Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Otorhinolaryngol. Nov 28, 2015; 5(4): 105-109
Published online Nov 28, 2015. doi: 10.5319/wjo.v5.i4.105
Table 1 Review of literature
Ref.YearNumber1Grading of laryngeal cleftType of repairProspectiveLevel of evidence
Yalamachili et al201518 (22)16 grade 1; 2 grade 218 endoscopicYesIV
Ojha[2]201427 (42)27 grade 127 endoscopicNoIV
Thiel et al[6]2011126 grade 1; 5 grade 2; 1 grade 33 endoscopic; 2 openNoIV
Cohen et al[19]20111616 grade 116 injection laryngoplastyNoIV
Broomfield et al[7]201173 grade 2; 4 grade 37 endoscopicNoIV
Rahbar et al[18]200949 (74)28 grade 1; 21 grade 249 endoscopicNoIV
Rahbar et al[17]2006223 grade 1; 10 grade 2; 9 grade 36 endoscopic; 16 openNoIV
Chien et al[8]200616 (20)16 grade 116 endoscopicYesIV
Kubba et al[16]20053535 grade 1-3VariableNoIV
Watters et al[21]20038 (12)8 grade 18 endoscopicNoIV
Kennedy et al[15]200088 grade 18 gelfoamNoIV
Glossop et al[22]19846 (10)6 grade 2-4VariableNoIV