Resecting liver surgery has been dominated by open surgical approaches (OLR). Minimal invasive procedures such as robotic liver surgery (RLR) are technically challenging but may reduce the surgical trauma and complication rates.

This study aims to compare the outcomes of RLR and OLR. A retrospective, single-centre analysis was conducted on 185 patients who underwent liver resection for benign or malign diseases (OLR: 86, RLR: 99). The primary objective was complication rates based on Clavien-Dindo classification, Secondary objectives included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and resection outcomes.

RLR was associated with significantly less major complications (23.1 % vs. 41.9 %, p = 0.011), lower blood loss (200 ml vs. 400 ml, p = 0.013) and shorter hospital stays (9.0 vs. 13.0 days, p < 0.001). Primary oncological results were similar.

RLR provides equivalent resection quality to OLR, with fewer complications, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stays.

Robotic-assisted hepatectomy has gained traction in hepatobiliary surgery, but its cost-effectiveness compared to traditional surgical approaches remains unclear. This study investigates clinical outcomes and financial implications of robotic-assisted liver surgery in a high-volume center, comparing it with open and laparoscopic methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients undergoing hepatectomy at Lille University Hospital in 2018 and 2021, performed by the institution's first experienced robotic hepatobiliary surgeon. Data on patient demographics, intraoperative details, postoperative outcomes, and costs were analyzed. Costs included hospital stays, surgical materials, and complications, derived from national cost studies. A total of 111 patients were included, with a rise in minimally invasive procedures from 47.5% in 2018 to 75% in 2021. Robotic-assisted hepatectomy was associated with reduced hospital stays, lower complication rates, and fewer severe morbidities compared to laparotomy. The average cost per procedure (all surgical approaches combined) decreased from €12,169 in 2018 to €8,513 in 2021, with robotic surgery offering a significant financial advantage. The total savings for the 71 patients in the 2021 cohort was €259,576, driven primarily by reduced hospitalization times and fewer complications. Robotic-assisted hepatectomy is clinically safe and cost-effective, offering substantial financial savings over traditional surgery. The reduction in postoperative complications and hospital stay durations, particularly for complex cases, highlights the advantages of robotic surgery in hepatobiliary procedures. As surgical expertise increases, robotic surgery represents a sustainable and efficient alternative in liver resection.

Internationally, evidence supporting robotic liver resection (RLR) has gradually increased in recent years. However, a standardized protocol for RLR remains lacking. This study describes a surgical protocol and the initial outcomes of RLR in a high-volume center for robotic hepatopancreatobiliary surgery in Japan.

Patients were placed in the reverse Trendelenburg position, with a supine position for anterolateral tumors and left lateral position for posterosuperior tumors. Our standard RLR protocol involved a two-surgeon technique. Liver parenchymal transection was performed by an assistant using the clamp crush technique with a console, with or without a laparoscopic Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA). Surgical techniques, including the tips, tricks, and pitfalls of RLR, are also demonstrated.

We performed 113 RLR at our institution for common primary diseases, including hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 52, 46.0%) and metastatic tumors (n = 48, 42.5%) between July 2022 and December 2024. The median operative time and estimated blood loss were 156 min (interquartile range [IQR], 121-209 min) and 20 mL (IQR, 0-100 mL), respectively. During liver parenchymal transection, a laparoscopic CUSA was used in 59 patients (52.2%), and a water-jet scalpel was used in 12 patients (10.6%). The incidence of mortality, major complications, and bile leakage was 0%, 6.2%, and 2.7%, respectively. The median hospital stay was 7 days (IQR, 6-9 days).

We successfully introduced an RLR program using the two-surgeon technique. Safe implementation of RLR can be achieved upon completion of the training program and thorough understanding of the surgical protocols.

Liver resection is the standard treatment for resectable liver tumors and metastases. However, mortality and morbidity remain significant concerns, particularly for patients with chronically elevated central venous pressure (CVP), which increases perioperative complication risks. The optimal parenchymal transection technique for these patients remains unclear, necessitating further research.

This study established an innovative porcine model for high-CVP liver resection. Animals were divided into two groups: a control group (CVP ≤ 5 mmHg, low-CVP) and an intervention group (CVP ≥ 10 mmHg, high-CVP). A left lateral liver resection was performed using three parenchymal transection techniques: clamp-crush (CC), harmonic scalpel (HS), and stapler (ST). The primary endpoint was intraoperative blood loss, while secondary endpoints included transection time and bile leakage.

