Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Crit Care Med. Nov 4, 2015; 4(4): 278-286
Published online Nov 4, 2015. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v4.i4.278
Recruitment maneuvers in acute respiratory distress syndrome: The safe way is the best way
Raquel S Santos, Pedro L Silva, Paolo Pelosi, Patricia RM Rocco
Raquel S Santos, Pedro L Silva, Patricia RM Rocco, Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil
Paolo Pelosi, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
Author contributions: Santos RS designed the review, conducted the literature review, wrote the article, and prepared the and table; Silva PL designed the review, conducted the literature review, wrote the article, prepared the figure and table, and supervised all the process; Pelosi P and Rocco PRM wrote the article and supervised all the process.
Supported by Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Carlos Chagas Filho Rio de Janeiro State Research Foundation (FAPERJ), Department of Science and Technology (DECIT)/Brazilian Ministry of Health; and Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES).
Conflict-of-interest statement: Authors have no conflict of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Patricia RM Rocco, MD, PhD, Professor, Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, s/n, Bloco G-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil. prmrocco@gmail.com
Telephone: +55-21-39386530 Fax: +55-21-22808193
Received: May 30, 2015
Peer-review started: May 30, 2015
First decision: August 14, 2015
Revised: September 8, 2015
Accepted: October 20, 2015
Article in press: October 27, 2015
Published online: November 4, 2015
Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) represents a serious problem in critically ill patients and is associated with in-hospital mortality rates of 33%-52%. Recruitment maneuvers (RMs) are a simple, low-cost, feasible intervention that can be performed at the bedside in patients with ARDS. RMs are characterized by the application of airway pressure to increase transpulmonary pressure transiently. Once non-aerated lung units are reopened, improvements are observed in respiratory system mechanics, alveolar reaeration on computed tomography, and improvements in gas exchange (functional recruitment). However, the reopening process could lead to vascular compression, which can be associated with overinflation, and gas exchange may not improve as expected (anatomical recruitment). The purpose of this review was to discuss the effects of different RM strategies - sustained inflation, intermittent sighs, and stepwise increases of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and/or airway inspiratory pressure - on the following parameters: hemodynamics, oxygenation, barotrauma episodes, and lung recruitability through physiological variables and imaging techniques. RMs and PEEP titration are interdependent events for the success of ventilatory management. PEEP should be adjusted on the basis of respiratory system mechanics and oxygenation. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that RMs are associated with lower mortality in patients with ARDS. However, the optimal RM method (i.e., that providing the best balance of benefit and harm) and the effects of RMs on clinical outcome are still under discussion, and further evidence is needed.

Keywords: Recruitment maneuvers, Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Positive end-expiratory pressure, Transpulmonary pressure, Lung ultrasonography

Core tip: Experimental and clinical studies show that stepwise recruitment maneuvers (RMs) improve oxygenation and lung aeration and are associated with less hemodynamic instability and inflammatory impact on lung tissue compared to traditional abrupt maneuvers. Patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, characterized by increased edema and atelectasis, are good candidates for RMs. Patients whose oxygenation improves with increased pressure are at lower risk of death. Post-recruitment positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration is critical to maintaining stabilization of alveolar units and avoiding derecruitment. The use of individualized PEEP based on lung compliance might move clinical management forward.