Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2016; 7(7): 434-441
Published online Jul 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i7.434
Table 1 Patient details
CaseGenderAgePrevious stabilisation proceduresDuration of follow-up (yr)Additional procedures
1Male41Putti-Platt procedure; Allograft humeral head reconstruction; Coracoid transfer; Revision allograft humeral head reconstruction4.3-
2Female64Coracoid transfer4.6-
3Male48No previous stabilisation procedures4.8-
4Male32Putti-Platt procedure; Bankart repair; Revision Bankart repair; Allograft humeral head reconstruction; Humeral head resurfacing5.0Examination under anaesthesia and arthrocentesis due to persistent pain
5Male51No previous stabilisation procedures--
Table 2 Clinical outcome following constrained fixed-fulcrum reverse shoulder arthroplasty
CaseActive forward elevation in degrees (preop/postop)Active external rotation in degrees (preop/postop)Oxford shoulder instability score (preop/postop)Subjective shoulder value (preop/postop)
1130/8030/255/320/60
245/8020/2015/3750/70
360/9010/706/3320/60
450/1500/457/1610/50
Table 3 Change in the Oxford Shoulder Instability score following constrained fixed-fulcrum reverse shoulder arthroplasty
ItemNo. of patients reporting an improvementNo. of patients reporting worseningNo. of patients reporting no change
No. of dislocations400
Dressing oneself400
Worst pain400
Interference with work400
Avoidance of activities due to fear of dislocation400
Prevented activities of importance400
Interference with social life301
Interference with sport/hobbies103
Frequency with which patient thinks about their shoulder301
Willingness to life heavy objects103
Base-line level of pain in shoulder400
Avoidance of certain positions when sleeping202