No differences were found for blood loss or transection time among the low-CVP subgroups. In the high-CVP group, the HS and ST techniques were associated with significantly reduced blood loss and faster transection times than the CC technique. While transection times for the HS and ST were similar between the low- and high-CVP groups, they were significantly longer with the CC technique in the high-CVP group. The incidence of bile leakage was comparable across all three techniques.

This pilot study demonstrates superior outcomes for HS and ST techniques in high-CVP liver resections. Insights from this large animal model provide a basis for investigating optimal transection techniques for chronically elevated CVP, bridging preclinical research and clinical practice.

Robotic-assisted surgery has been recognized for enhancing the feasibility of minimally invasive procedures, particularly in high-complexity fields like hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery. This study aims to describe the implementation and development of a robotic HPB surgery program at a Swedish referral center, during a structured transition from mostly open surgery, as well as evaluating perioperative outcomes. A retrospective observational study at Karolinska University Hospital (September 2020-July 2024) included patients undergoing robotic HPB resections. Data on demographics, procedure types, intraoperative metrics, and outcomes were collected. Program implementation followed a stepwise approach. A total of 495 robotic resections were performed by three generations of surgeons, including 235 liver, 208 pancreatic, and 52 biliary resections. The overall conversion rate to open surgery was 7.7%. Major complications were observed in 10.9% of cases, with a mortality rate of 0.8%. Exposure and training improved outcomes over time, indicating the value of a structured implementation approach and a stepwise introduction of new surgeons into the robotic program. The transition to robotic HPB surgery requires a well-organized approach that includes thorough training and close collaboration within a multidisciplinary team. The program focused on helping junior surgeons develop their skills, starting with simpler procedures to reduce risks and ensure patient safety. After 8 semesters, minimally invasive HPB surgeries have increased from 15 to 41%. Results show that the program is safe and effective, highlighting the importance of institutional support, teamwork, and strategic planning in building a successful and lasting robotic surgery program.

HPB surgery is being increasingly performed robotically worldwide. However, there is no consensus on what constitutes adequate training or an established curriculum. We evaluate the existing literature on formal education in robotic hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgery and propose a curriculum using Kern's six-step curriculum development model.

A systematic search was performed across major databases and the methodology of the Joanna Briggs Institute was followed. The PRISMA-ScR was conformed in reporting. Evidence pertaining to cholecystectomy alone was excluded and studies that described formal training pathways were included.

Fifteen curricula were included with predilection towards the pancreas (n = 7, liver: n = 5, combination: n = 3). Almost all studies proposed initial robot system training through online modules, observership and console simulation exercises. Following this, six curricula described procedure-specific anastomosis training. Almost all studies described mentorship and proctorship. The assessment for implementation commonly described includes objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) and cumulative sum technique (CUSUM) for operation time, conversion-to-open rate and postoperative complications.

This study has summarised the formal curricula for learning robotic HPB surgery. The majority share similar implementation tools. A comprehensive curriculum based on validated educational principles has been proposed which incorporates these elements.

Robotic (RLR) and laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) provide similar short-term outcomes, but data focused on recurrence and survival are still lacking. We hypothesized non-inferior oncologic results of RLR compared to LLR for HCC of stage BCLC 0-A.

RLRs and LLRs on patients with HCC of stage BCLC 0-A and preserved liver function (Child A or B if cirrhosis) were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mitigate selection bias. The primary endpoints were recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were incidence, pattern, and treatment of recurrences.

After 1:1 PSM, two groups (RLR = 68; LLR = 68) of patients with similar characteristics, liver function and HCC features were obtained: median age 71-years, males 73.5%, underlying cirrhosis 91.2% (Child A, 96.8%, MELD ≤ 9, 96.0%), portal hypertension 22.1%, single-HCC 90.4%. Two- and 5-year RFS were 78.0 vs 59.0% and 54.0 vs 53.0% (p = 0.107), while OS was 97.0 vs 90.0% and 87.0 vs 90.0% (p = 0.951) for RLR vs LLR, respectively. Incidence of HCC recurrence was similar (35.3 vs 39.7%; p = 0.723). Recurrences developed mostly within the liver (29.4 vs 30.9%; p = 1.000) and within 2 years after hepatectomy (19.1 vs 32.4%, p = 0.116) in RLR vs LLRs. Curative-intent treatment of recurrences did not differ (liver transplantation 19.6%, redo-resection 15.7%, locoregional treatments 52.9%) except for a tendency toward more redo-resections for recurrences after RLR.

