Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2014; 5(2): 112-123
Published online Apr 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i2.112
Table 1 Gertzbein classification[5]
GradeBreach distance
00 mm (no breach)
1< 2 mm
22-4 mm
3> 4 mm
Table 2 Heary classification[22]
Grade Breach
1None
2Lateral, but screw tip is within VB
3Anterior or lateral breach of screw tip
4Medial or inferior breach
5Breach that requires immediate revision (due to proximity to sensitive structures)
Table 3 Summary of studies that have evaluated free-hand pedicle screw placement
Most common pathologyScrew locationNumber of patientsNumber of screwsAccuracy (%)Revision rate (%)
Gertzbein et al[5], 1990TraumaT8-S14016771.9N/A
Liljenqvist et al[9], 1997ScoliosisT4-T123212075.0N/A
Kim et al[23], 2004ScoliosisT1-T12Unclear57793.80
Karapinar et al[31], 2007TraumaT10-L39864094.20
Schizas et al[32], 2007TraumaT1-T6136088.30
Kotil et al[33], 200TraumaT1-L5Unclear36893.51.5
Modi et al[26], 2009ScoliosisT1-T124385493.0N/A
Parker et al[27], 2011Degenerative/DeformityT1-S1964681698.30.8
Table 4 Summary of studies evaluating fluoroscopy-aided pedicle screw placement
Most common pathologyScrew locationNumber of patientsNumber of screwsAccuracy (%)Revision rate (%)
Halm et al[44], 2000ScoliosisT10-L41210481.78.3
Belmont et al[7], 2001ScoliosisT1-T124027957.05.0
Carbone et al[45], 2003TraumaT1-T122212686.5N/A
Kuntz et al[46], 2004TraumaT1-T122819927.6N/A
Vougioukas et al[47], 2005DegenerativeT1-T124132878.00.0
Amato et al[48], 2010DegenerativeL1-S110242492.28.8
Table 5 Summary of studies evaluating navigation-aided pedicle screw placement
Most common pathologyScrew locationNumber of patientsNumber of screwsAccuracy (%)Revision rate (%)
Idler et al[53], 1996Postlaminectomy instability and spinal stenosisL1-S13013995.7N/A
Youkilis et al[14], 2000AssortedT1-T125222491.5N/A
Bledsoe et al[58], 2009Cervical deformityT1-T33415093.30
Nottmeier et al[59], 2009UnclearT1-S118495192.5N/A
Oertel et al[60], 2011Degenerative DiseaseT8-S15027896.80
Scheufler et al[55], 2011Idiopathic and Degenerative DeformityT2-S146Ta-243T-96.54.3
LSb-542LS-94.4
Dinesh et al[54], 2012MetastasisT1-T124326197.31.5 (intraop)
1.2 (postop)
Lee et al[61], 2013Degenerative SpondylolisthesisT1-S117893296.81.4
Ling et al[62], 2013Degenerative DiseaseT5-S19246795.31.3 (intraop)
Table 6 Studies comparing navigation methods to either free-hand or fluoroscopic methods
Most common pathologyScrew locationMethodPatients(n)Screws(n)Revisionrate (%)Accuracy(%)MethodPatients(n)Screws(n)Revisionrate (%)Accuracy(%)Studydesign
Amiot et al[34], 2000Degenerative diseaseT2-S1CT-navigation50294095Fluoroscopy100544285.0R, P
Laine et al[63], 2000Spinal stenosisT8-S1CT-navigation412194 (intraop)95.4Freehand502770 (intraop)86.8P
Rajasekaran et al[56], 2006DeformityT1-T12Fluoroscopy-navigation17242N/A98Fluoroscopy16236N/A77.0P
Merloz et al[35], 2007Trauma and degenerative diseaseT8-L5Fluoroscopy-navigation26140N/A95Fluoroscopy26138N/A87.0R
Tormenti et al[64], 2010DeformityT1-S1CT- navigation12164098.8Fluoroscopy142117.194.8R
Shin et al[65], 2013Degenerative diseaseT9-S1O-arm navigation201245 (intraop)91.9Fluoroscopy201385 (postop)87.7P
Waschke et al[66], 2013Trauma and degenerative diseaseT1-S1CT-navigation50524221.2L-96.4Fluoro- scopy50120024.4L-93.9R
T-95.5T-79.0