ± 1.07a | 3.04 ± 1.24a | 2.78 ± 0.73a |
Observation group | 86 | 7.01 ± 1.35 | 3.02 ± 1.12a | 2.56 ± 1.19a | 2.11 ± 0.58a |
t value | 0.749 | 3.375 | 2.413 | 6.146 | |
P value | 0.455 | < 0.001 | 0.017 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of short-form 36 scores
Group | Number of cases | Physical function | Psychological function | Emotional function | Social function | ||||
Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | ||
Control group | 85 | 60.83 ± 5.91 | 71.57 ± 4.95 | 66.57 ± 4.88 | 72.19 ± 4.65 | 64.15 ± 5.01 | 75.08 ± 5.43 | 61.32 ± 4.13 | 73.47 ± 3.97 |
Observation group | 86 | 61.04 ± 5.77 | 74.33 ± 5.03a | 66.26 ± 5.12 | 75.03 ± 4.39a | 63.93 ± 4.86 | 77.21 ± 5.15a | 60.84 ± 4.37 | 75.49 ± 4.58a |
t value | 0.238 | 3.680 | 0.373 | 4.130 | 0.310 | 2.562 | 0.723 | 3.102 | |
P value | 0.812 | 0.0003 | 0.709 | < 0.001 | 0.757 | 0.011 | 0.471 | 0.002 |
Table 5 Comparison of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores
Table 6 Comparison of nursing satisfaction, n (%)
Group | Number of cases | Very satisfied | Quite satisfied | Dissatisfied | Overall satisfaction |
Control group | 85 | 30 (35.29) | 41 (48.24) | 14 (16.47) | 71 (83.53) |
Observation group | 86 | 38 (44.19) | 45 (52.33) | 3 (3.49) | 83 (96.51) |
χ2 | 8.047 | ||||
P value | 0.005 |
- Citation: Cheng Y, Mao JM, Zhang Y. Impact of comprehensive psychological cognitive nursing on the quality of life of patients with chronic pain and depression. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(9): 107534
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i9/107534.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.107534