Oncologic outcomes of RLR were not inferior to those of LLR in selected HCC patients of stage BCLC 0-A with underlying cirrhosis. Both techniques guaranteed similar salvageability in case of HCC recurrence.

Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) can be surgically managed through open resections (OLR), laparoscopic resections (LLR), or robotic liver resections (RLR). However, there is ongoing uncertainty regarding the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive approaches like LLR and RLR. This study aims to clarify these issues by conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare outcomes across OLR, LLR and RLR for patients with CRLM. Following the PRISMA-NMA guidelines, the meta-analysis included 13 studies with a combined total of 6582 patients. Of these, 50.6% underwent LLR, 45.3% underwent OLR, and 4.1% underwent RLR. The analysis found no significant differences in R0 resection rates between LLR (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84-1.26) and RLR (OR 1.57, 95% CI: 0.98-2.51) when compared to OLR. Additionally, there were no significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, and 5 years. Despite these findings, both LLR and RLR were associated with reduced postoperative complication rates (RLR: OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.32-0.86; LLR: OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.37-0.68). However, patients undergoing LLR were more likely to require conversion to open surgery compared to those undergoing RLR (OR: 12.46, 95% CI: 2.64-58.67). Furthermore, RLR was associated with a reduced need for blood transfusions (OR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.05-0.32), and LLR resulted in shorter hospital stays (mean difference: -6.66 days, 95% CI: -11.6 to -1.88 days). This study demonstrates the oncological safety of LLR and RLR approaches for CRLM relative to OLR, with enhanced perioperative outcomes anticipated following minimally invasive resections of CRLM.

Background: In Japan, the hinotori™ surgical robot system (Medicaroid Corporation, Kobe, Japan) was approved for gastrointestinal surgeries in October 2022. This report details our initial experience performing liver resection using the hinotori™ system. Methods: Ten patients, who were assessed as cases that would benefit from the robot-assisted procedure, underwent liver resections using the hinotori™ system at Fujita Health University, Okazaki Medical Center, between August 2023 and October 2024. The backgrounds (patient, tumor, and liver function conditions, along with types of liver resections and previous surgical procedures) and short-term outcomes (operation time, blood loss, postoperative complications, open conversion, length of hospital stay, and mortality) of the cases were evaluated. Results: Eight cases of partial liver resection, one extended left medial sectionectomy, and one left hemi-hepatectomy were performed. Six cases of hepatocellular carcinomas, three cases of liver metastases, and one case of hepatolithiasis were included. There were seven male and three female patients with a median age of 70 years. Three physical status class III and seven class II patients were included. The median body mass index was 24. Five patients had previous upper abdominal surgical histories and five patients had liver cirrhosis. The median operation time was 419.5 min, and the median intraoperative blood loss was 276 mL. An open conversion in one hepatocellular carcinoma case was carried out due to bleeding from collateral vessels in the round ligament. The median length of hospital stay was 7.5 days. A grade IIIa complication (delayed bile leakage) was developed in one case. All patients with tumors underwent R0 resection. There were no cases of mortality. Conclusions: Liver resection using the hinotori™ system was feasibly performed. This study reports the first global use of the hinotori™ system for liver resection.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease and certain malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Data on the surgical management of de novo or recurrent tumors that develop in the transplanted allograft are limited. This study aimed to investigate the perioperative and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing hepatic resection for de novo or recurrent tumors after liver transplantation.

The study enrolled adult and pediatric patients from 12 centers across North America who underwent hepatic resection for the treatment of a solid tumor after LT. Perioperative outcomes were assessed as well as recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for those undergoing resection for HCC.

Between 2003 and 2023, 54 patients underwent hepatic resection of solid tumors after LT. For 50 patients (92.6 %), resection of malignant lesions was performed. The most common lesion was HCC (n = 35, 64.8 %), followed by cholangiocarcinoma (n = 6, 11.1 %) and colorectal liver metastases (n = 6, 11.1 %). The majority of the 35 patients underwent resection of HCC did not receive any preoperative therapy (82.9 %) or adjuvant therapy (71.4 %), with resection their only treatment method for HCC. During a median follow-up period of 50.7 months, the median RFS was 21.5 months, and the median OS was 49.6 months.

