BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews Open Access
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Exp Med. Sep 20, 2026; 16(3): 121518
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5493/wjem.121518
Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase as a marker of bone formation: Clinical and imaging correlates
Pooja Jayaraman Thirunavukkarasu, Arunagiri Gunasekar, Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Thiruvallur 602001, Tamil Nadu, India
Naveen Jeyaraman, Madhan Jeyaraman, Department of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India
Naveen Jeyaraman, Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy, Madhan Jeyaraman, Department of Regenerative Medicine, Agathisha Institute of Stemcell and Regenerative Medicine (AISRM), Chennai 600030, Tamil Nadu, India
Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy, Department of Orthopaedics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Karaikal 609602, Puducherry, India
Viji Devanand, Department of Physiology, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai 600044, Tamil Nadu, India
Sanjeevi Bharadwaj, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wye Valley National Health Service Trust, Hereford HR1 2BN, Herefordshire, United Kingdom
ORCID number: Naveen Jeyaraman (0000-0002-4362-3326); Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy (0000-0002-2445-2883); Madhan Jeyaraman (0000-0002-9045-9493).
Author contributions: Jeyaraman M, Bharadwaj S, and Jeyaraman N designed the research; Thirunavukkarasu PJ, Gunasekar A, Jeyaraman N, Nallakumarasamy A, Devanand V, and Bharadwaj S analyzed the articles for performing review and wrote the manuscript; Jeyaraman M finalized the manuscript.
AI contribution statement: No AI tool was involved in the generation of research data, interpretation of results, or formulation of conclusions.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no conflict of interest in publishing the manuscript.
Corresponding author: Madhan Jeyaraman, MD, PhD, Researcher, Department of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Velappanchavadi, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India. madhanjeyaraman@gmail.com
Received: March 26, 2026
Revised: May 26, 2026
Accepted: June 17, 2026
Published online: September 20, 2026
Processing time: 178 Days and 8.8 Hours

Abstract

Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) is a biochemical marker of bone formation, reflecting osteoblast function and bone turnover. Unlike bone mass and structure measurements using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography, BSAP does not directly measure bone mass or microarchitecture but provides dynamic information on bone metabolism. BSAP has high specificity for bone formation with low biological variability and consistent levels across many clinical conditions, making it a reliable biochemical indicator of bone turnover, especially early response to anabolic treatment and in high-turnover bone conditions. Biologically, BSAP is synthesized by osteoblasts and is important in matrix maturation and mineralisation. In clinical practice, BSAP increases with anabolic treatment, often before changes in bone density, and is thus a predictor of early treatment response. Low levels of BSAP are found in conditions with delayed fracture healing, such as hypophosphatasia, and high levels are found in high-turnover conditions such as Paget’s disease. BSAP also has a role in conditions such as chronic kidney disease, where it can discriminate between states of bone turnover. However, its use is hampered by variability between laboratories, the absence of reference ranges, and the lack of normative data in different populations. Novel methods combining BSAP with innovative imaging techniques have the potential to improve personalised diagnosis, but need further research. This review highlights the potential of BSAP as an adjunct biomarker in use in early diagnosis, monitoring therapeutic intervention and overall assessment of bone metabolism for clinical decision making in metabolic bone diseases in conjunction with imaging.

Key Words: Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase; Osteoblast; Wnt/β-catenin; Skeletal metabolism; Bone formation

Core Tip: Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) is a good indicator of osteoblastic bone formation, released by osteoblasts as the matrix matures and becomes mineralized. In contrast to imaging, BSAP reflects metabolic activity, increasing early with anabolic therapies and helping to differentiate bone disorders, including Paget’s disease, hypophosphatasia and chronic kidney disease-related bone disease. However, due to the difficulties in standardization and in having norm values, BSAP’s combination with imaging and artificial intelligence models holds the promise of a more accurate and personalized approach to skeletal health.



INTRODUCTION

Bone is a living tissue that is constantly being remodelled by the activities of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. The former is involved in the formation of new bone matrix, and the latter is involved in the removal of old and damaged bone[1]. This process is called bone remodeling and is essential to bone's mineral balance and strength. Osteocytes, a type of bone cell, sense when the bone is under stress or damaged and regulate the action of the osteoblasts and osteoclasts.

While imaging techniques can measure bone mass and structure, biochemical markers can give insight into bone metabolism and turnover dynamics[2]. The markers may be generally divided into bone resorption markers [for example, C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) and tartate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b, indicative of osteoclast activity) and markers of bone formation (such as osteocalcin, procollagen type 1 n-terminal propeptide (P1NP), and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), which reflect osteoblast activity). These markers are useful to analyse bone metabolic disorders, monitor treatment effectiveness, and fracture risk[3-6]. There are however some differences in specificity, biological variability and clinical applicability which could restrict the reliability of these markers in some conditions.

