Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Aug 19, 2025; 15(8): 107313
Published online Aug 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i8.107313
Published online Aug 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i8.107313
Table 1 Essential components of the therapeutic process of acceptance and commitment therapy for psychosis
Therapeutic elements | Main goals |
Create a state of creative hopelessness | The goal is for patients to pay attention to their strategies for solving their problems and how these strategies ultimately failed |
Raise the possibility that “the problem is control” | The patients should now understand that certain aspects of their experience (emotions, thoughts, memories) cannot be controlled. The use of central metaphors is recommended |
Create a distance from the language (defusion) | Starting to doubt aspects other than hallucinations or delusions is one way to get patients to distance themselves from their experiences |
Help create a transcendent sense of self (“self as context”) | Focus intervention on enhancing “self as context.” ACT techniques focus primarily on strengthening the sense of “self as context” instead of “self as content” |
To clarify and strengthen the patient’s values | Look for conditions in which a person with psychosis can pursue these values despite their circumstances (e.g., symptoms). Materialize these values in actions aimed at achieving them |
Develop willpower | The will presupposes a hierarchical organization of ends and places the person in front of the troubled and, therefore, the inevitably tragic character of existence. Therapy is placed in the context of the person's life, and relapses are included as an additional aspect |
Table 2 Participants, interventions, comparators, outcomes, study design
Category | Description |
P: Participants | People with psychotic disorders in their early stages. People with subthreshold psychotic symptoms |
I: Intervention | Acceptance and commitment therapy or acceptance-based therapy for psychosis |
C: Comparison | Comparison with other types of therapeutic intervention, TAU, or control groups |
O: Outcomes | Changes in positive, negative, general, and mood symptoms; changes in psychosocial functionality; treatment adherence; feasibility; acceptability; rehospitalizations; improvement in coping with symptoms; changes in psychological flexibility |
S: Study design | Randomized controlled trials, open trials, preliminary studies, or quasi-experimental studies. Secondary analysis from RCTs |
Table 3 Summary of reviewed studies on acceptance and commitment therapy in early psychosis
Ref. | Des. | Participants/samples | Population | Intervention | Conclusions | Results |
Vaessen et al[65] | No RCT | n = 16. No control group | People with ultra-high risk (clinically established) or first-episode psychosis | ACT in Daily Life (ACT-DL): A new mobile health treatment protocol for people with early psychosis. The protocol was designed to facilitate the translation of therapeutic techniques learned during in-person ACT sessions into the patient’s daily life | ACT-DL may aid individuals in integrating skills they learn during therapy sessions into their everyday lives. ACT-DL may help early psychosis patients by applying ACT skills to different contexts of everyday life. Adherence to the protocol was relatively demanding | Participants evaluated the overall training (M = 5.63 ± 1.17), the ACT therapy sessions (M = 5.63 ± 1.36), and home exercises (M = 4.81 ± 1.63) as useful. Moreover, participants evaluated the app as useful (M = 4.56 ± 1.69) and reported that it helped them apply the exercises in daily life (M = 4.75 ± 1.71) and made them more aware of their feelings (M = 5.25 ± 1.56) |
Van Aubel et al[66] | RCT | Total n = 55. ACT-DL (n = 27). Active control (n = 28) | Young people (16 to 25) with subthreshold depressive and/or psychotic symptoms | ACT-DL through an app | Depressive symptoms decreased more in ACT-DL than in active control. Self-reported symptoms decreased equally in ACT-DL and active control. ACT-DL did not modify PF | Depression scores (rated by the interviewer) decreased among participants in the ACT-DL group compared with controls (P = 0.027) |
Myin-Germeys et al[67] | RCT | Total n = 148 ACT-DL + TAU (n = 71) TAU (n = 77) | People with ultra-high risk (clinically established) or first-episode psychosis | Multicenter INTERACT RCT. ACT-DL combines face-to-face therapy with an ecological momentary intervention (EMI) | The study did not support a significant effect of ACT-DL compared to TAU on primary outcomes However, global functioning and psychotic distress were improved in the ACT-DL group | Results showed that Global functioning (χ2 = 9.05; P = 0.033) and negative symptoms (χ2 = 19.91; P < 0.001) improved in ACT-DL compared to TAU, as did psychotic distress (χ2 = 21.56; P < 0.001) measured as EMI |
van Aubel et al[68] | No RCT | n = 71. No control group | People with ultra-high risk (clinically established) or FEP | No intervention. Data on treatment engagement with and acceptability of ACT-DL during and after the intervention of ACT-DL. This study is a secondary analysis of the INTERACT trial | The study showed good treatment engagement with and acceptability of ACT-DL in early psychosis. Participants attended an encouraging number of face-to-face sessions and weekly interactions. Results suggested an effective real-world application of ACT techniques. Moreover, ACT-DL improved emotional awareness | The results demonstrated high levels of commitment and participation among the participants, with the majority (n = 42) completing all sessions. In addition, 86% to 96% of subjects rated the sessions and exercises as useful |