Hepatic resection following OLT is safe and associated with morbidity and mortality rates that are comparable to those reported for patients undergoing resection in native livers. Hepatic resection as the primary and often only treatment modality for HCC following LT is associated with acceptable RFS and OS and should be considered in well selected patients.

As in many surgical branches, minimally invasive methods are becoming increasingly prominent in hepatobiliary surgery. Nowadays, robotic and laparoscopic methods are among the hot topics in the current literature. Both laparoscopic and robotic surgery have better short-term results than open surgery in terms of the blood loss, need for blood transfusion, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, and postoperative major complication rate. In addition to cosmetic benefits, minimally invasive methods have similar results to open surgery in terms of oncologic outcomes. Minimally invasive techniques for hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal cancer liver metastasis and cholangiocarcinoma, which are the most common indications for surgery, also for donor and recipient surgeries in organ transplantation, can be safely applied in high-volume centers and by experienced surgeons. The use of robotic surgery is increasing especially in major hepatectomy operations. The main advantages of robotic surgery over laparoscopic surgery are less bleeding, less conversion rate and a shorter learning curve. However, there is a need for studies investigating the cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery, the production of devices such as robotic ultrasonographic dissectors, and the establishment of structured minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery training programs. The aim of this review is to evaluate the recent findings and current evidence on minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery.

This study aimed to assess short-term biliary outcomes in adult living donor liver transplants using right grafts, comparing robotic surgery with real-time indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography for optimal hilar plate transection, against the conventional open approach.

Determining the optimal transection plane through the hilar plate is crucial in donor hepatectomies, impacting outcomes significantly.

From 2011 to 2023, a total of 839 right graft living donor hepatectomies were performed, with 414 (49%) performed via the open approach and 425 (51%) utilizing the robotic platform.

The magnetic resonant cholangiopancreatography predictions correlated moderately with the actual count of graft ducts ( r =0.57, P <0.001). Out of all 839 right donor hepatectomies, 321 (44%) were single duct grafts, of which 193/425 (49%) were retrieved with the robotic while 128/414 (38%) were with the open approach (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.16-2.14), P =0.003). Overall, 50 (6%) of the donors developed a biliary complication during their hospital stay, of whom 38 (9%) were grafts retrieved with the open, while 13 (3%) with the robotic approach (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.15-0.61, P <0.001). Similarly, 63 (15%) of the adult recipients developed a biliary complication of any severity when grafts were retrieved with the open approach compared to 35 (8%) with the robotic approach (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.31-0.79), P =0.002).

The robotic platform with integrated real-time indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography during right donor hepatectomy offers improved safety for the donor by accurately addressing the right hilar corridor, resulting in fewer graft ducts and fewer complications for the donor and recipient when compared to the standard open approach.

Robotic liver resection has been reported in case series since the early 2000s. The surgical robot is capable of precise operation using articulated forceps with seven degrees of freedom. The robot also eliminates tremors and provides a good surgical field with highly detailed 3D high-definition images. The clinical results demonstrating their usefulness have been increasing year by year. Initially, a shorter hospital stay was observed in comparison with open hepatectomy. Recent reports have also shown lower conversion and complication rates in comparison with laparoscopic hepatectomy. The clamp and crush method with bipolar forceps, sealing devices, ultrasonic shears, and the combined procedure of Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator and robotic forceps as hybrid procedures have been reported as effective methods of parenchymal transection in robotic surgery. Theoretically, the advantages of the robotic platform allow for more complex liver resection around hilar structures and major blood vessels, as well as for vascular reconstruction or biliary reconstruction. The application of robotic liver surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, living donor hepatectomy, and living donor liver transplantation has been reported. Robotic liver surgery is becoming more popular for certain indications; however, it is important to further evaluate its long-term surgical and oncological outcomes and costs in comparison with conventional laparoscopic and open liver surgery, based on accumulated experience.