BSAP is an isoenzyme, mainly secreted by osteoblasts, which is a key factor in the bone formation process. Early studies used total alkaline phosphatase (ALP) as a marker of bone formation, but it lacks tissue specificity and is produced by other tissue types including the liver. To discover that BSAP is a bone-specific isoenzyme greatly enhanced the specificity of biochemical assessment of bone formation. The amount of BSAP reflects the amount of new bone turnover by the active osteoblasts[7]. Biological variability and stability under clinical conditions is lower for BSAP than for other markers of bone formation like osteocalcin and P1NP[8]. Osteocalcin is biologically highly variable, and P1NP is sensitive, but it may depend on systemic factors and assay variability. This review, therefore, is intended to critically discuss the biological background, clinical uses, and diagnostic value of BSAP, especially its superiority over other markers of bone formation and its role in conjunction with imaging methods in the diagnosis of bone metabolism (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Biological role of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase in bone formation. BSAP: Bone specific alkaline phosphatase; TNALP: Tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase; PTH: Parathormone; IGF-1: Insulin-like growth factor-1; FGF23: Fibroblast growth factor-23; HA: Hyaluronic acid.
THE BIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY OF BSAP IS SUMMARIZED

ALP is an enzyme that is present throughout the body, particularly in the liver, bile ducts and bones[9]. It is involved in dephosphorylation, a process which is necessary for metabolism and bone mineralization[10,11]. Four ALP isoenzymes exist in humans - placental, germ cell, intestinal and the tissue nonspecific isoform. Osteoblasts are the source of BSAP, which is found on the surface of osteoblasts, and this gives it specific properties for bone tissue[12].

Organic matrix of bone is synthesized by osteoblasts and is made up of mainly type I collagen and other proteins. They also produce BSAP, which they bind to their surface and to small matrix vesicles. Signaling pathways that regulate osteoblast activity and differentiation regulate this process. When mineralization is initiated, BSAP hydrolyzes pyrophosphate which is a key inhibitor of mineralization, into inorganic phosphate, providing more phosphate for mineral deposition in the collagenous matrix. It also alters the proteins like osteopontin which aids the formation and stabilization of hydroxyapatite crystals, a critical process for bone strength and rigidity. Such processes take place in the context of bone remodeling, the balance between bone formation by osteoblasts and bone resorption by the osteoclasts. Factors that upregulate BSAP production include hormonal factors like parathyroid hormone and vitamin D, while other factors like fibroblast growth factor 23 limit phosphate availability leading to potential failure of mineralization[11].

Besides the biologic role, circulating BSAP levels are also dependent on the physiologic stage and the skeletal activity[12]. In adults, levels are generally low, but they tend to elevate during childhood, adolescence, after fractures, and following surgery[13]. In women, levels remain stable until menopause, then the rate of bone turnover increases, leading to higher ALP and BSAP levels compared to younger women. Liver disorders, some cancers, or very high turnover bone disorders can elevate the total ALP and make BSAP measurements less reliable. Unlike several other bone markers, BSAP remains relatively stable in chronic kidney disease, supporting its clinical utility in such conditions.

Other bone turnover markers include osteocalcin and procollagen type 1 propeptides [N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) and C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen]. These markers provide a dynamic assessment of skeletal metabolism and reflect osteoblast and osteoclast activity more rapidly than changes in bone mineral density. PINP reflects type 1 collagen synthesis and demonstrates relatively low variability. Osteocalcin, produced from osteoblasts, has a short half-life, complex post-translational processing, and depends on vitamin K. Unlike PINP - which accumulates when kidneys fail - BSAP is not affected by kidney function, so it is more reliable for patients with kidney disease. For bone resorption, the main markers are serum CTX and N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen. CTX responds quickly to antiresorptive drugs and has a significant diurnal variation; thus, morning fasting samples are preferred. In contrast, BSAP demonstrates minimal circadian variation. Together, BSAP, PINP, and CTX provide complementary information on bone formation and resorption, and their selection depends on the clinical context and the specific aspect of bone turnover being assessed[14].

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF BSAP
Monitoring of therapeutic response

When bone-building anabolic drugs are prescribed, the key clinical question is whether the osteoblasts are effectively stimulated. BSAP, as a marker of osteoblast activity, plays a vital role in assessing this response. When osteoblasts are active, BSAP levels elevate; thus, BSAP tracks the effectiveness of anabolic osteoporosis treatments like teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab. An early rise in BSAP following treatment usually indicates that the therapy is effective and bone turnover is active[15]. For example, in a postmenopausal woman receiving teriparatide therapy, a rise in BSAP levels within the first 3 months may indicate an effective anabolic response even before measurable changes in bone mineral density are observed.

Monitoring response to teriparatide, abaloparatide, romosozumab - teriparatide, a recombinant human parathyroid hormone analogue administered as a daily injection, rapidly rises BSAP, with peak concentrations observed between one and twelve months, followed by a decline when the therapy is discontinued[16,17]. Abaloparatide, which acts on parathyroid hormone-related protein/peptide, also boosts BSAP, but not quite as much as Teriparatide. Romosozumab inhibits sclerostin, so it stimulates bone formation and slows down bone breakdown. An early and marked rise in bone formation markers is observed initially, followed by a gradual decline to baseline over subsequent months. This early surge in the levels of biomarkers corresponds to the rapid anabolic effects[18,19].

