Scientometrics Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Pediatr. May 9, 2022; 11(3): 307-320
Published online May 9, 2022. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v11.i3.307
Global research production in neonatal abstinence syndrome: A bibliometric analysis
Sa'ed H Zyoud, Samah W Al-Jabi, Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus 44839, Palestine
Sa'ed H Zyoud, Poison Control and Drug Information Center, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus 44839, Palestine
Sa'ed H Zyoud, Clinical Research Centre, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus 44839, Palestine
Moyad Jamal Shahwan, Clinical Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman 2758, United Arab Emirates
Moyad Jamal Shahwan, Centre of Medical and Bio‑allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman 2758, United Arab Emirates
Ammar Abdulrahman Jairoun, Department of Health and Safety, Dubai Municipality, Dubai 67, United Arab Emirates
ORCID number: Sa'ed H Zyoud (0000-0002-7369-2058); Samah W Al-Jabi (0000-0002-4414-9427); Moyad Jamal Shahwan (0000-0001-8367-4841); Ammar Abdulrahman Jairoun (0000-0002-4471-0878).
Author contributions: Zyoud SH designed the study, collected the data, analyzed the data, made major contributions to the manuscript’s existing literature search and interpretation, and drafted the manuscript; Al-Jabi SW, Jairoun AA, and Shahwan WM were involved in interpretation of the data, and made revisions to the initial draft; all authors provided a critical review and approved the final manuscript before submission.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest to declare.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Sa'ed H Zyoud, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Academic Street, Nablus 44839, Palestine. saedzyoud@yahoo.com
Received: March 19, 2021
Peer-review started: March 19, 2021
First decision: May 6, 2021
Revised: May 21, 2021
Accepted: March 16, 2022
Article in press: March 16, 2022
Published online: May 9, 2022

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Recently, neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) emerged as a significant global concern with a dramatic increase in healthcare expenditures. The incidence of the NAS has increased notably in the past decade and emergence as a global public health problem.

AIM

To evaluate the development and trend of global NAS research from 1958 to 2019 by bibliometric analysis.

METHODS

Analyzed aspects included publication output per year, language, document types, journals, countries/territories, h-index, authors, and top research priorities. The VOSviewer was used to determine the top research priorities, and trends, and to present bibliometric networks concerning various dimensions, such as co-authorship, authors, and countries.

RESULTS

A total of 1738 articles were retrieved in the Scopus database from 1958 to 2019. It was found that the great majority of the total NAS documents (n = 1295) were original articles followed by reviews (n = 268) and letters (n = 48). The most productive countries in the NAS field were the United States (n = 833), Canada (n = 112), the United Kingdom (n = 111), and Germany (n = 77). Treatment and hospital outcomes in NAS, evidence-based nurse-driven interventions for the care of newborns with NAS, and a systematic reviews and network meta-analysis for therapeutic approaches of NAS were found in recent years (after 2010), compared with terms such as pathophysiology, mechanisms of NAS, and signs and symptoms in the early years.

CONCLUSION

Treatment and pediatric outcomes and the effectiveness of pharmacological treatment may be frontiers in the NAS field, and continued efforts from researchers are needed in those topics.

Key Words: Neonatal abstinence syndrome, Bibliometric, Scopus, VOSviewer, Visualization

Core Tip: This bibliometric study extracts data on Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) research at a global level, aiming to provide the top-cited articles and top research priorities in NAS and to determine the most prolific countries, journals, and authors. This would enable scientists and clinicians interested in the NAS field to identify the most prevalent topics that have been used for increasing our understanding of NAS and provide a basis for future research. Treatment and pediatric outcomes and the effectiveness of pharmacological treatment may be frontiers in the NAS field, and continued efforts from researchers are needed on these topics.



INTRODUCTION

Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a group of signs and symptoms that occur due to the sudden discontinuation of infants shortly after the birth of certain substances that were abused or used during pregnancy[1,2]. NAS can present with a broad range of signs and symptoms including restlessness, agitation, feeding intolerance, gastrointestinal disturbances, hypertonia, tremors, seizures, and respiratory distress[2-6].

Recently, NAS emerged as a significant global concern with a dramatic increase in healthcare expenditures[1,7-9]. The incidence of NAS has increased notably in the past decade and emergence as a global public health problem. The reported rise in antidepressant therapy during pregnancy, or the use of narcotic analgesics for pain relief in pregnant women, or the illicit use of opioids such as heroin and oxycodone[10] may play an important role in this aspect. The most clinically significant interventions in NAS management are appropriate to nonpharmacologic interventions[6,11] including promoting breastfeeding of infants when not contraindicated, rooming-in, positioning of the infant, bed type, and non-insertive acupuncture. Opioids such as morphine or methadone or buprenorphine are usually the first-line agent to treat the symptoms of withdrawal when pharmacological treatment is indicated. Although phenobarbital has been recognized as a second-line agent to be used in infants when opioids fail, clonidine may be used as a nonopioid adjunctive NAS therapy with minimal adverse effects and reduced treatment time[5,6,12,13].

