Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2025; 14(3): 105611
Published online Sep 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.105611
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow diagram of retrospective study on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and return of spontaneous circulation in intensive care unit patients. CPR: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; DNR: Do-not-resuscitate; ROSC: Return of spontaneous circulation.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Initial cardiac rhythm distribution among study participants. Pie chart showing the proportion of patients with pulseless electrical activity (48.6%), asystole (35.2%), and ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (16.2%) as initial recorded rhythms. VF: Ventricular fibrillation; VT: Ventricular tachycardia; PEA: Pulseless electrical activity.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation distribution. Box-and-whisker plot displaying the median cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration of 15 minutes (interquartile range: 10-22 minutes). CPR: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; MICU: Medical intensive care unit.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Probability of return of spontaneous circulation by cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration. Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrating the declining probability of return of spontaneous circulation achievement with increasing duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (log-rank P < 0.001).
Figure 5
Figure 5 Survival outcomes. CPR: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; DNR: Do-not-resuscitate; ROSC: Return of spontaneous circulation.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Forest plot of mortality predictors. Graphical representation of multivariate Cox regression results showing hazard ratios of mortality predictors. CPR: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ROSC: Return of spontaneous circulation.