Time course of BSAP changes after therapy - the time duration for the response varies among the anabolic agents. Romosozumab produces a significant rise within days to one month of therapy, while teriparatide and abaloparatide require nearly 3 months to produce a significant elevation of BSAP. With teriparatide, the elevated levels persist for several months, while with romosozumab, it declines approximately after a period of 6 months[20,21].

Predicting bone mineral density gains - an early rise in BSAP levels is a sign of an increased rate of formation of new bone and improved bone mineral density. As the biochemical changes precede the measurable changes by imaging techniques, it is an indication that increased BSAP is associated with long-term bone mineral density gains. A mild increase is suggestive of partial anabolic response, while a significant elevation is suggestive of a stronger therapeutic effect[22]. Compared to other bone formation markers such as PINP and osteocalcin, BSAP demonstrates greater specificity for osteoblastic activity and improved stability across clinical conditions. When used alongside CTX, it provides a more comprehensive assessment of bone turnover.

Assessment of bone turnover and fracture healing

Fracture healing is a dynamic process involving stages of inflammation, repair, and remodeling. Clinically, in patients with long bone fractures, a rise in BSAP levels during 3-6 weeks reflects active callus formation, whereas persistently low levels may indicate delayed healing. Immediately after the injury, hematoma formation occurs, and an inflammatory reaction sets in to clear the debris and initiate tissue repair. This is followed by the formation of a soft callus, which stabilizes the fracture site. The osteoblasts synthesize new bone matrix, which converts the soft callus into mineralized hard callus[23,24].

BSAP changes during fracture healing - the levels of BSAP do not rise immediately following a fracture. During the stage of inflammation, the concentration tends to remain at the baseline. Approximately 3-6 weeks post-injury, the levels begin to rise, reflecting increased osteoblast activity during the stage of callus formation and mineralization. Peak levels are observed most commonly between 6 weeks and 12 weeks, corresponding to active bone deposition. As the remodeling phase regresses, the bone formation declines, and BSAP levels return toward baseline[20,25].

Link to callus formation and remodeling - as it is known that elevated BSAP corresponds to callus formation and mineralization, elevated levels of BSAP correspond to new bone formation and mineralization, supporting the structural stabilization and remodeling at the fracture site[26-28].

BSAP in delayed union or non-union - in cases of delayed union or non-union of the fracture, BSAP levels may not increase or may even decline. Persistently low levels beyond 6-8 weeks indicate impaired osteoblastic activity and insufficient callus formation. Declining BSAP levels may suggest non-union. However, it should be correlated with other clinical diagnostic methods and imaging studies to provide an accurate diagnosis[29].

Participate in metabolic bone disorders

Bone is a living tissue which is continually being built up and broken down to to preserve structural integrity, mineral homeostasis. If this balance is upset, different metabolic bone diseases may arise. BSAP helps in identifying and evaluating osteoporosis, Paget’s, osteomalacia, and renal osteodystrophy[30-32]. Osteoporosis - osteoporosis is the most common metabolic bone disorder. It is low bone mass and a loss of normal bone structure, which make Weakens bones and increases their risk of breaking. It typically occurs due to an an imbalance between the processes of bone formation and bone resorption. From diagnostic point of view, BSAP levels can be elevated or normal in postmenopausal women and older adults. This varies, depending on the rate of bone turnover.

BSAP is one of the important indicators of high turnover osteoporosis and is helpful in distinguishing high turnover and low turn over states. This serves as an early biochemical signal which can help in risk stratification and guidance of individualized therapeutic decisions. When interpreted alongside resorptive markers such as CTX, BSAP provides a more comprehensive assessment of bone remodeling dynamics[33,34]. For prognosis and treatment monitoring, elevated BSAP levels indicate enhanced osteoblastic activity and improved bone mineral density[35]. If BSAP levels remain low persistently, it often indicates low bone turnover or weak response to treatment. On the other hand, if BSAP levels rise too high, it might indicate overtreatment or temporary remodeling of bone[36].

Paget’s disease - in Paget’s disease of bone, the process of bone remodeling is highly dysregulated with accelerated and disorganised cycles of bone formation and resorption. During the active phase of the disease, the BSAP levels are elevated around 10-25 times the upper limit of the normal range, indicating excessive osteoblastic activity secondary to excessive turnover. BSAP is preferred over total ALP because it is specific to the bones and its levels decline with appropriate treatment with bisphosphonates[37,38].

Osteomalacia - osteomalacia is another condition, where bones do not mineralize properly, often due to low vitamin D, phosphate imbalance, or renal dysfunction. BSAP levels tend to be high in these patients, reflecting enhanced osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis, which is not properly mineralized. When high BSAP levels are present alongside low vitamin D, calcium, and phosphate, the diagnosis is more suggestive of osteomalacia than osteoporosis, as in osteoporosis, mineralisation is generally preserved despite reduced bone mass[39].