Although several bibliometric analyses have been carried out on several topics related to substance abuse such as illicit drug addiction[14], cocaine intoxication[15], substance use disorders[16], drug and alcohol[17], and drug abuse and dependence[18-23], an extensive literature search did not reveal any bibliometric analysis on NAS. Therefore, this bibliometric study extracts data on NAS research at a global level, aiming to provide the top-cited articles and top research priorities in NAS and to determine the most prolific countries, journals, and authors. This would enable scientists and clinicians interested in the NAS field to identify the most prevalent topics that have been used for increasing our understanding of NAS and provide a basis for future research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Database used

To achieve the objectives of the current bibliometric study, we performed a generalized search using the database of Scopus (Elsevier's citation database). The search was performed on July 17, 2020. Because the first publication related to NAS was published in 1958, the timespan was set from 1958 to 2019. The final year (2020) was omitted from the study as, at the time of data collection, certain publications from that year might not have been indexed in databases and this year's data does not represent a complete year of publication in the field.

Search strategy

The search was thus conducted using the following search string: (TITLE-ABS (neonat*) OR TITLE-ABS (newborn) OR TITLE-ABS (birth) OR TITLE-ABS (infant) AND TITLE-ABS ("Abstinence Syndrome") OR TITLE-ABS ("Abstinence Symptom*") OR TITLE-ABS ("Substance Withdrawal") OR TITLE-ABS ("narcotic syndrome") OR TITLE-ABS ("narcotic Symptom*") OR TITLE-ABS ("Withdrawal Symptom*") OR TITLE-ABS ("Withdrawal Syndrome") OR TITLE-ABS ("drug Withdrawal") OR TITLE-ABS ("Passive Addiction") OR TITLE-ABS("opioid withdrawal") OR TITLE-ABS ("opioid syndrome") AND EXCLUDE (DOCTYPE) AND [EXCLUDE (PUBYEAR, 2020). Neonatal abstinence syndrome-related terms were selected for this string based on those identified in previous literature reviews[6,10,24-27]. The search strategy for the terms related to NAS was restricted to Title/Abstract to achieve greater accuracy in the results because many reported publications were not related to NAS (i.e., false-positive data) if applied to other search fields such as keywords. The use of title/abstract search is recommended in bibliometric studies[15,28,29] in contrast to the title-abstract-keywords search query because it substantially increases specificity with minimum loss of sensitivity. The main explanation for the generation of false-positive results by keyword search is that Scopus considers keywords such as "Medline keywords", "EMTREE medical terms" and "EMTRE drug terms" as author and indexed keywords. In the absence of false-positive and false-negative findings, the method adopted in the current study was validated[30]. No language restrictions were applied. Thus, both English and non-English documents were used.

Data analysis and visualization

The data was organized and analyzed using Microsoft Office Excel 2010. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis, using frequencies and percentages. The downloaded document included the title, abstract, publication date, journal information, authors, country, collaboration patterns, and citations as indicators for quantity and qualitative analysis. These indicators were identified according to previous bibliometric literature[31-33]. The VOSviewer version 1.6.14[34], a software package for analyzing and visualizing large bibliographic datasets, was used for content analysis to determine the top research priority topics, and trends, and to present bibliometric networks concerning various dimensions, such as co-authorship, authors, and countries. To map the network of terms co-occurrence in the title and abstract countries, collaboration co-authorship was extracted from downloaded bibliometric records. In terms with an occurrence frequency no less than 20 authors and countries who had at least five publications were chosen for visualisation. The number of publications related to a certain word is measured by the size of circles in VOSviewer maps and the distance between the two terms means the number of cooccurrences of the terms. Moreover, words that are similar to each other or have a certain color are more likely to deal with the same topic[34]. In addition, the terms co-occurrences were analyzed to distinguish topics used by the authors’ overtime. Using the "link strength" indicator extracted from visualization maps, an international research collaboration among active countries was evaluated. The strength of the link is a measure of the strength of cooperation between any two countries in this field. The higher value of link strength means the thickness of the connecting line, which is considered the stronger research collaboration between certain countries in this field[34].

RESULTS

A total of 1738 articles were retrieved in the Scopus database from 1958 to 2019. It was found that the great majority of the total NAS documents (1295; 74.51%) were original articles followed by reviews (268; 15.42%) and letters (48; 2.76%). The yearly publication number of articles increased rapidly from 1958 to 2019 (Figure 1). Yearly articles increased from 2 in 1958 to 40 in 2007 and then to 177 in 2019. Twenty-three languages of publication were identified in the 1,738 articles retrieved. The four predominant languages were English (n = 1489; 85.67%), followed by German (n = 66; 3.80%), Spanish (n = 39; 2.24%), and French (n = 38; 2.13%).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Annual number of articles published in neonatal abstinence syndrome.

There is a total of 111 countries/areas that make great contribution research publications in neonatal abstinence syndrome. Table 1 presents the 10 most productive countries in the NAS concerning total publications, h-index, as well as the collaboration pattern. The most productive countries in NAS field were the United States (n = 833; 47.93%), Canada (n = 112; 6.44%), the United Kingdom (n = 111; 6.39%) and Germany (n = 77; 4.43%). The h-index of the total retrieved articles was 87. Among the most productive countries, the United States achieved the highest h-index value with 71, followed by the United Kingdom with 29, and Canada with 29. A network visualization map for country collaboration is shown in Figure 2 and demonstrates that the United States is the most important collaboration country. Of the 111 countries, 33 had at least five publications; the largest set of connected countries consists of 28 countries in 8 clusters. For research collaboration, the strongest was in the United States (total link strength = 111), followed by the United Kingdom (total link strength = 72), and Netherlands (total link strength = 70). For most countries, the link strength was less than 20, suggesting insufficient international research collaboration in this field[34].

