Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World Journal of Experimental Medicine. Aug 30, 2018; 8(1): 8-11
Published online Aug 30, 2018. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v8.i1.8
Autonomic function and ventricular tachyarrhythmias during acute myocardial infarction
Theofilos M Kolettis, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute and University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina 45500, Greece
ORCID number: Theofilos M Kolettis (0000-0002-6680-9131).
Author contributions: Kolettis TM wrote this article.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The author has no conflict of interest to declare.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Theofilos M Kolettis, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute and University of Ioannina Medical School, 1 Stavrou Niarxou Avenue, Ioannina 45500, Greece. thkolet@cc.uoi.gr
Telephone: +30-265-1007227 Fax: +30-265-1007053
Received: July 5, 2018
Peer-review started: July 5, 2018
First decision: August 2, 2018
Revised: August 5, 2018
Accepted: August 21, 2018
Article in press: August 21, 2018
Published online: August 30, 2018

Abstract

Most cases of sudden cardiac death are attributed to sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTs), triggered by acute coronary occlusion. Autonomic dysfunction, an important arrhythmogenic mechanism in this setting, is being actively investigated, aiming at the advent of preventive strategies. Recent experimental studies have shown vagal withdrawal after anterior myocardial infarction, coinciding with high incidence of VTs, followed by more gradual sympathetic activation coinciding with a second arrhythmia peak. This article summarizes recent knowledge on this intriguing topic, generating hypotheses that can be investigated in future experimental and clinical studies.

Key Words: Sudden cardiac death, Acute myocardial infarction, Ventricular tachyarrhythmias, Ventricular fibrillation, Delayed arrhythmogenesis, Ventricular tachycardia, Early arrhythmogenesis, Vagal activity, Sympathetic activity, Arrhythmogenic mechanisms

Core tip: Autonomic dysfunction in response to acute myocardial infarction is subject of continuous investigation. Recent experimental data indicated vagal withdrawal, followed by more gradual sympathetic activation, coinciding with early and delayed arrhythmogenesis, respectively. These findings call for further research on the pathophysiologic role of the autonomic nervous system on the ischemic ventricular myocardium.



INTRODUCTION

Sudden cardiac death is a major health-related problem worldwide, accounting for more than half of cardiovascular mortality[1]. It is invariably caused by sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTs), occurring in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (MI). The high incidence and the ominous prognosis of ischemia-related VTs dictate ample research efforts toward in-depth understanding of the underlying mechanisms, aiming at the advent of preventive strategies[2].

During acute-MI, epinephrine is released in the ischemic myocardium, followed by activation of chromaffin cells in the adrenal medulla[3]; epinephrine, either locally released or circulating, alters ventricular electrophysiology and has been long known to exert a prominent role in genesis of VTs[4]. Acute-MI is also often accompanied by marked autonomic dysfunction, but its precise time-course along the acute phase of MI and the ensuing arrhythmogenic effects remain incompletely understood. This article briefly summarizes recent knowledge on this topic that may offer further insights into the complex pathophysiology of sudden cardiac death.

AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTION DURING MI
Afferent stimuli

Although cardiogenic reflexes were first recognized in the mid-19th century, studies on the autonomic effects on the ischemic myocardium and their impact on VTs were systematically performed only a century later[5]. These led to early clinical reports introducing the role of autonomic dysfunction on ventricular electrophysiology following acute coronary occlusion[6]. The activation of ventricular afferent fibers in the ischemic myocardium was subsequently demonstrated, mediated by hemodynamic changes induced by acute-MI, as well as by the local production of chemical stimuli[7]. This process is dynamic, determined by the time-course of left ventricular hemodynamics and by the balance between the rate of production and metabolism of various mediators.

Sympathetic afferents are mainly nonmyelinated, with only occasional thinly myelinated Aδ-fibers, that form a network over the epicardium[8]. Most sympathetic afferents are activated by adenosine triphosphate and are classified as ischemia-sensitive[7], although the pathophysiologic significance of those not responding to adenosine triphosphate remains unknown. Afferent activation depends on the location of the ischemic myocardium, as shown by experimental[9] and clinical[10] data; in this regard, vagal Aδ- and nonmyelinated C-fibers, located in the inferior left and right ventricular wall, are frequently activated during ischemia involving these walls.

Efferent autonomic activation

Afferent stimuli reach the nucleus tractus solitarius, which acts as an integrative center, signaling emergency changes in the central nervous system. In this structure, a series of sensory nuclei, embedded in the medulla oblongata, form circuits with other nuclei in the brainstem and with a large number of other central regions. The medulla contains sympathetic cell bodies, with respective nerves travelling along the spinal cord; from there, sympathetic fibers synapse with sympathetic ganglia, and postganglionic fibers ultimately synapse at their target sites. The parasympathetic cell bodies exit the medulla as long preganglionic efferent fibers that form synapses with postganglionic fibers within the myocardium.

