Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Orthop. Nov 18, 2014; 5(5): 614-622
Published online Nov 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.614
Table 1 Algorithmic approach of proximal femur reconstruction according to Paprosky classification
TypeDescriptionTreatment option
IMinimal metaphyseal cancellous bone loss Intact diaphysisCementless or cemented primary stems with common length and geometry
IIMore extensive cancellous bone loss including the whole metaphysis down to the level of the lesser trochanterProximally fixed stem (usually modular) Calcar replacement stem if medial cortex of the femoral neck is compromised
IIIAExtensive metaphyseal and diaphyseal bone loss of the femur; More than 4 cm of diaphyseal bone are available for distal fixation of cementless stemCementless stems with distal (diaphyseal) Extensively porous coated stems Modular stems fluted distally and porous coated proximally
IIIBAvailable diaphyseal bone is less than 4 cm in lengthExtensively porous-coated stems Impaction grafting + cemented stem Modular cementless tapered fluted stem
IVWidened diaphysis that provides no support for cementless fixationImpaction grafting + cemented stem Allograft prosthetic composite Tumor megaprosthesis