Figure 2
Figure 2 Network visualization map for countries collaboration among most productive countries. Of the 111 countries, 33 had at least five publications; the largest set of connected countries consists of 28 countries in 8 clusters.
Table 1 The top 10 countries contributed to publications in neonatal abstinence syndrome research (1958 to 2019).
SCR
Country
Number of documents (%)
h-index
No. of collaborated countries
1stUnited States833 (47.93)7138
2ndCanada112 (6.44)2914
3rdUnited Kingdom111 (6.39)2925
4thGermany77 (4.43)1723
5thItaly65 (3.74)1521
6thAustralia63 (3.62)267
7thFrance62 (3.57)2023
8thSpain59 (3.39)1822
9thAustria52 (2.99)1919
10ththe Netherlands45 (2.59)1624

Table 2 shows the 11 journals with more than 17 published papers with their impact factors. The journals publishing most papers are Pediatrics (n = 43), Journal of Pediatrics (n = 34), and Journal of Perinatology (n = 33).

Table 2 The top 11 most productive journals on neonatal abstinence syndrome research from 1958 to 2019.
SCR1
Journal
Frequency (%)
IF2
1stPediatrics43 (2.47)5.359
2ndJournal of Pediatrics34 (1.96)3.700
3rdJournal of Perinatology33 (1.90)1.967
4thDrug and Alcohol Dependence31 (1.78)3.951
5thAddiction27 (1.55)6.343
6thAdvances in Neonatal Care23 (1.32)1.405
6thAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology23 (1.32)6.502
8thActa Paediatrica 22 (1.27)2.111
9thArchives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition19 (1.09)5.436
10thJournal of Addiction Medicine18 (1.04)3.014
10th Pediatric Research18 (1.04)2.747

Among the top contributive authors (Table 3), Jones Hendrée (42 publications) from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (United States) was ranked first, followed by Fischer, Gabriele (29 publications) from the Medical University Vienna (Austria). Of note, 8 and 3 authors are from the United States and Austria, respectively, suggesting an important contributing role to these countries. A network visualization map for the authors’ collaboration is shown in Figure 3. Of the 5305 authors, 118 had at least five publications; the largest set of connected authors consists of 70 authors in 11 clusters.

Figure 3
Figure 3 Co-authorship network among most productive authors with the threshold of minimum 5 publications. Of the 5305 authors, 118 had at least five publications; the largest set of connected authors consists of 70 authors in 11 clusters.
Table 3 The first twelve authors by record count in neonatal abstinence syndrome research.
SCR1
Author name
Country
Number of documents (%)
1stJones HEUnited States42 (2.42)
2ndFischer GAustria29 (1.67)
3rdJansson LMUnited States28 (1.61)
3rd Patrick SWUnited States28 (1.61)
5thFinnegan LPUnited States24 (1.38)
5thKaltenbach KUnited States24 (1.38)
5thWachman EMUnited States24 (1.38)
8thDavis JMUnited States17 (0.98)
9thJagsch RAustria14 (0.81)
10thHuestis MAUnited States12 (0.69)
10thKoren GIsrael 12 (0.69)
10thRaith WAustria12 (0.69)

In VOSviewer, co-occurrence analysis for the title and abstract contents was used to produce the term co-occurrence network of NAS studies (Figure 4). In Figure 4, it can be seen that the top research priorities of NAS studies form five clusters, and the terms in the same cluster show superior connection in each of the research topics. These five clusters were as follows: Cluster 1 (blue) involved terms related to “treatment and hospital outcomes in NAS” such as “hospitalization, length, stay, hospital stay, discharge, neonate outcome”; Cluster 2 (yellow) involved terms related to “evidence-based nurse-driven interventions for the care of newborns with NAS” such as “nurse, intervention, guideline, barrier, challenge”; Cluster 3 (red) involved terms related to “pathophysiology and mechanisms of NAS” such as “brain, onset, alteration, activity, administration, tolerance, analgesia, sedation, animal, rat”; Cluster 4 (purple) involved terms related to “systematic review and network meta-analysis for therapeutic approaches of NAS” such as “systematic review, meta-analysis, Medline, trial, search”; and Cluster 5 (green) involved terms related to “signs and symptoms” such as “jitteriness in neonates, meconium, irritability, prematurity”. In the analysis of term co-occurrence (Figure 5), we also identified terms in the titles and abstracts related to NAS over time. Treatment and hospital outcomes in NAS, evidence-based nurse-driven interventions for the care of newborns with NAS, and a systematic reviews and network meta-analysis for therapeutic approaches of NAS were found in recent years (after 2010), compared with terms such as pathophysiology, mechanisms of NAS, and signs and symptoms in the early years (before 2010).

