Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Orthop. Aug 18, 2017; 8(8): 638-643
Published online Aug 18, 2017. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.638
Table 1 Patient demographics and characteristics
Characteristicsn (%)
No. of patients97
Age (yr)9.3
Follow up (mo)39.99
Open fracture48
Tibia27
Gustillo Anderson 15 (18.52)
Gustillo Anderson 211 (40.74)
Gustillo Anderson 3a7 (25.92)
Gustillo Anderson 3b2 (7.41)
Gustillo Anderson 3c2 (7.41)
Femur10
Gustillo Anderson 14 (40.00)
Gustillo Anderson 22 (20.00)
Gustillo Anderson 3a2 (20.00)
Gustillo Anderson 3b1 (10.00)
Gustillo Anderson 3c1 (10.00)
Not specified11
Fracture pattern
Tibia97
Diaphysis75 (77.32)
Metaphysis9 (9.28)
Epiphysis13 (13.40)
Femur97
Diaphysis73 (75.26)
Metaphysis15 (15.46)
Epiphysis9 (9.28)
Management
ORIF femur and non-operative tibia14
ORIF tibia and non-operative femur12
ORIF tibia and femur19
Non-operative tibia and femur52
Table 2 Complications
Characteristicsn (%)
Limb length discrepancy32
Overgrowth24 (75.00)
Undergrowth8 (25.00)
Non-union7
Femur3 (42.86)
Tibia4 (57.14)
Mal-union20
Femur11 (55.00)
Tibia9 (45.00)
Infection9
2nd surgery13
Premature physeal closure3
Table 3 Univariate analysis
CharacteristicsmeanP
Age (yr)< 0.001
ORIF femur and non-operative tibia11.47
ORIF tibia and non-operative femur10.07
ORIF tiba and femur11.45
Non-operative tibia and femur7.7
Length of stay (d)0.001
ORIF femur and non-operative tibia27.26
ORIF tibia and non-operative femur100.86
ORIF tiba and femur18
Non-operative tibia and femur37.35
Limb length discrepancy overgrowth (mm)0.372
ORIF femur and non-operative tibia1.37
ORIF tibia and non-operative femur1.9
ORIF tiba and femur2.27
Non-operative tibia and femur2.81
Limb length discrepancy undergrowth (mm)0.514
ORIF femur and non-operative tibia1.2
ORIF tibia and non-operative femur6
ORIF tiba and femur2.7
Non-operative tibia and femur2.75