Revised: April 9, 2013
Accepted: April 13, 2013
Published online: June 28, 2013
Processing time: 126 Days and 5.5 Hours
The nucleus accumbens (NA), a major pleasure center of the human brain, is a limbic-motor interface involved in several neurological and psychiatric disorders. During the last decade, this nucleus is also a deep brain stimulation target for selected patients. Purpose of this paper is to comment on the article entitled “Stereotactic anatomy of the human nucleus accumbens: from applied mathematics to microsurgical accuracy” which was recently published in “Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy” and is one of the latest articles on NA anatomy and surgery. The described results included a probability-based guide for in vivo (side-depended) stereotactic localization of the human NA and a standard for the NA, specific stereotactic zone of the human brain (which can be used in combination for an accurate stereotactic NA targeting). Furthermore, two specific stereotactically standard NA areas were found which could be used as abundant stereotactic guides for targeting of the anterior limb of the internal capsule, with electrode’s contact 0 (lowest) placed in the vicinity of the NA. However, the most important finding of this paper was standard area M (Mavridis’ area), which is the most reliable stereotactically standard area of the human NA, regardless of side or gender, useful for highly accurate stereotactic NA targeting.
Core tip: Nucleus accumbens (NA), a major pleasure center of the human brain, is a limbic-motor interface involved in several neurological and psychiatric disorders. It is also a deep brain stimulation target for selected patients. Purpose of this paper is to comment on the article entitled “Stereotactic anatomy of the human nucleus accumbens: from applied mathematics to microsurgical accuracy” which was recently published in “Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy”. Its most important finding was standard area M (Mavridis’ area), which is the most reliable stereotactically standard area of the human NA, regardless of side or gender, useful for highly accurate stereotactic NA targeting.
- Citation: Mavridis IN. Nucleus accumbens stereotactic surgery: Achieving accuracy through area M. World J Neurol 2013; 3(2): 7-9
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6212/full/v3/i2/7.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5316/wjn.v3.i2.7
Core tip: Nucleus accumbens (NA), a major pleasure center of the human brain, is a limbic-motor interface involved in several neurological and psychiatric disorders. It is also a deep brain stimulation target for selected patients. Purpose of this paper is to comment on the article entitled “Stereotactic anatomy of the human nucleus accumbens: from applied mathematics to microsurgical accuracy” which was recently published in “Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy”. Its most important finding was standard area M (Mavridis’ area), which is the most reliable stereotactically standard area of the human NA, regardless of side or gender, useful for highly accurate stereotactic NA targeting.
Purpose of this paper is to comment on the recent article entitled “Stereotactic anatomy of the human nucleus accumbens: from applied mathematics to microsurgical accuracy”[1]. It is one of the latest articles on nucleus accumbens (NA) anatomy and surgery.
The NA, a major pleasure center of the human brain (Figure 1), is a limbic-motor interface involved in several neurological and psychiatric disorders[2]. During the last decade, this nucleus became also a deep brain stimulation (DBS) target for selected patients mainly suffering from refractory major depression[3], obsessive-compulsive disorder[4] and Tourette syndrome[5].
According to the commended article, NA coordinates were measured at five different neurosurgically important three-dimensional levels, through two clinically oriented stereotactic studies, a magnetic resonance imaging and a gross anatomical (with totally 84 NAs studied). The study offered a stereotactic anatomic guide for some common targeting needs of the NA stereotactic surgery, resulted from detailed analysis and careful combination of the measured data[1].
The results included a probability-based guide for in vivo (side-depended) stereotactic localization of the human NA and a standard for the NA, specific stereotactic zone of the human brain (which can be used in combination for an accurate stereotactic NA targeting). Furthermore, two specific stereotactically standard NA areas were found which could be used as abundant stereotactic guides for targeting of the anterior limb of the internal capsule, with electrode’s contact 0 (lowest) placed in the vicinity of the NA[1].
However, the most important finding of this paper was standard area M (Mavridis’ area), which is the most reliable stereotactically standard area of the human NA, regardless of side or gender, useful for highly accurate stereotactic NA targeting. Standard area M is defined by coordinates (X, X΄, Y, Y΄, Z, Z΄) = (6, 9, 2, 2, -0.8, -2) and represents the most reliable standard part of the NA (of those revealed by the coordinates’ analysis) within the human brain, regardless of side or gender. The surface of this area is 3.6 mm2[1]. Area M consists a revolutionary finding because it is expected to be applicable in every adult human hemisphere. Additionally it offers a compass for neurosurgeons given the relative variety of NA target coordinates used in the past by several authors[3-16].