Renal osteodystrophy - renal osteodystrophy encompasses a spectrum of skeletal abnormalities associated with chronic kidney disease and may present with both high and low bone turnover. In secondary parathyroidism, elevated human parathyroid hormone stimulates bone turnover, resulting in increased BSAP. Conversely, in dynamic bone diseases, BSAP levels are decreased as bone formation is suppressed[40-42]. In patients with chronic kidney disease, BSAP can help differentiate low-turnover adynamic bone disease from high-turnover states, aiding clinical decision-making.

Applications in special populations

In children, bone is in a continuous state of growth and remodeling, characterised by rapid modelling, elongation, and structural adaptation. Naturally, bone turnover markers like BSAP are higher in the pediatric population than in adults[43]. But in some childhood bone diseases, BSAP may deviate from the reference range, providing an important diagnostic insight. Interpretation of BSAP levels in pediatric populations requires age-specific reference ranges due to physiologically elevated bone turnover.

In rickets, the BSAP levels increase drastically, even reaching ten to twenty times the normal upper limit for age. This reflects the heightened osteoblastic activity in response to defective mineralization, making it a highly sensitive biochemical marker for diagnosis and treatment monitoring[44]. On the contrary, in rare genetic conditions like hypophosphatasia[45], mutations in the ALPL gene result in abnormally low levels of BSAP. In other disorders, like osteogenesis imperfecta, the BSAP levels can be normal or high, depending on the rate of bone turnover and extent of disease at a given time (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical applications of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase.
Clinical scenario
BSAP pattern
Clinical interpretation
Utility
Anabolic therapy↑ Early riseIncreased osteoblast activityEarly response marker
Antiresorptive therapy↓ DecreaseReduced bone turnoverMonitor treatment
Fracture healing↑ Peak at 6-12 weeksCallus formationAssess healing
Osteoporosis↑ Or normalHigh vs low turnoverGuide therapy
Paget’s disease↑↑ Markedly elevatedExcess bone formationDiagnosis and monitoring
OsteomalaciaDefective mineralizationDiagnostic support
CKD bone disease↑ or ↓Turnover differentiationClinical decision-making
IMAGING CORRELATES OF BSAP

Though conventional imaging techniques such as X-rays, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and computed tomography scans provide information about the bone density and structure, they cannot directly reflect the biological processes of bone remodeling. BSAP is a marker of osteoblastic activity that indicates the rate of new bone formation. When biochemical and imaging results are interpreted together, a more detailed analysis of bone health can be made[46]. Imaging modalities primarily provide structural information, whereas BSAP reflects the underlying metabolic activity, thereby allowing simultaneous assessment of bone quantity and turnover.

Correlation of BSAP levels with DXA, quantitative computed tomography, and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography findings

The standard diagnostic tool for the assessment of bone mineral density and diagnosis of osteoporosis is DXA. It quantifies bone mineral density but does not measure the turnover rates. In contrast, BSAP reflects the rate of bone turnover as a marker of osteoblastic activity. In cases of osteoporosis, initially, elevated BSAP levels with low bone mineral density (BMD) are suggestive of rapid bone turnover and bone loss. When anabolic therapy is initiated, the levels of BSAP are elevated even before any changes can be detected in DXA, while when antiresorptive drugs are initiated, BSAP levels fall even before the BMD starts to recover. Thus, BSAP acts as an early indicator of therapeutic response. The difference in time is indicative of biochemical changes in BSAP often precede structural changes detected by imaging, making it particularly useful for early evaluation of effectiveness of treatment. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) allow for 3D evaluation of bone structure, such as trabecular thickness, spacing, and thickness of the cortex[47]. The linkage between BSAP and these scans is a subject of research shows that older persons with high BSAP have lower BMD and higher porosity.

Increased risk of fracture due to low bone density (cortical bone) on QCT. When started on anabolic HR-pQCT demonstrates improvement in trabecular number and BSAP rises early cortical thickness[48]. These results show a correlation between high BSAP and correlation of biochemical activity with structural changes in bone microarchitecture remodeling. These patterns are useful in distinguishing in patients with CKD between high and low bone turnover[49].

BSAP and bone microarchitecture

Bone microarchitecture (namely trabecular internal network) is important for the integrity of bone. The mineralization of the bone sponge and the formation of a strong cortical shell are important to the strength of the bone regardless of the bone mineral density. Even when the DXA values are within the normal range, minute microarchitectural deterioration can increase the risk of fracture. This explains why patients with normal BMD may still experience fractures, as BSAP reflects ongoing remodeling that may compromise bone quality. Persistently elevated BSAP indicates excessive remodeling, which disrupts the trabecular connectivity and increases porosity. HR-pQCT can detect these microarchitectural changes; however, sustained elevation of BSAP is indicative of high bone turnover. A transient rise in BSAP levels may be associated with moderate aerobic exercise, which suggests that short-term elevations reflecting adaptive remodeling may be beneficial when accompanied by improvements in bone architecture[50].