The liver requires careful handling intra-operatively owing to its vital functions and complexity. Traditional open hepatectomy, while standard, is invasive and requires long recovery periods. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a less invasive option, with its own challenges. The rise of robotic surgery, such as the da Vinci® system, improves precision and control, addressing the limitations of conventional methods, but brings new concerns, such as costs and training. This review focuses on the latest advancements in robotic hepatectomy from 2022/23 articles, delving into topics like "robotic surgery in liver transplantation," "robotic hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma," "robotic vascular reconstruction following hepatectomy," "robotic repeat hepatectomy," and "prospective trials in robotic hepatectomy." To retrieve articles, a focused literature search was conducted using PubMed for articles from 2022/23 with a 5-year filter, excluding reviews. Initially, abstracts were screened, and relevant articles on robotic surgery were examined in full for inclusion in this review. Although all the above items are cutting-edge, and many of the references are necessarily at the level of case reports, recent articles are still accompanied by surgical videos, which are useful to readers, especially surgeons who are considering imitating the procedures. In summary, we examined the recent advancements in robotic liver resection. The inclusion of videos that present new techniques aids in knowledge transfer. We anticipate the continued growth of this field of research.

The safety and efficacy of robotic liver resection (RLR) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been reported worldwide. However, the exact role of RLR in HCC patients with liver cirrhosis is not sufficiently determined.

We conducted a retrospective study on consecutive patients with cirrhosis or non-cirrhosis who received RLR for HCC from 2018 to 2023. Data on patients' demographics and perioperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the risk factors of prolonged postoperative length of stay (LOS) and morbidity.

Of the 571 patients included, 364 (64%) had cirrhosis. Among the cirrhotic patients, 48 (13%) were classified as Child-Pugh B. After PSM, the cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis group (n = 183) had similar operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion, LOS, overall morbidity (p > 0.05). In addition, the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were similar between the two groups in the subgroup analyses of patients with tumor size ≥ 5 cm, major hepatectomy, and high/expert IWATE difficulty grade. However, patients with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis had longer LOS and more overall morbidity than that of Child-Pugh A. Child-Pugh B cirrhosis, ASA score > 2, longer operative time, and multiple tumors were risk factors of prolonged LOS or morbidity in patients with cirrhosis.

The presence of Child-Pugh A cirrhosis didn't significantly influence the difficulty and perioperative outcomes of RLR for selected patients with HCC. However, even in high-volume center, Child-Pugh B cirrhosis was a risk factor for poor postoperative outcomes.

Evidence concerning long-term outcome of robotic liver resection (RLR) and laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients is scarce.

This study enrolled all patients who underwent RLR and LLR for resectable HCC between July 2016 and July 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to create a 1:3 match between the RLR and LLR groups. A comprehensive collection and analysis of patient data regarding efficacy and safety have been conducted, along with the evaluation of the learning curve for RLR.

Following PSM, a total of 341 patients were included, with 97 in the RLR group and 244 in the LLR group. RLR group demonstrated a significantly longer operative time (median [IQR], 210 [152.0-298.0] min vs. 183.5 [132.3-263.5] min; p = 0.04), with no significant differences in other perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes. Overall survival (OS) was similar between the two groups (p = 0.43), but RLR group exhibited improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) (median of 65 months vs. 56 months, p = 0.006). The estimated 5-year OS for RLR and LLR were 74.8% (95% CI: 65.4-85.6%) and 80.7% (95% CI: 74.0-88.1%), respectively. The estimated 5-year RFS for RLR and LLR were 58.6% (95% CI: 48.6-70.6%) and 38.3% (95% CI: 26.4-55.9%), respectively. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, RLR (HR: 0.586, 95% CI (0.393-0.874), p = 0.008) emerged as an independent predictor of reducing recurrence rates and enhanced RFS. The operative learning curve indicates that approximately after the 11th case, the learning curve of RLR stabilized and entered a proficient phase.

OS was comparable between RLR and LLR, and while RFS was improved in the RLR group. RLR demonstrates oncological effectiveness and safety for resectable HCC.