Figure 4
Figure 4 Terms co-occurrence network of neonatal abstinence syndrome studies. Of the 27233 terms, 436 terms occurred at least 20 times. For each of the 436 terms, a relevance score was calculated and used to select the 60% most relevant terms. The largest set of connected terms consists of 262 terms in five clusters.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Distribution of terms according to their time of appearance. The blue colored terms mean early appearance and yellow colored terms appeared later.

The top 20 cited publications in the field of NAS ranked by the total number of citations are shown in Table 4. The highest cited publication in the top 20 was cited 529 times and the lowest cited article 177 times[1,2,9,35-52]. Table 5 includes the most frequently encountered agents related to NAS literature. “Methadone” (n = 629) was the most commonly occurred in NAS literature, followed by “morphine” (n = 378), “buprenorphine” (n = 313), and “phenobarbital” (n = 275).

Table 4 The 20 Most-cited articles in neonatal abstinence syndrome based on the citation count.
SCR
Ref.
Title
Year
Source title
Cited by
1stPatrick et al[1]Neonatal abstinence syndrome and associated health care expenditures: United States, 2000-20092012JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association529
2ndJones et al[43]Neonatal abstinence syndrome after methadone or buprenorphine exposure2010New England Journal of Medicine526
3rdHudak et al[40]Neonatal drug withdrawal2012Pediatrics443
4thFinnegan et al[38]Neonatal abstinence syndrome: assessment and management1975Addictive diseases435
5thSanz et al[49]Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnant women and neonatal withdrawal syndrome: A database analysis2005Lancet318
6thHughes et al[41]Nicotine withdrawal vs other drug withdrawal syndromes: similarities and dissimilarities1994Addiction253
7thPatrick et al[9]Increasing incidence and geographic distribution of neonatal abstinence syndrome: United States 2009 to 20122015Journal of Perinatology251
8thLevinson-Castiel et al[45]Neonatal abstinence syndrome after in utero exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in term infants2006Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine238
9thCostei et al[37]Perinatal outcome following third trimester exposure to paroxetine2002Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine233
10th Kocherlakota[2]Neonatal abstinence syndrome2014Pediatrics219
11th Tolia et al[50]Increasing incidence of the neonatal abstinence syndrome in United States neonatal ICUs2015New England Journal of Medicine213
12th American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs[36]Neonatal drug withdrawal1998Pediatrics212
13th ACOG Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women and American Society of Addiction Medicine[35]Committee opinion No. 524: Opioid abuse, dependence, and addiction in pregnancy2012Obstetrics and Gynecology208
13th Jones et al[42]Buprenorphine vs methadone in the treatment of pregnant opioid-dependent patients: Effects on the neonatal abstinence syndrome2005Drug and Alcohol Dependence208
15th Wisner et al[51]Pharmacologic treatment of depression during pregnancy1999Journal of the American Medical Association200
16th Zajecka et al[52]Discontinuation symptoms after treatment with serotonin reuptake inhibitors: A literature review1997Journal of Clinical Psychiatry197
17th Nau et al[46]Valproic acid and its metabolites: Placental transfer, neonatal pharmacokinetics, transfer via mother's milk and clinical status in neonates of epileptic mothers1981Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics197
18th Ryan et al[48]Cocaine abuse in pregnancy: Effects on the fetus and newbornF1987Neurotoxicology and Teratology181
19th Lejeune et al[44]Prospective multicenter observational study of 260 infants born to 259 opiate-dependent mothers on methadone or high-dose buprenophine substitution2006Drug and Alcohol Dependence180
20th Hadeed and Siegel[39]Maternal cocaine use during pregnancy: Effect on the newborn infant1989Pediatrics177
21st Nordeng et al[47]Neonatal withdrawal syndrome after in utero exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors2001Acta Paediatrica, 175
Table 5 List of most frequent drugs occurrences in neonatal abstinence syndrome literature.
Drug
Number of publications
Methadone629
Morphine 378
Buprenorphine313
Phenobarbital 275
Diamorphine212
Heroine138
Cocaine 138
Clonidine 130
Diazepam 124
Alcohol 80
Cannabis79
Chlorpromazine76
Naloxone 62
Fentanyl 56
DISCUSSION

This study is set out with the aim of investigating the current situation of NAS research at a global level by analysing the related literature bibliometrically. In 2015, member states of the United Nations had signed and adopted Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to be achieved in 2030[53]. The third goal is dedicated to health and well-being. The fifth target of the third goal in the SDGs promotes the prevention and treatment of substance use disorders. Furthermore, the second target of the third goal promotes the health of the newborn and children by minimizing preventable deaths[54]. The current study will endorse the attainment of 2030 goals by shedding light on an important problem related to maternal and newborn health within the context of substance use disorders.

The current study is novel in describing the characteristics of research publications related to NAS across time, via bibliometric analysis, and determining the top research priorities in this field during six decades (1958-2019). Advances in the knowledge of NAS by determining the top research priorities for this complex health issue will help to improve future research for maternal and neonatal care.

Overall, the current study demonstrated an increase in the number of publications involving NAS over the period 1958–2019. In another way, the total number of publications related to NAS increased more than twofold from 437 before 2000 to 971 during the last decade (2010–2019). This was possible because of different explanations. First, research concerning substance abuse, with a focus on prevention and policy issues has become a rapidly emerging area in medical sciences and is recently reaching maturity. Second, this progress can be attributed largely to the trend of increasing maternal opiates and illicit drug use across the world. Third, the development of neonatal opioid withdrawal scale to measure opioid withdrawal signs and symptoms in the neonate. Fourth, the rapid growth of the global economy with the development of information technology has contributed to the progress of research to keep up this increasing trend.