Integration of biochemical and imaging markers in clinical decision making

The integration of biochemical and imaging markers enhances clinical decision-making. For example, low DXA-derived bone mineral density with normal BSAP may indicate low-turnover bone loss, as seen in ageing. In contrast, low bone mineral density with elevated BSAP indicates high-turnover conditions, such as in postmenopausal states. Despite the presence of normal bone mineral density values in conditions such as Paget’s disease of bone and osteomalacia, BSAP levels remain elevated. Thus, combining BSAP with imaging studies can help differentiate between structural bone loss and changes in bone turnover, increasing the accuracy of diagnosis and This will help facilitate more informed therapeutic decisions.

METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS

While BSAP is a great bone formation marker and osteoblast function, more than just numbers are needed for accurate interpretation. Analytical methodology, biological variability, and patient-specific factors like age, renal function and In order to accurately interpret, comorbidities should be taken into account.

Assay types and standardization issues

Although the measurement of BSAP requires only a single blood sample, testing methodologies vary across laboratories. Earlier, techniques such as electrophoresis and heat inactivation were used to differentiate BSAP from hepatic ALP. In recent years, immunoassays, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunoradiometric assays, and electrochemiluminescence immunoassays, have been used to target the bone-specific isoform. Automated immunoassays employing monoclonal antibodies are increasingly used for improved sensitivity and specificity[51-53].

Biological variability and confounding factors

BSAP reflects the current osteoblastic activity but is influenced by physiological and pathological factors. Intra-individual variability exists as the BSAP levels fluctuate with factors such as age, growth spurts, fracture healing, liver disease, and certain medications. ALP levels may be elevated in liver disease due to hepatic isoforms, which can act as a confounding factor[54]. In addition, medications such as antiresorptive agents and anabolic therapies can significantly alter BSAP levels, which should be considered when interpreting results. BSAP exhibits only minimal diurnal variation, and its levels remain relatively unaffected by intake of food, menstrual cycle, and routine physical activity. Transient elevations may be present in acute skeletal injury. These confounding factors highlight the importance of interpreting BSAP levels in conjunction with clinical context and other diagnostic findings.

Interpretation in the context of renal function, age, sex, and comorbidities

Since the excretion of BSAP is not via the renal route, it remains a reliable marker in patients with chronic kidney disease, unlike other biomarkers that are renally excreted and accumulate in cases of renal failure[55]. Children and adolescents generally have higher levels of BSAP due to growth spurts, while postmenopausal women often exhibit elevated BSAP levels due to an increased rate of bone turnover. Other co-existing factors and comorbidities, including liver disorders or genetic conditions such as hypophosphatasia, should also be considered as they may influence the results and complicate result interpretation[42,56]. However, standardized normative reference ranges for BSAP across different age groups, sexes, and ethnic populations remain limited, which may affect its interpretation across diverse clinical settings. Furthermore, variations in BSAP levels across age, sex, and ethnicity highlight the need for population-specific reference ranges to improve diagnostic accuracy.

LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS OF BSAP

Although BSAP is a useful measure of bone formation, it is only an one of the elements of the overall framework for comprehensive evaluation of bone health. There are several limitations and gaps in knowledge that need to be overcome before it can be has become a routine clinical tool that is standardized.

Gaps in current evidence

Incomplete standardization - a universally standardized method for measuring BSAP has not yet been established, despite many years of progress. This is because laboratories use different assay methods, reference ranges, and calibration standards, and thus the interlaboratory BSAP results vary by as much as 15%-20%, which affects the clinical interpretation[57].

Limited data on certain groups - most BSAP research focuses on older adults and postmenopausal women. Thus, significant gaps remain in men with hypogonadism and osteoporosis, the pediatric and adolescent population, individuals with diverse ethnic backgrounds whose baseline levels may vary, and patients with chronic systemic diseases. These gaps limit the generalizability of BSAP interpretation across diverse populations.

Uncertain predictive thresholds - although an early rise in BSAP is associated with improvement in bone density and fracture healing, precise predictive thresholds have not been defined. BSAP levels are affected by various factors such as age, therapeutic modality, and baseline status. This limits the use of BSAP as a standalone predictive biomarker for clinical decision-making.

Need for longitudinal and interventional studies.

Long-term monitoring - prospective long-term longitudinal studies are needed to correlate BSAP with imaging modalities such as DXA, QCT, and HR-pQCT for obtaining detailed clinical outcomes. Intervention-based trials - though it is known that levels of BSAP elevate with anabolic therapies and decline with antiresorptive agents, evidence on whether treatment adjustments based on BSAP levels improve clinical outcomes remains limited. Therefore, randomized clinical trials are required to evaluate this.

Potential for BSAP in artificial intelligence-driven bone health and precision medicine

BSAP as a digital biomarker - BSAP may be incorporated into data-driven predictive models integrating biochemical, imaging, and clinical data to enhance assessment of bone health[58]. Personalization of therapy - such integrative approaches may support personalized treatment strategies by identifying patients at higher risk of fracture or altered bone turnover; however, these applications require further validation before clinical implementation, particularly in predicting fracture healing and identifying high-risk individuals. Implementation challenges - the integration of BSAP into data-driven platforms requires standardized data collection, assay harmonization, and robust validation. Secure and interoperable data systems are essential to integrate biochemical, imaging, and clinical information while ensuring patient privacy. Further, transparent interpretation of models and representation of diverse groups are essential for fair and consistent implementation.