It is clear that the described study offered a necessary (considering the expanding dynamics of NA DBS) deep insight into the stereotactic anatomy of the human NA, missing from the literature[1]. Clinical research, more difficult of course, always requires a stable ground of basic research in order to bring successful treatment strategies as a result. Now that a safe anatomical basis for achieving surgical accuracy exists, problems that remain to be resolved are mainly related to NA DBS clinical application. Consequently, future research directions should focus on microelectrode recordings interpretation, establishing guidelines for stimulation parameters, minimizing complications and safely expanding respective therapeutic indications, if possible. Such efforts should always be made by multidisciplinary teams of experienced clinicians.
| 1. | Mavridis I, Boviatsis E, Anagnostopoulou S. Stereotactic anatomy of the human nucleus accumbens: from applied mathematics to microsurgical accuracy. Surg Radiol Anat. 2011;33:583-594. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in RCA: 14] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 2. | Mavridis IN. [Stereotactic neurosurgical anatomy of the nucleus accumbens] - PhD Thesis. Athens: School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens 2012; 42-59 Available from: http://www.lib.uoa.gr/greylit/greylit.pl?i=CE8254B35CE35B06C2257A3100487A71. |
| 3. | Schlaepfer TE, Cohen MX, Frick C, Kosel M, Brodesser D, Axmacher N, Joe AY, Kreft M, Lenartz D, Sturm V. Deep brain stimulation to reward circuitry alleviates anhedonia in refractory major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:368-377. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 660] [Cited by in RCA: 632] [Article Influence: 35.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (3)] |
| 4. | Sturm V, Lenartz D, Koulousakis A, Treuer H, Herholz K, Klein JC, Klosterkötter J. The nucleus accumbens: a target for deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive- and anxiety-disorders. J Chem Neuroanat. 2003;26:293-299. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 392] [Cited by in RCA: 375] [Article Influence: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 5. | Kuhn J, Lenartz D, Mai JK, Huff W, Lee SH, Koulousakis A, Klosterkoetter J, Sturm V. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens and the internal capsule in therapeutically refractory Tourette-syndrome. J Neurol. 2007;254:963-965. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 118] [Cited by in RCA: 123] [Article Influence: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 6. | Rauch SL, Dougherty DD, Malone D, Rezai A, Friehs G, Fischman AJ, Alpert NM, Haber SN, Stypulkowski PH, Rise MT. A functional neuroimaging investigation of deep brain stimulation in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Neurosurg. 2006;104:558-565. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 195] [Cited by in RCA: 168] [Article Influence: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 7. | Kuhn J, Lenartz D, Huff W, Lee S, Koulousakis A, Klosterkoetter J, Sturm V. Remission of alcohol dependency following deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens: valuable therapeutic implications? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:1152-1153. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 213] [Cited by in RCA: 185] [Article Influence: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 8. | Kuhn J, Lenartz D, Huff W, Mai JK, Koulousakis A, Maarouf M, Lee SH, Klosterkoetter J, Sturm V. Transient Manic-like Episode Following Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation of the Nucleus Accumbens and the Internal Capsule in a Patient With Tourette Syndrome. Neuromodulation. 2008;11:128-131. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in RCA: 25] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 9. | Heinze HJ, Heldmann M, Voges J, Hinrichs H, Marco-Pallares J, Hopf JM, Müller UJ, Galazky I, Sturm V, Bogerts B. Counteracting incentive sensitization in severe alcohol dependence using deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens: clinical and basic science aspects. Front Hum Neurosci. 2009;3:22. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 68] [Cited by in RCA: 68] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 10. | Neuner I, Podoll K, Lenartz D, Sturm V, Schneider F. Deep brain stimulation in the nucleus accumbens for intractable Tourette’s syndrome: follow-up report of 36 months. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;65:e5-e6. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 77] [Cited by in RCA: 73] [Article Influence: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 11. | Bewernick BH, Hurlemann R, Matusch A, Kayser S, Grubert C, Hadrysiewicz B, Axmacher N, Lemke M, Cooper-Mahkorn D, Cohen MX. Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation decreases ratings of depression and anxiety in treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;67:110-116. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 567] [Cited by in RCA: 569] [Article Influence: 35.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 12. | Huff W, Lenartz D, Schormann M, Lee SH, Kuhn J, Koulousakis A, Mai J, Daumann J, Maarouf M, Klosterkötter J. Unilateral deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens in patients with treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: Outcomes after one year. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010;112:137-143. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 222] [Cited by in RCA: 208] [Article Influence: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 13. | Mantione M, van de Brink W, Schuurman PR, Denys D. Smoking cessation and weight loss after chronic deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens: therapeutic and research implications: case report. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:E218; discussion E218. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 143] [Cited by in RCA: 136] [Article Influence: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (2)] |
| 14. | Denys D, Mantione M, Figee M, van den Munckhof P, Koerselman F, Westenberg H, Bosch A, Schuurman R. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67:1061-1068. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 480] [Cited by in RCA: 491] [Article Influence: 30.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (3)] |
| 15. | Bewernick BH, Kayser S, Sturm V, Schlaepfer TE. Long-term effects of nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: evidence for sustained efficacy. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37:1975-1985. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 252] [Cited by in RCA: 275] [Article Influence: 19.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 16. | Heldmann M, Berding G, Voges J, Bogerts B, Galazky I, Müller U, Baillot G, Heinze HJ, Münte TF. Deep brain stimulation of nucleus accumbens region in alcoholism affects reward processing. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36572. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 43] [Cited by in RCA: 45] [Article Influence: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
P- Reviewer Xi ZX S- Editor Gou SX L- Editor A E- Editor Lu YJ