In this study, the United States was found to be the leader in NAS research. This result may be explained by the fact that the United States is the most prolific country for research in general by most bibliometric studies[31,55-57]. Moreover, the United States is one of the countries that attributed largely to the trend of increasing maternal cocaine, illicit drugs, and opiate use, and subsequently escalating numbers of deaths[58]. Additionally, the United States may be leading because of its size and economic strength and has a large research system including United States institutions, individual colleges, and hospitals[59]. Seven newborns were diagnosed with NAS for every 1,000 hospital stays for newborns, according to 2016 statistics[60]. This is around one baby in the United States diagnosed with NAS every 19 minutes, or almost 80 newborns diagnosed every day[60].

Clearly, the most commonly used keyword in NAS literature was “methadone,” followed by “morphine”, “buprenorphine”, and “phenobarbital”. It is interesting to note that three studies from the top 20 cited publications in the field of NAS were evaluating the efficacy and safety of methadone vs buprenorphine therapy for treating opioid-dependent pregnant patients[42-44].

The most cited publication in the field of NAS was published in 2012 in JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, conducted by Patrick et al[1], where the authors found an increase in maternal opiate use and incidence of NAS in the United States. The authors analyzed information on 7.4 million discharges from 4121 hospitals in 44 states, to measure the epidemiology and economic damage associated with NAS over the past decade. The authors reported that the number of mothers using opiates rose from 1.19 to 5.63 per 1000 hospital births per year between 2000 and 2009, and that it is estimated that aggregate hospital costs for NAS cases, adjusted for inflation, rose from $190 million to $720 million between 2000 and 2009. The second most cited publication was published in 2010 in New England Journal of Medicine, conducted by Jones et al[43] resulting from the collaboration between several countries (United States, Canada, and Austria). This study considered the use of buprenorphine as the first-line treatment option instead of methadone for the treatment of opioid dependency during pregnancy. Methadone therapy for heroin addiction began in New York City in 1964[61], and then became the standard therapy for treating opioid-dependent pregnant patients in both the developed and developing worlds[62]. Methadone therapy led to several adverse pregnancy events during withdrawal[63]. After that, marked progress has been made in the area of buprenorphine research as an alternative treatment for opioid dependence[43] which gives relative superiority for buprenorphine to be associated with a lower risk of NAS severity[64]. This finding also accords with our observations, which showed that top research priorities including treatment and pediatric outcomes, and the effectiveness of pharmacological treatment were found in recent years. Furthermore, top research priorities in the field of NAS are consistent with the findings highlighted in the most highly cited publications, which provide substantial and valuable findings that open the door for new areas of research investigation.

Despite the importance of this topic, there remains a paucity of evidence on several issues related to NAS[65-68]. The most significant knowledge gaps in NAS are the long-term outcomes and the international differences between treatments of drug-using mother/infant dyads. What happens to the children afterward? How have they looked after? Some of the medications used to treat NAS (e.g., methadone) are not sanctioned in countries outside the United States. Opioid-exposed infants are still at significantly higher risk of dying, of being abused, and of sliding towards an unpalatable life trajectory after discharge from the hospital. Further work is needed to highlight this missing information and note the urgent need to prioritize research and clinical care towards improving and ameliorating the impact of maternal drug use. More broadly, the emphasis on the need to conduct more research into pharmacological treatment neglects other aspects of care for infants, including rooming-in, breastfeeding, etc. The medications that are used to treat NAS are not innocuous, therefore, research is also needed to avoid pharmacological treatment, rather than to see which treatment is most effective in discharging the infants out of the hospital faster.

Strengths and limitations

This bibliometric study is the first comprehensive investigation to explore the distribution trends and top research priorities in the field of NAS. Additionally, another strength of the current study including a large literature database (i.e., Scopus), benefits from a higher coverage than other databases[69,70], spanning multiple years of analysis to identify relevant NAS literature. Several limitations matching those observed in earlier bibliometric studies[31,71,72] should be noted. The main limitation of this study was the use of the Scopus database which expects that most perspectives of the publications in the field of NAS indexed in this database were analysed. Additionally, the current study used a comprehensive list of keywords based on those identified in previous literature reviews[6,10,24-27]; however, there is a possible slight chance that some keywords have been missed which may lead to false-negative results.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this bibliometric review defined the scientific research output in the field of NAS using bibliometric methods over the past 60 years, including publication numbers, countries, organizations, journals, top research priorities, and emerging trends. The findings from this study make several contributions to the current literature. First, this study confirmed the increase in the number of publications involving NAS over the period 1958–2019. Second, the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom had the leading position in global research productivity in this field. Third, it was found that the comparative studies related to the safety and efficacy of methadone and buprenorphine in NAS were the mainstay of the top-cited studies. In the last treatment and pediatric outcomes, and the effectiveness of pharmacological treatment may be frontiers in the NAS field, and continued efforts from researchers are needed on these topics. This bibliometric study offers an objective and quantitative summary of the progress of research in the NAS field, which can serve as a significant guide and entry point for more scientific research. This information can be used to develop targeted interventions aimed to improve international cooperation between organizations and countries by applying useful initiatives and policies.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) has recently become a major global issue, resulting in a substantial rise in healthcare costs. The NAS has become a global public health epidemic in the last decade, with a rise in incidence.