CONCLUSION

BSAP is an important biochemical marker of bone formation and is more specific of osteoblastic activity than many other biochemical markers. It offers useful information on skeletal remodelling, and can sometimes find changes before they are identified by bone mineral density scans. It is also a recent study that confirms its utility as a dynamic and early marker of bone turnover and treatment response. In osteoporosis, the levels of BSAP may be a marker of early disease activity, and during the healing of fractures, BSAP levels are initially elevated and then decreased as the fracture progresses. BSAP is useful in disorders like Paget’s disease or renal osteodystrophy, to determine if the bone is being formed excessively, or not formed at all, or if the bone is being formed in a dysregulated manner. In conjunction with imaging techniques such as dual-energy X ray absorptiometry and when used along with markers such as PINP and CTX, BSAP provides comprehensive monitoring. Further validation is needed for the use of emerging integrative approaches, incorporating biochemical markers, imaging and clinical data, to further increase its clinical utility. An integrative approach allows early therapeutic intervention, personalized treatment strategies and better overall management of skeletal disorders. In addition, there will be a need for interdisciplinary cooperation between biochemists, radiologists and clinicians to maximize the use of this in clinical practice.

References
1.  Hadjidakis DJ, Androulakis II. Bone remodeling. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1092:385-396.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1226]  [Cited by in RCA: 1004]  [Article Influence: 50.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (3)]
2.  Seibel MJ. Biochemical markers of bone turnover: part I: biochemistry and variability. Clin Biochem Rev. 2005;26:97-122.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Ebina K, Etani Y, Noguchi T, Nakata K, Okada S. Clinical effects of teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab. 2025;43:3-9.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 27]  [Article Influence: 27.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Nyman MT, Paavolainen P, Forsius S, Lamberg-Allardt C. Clinical evaluation of fracture healing by serum osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1991;80:289-293.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
5.  Szulc P, Naylor K, Hoyle NR, Eastell R, Leary ET; National Bone Health Alliance Bone Turnover Marker Project. Use of CTX-I and PINP as bone turnover markers: National Bone Health Alliance recommendations to standardize sample handling and patient preparation to reduce pre-analytical variability. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28:2541-2556.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 158]  [Cited by in RCA: 256]  [Article Influence: 28.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Taniguchi T, Matsumoto T, Shindo H. Changes of serum levels of osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase, IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 during fracture healing. Injury. 2003;34:477-479.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in RCA: 33]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Bhattoa HP. Laboratory aspects and clinical utility of bone turnover markers. EJIFCC. 2018;29:117-128.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  Sharma U, Pal D, Prasad R. Alkaline phosphatase: an overview. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2014;29:269-278.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 732]  [Cited by in RCA: 589]  [Article Influence: 49.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Buchet R, Millán JL, Magne D. Multisystemic functions of alkaline phosphatases. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1053:27-51.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 162]  [Cited by in RCA: 134]  [Article Influence: 10.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
10.  Swetha S, Rao GN, Mahalakshmi V, Sathya R. Alkaline phosphatase and acid phosphatase in health and disease - A systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2025;29:324-334.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Vimalraj S. Alkaline phosphatase: Structure, expression and its function in bone mineralization. Gene. 2020;754:144855.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 123]  [Cited by in RCA: 615]  [Article Influence: 102.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Makris K, Mousa C, Cavalier E. Alkaline Phosphatases: Biochemistry, Functions, and Measurement. Calcif Tissue Int. 2023;112:233-242.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 95]  [Article Influence: 31.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
13.  Abe Y, Chiba M, Yaklai S, Pechayco RS, Suzuki H, Takahashi T. Increase in bone metabolic markers and circulating osteoblast-lineage cells after orthognathic surgery. Sci Rep. 2019;9:20106.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 25]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Garnero P. New developments in biological markers of bone metabolism in osteoporosis. Bone. 2014;66:46-55.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 91]  [Cited by in RCA: 98]  [Article Influence: 8.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Bandeira L, Lewiecki EM. Anabolic therapy for osteoporosis: update on efficacy and safety. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2022;66:707-716.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 42]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Ahmed D, Al-Wattar W, Taqa GA. The Impacts of Teriparatide Treatment on Bone Alkaline Phosphatase, Calcium and Phosphate Serum Levels in Rats. J Appl Vet Sci. 2023;9:55-60.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
