BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Pediatr. Dec 9, 2026; 15(4): 125891
Published online Dec 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.125891
Comparison of national and international pediatric fever clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review
Momčilo T Pavlović, Karolina F Berenji, Zeljko L Rokvic
Momčilo T Pavlović, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Children’s Ambulatory Care Center, Subotica 24000, Serbia
Karolina F Berenji, Department of Hygiene and Human Ecology, Institute of Public Health Subotica, Subotica 24000, Serbia
Zeljko L Rokvic, Department of Medical Studies, College of Vocational Studies, Subotica 24000, Serbia
Author contributions: Pavlovic MT and Berenji KF performed the literature search and independently screened all titles, abstracts, and full-text articles for eligibility, resolving any disagreements through consensus, comparative analysis and interpretation of the findings; Pavlovic MT extracted data from the included guidelines using a standardized data collection form, and Berenji KF independently verified the extracted data for accuracy and completeness; Rokvic ZL contributed to the study design, manuscript drafting, critical revision of the manuscript, and provided valuable intellectual input throughout the study; all authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version for submission.
AI contribution statement: ChatGPT (OpenAI; GPT-5 family), Grammarly Premium, and Paperpal were used for language polishing, editorial revision, and formatting assistance. No artificial intelligence tool was used to generate research data, perform data analysis, or independently interpret results or formulate conclusions. All AI-assisted content was critically reviewed and revised by the authors, who take full responsibility for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The authors have read the PRISMA 2020 Checklist, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2020 Statement.
Corresponding author: Momčilo T Pavlović, PhD, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Children’s Ambulatory Care Center, Šolohova 18, Subotica 24000, Serbia. pavlovic.vsovsu@gmail.com
Received: July 21, 2026
Revised: August 5, 2026
Accepted: September 4, 2026
Published online: December 9, 2026
Processing time: 62 Days and 4.8 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Fever is one of the most common reasons for pediatric medical consultations worldwide. Although numerous clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed to support evidence-based fever management, variations in recommendations persist across national and international guidelines.

AIM

To compare recommendations from contemporary national and international pediatric fever CPGs and identify areas of consensus and divergence.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, guideline repositories, and relevant organizational websites. National and international pediatric fever CPGs published or updated between January 1, 2010, and June 12, 2026, were eligible. Recommendations were extracted using a standardized form and grouped into four predefined domains: Temperature assessment, antipyretic therapy, physical methods, and caregiver education. Agreement across guidelines was classified as excellent (≥ 80%), partial (60%-79%), or low (< 60%).

RESULTS

Eleven CPGs met the inclusion criteria. Excellent agreement (≥ 80%) was observed for recommendations on the indication for antipyretic treatment, use of paracetamol and ibuprofen, and caregiver education (all 100%), as well as for avoiding the use of fever alone as an indicator of serious bacterial infection and against the use of antipyretics for the prevention of febrile seizures (both 91%). By contrast, recommendations on temperature measurement sites showed the greatest variability across guidelines. Partial agreement (64%) was observed for body temperature thresholds, vaccination prophylaxis, tepid sponging, and routine combined antipyretic therapy, while alternating antipyretic therapy showed the lowest agreement among antipyretic-related recommendations (55%). Recommended maximum daily paracetamol doses also varied substantially, ranging from 40 mg/kg/day to 90 mg/kg/day.

CONCLUSION

Contemporary pediatric fever CPGs show broad consensus on antipyretic therapy and caregiver education, but recommendations on temperature assessment, physical methods, and paracetamol dosing remain more variable, warranting harmonization.

Keywords: Fever; Child; Clinical practice guidelines; Antipyretics; Fever management; Systematic review

Core Tip: This systematic review compared recommendations from 11 contemporary national and international clinical practice guidelines for pediatric fever management. Despite broad agreement regarding the use of antipyretics for relieving discomfort and the importance of caregiver education, important differences remain in fever definitions, temperature measurement, physical cooling methods, and antipyretic dosing recommendations. These findings identify areas of international consensus and ongoing variation, providing clinicians with a practical overview of contemporary recommendations and highlighting priorities for future guideline harmonization.

Write to the Help Desk