Research motivation

Despite the fact that bibliometric studies have been conducted on a variety of topics related to substance abuse, such as illegal drug addiction, a thorough search of the literature revealed no bibliometric research on NAS.

Research objectives

Bibliometric analysis was used to assess the evolution and pattern of the global NAS research from 1958 to 2019.

Research methods

Yearly publication production, language, document types, journals, countries/territories, h-index, authors, and top research priorities were among the indicators examined. The VOSviewer was used to assess the top research priorities and patterns, as well as to present bibliometric networks on a variety of dimensions, including co-authorship, authors, and countries.

Research results

The current study is novel in that it uses bibliometric analysis to describe the characteristics of research publications relevant to NAS over time and determine the top research priorities in this field over six decades (1958-2019). Advances in NAS awareness will help to enhance future maternal and neonatal care research by identifying the top research priorities for this complex health problem.

Research conclusions

Treatment and pediatric outcome, as well as the efficacy of pharmacological treatment, may be frontiers in the NAS area, and researchers must continue to work on these topics.

Research perspectives

This will allow scientists and clinicians interested in the field of NAS to recognise the most common topics that have been used to improve our understanding of the disease and serve as a foundation for future study.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Substance abuse

Country/Territory of origin: Palestine

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Dong Y, China S-Editor: Ma YJ L-Editor: A P-Editor: Ma YJ

