Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng.
World J Stomatol. Feb 20, 2013; 2(1): 24-29
Published online Feb 20, 2013. doi: 10.5321/wjs.v2.i1.24
Table 1 Descriptive data showing comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and test stick results
VisitGroupTest stick resultsMMP-8 (mg/L)
Total
> 11
BaselineGroup 1Positive11
Negative4949
Total5050
Group 2Positive404
Negative83846
Total123850
Group 3Positive30232
Negative51318
Total351550
3 moGroup 1Positive11
Negative4949
Total5050
Group 2Negative5050
Total5050
Group 3Positive13013
Negative03737
Total133750
Table 2 Test strip results at baseline and three month follow-up
VisitGroupSiteTest result of site1 mg/L> 1 mg/L
BaselineGroup 150Positive10
Negative490
Group 250Positive04
Negative388
Group 350Positive230
Negative135
3rd moGroup 150Positive01
Negative049
Group 250Positive00
Negative050
Group 350Positive013
Negative370
Table 3 Changes in clinical parameters from baseline to three months following scaling and root planning n (%)
VisitBleeding on ProbingProbing pocket depth
Total
5 mm< 5 mm
BaselineNegative8 (30.8)8 (33.3)16 (32.0)
Positive18 (69.2)16 (66.7)34 (68.0)
Total26 (100.0)24 (100.0)50 (100.0)
3 moNegative43 (86.0)43 (86.0)
Positive7 (14.0)7 (14.0)
Total50 (100.0)50 (100.0)