Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2025; 14(3): 101864
Published online Sep 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.101864
Published online Sep 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.101864
Table 1 Three-step model used for sepsis classification
Step | Description |
Step 1: Evidence of dysregulated host response | Assessed using the National Early Warning Score-2 ≥ 6 |
Step 2: Risk factors for infection | Evaluated based on the presence of risk factors such as chronic illnesses, malnutrition, unhygienic living conditions, immunosuppressive states, age, trauma, structural diseases, recent surgery, travel history, animal bites, and previous hospitalizations |
Step 3: Evidence of infection | Determined through: |
3 (A) Clinical evidence | Syndromic diagnosis including pyelonephritis, infective endocarditis, intra-abdominal infections, skin and soft tissue infections, meningitis, cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections, catheter-related infections, osteomyelitis, abscesses, and pneumonia |
3 (B) Supportive/suggestive evidence | Imaging (X-ray, ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography) and biomarkers (blood, urine, other fluids) |
3 (C) Confirmatory evidence | Direct visualization, endoscopic evidence, microscopy and culture growth, PCR/gene detection, and immunological methods |
Interpretation | Sepsis categories/classification |
(1) Step-1 = negative; (2) Step-1 = positive with step-2 and 3 = negative | Asepsis |
Step-1, 2 and 3 (A) = positive | Possible sepsis |
Step-1, 2 and 3 (B) = positive | Probable sepsis |
Step-1, 2 and 3 (C) = positive | Confirmed sepsis |
- Citation: Pilania J, Panda PK, Chauhan U, Kant R. Correct sepsis classification–A must for antimicrobial stewardship: A longitudinal observational study. World J Crit Care Med 2025; 14(3): 101864
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v14/i3/101864.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.101864