The effects of the autonomic nervous system on ventricular electrophysiology during myocardial ischemia have attracted rigorous research efforts[11-14]: Sympathetic activation shortens the ventricular action potential and the refractory period under normal conditions, but these actions vary in the ischemic ventricular myocardium. Thus, in addition to ionic imbalance, sympathetic activation enhances the dispersion of repolarization across the energy-depleted ischemic myocardium and lowers the fibrillation-threshold[11], perhaps without altering local conduction[12]. By contrast, parasympathetic stimulation prolongs the action potential duration and the effective refractory period[13]; hence, vagal activation exerts potent anti-fibrillatory actions on the ischemic myocardium, although transmural dispersion of repolarization seems unaffected[14].

Early clinical reports have underscored the involvement of both arms of the autonomic nervous system post-MI[15]; however, the precise time-course of sympathetic and vagal alterations and their contribution to arrhythmogenesis remain incompletely understood[2]. This can be explained by the marked individual variation, attributed to the size and location of MI, its hemodynamic sequelae, and to the magnitude of the accompanying symptoms of pain and anxiety. Moreover, accurate pathophysiologic conclusions are hindered by the inevitable delays in monitoring patients in coronary care units, coupled with the confounding effects of treatment.

VTs during acute MI

In response to acute coronary occlusion, two temporally distinct peaks have been described in various species, with several lines of epidemiological data pointing towards a similar curve in man[1,2]. Although this topic has been long debated, classification into VTs linked to reversible ischemia versus those occurring during evolving necrosis is based on firm pathophysiologic differences; more importantly, classification into early and delayed VTs is clinically sound, as it corresponds to the pre- and in-hospital phases, respectively, carrying profound consequences on survival rates and potential treatment strategies. As noted above, scarce data exist in humans on the incidence of early-phase VTs and concurrent autonomic responses. Therefore, the investigation on the underlying mechanisms of ischemia-induced VTs relies largely on in vivo animal models; indeed, these models offer clear-cut advantages in monitoring physiologic parameters during specific periods after coronary ligation, in the absence of the confounding effects of various interventions.

ANALYSIS OF RECENT EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES

Our group recently examined the autonomic responses and the incidence of VTs in the in vivo rat-model, by comparing sham-operated controls with an animal-group post-ligation of the left coronary artery[16]. Continuous electrocardiographic recording was performed in conscious rats via implanted telemetry transmitters, and autonomic indices were derived by heart rate variability techniques; specifically, sympathetic activity was assessed by detrended fluctuation analysis, and vagal activity by time- and frequency-domain analysis. Frequent VTs were observed post-ligation, following the typical pattern of an early prominent peak and a more prolonged delayed arrhythmogenic window. Vagal activity decreased markedly immediately post-ligation and remained low throughout the 24 h-observational period. The pattern of sympathetic activation differed, showing a progressive rise; it became significant at a later stage post-MI and remained elevated until the end of the recording. Using micro-neurographic recordings, such delayed sympathetic activation post-MI was also observed by Jardine et al[17] in the ovine-model, in which enhanced cardiac sympathetic nerve-activity was observed only after the first hour post-ligation. These findings support the notion of attenuated parasympathetic, rather than enhanced sympathetic-inputs, contributing to early-phase VTs, given the aforementioned anti-fibrillatory vagal effects on the ischemic myocardium[14].

Two recent studies lend further support to this hypothesis: in the canine-model[18], no antiarrhythmic effect was found after suppression of the left stellate-ganglion for 60 min post-MI, except from experiments in which its action was completely abrogated. Likewise, a study from our group[19] examined the incidence of VTs post-ligation in rats pretreated with clonidine, a centrally acting inhibitor of sympathetic preganglionic-neurons; treated rats displayed a lower incidence of VTs occurring during the delayed phase post-MI, but early phase arrhythmogenesis was unaffected[19].

PERSPECTIVE

Autonomic dysfunction, commonly observed during acute MI, contributes to the genesis of VTs. Autonomic responses vary, depending on several modulating factors, some of which remain incompletely understood; hence, the precise nature and time-course of such responses during the acute phase of MI is subject of continuous investigation. Early-stage VTs are at the center of research-efforts, because they invariably occur prior to medical attendance and they are responsible for most cases of sudden cardiac death. Recent in vivo experimental studies have drawn the attention toward vagal withdrawal, associated with pro-fibrillatory effects in the ischemic ventricular myocardium. Such decreased parasympathetic inputs appear to occur swiftly in response to ischemia, whereas sympathetic activation is more gradual and coincides with a second cluster of VTs. These studies provide further insights into the pathophysiology of acute MI and sudden cardiac death. Nonetheless, these findings should be viewed as hypothesis-generating research that warrants further validation in animal models and, ultimately, in patients. The investigation of autonomic dysfunction during acute MI is an intriguing topic of high clinical importance that may unravel further aspects of the interrelation between the brain and the heart.