17.  Jha VK, Abhisheka K, Akal RS, Mahapatra D, Rai SK. Teriparatide Improves Bone Formation Markers and Bone Mineral Density in Adynamic Bone Disease Associated with Chronic Kidney Disease. Indian J Nephrol. 2024;34:254-256.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Leder BZ. Optimizing Sequential and Combined Anabolic and Antiresorptive Osteoporosis Therapy. JBMR Plus. 2018;2:62-68.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in RCA: 62]  [Article Influence: 7.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Cianferotti L, Cipriani C, Palermo A, Viapiana O, Zavatta G, Mazziotti G. A practical approach for anabolic treatment of bone fragility with romosozumab. J Endocrinol Invest. 2024;47:2649-2662.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Moore AE, Blake GM, Taylor KA, Rana AE, Wong M, Chen P, Fogelman I. Assessment of regional changes in skeletal metabolism following 3 and 18 months of teriparatide treatment. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:960-967.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Reid IR, Billington EO. Drug therapy for osteoporosis in older adults. Lancet. 2022;399:1080-1092.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 72]  [Cited by in RCA: 554]  [Article Influence: 138.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
22.  Chen H, Li J, Wang Q. Associations between bone-alkaline phosphatase and bone mineral density in adults with and without diabetes. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e0432.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in RCA: 29]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Bansal MS, Dhanda D, Sharma K, Patidar P, Meena M, Bishnoi P. Role of bone turnover marker-bone specific alkaline phosphatase evaluation in monitoring healing of tibial shaft fractures managed by closed reduction. Int J Orthop Sci. 2020;6:795-800.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
24.  Cox G, Einhorn TA, Tzioupis C, Giannoudis PV. Bone-turnover markers in fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:329-334.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 67]  [Cited by in RCA: 80]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Nakagawa H, Kamimura M, Takahara K, Hashidate H, Kawaguchi A, Uchiyama S, Miyasaka T. Changes in total alkaline phosphatase level after hip fracture: comparison between femoral neck and trochanter fractures. J Orthop Sci. 2006;11:135-139.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in RCA: 31]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Bhati DS, Maheshwari DR, Kakkar DM. Evaluation of serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase levels in isolated closed diaphyseal fractures of long bones in relation to fracture healing. Int J Orthop Sci. 2018;4:643-646.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
27.  Muljacić A, Poljak-Guberina R, Zivković O, Bilić V, Guberina M, Crvenković D. Course and rate of post-fracture bone healing in correlation with bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and bone callus formation. Coll Antropol. 2013;37:1275-1283.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
28.  Bansal SB, Bishnoi PB, Dhanda DD, Sharma SK, Patidar DP, Meena MM. Evaluation of bone formation marker- Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP) in assessing clinico-radiological union of isolated closed tibial shaft fractures fixed by closed intramedullary nailing. Int J Orthop Sci. 2021;7:442-447.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
29.  Herrmann M, Klitscher D, Georg T, Frank J, Marzi I, Herrmann W. Different Kinetics of Bone Markers in Normal and Delayed Fracture Healing of Long Bones. Clin Chem. 2002;48:2263-2266.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
30.  Cavalier E, Bergmann P, Bruyère O, Delanaye P, Durnez A, Devogelaer JP, Ferrari SL, Gielen E, Goemaere S, Kaufman JM, Toukap AN, Reginster JY, Rousseau AF, Rozenberg S, Scheen AJ, Body JJ. The role of biochemical of bone turnover markers in osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease: a consensus paper of the Belgian Bone Club. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27:2181-2195.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in RCA: 40]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Minisola S, Cipriani C, Colangelo L, Labbadia G, Pepe J, Magnusson P. Diagnostic Approach to Abnormal Alkaline Phosphatase Value. Mayo Clin Proc. 2025;100:712-728.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 29]  [Article Influence: 29.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Sobh MM, Abdalbary M, Elnagar S, Nagy E, Elshabrawy N, Abdelsalam M, Asadipooya K, El-Husseini A. Secondary Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases. J Clin Med. 2022;11:2382.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in RCA: 97]  [Article Influence: 24.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
33.  Kyd PA, Vooght KD, Kerkhoff F, Thomas E, Fairney A. Clinical usefulness of bone alkaline phosphatase in osteoporosis. Ann Clin Biochem. 1998;35 ( Pt 6):717-725.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Wheater G, Elshahaly M, Tuck SP, Datta HK, van Laar JM. The clinical utility of bone marker measurements in osteoporosis. J Transl Med. 2013;11:201.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 244]  [Cited by in RCA: 219]  [Article Influence: 16.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Tanavalee C, Ngarmukos S, Amarase C, Tantavisut S, Jaruthien N, Tanavalee A. A randomized controlled trial of teriparatide for accelerating bone union and improving clinical outcomes in patients with pertrochanteric fracture fixation. Sci Rep. 2025;15:19465.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Ouyang X, Ma Q, Zhou C, Tang J, Li M, Qing J, Lei X, Huang D, Liu H, Zhang G. Natural bioactive products in the regulation of bone metabolism and regeneration. Front Pharmacol. 2025;16:1683279.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Masrour Roudsari J, Mahjoub S. Quantification and comparison of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase with two methods in normal and paget's specimens. Caspian J Intern Med. 2012;3:478-483.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