References
1.  Patrick SW, Schumacher RE, Benneyworth BD, Krans EE, McAllister JM, Davis MM. Neonatal abstinence syndrome and associated health care expenditures: United States, 2000-2009. JAMA. 2012;307:1934-1940.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 660]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 655]  [Article Influence: 54.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Kocherlakota P. Neonatal abstinence syndrome. Pediatrics. 2014;134:e547-e561.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 371]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 352]  [Article Influence: 35.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Sanlorenzo LA, Stark AR, Patrick SW. Neonatal abstinence syndrome: an update. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2018;30:182-186.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 8.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Grossman M, Seashore C, Holmes AV. Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Management: A Review of Recent Evidence. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2017;12:226-232.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Raffaeli G, Cavallaro G, Allegaert K, Wildschut ED, Fumagalli M, Agosti M, Tibboel D, Mosca F. Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Update on Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies. Pharmacotherapy. 2017;37:814-823.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 38]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Wachman EM, Schiff DM, Silverstein M. Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA. 2018;319:1362-1374.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 122]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 128]  [Article Influence: 21.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Corr TE, Hollenbeak CS. The economic burden of neonatal abstinence syndrome in the United States. Addiction. 2017;112:1590-1599.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 64]  [Article Influence: 9.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Okoroh EM, Gee RE, Jiang B, McNeil MB, Hardy-Decuir BA, Zapata AL. Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Trend and Expenditure in Louisiana Medicaid, 2003-2013. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21:1479-1487.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Patrick SW, Davis MM, Lehmann CU, Cooper WO. Increasing incidence and geographic distribution of neonatal abstinence syndrome: United States 2009 to 2012. J Perinatol. 2015;35:650-655.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 401]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 386]  [Article Influence: 42.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  McQueen K, Murphy-Oikonen J. Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2468-2479.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 206]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 201]  [Article Influence: 25.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Bagley SM, Wachman EM, Holland E, Brogly SB. Review of the assessment and management of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2014;9:19.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 107]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 111]  [Article Influence: 11.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Streetz VN, Gildon BL, Thompson DF. Role of Clonidine in Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Ann Pharmacother. 2016;50:301-310.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  McPherson C. Pharmacotherapy for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Choosing the Right Opioid or No Opioid at All. Neonatal Netw. 2016;35:314-320.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Khalili M, Rahimi-Movaghar A, Shadloo B, Mojtabai R, Mann K, Amin-Esmaeili M. Global Scientific Production on Illicit Drug Addiction: A Two-Decade Analysis. Eur Addict Res. 2018;24:60-70.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Zyoud SH, Waring WS, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM. Global cocaine intoxication research trends during 1975-2015: a bibliometric analysis of Web of Science publications. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017;12:6.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  González-Alcaide G, Calafat A, Becoña E, Thijs B, Glänzel W. Co-Citation Analysis of Articles Published in Substance Abuse Journals: Intellectual Structure and Research Fields (2001-2012). J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016;77:710-722.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Clifford A, Shakeshaft A. A bibliometric review of drug and alcohol research focused on Indigenous peoples of Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2017;36:509-522.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Bramness JG, Henriksen B, Person O, Mann K. A bibliometric analysis of European versus USA research in the field of addiction. Research on alcohol, narcotics, prescription drug abuse, tobacco and steroids 2001-2011. Eur Addict Res. 2014;20:16-22.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Condon TP. Reflecting on 30 years of research. A look at how NIDA has advanced the research, prevention, and treatment of drug abuse and addiction. Behav Healthc. 2006;26:14, 16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Rawson RA, Woody G, Kresina TF, Gust S. The globalization of addiction research: capacity-building mechanisms and selected examples. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2015;23:147-156.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Blobaum PM. Mapping the literature of addictions treatment. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013;101:101-109.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Rahimi-Movaghar A, Amin-Esmaeili M, Safarcherati A, Sarami H, Rafiey H. A Scientometric Study of Iranian Scientific Productions in the Field of Substance Use and Addiction Research in the Years 2008 to 2012. Addict Health. 2015;7:99-108.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Valderrama Zurián JC, Aleixander R, Castellano M. Citation count analysis in addiction (2001). Addiction. 2004;99:387-388.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Cleary BJ, Donnelly J, Strawbridge J, Gallagher PJ, Fahey T, Clarke M, Murphy DJ. Methadone dose and neonatal abstinence syndrome-systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2010;105:2071-2084.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 126]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 115]  [Article Influence: 8.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  MacMillan KDL, Rendon CP, Verma K, Riblet N, Washer DB, Volpe Holmes A. Association of Rooming-in With Outcomes for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172:345-351.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 113]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 125]  [Article Influence: 20.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Murphy-Oikonen J, McQueen K. Outpatient pharmacologic weaning for neonatal abstinence syndrome: a systematic review. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018;20:e76.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Rees P, Stilwell PA, Bolton C, Akillioglu M, Carter B, Gale C, Sutcliffe A. Childhood Health and Educational Outcomes After Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Pediatr. 2020;226:149-156.e16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Olisah C, Okoh OO, Okoh AI. A bibliometric analysis of investigations of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in biological and environmental matrices from 1992 - 2018. Heliyon. 2018;4:e00964.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Ekundayo TC, Okoh AI. A global bibliometric analysis of Plesiomonas-related research (1990 - 2017). PLoS One. 2018;13:e0207655.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 81]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69]  [Article Influence: 11.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Sweileh WM. Bibliometric analysis of global scientific literature on vaccine hesitancy in peer-reviewed journals (1990-2019). BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1252.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 6.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Zyoud SH, Waring WS, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM. Bibliometric profile of global scientific research on digoxin toxicity (1849-2015). Drug Chem Toxicol. 2020;43:553-559.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Zhang TS, Qin HL, Wang T, Li HT, Li H, Xia SH, Xiang XH. Bibliometric analysis of top 100 cited articles in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease research. World J Hepatol. 2016;8:1478-1488.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Wang CY, Zhou SC, Li XW, Li BH, Zhang JJ, Ge Z, Zhang Q, Hu JH. Bibliometric analysis of randomized controlled trials of colorectal cancer over the last decade. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8:3021-3030.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84:523-538.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4505]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3728]  [Article Influence: 248.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  ACOG Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women; American Society of Addiction Medicine. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 524: Opioid abuse, dependence, and addiction in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:1070-1076.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 238]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 306]  [Article Influence: 25.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Neonatal drug withdrawal. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs. Pediatrics. 1998;101:1079-1088.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Costei AM, Kozer E, Ho T, Ito S, Koren G. Perinatal outcome following third trimester exposure to paroxetine. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:1129-1132.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 183]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 194]  [Article Influence: 8.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Finnegan LP, Connaughton JF Jr, Kron RE, Emich JP. Neonatal abstinence syndrome: assessment and management. Addict Dis. 1975;2:141-158.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  Hadeed AJ, Siegel SR. Maternal cocaine use during pregnancy: effect on the newborn infant. Pediatrics. 