Chien et al[69] | RCT | Total n = 126. AIM-AT (n = 42) Psychoeducation (n = 42) TAU (n = 42) | Outpatients with psychosis ≤ 3 years’ duration | Acceptance-based intervention plus motivational interviewing to improve medication adherence for people with early psychosis (AIM-AT) | Compared to the other two groups, participants in the AIM-AT experienced significant improvements in primary outcomes (medication adherence and knowledge of the disease). The AIM-AT group was also better in psychotic symptoms, psychosocial functioning, satisfaction with service, duration of hospitalization, and number of patients hospitalized during the follow-up | Compared with psychoeducation and/or TAU, the AIM-AT group had more significant improvements, with moderate to large effect sizes (η2 = 0.07–0.18). Adherence: η2 = 0.18. Insight: η2 = 0.10. Psychotic symptoms (PANSS): η2 = 0.12. Functioning (SLOF): η2 = 0.09. Length of hospitalization: η2 = 0.09 |
Özer and Dişsiz[7] | RCT | Total n = 53. ACT (n = 26) TAU (n = 27) | People with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders with less than 3 years of duration | 8-session ACT program as an online group therapy | Online group ACT applied to individuals with early psychosis was found to reduce psychotic symptoms and increase their levels of functioning. Hospitalizations were also found to be lower in the intervention group | Differences in post-test and follow-up on symptoms (total PANSS): χ2 = 42.66; P = 0.000. Effect size in between-group differences: Positive symptoms (W = 0.80); Negative symptoms (W = 0.65); General symptoms (W = 0.86). Differences in social functioning: χ2 = 42.67; P = 0.000. Effect size: W = 0.821 |
Li et al[54] | No RCT | n = 148. No control group | Individuals were at high clinical risk for psychosis or with first-episode psychosis | Data obtained from the INTERACT study baseline assessment, during which all participants completed 6 days of experience sampling assessment of momentary negative affect and assessments of emotion regulation strategy use | The study demonstrated that greater emotion regulation (ER) flexibility predicts more stable negative emotions and faster affective recovery. Findings further provide evidence for ER flexibility in early psychosis, emphasizing the adaptive nature of regulatory flexibility to reduced instability in negative affect (NA) and faster recovery from NA in everyday life | At the intrapersonal level, results show significant associations between lower NA instability and higher ER flexibility (P = 0.049). However, the opposite pattern is observed at the interpersonal level: Higher NA instability is associated with greater ER flexibility (P < 0.001) |
Chong et al[70] | RCT | Total n = 72. ACT-LCP (n = 36). Active control (n = 37) | Early psychosis patients | Five-week group program focusing on ACT-based motivation for healthy lifestyles: ACT-based Lifestyle Counselling Program (ACT-LCP) | The ACT-LCP was feasible and acceptable, demonstrating initial efficacy in individuals with early psychosis. Improvements were observed in PF, autonomous motivation, psychotic symptoms, and quality of life at 12 weeks post-intervention | Significant improvements in ACT-LCP participants compared to controls at the 12-month follow-up in terms of physical activity (P < 0.001), autonomous motivation (aMD = 4.74; P < 0.001), psychological inflexibility (aMD = -7.69; P < 0.001), mental state (aMD = -6.83; P < 0.001), and quality of life (aMD = 0.46; P = 0.006) |
Table 4 Methodological quality appraisal of the randomized controlled trials
Domain/question | van Aubel et al[66] | Myin-Germeys et al[67] | Chien et al[69] | Özer and Dişsiz[7] | Chong et al[70] |
Internal validity. Bias related to: | |||||
Selection and allocation | |||||
1. Was true randomization used for assignment of participants to treatment groups? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
2. Was allocation to treatment groups concealed? | U | Y | Y | Y | Y |
3. Were treatment groups similar at the baseline? | Y | U | Y | Y | Y |
Administration of intervention/exposure | |||||
4. Were participants blind to treatment assignment? | N | N | N | N | N |
5. Were those delivering treatment blind to treatment assignment? | Y | Y | U | U | N |
6. Were outcomes assessors blind to treatment assignment? | Y | Y | Y | N | U |
Assessment, detection, and measurement of the outcome | |||||
7. Were treatment groups treated identically other than the intervention of interest? | Y | Y | Y | U | Y |
8. Was follow up complete and if not, were differences between groups in terms of their follow up adequately described and analyzed? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
9. Were participants analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Participant retention | |||||
10. Were outcomes measured in the same way for treatment groups? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Statistical conclusion validity | |||||
11. Were outcomes measured in a reliable way? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
12. Was appropriate statistical analysis used? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
13. Was the trial design appropriate, and any deviations from the standard RCT design accounted for in the conduct and analysis of the trial? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Score | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
Table 5 Description of the acceptance and commitment therapy in “Daily Life” key components
Module | Description |