Footnotes

Manuscript source: Invited Manuscript

Specialty type: Medicine, research and experimental

Country of origin: Greece

Peer-review report classification

Grade A (Excellent): A

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P- Reviewer: Langdon S S- Editor: Dou Y L- Editor: A E- Editor: Wu YXJ

References
1.  Kolettis TM. Ventricular arrhythmias during acute ischemia/infarction: mechanisms and management. Cardiac arrhythmias: from basic mechanism to state-of-the-art management. London: Springer-Verlag 2014; 237-251.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Kolettis TM. Coronary artery disease and ventricular tachyarrhythmia: pathophysiology and treatment. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2013;13:210-217.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Schömig A. Adrenergic mechanisms in myocardial infarction: cardiac and systemic catecholamine release.. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;12 Suppl 1:S1-S7.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Warner MR, Kroeker TS, Zipes DP. Sympathetic stimulation and norepinephrine infusion modulate extracellular potassium concentration during acute myocardial ischemia. Circ Res. 1992;71:1078-1087.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Han J, Garciadejalon P, Moe GK. Adrenergic effects on ventricular vulnerability. Circ Res. 1964;14:516-524.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 299]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 312]  [Article Influence: 11.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Webb SW, Adgey AA, Pantridge JF. Autonomic disturbance at onset of acute myocardial infarction. Br Med J. 1972;3:89-92.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 327]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 322]  [Article Influence: 6.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Ardell JL. Sensory transduction of the ischemic myocardium. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;299:H1753-H1754.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Fu LW, Longhurst JC. Regulation of cardiac afferent excitability in ischemia. Sensory Nerves. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2009; 185-225.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Zucker IH, Cornish KG. The Bezold-Jarisch in the conscious dog. Circ Res. 1981;49:940-948.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Chiladakis JA, Patsouras N, Manolis AS. The Bezold-Jarisch reflex in acute inferior myocardial infarction: clinical and sympathovagal spectral correlates. Clin Cardiol. 2003;26:323-328.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Opthof T, Coronel R, Vermeulen JT, Verberne HJ, van Capelle FJ, Janse MJ. Dispersion of refractoriness in normal and ischaemic canine ventricle: effects of sympathetic stimulation. Cardiovasc Res. 1993;27:1954-1960.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 65]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Kolettis TM, Kontonika M, La Rocca V, Vlahos AP, Baltogiannis GG, Kyriakides ZS. Local conduction during acute myocardial infarction in rats: Interplay between central sympathetic activation and endothelin. J Arrhythm. 2017;33:144-146.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Ng GA, Brack KE, Coote JH. Effects of direct sympathetic and vagus nerve stimulation on the physiology of the whole heart--a novel model of isolated Langendorff perfused rabbit heart with intact dual autonomic innervation. Exp Physiol. 2001;86:319-329.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 104]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 108]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Shen MJ, Zipes DP. Role of the autonomic nervous system in modulating cardiac arrhythmias. Circ Res. 2014;114:1004-1021.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 469]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 511]  [Article Influence: 51.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Lombardi F, Sandrone G, Spinnler MT, Torzillo D, Lavezzaro GC, Brusca A, Malliani A. Heart rate variability in the early hours of an acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:1037-1044.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 51]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 52]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Kolettis TM, Kontonika M, Lekkas P, Vlahos AP, Baltogiannis GG, Gatzoulis KA, Chrousos GP. Autonomic responses during acute myocardial infarction in the rat model: implications for arrhythmogenesis. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2018;29:339-345.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Jardine DL, Charles CJ, Ashton RK, Bennett SI, Whitehead M, Frampton CM, Nicholls MG. Increased cardiac sympathetic nerve activity following acute myocardial infarction in a sheep model. J Physiol. 2005;565:325-333.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 67]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Yu L, Wang M, Hu D, Huang B, Zhou L, Zhou X, Wang Z, Wang S, Jiang H. Blocking the Nav1.8 channel in the left stellate ganglion suppresses ventricular arrhythmia induced by acute ischemia in a canine model. Sci Rep. 2017;7:534.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Kolettis TM, Kontonika M, Barka E, Daskalopoulos EP, Baltogiannis GG, Tourmousoglou C, Papalois A, Kyriakides ZS. Central sympathetic activation and arrhythmogenesis during acute myocardial infarction: modulating effects of endothelin-B receptors. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2015;2:6.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]