38.  Pishdad R, Moseley KF. Paget disease of bone. CMAJ. 2023;195:E814.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Belkhouribchia J, Bravenboer B, Meuwissen M, Velkeniers B. Osteomalacia with low alkaline phosphatase: a not so rare condition with important consequences. BMJ Case Rep. 2016;2016:bcr2015212827.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Bergman A, Qureshi AR, Haarhaus M, Lindholm B, Barany P, Heimburger O, Stenvinkel P, Anderstam B. Total and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase are associated with bone mineral density over time in end-stage renal disease patients starting dialysis. J Nephrol. 2017;30:255-262.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in RCA: 29]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Jørgensen HS, Behets G, Viaene L, Bammens B, Claes K, Meijers B, Naesens M, Sprangers B, Kuypers D, Cavalier E, D'Haese P, Evenepoel P. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Bone Turnover Markers in Renal Osteodystrophy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2022;79:667-676.e1.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 54]  [Article Influence: 10.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Srisuwarn P, Eastell R, Salam S. Clinical Utility of Bone Turnover Markers in Chronic Kidney Disease. J Bone Metab. 2024;31:264-278.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Cheng X, Zhao C. The correlation between serum levels of alkaline phosphatase and bone mineral density in adults aged 20 to 59 years. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102:e34755.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 25]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Bae E, Sim SY, Park SJ, Kim SE, Kim S, Kim SH, Cho WK, Cho KS, Jung MH, Suh BK, Ahn MB. Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase as a Complementary Diagnostic Marker for the Assessment of Children and Adolescents with Secondary Osteoporosis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025;15:630.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Camacho PM, Mazhari AM, Wilczynski C, Kadanoff R, Mumm S, Whyte MP. Adult hypophosphatasia treated with teriparatide: Report of 2 patients and review of the literature. Endocr Pract. 2016;22:941-950.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in RCA: 40]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Rathwa HS, Verma T, Chavali VH. Assessment of union in fractures: Role of Serum Alkaline Phosphatase and Ultrasonography. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;14:94-100.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Nishiyama KK, Shane E. Clinical imaging of bone microarchitecture with HR-pQCT. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013;11:147-155.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 124]  [Cited by in RCA: 143]  [Article Influence: 11.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Shalof H, Dimitri P, Shuweihdi F, Offiah AC. "Which skeletal imaging modality is best for assessing bone health in children and young adults compared to DXA? A systematic review and meta-analysis". Bone. 2021;150:116013.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 31]  [Article Influence: 6.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Amstrup AK, Jakobsen NF, Moser E, Sikjaer T, Mosekilde L, Rejnmark L. Association between bone indices assessed by DXA, HR-pQCT and QCT scans in post-menopausal women. J Bone Miner Metab. 2016;34:638-645.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in RCA: 52]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
50.  Topoliński T, Mazurkiewicz A, Jung S, Cichański A, Nowicki K. Microarchitecture parameters describe bone structure and its strength better than BMD. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:502781.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Cavalier E, Rozet E, Carlisi A, Bekaert AC, Rousselle O, Hubert P, Chapelle JP, Delanaye P. Analytical validation of serum bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP OSTASE) on Liaison. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48:67-72.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Gomez B Jr, Ardakani S, Ju J, Jenkins D, Cerelli MJ, Daniloff GY, Kung VT. Monoclonal antibody assay for measuring bone-specific alkaline phosphatase activity in serum. Clin Chem. 1995;41:1560-1566.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
53.  Hata K, Tokuhiro H, Nakatsuka K, Miki T, Nishizawa Y, Morii H, Miura M. Measurement of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase by an immunoselective enzyme assay method. Ann Clin Biochem. 1996;33 ( Pt 2):127-131.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Gao M, Yi J, Liu L, Xu L. Alkaline phosphatase (ALPL) as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker linked to immune response in thyroid cancer. Gland Surg. 2025;14:1787-1802.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Xue X, Li JX, Wang JW, Lin LM, Cheng H, Deng DF, Xu WC, Zhao Y, Zou XR, Yuan J, Zhang LX, Zhao MH, Wang XQ. Association between alkaline phosphatase/albumin ratio and the prognosis in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 1-4: results from a C-STRIDE prospective cohort study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1215318.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Li W, Liu X, Liu L, Zhang L, Li M, Liu R, Li T, Chen E, Liu S. Relationships of Serum Bone Turnover Markers With Metabolic Syndrome Components and Carotid Atherosclerosis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:824561.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
57.  Cavalier E, Souberbielle JC, Gadisseur R, Dubois B, Krzesinski JM, Delanaye P. Inter-method variability in bone alkaline phosphatase measurement: clinical impact on the management of dialysis patients. Clin Biochem. 2014;47:1227-1230.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in RCA: 29]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
58.  Zhao N, Shi J, Li M, Xu P, Wang X, Li X. Alkaline Phosphatase Electrochemical Micro-Sensor Based on 3D Graphene Networks for the Monitoring of Osteoblast Activity. Biosensors (Basel). 2022;12:406.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Footnotes

Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Medicine, research and experimental

Country of origin: India

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific quality: Grade A, Grade B, Grade C

Novelty: Grade B, Grade B, Grade C

Creativity or innovation: Grade A, Grade B, Grade C

Scientific significance: Grade A, Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Wang Z, Associate Professor, MD, PhD, China; Zhou XC, PhD, Postdoctoral Fellow, Senior Researcher, China S-Editor: Bai SR L-Editor: A P-Editor: Lei YY

Write to the Help Desk