Significant advances in surgical techniques and relevant medium- and long-term outcomes over the past two decades have led to a substantial expansion in the indications for major liver resections. To support these outstanding results and to reduce perioperative complications, anesthesiologists must address and master key perioperative issues (preoperative assessment, proactive intraoperative anesthesia strategies, and implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery approach). Intensive care unit monitoring immediately following liver surgery remains a subject of active and often unresolved debate. Among postoperative complications, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) occurs in different grades of severity (A-C) and frequency (9%-30%), and it is the main cause of 90-d postoperative mortality. PHLF, recently redefined with pragmatic clinical criteria and perioperative scores, can be predicted, prevented, or anticipated. This review highlights: (1) The systemic consequences of surgical manipulations anesthesiologists must respond to or prevent, to positively impact PHLF (a proactive approach); and (2) the maximal intensive treatment of PHLF, including artificial options, mainly based, so far, on Acute Liver Failure treatment(s), to buy time waiting for the recovery of the native liver or, when appropriate and in very selected cases, toward liver transplant. Such a clinical context requires a strong commitment to surgeons, anesthesiologists, and intensivists to work together, for a fruitful collaboration in a mandatory clinical continuum.

the role of minimally invasive liver surgery has been progressively developed, with the practice increasing in safety and feasibility also with respect to major liver resections. The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility and safety of major liver resection in elderly patients.

data from a multicentric retrospective database including 1070 consecutive robotic liver resections in nine European hospital centers were analyzed. Among these, 131 were major liver resections. Patients were also divided in two groups (<65 years old and ≥65 years old) and perioperative data were compared between the two groups.

a total of 131 patients were included in the study. Operative time was 332 ± 125 min. Postoperative overall complications occurred in 27.1% of patients. Severe complications (Clavien Dindo ≥ 3) were 9.9%. Hospital stay was 6.6 ± 5.3 days. Patients were divided into two groups based on their age: 75 patients < 65 years old and 56 patients ≥ 65 years old. Prolonged pain, lung infection, intensive care stay, and 90-day readmission were worse in the elderly group. The two groups were matched for ASA and Charlson comorbidity score and, after statistical adjustment, postoperative data were similar between two groups.

robotic major liver resection in elderly patients was associated with satisfying short-term outcomes.

Background/Objectives: The IWATE criteria are well-established as a helpful tool to preoperatively estimate the difficulty and perioperative outcome of laparoscopic liver resections. We evaluated the relationship between the IWATE criteria and the perioperative outcomes in robotic-assisted liver resections (RARLs). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 58 patients who underwent robotic-assisted liver surgery at our center between July 2019 and April 2023. The operative difficulty of every patient was graded according to the IWATE criteria and compared to the perioperative outcome. Results: The median operation time was 236.5 min (range 37-671 min), and the median length of stay was 6 days (range 3-37 min). The majority had no complications (65.5%; n = 38), 18 (31.0%) patients suffered from mild complications (CD ≤ 3A) and 2 patients (3.4%) suffered from relevant complications (CD ≥ 3B). We observed no deaths within 30 postoperative days. The surgery time, postoperative ICU stay and perioperative blood transfusions increased significantly with a higher difficulty level (p = < 0.001; p < 0.001; p = 0.016). The length of stay, conversion to open surgery (n = 2) and complication rate were not significantly linked to the resulting IWATE group. Conclusions: The IWATE criteria can be implemented in robotic-assisted liver surgery and can be helpful in preoperatively estimating the difficulty of robotic liver resections. Whether there is a "robotic effect" in minimally invasive liver resections has to be further clarified. The IWATE criteria can help to develop curricula for robotic training.

The use of the robotic approach in liver surgery is exponentially increasing. Although technically the robot introduces several innovative features, the instruments linked with the traditional laparoscopic approach for the liver parenchymal transection are not available, which may result in multiple technical variants that may bias the comparative analysis between the different series worldwide. A real robotic approach, minimally efficient for the liver parenchymal transection, with no requirement of external tool, available for the already existing platforms, and applicable to any type of liver resection, counting on the selective use of the plugged bipolar forceps and the monopolar scissors, or "microfracture-coagulation" (MFC) transection method, is described in detail. The relevant aspects of the technique, its indications and methodological basis are discussed.

Robotic surgery has experienced a dramatic increase in utilization across general surgery over the last two decades, including in surgical oncology. Although urologists and gynecologists were the first to show that this technology could be utilized in cancer surgery, the robot is now a powerful tool in the treatment of gastrointestinal, hepato-pancreatico-biliary, colorectal, endocrine, and soft tissue malignancies. While long-term outcomes are still pending, short-term outcomes have showed promise for this technologic advancement of cancer surgery.