1989;84:205-210.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Hudak ML, Tan RC; COMMITTEE ON DRUGS;  COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN;  American Academy of Pediatrics. Neonatal drug withdrawal. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e540-e560.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 600]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 579]  [Article Influence: 48.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Hughes JR, Higgins ST, Bickel WK. Nicotine withdrawal versus other drug withdrawal syndromes: similarities and dissimilarities. Addiction. 1994;89:1461-1470.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 215]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 200]  [Article Influence: 6.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Jones HE, Johnson RE, Jasinski DR, O'Grady KE, Chisholm CA, Choo RE, Crocetti M, Dudas R, Harrow C, Huestis MA, Jansson LM, Lantz M, Lester BM, Milio L. Buprenorphine versus methadone in the treatment of pregnant opioid-dependent patients: effects on the neonatal abstinence syndrome. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;79:1-10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 220]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 213]  [Article Influence: 11.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Jones HE, Kaltenbach K, Heil SH, Stine SM, Coyle MG, Arria AM, O'Grady KE, Selby P, Martin PR, Fischer G. Neonatal abstinence syndrome after methadone or buprenorphine exposure. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2320-2331.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 642]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 629]  [Article Influence: 44.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Lejeune C, Simmat-Durand L, Gourarier L, Aubisson S; Groupe d'Etudes Grossesse et Addictions (GEGA). Prospective multicenter observational study of 260 infants born to 259 opiate-dependent mothers on methadone or high-dose buprenophine substitution. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;82:250-257.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 176]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 151]  [Article Influence: 8.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Levinson-Castiel R, Merlob P, Linder N, Sirota L, Klinger G. Neonatal abstinence syndrome after in utero exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in term infants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:173-176.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 213]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 225]  [Article Influence: 12.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Nau H, Rating D, Koch S, Häuser I, Helge H. Valproic acid and its metabolites: placental transfer, neonatal pharmacokinetics, transfer via mother's milk and clinical status in neonates of epileptic mothers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1981;219:768-777.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
47.  Nordeng H, Lindemann R, Perminov KV, Reikvam A. Neonatal withdrawal syndrome after in utero exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Acta Paediatr. 2001;90:288-291.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
48.  Ryan L, Ehrlich S, Finnegan L. Cocaine abuse in pregnancy: effects on the fetus and newborn. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1987;9:295-299.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 161]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 168]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Sanz EJ, De-las-Cuevas C, Kiuru A, Bate A, Edwards R. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnant women and neonatal withdrawal syndrome: a database analysis. Lancet. 2005;365:482-487.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 212]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 164]  [Article Influence: 8.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Tolia VN, Patrick SW, Bennett MM, Murthy K, Sousa J, Smith PB, Clark RH, Spitzer AR. Increasing incidence of the neonatal abstinence syndrome in U.S. neonatal ICUs. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2118-2126.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 317]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 315]  [Article Influence: 35.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Wisner KL, Gelenberg AJ, Leonard H, Zarin D, Frank E. Pharmacologic treatment of depression during pregnancy. JAMA. 1999;282:1264-1269.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 161]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 167]  [Article Influence: 6.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Zajecka J, Tracy KA, Mitchell S. Discontinuation symptoms after treatment with serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a literature review. J Clin Psychiatry. 1997;58:291-297.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 149]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 149]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  United Nations  Sustainable development goals. 2015. Vailable from: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
54.  Sweileh WM. Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on "sustainable development goals" with emphasis on "good health and well-being" goal (2015-2019). Global Health. 2020;16:68.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 66]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 8.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW, Zyoud SH, Sawalha AF. Outdoor air pollution and respiratory health: a bibliometric analysis of publications in peer-reviewed journals (1900 - 2017). Multidiscip Respir Med. 2018;13:15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 55]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Zyoud SH. Investigating global trends in paraquat intoxication research from 1962 to 2015 using bibliometric analysis. Am J Ind Med. 2018;61:462-470.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
57.  González-Alcaide G, Peris J, Ramos JM. Areas of research and clinical approaches to the study of liver abscess. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:357-365.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
58.  Volkow ND. Medications for opioid use disorder: bridging the gap in care. Lancet. 2018;391:285-287.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 8.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
59.  Chen RC, Chu D, Chiang CH, Chou CT. Bibliometric analysis of ultrasound research trends over the period of 1991 to 2006. J Clin Ultrasound. 2009;37:319-323.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention  Data and Statistics About Opioid Use During Pregnancy. 2020. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/pregnancy/opioids/data.html.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
61.  Joseph H, Stancliff S, Langrod J. Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT): a review of historical and clinical issues. Mt Sinai J Med. 2000;67:347-364.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
62.  Whelan PJ, Remski K. Buprenorphine vs methadone treatment: A review of evidence in both developed and developing worlds. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2012;3:45-50.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 86]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 119]  [Article Influence: 9.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
63.  Kuschel CA, Austerberry L, Cornwell M, Couch R, Rowley RS. Can methadone concentrations predict the severity of withdrawal in infants at risk of neonatal abstinence syndrome? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F390-F393.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 46]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
64.  Siu A, Robinson CA. Neonatal abstinence syndrome: essentials for the practitioner. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2014;19:147-155.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
65.  Uebel H, Wright IM, Burns L, Hilder L, Bajuk B, Breen C, Abdel-Latif ME, Feller JM, Falconer J, Clews S, Eastwood J, Oei JL. Reasons for Rehospitalization in Children Who Had Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome. Pediatrics. 2015;136:e811-e820.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 71]  [Article Influence: 7.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
66.  Uebel H, Wright IM, Burns L, Hilder L, Bajuk B, Breen C, Abdel-Latif ME, Falconer J, Clews S, Ward M, Eastwood J, Oei JL. Characteristics and causes of death in children with neonatal abstinence syndrome. J Paediatr Child Health. 2020;56:1933-1940.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
67.  Uebel H, Wright IM, Melhuish E, Eastwood J, Oei JL. Prenatal Opioid Exposure Research: Shortcomings and Solutions. J Addict Med. 2020;14:355-356.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
68.  Oei JL, Wouldes T. Will Simplifying the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring Tool Improve Outcomes for Infants With Opioid Exposure? JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e202271.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
69.  de Moya-Anegón F, Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z, Vargas-Quesada B, Corera-Álvarez E, Muñoz-Fernández FJ, González-Molina A, Herrero-Solana V. Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach. Scientometrics. 2007;73:53-78.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 172]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 122]  [Article Influence: 7.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
70.  Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics. 2016;106:213-228.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1180]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 820]  [Article Influence: 91.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
71.  Yue YY, Fan XY, Zhang Q, Lu YP, Wu S, Wang S, Yu M, Cui CW, Sun ZR. Bibliometric analysis of subject trends and knowledge structures of gut microbiota. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8:2817-2832.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
72.  Brennan C, Laubscher M, Maqungo S, Graham SM. Bibliometric analysis of research on the effects of human immunodeficiency virus in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. World J Orthop. 2021;12:169-177.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]