Creative hopelessness | Help patients understand that their previous attempts to solve their problems are failing and that they should consider other alternatives. The module contains two different ACT metaphors and four ACT exercises on “creative hopelessness.” The proposed exercises help patients to become more aware of their avoidant coping strategies |
Acceptance | Acceptance is presented as an alternative to control and avoidance. Patients are provided with two ACT metaphors and seven ACT exercises focused on the “acceptance” component. These exercises are designed to help them put the theory into practice and experience their feelings and emotions without trying to change them |
Cognitive defusion | Cognitive defusion is a chance to distance oneself from one's thoughts. Patients are guided through exercises focusing on observing and distancing from their thoughts. This week's mobile module includes two metaphors about the “cognitive defusion” component and 7 exercises for practicing cognitive defusion. Once patients can detach from their thoughts, they can transfer these strategies to thoughts about the self and let go of their self-image, which is the topic of the next module |
Self as context | Distancing from unpleasant beliefs (learned during the cognitive defusion module) is generalized to include beliefs about the self. Once we understand that we are not what we think or feel, we can understand ourselves as observers of pleasant or unpleasant experiences. The self is resistant to change; on the contrary, its content can change. The daily life module for this week focuses on the “self as context” component and includes two metaphors and four “self as context” exercises (instead of “self as content”) |
Contact with the present moment | This component helps patients focus less on the past and future and more on the “here and now.” Patients have practiced these skills throughout the other modules. The practice continues during the daily life module the week after this session, where two “contact with the present moment” metaphors remind patients to be aware of the present moment, and the same four exercises they have practiced during the session so far guide them in this process |
Values | This module is designed to help people live a life guided by values rather than unpleasant experiences. During this session, patients are invited to think about their personal values, which serve as a guide in life and a pilot for their behavior. This module includes two metaphors from the “values” component. During the three days following the session, patients are supplied with 4 exercises to explore further which values are important to them. Exploring values is necessary to connect with the goal of the next module |
Committed action | “Putting theory into practice” is a session dedicated to building meaningful, realistic, specific goals according to the personal values identified in the “values” session. The “committed action” daily life module includes two new metaphors and four new exercises to help patients set and achieve their objectives step by step |
Psychological flexibility | The central theme of the last session is to understand how to apply ACT skills “in a flexible manner” to concrete situations, depending on the challenges of the present moment. Patients were given a module summarizing all previous components during this last week. The module contains one metaphor and one exercise related to each component (acceptance, cognitive defusion, values, and committed action) |
Table 6 Description of the intervention protocol: Acceptance and commitment therapy-based intervention to improve medication adherence
Session/content | Session/content |
Session 1: Commitment to the group program and understanding of psychosis, treatment, and care | Sessions 4-6: Goal review, mindfulness skill development, addressing medication ambivalence, and enhancing interpersonal and communication skills |
Session 2: Introduction to ACT and beliefs about illness and medication | Sessions 7-9: Identifying obstacles to goal attainment, working on acceptance of unpleasant emotional experiences, and learning to break negative thought patterns |
Session 3: Improved self-management of psychotic symptoms and negative thoughts, and medical history review | Session 10: Evaluation of changes and self-reflection, development of future plans and practices: “Maintaining effective coping strategies in high-risk life situations” and “behavioral rehearsal of relapse prevention” |
Table 7 Description of the intervention protocol: Acceptance and commitment therapy-based lifestyle counseling program
Session | Content |
Session 1: Commitment, guidance, and psychoeducation in ACT | To provide an overview of ACT and establish goals for adopting healthy lifestyle habits |
Session 2: Relationship between a healthy lifestyle and a sense of purpose | To guide participants in identifying their personal values and exploring how they can be aligned with healthy lifestyle choices |
Session 3: Acceptance and shared humanity | Decrease fusion between self-criticism and self-concept and cultivate a personal perspective |
Session 4: The inevitability of “that” | Implement strategies to manage negative cognitions associated with healthy behaviors |
Session 5: Commitment to action | Develop behaviors related to a healthy lifestyle that align with personal values |
- Citation: Pena-Garijo J, Baeza-Mor T, Martinez-Raga J. Acceptance and commitment therapy applied to early psychosis: Therapeutic foundations and a narrative systematic review. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(8): 107313
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i8/107313.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i8.107313