Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2013; 4(2): 80-84
Published online Apr 18, 2013. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i2.80
Table 1 Description of studypopulation n (%)
Total1047 (100)
Male499 (47.7)
Female548 (52.3)
Age (range), yr36 (2-95)
Follow up (wk)3 (0-350)
Children77 (7.4)
Adults970 (92.6)
Left501 (47.9)
Right538 (51.4)
Utriusque8 (0.8)
Table 2 Distribution of fracture types I-IV in our study population n (%)
MasonMaleFemale
Type I859 (82.1)409 (47.6)450 (52.5)
Type II149 (14.2)67 (45.0)82 (55)
Type III28 (2.7)20 (71.4)8 (28.6)
Type IV11 (1.1)3 (27.3)8 (72.7)
Table 3 Immobilization time in conservative treatment
Type I
Type II
Type III
Type IV
nMedianMinMaxnMedianMinMaxnMedianMinMaxn
Cast upper arm2561165121600
Cast lower arm7224122200
Dorsale splint7414111100
Elastic bandage3113421300
Filmulin bandage52611123411813330
Gilchrist00122200
Cork splint upper arm00133300
Cork splint lower arm1111011110
Mitella8111000
Non900030000
Surgery10532611
Table 4 Summary treatment strategies and pain n (%)
TotalSurgeryPain nonPain mildPain severe
Type I859 (82.1)103 (30)7 (70)0
Type II149 (14.2)5341 (77.4)10 (18.9)2 (3.8)
Type III28 (2.7)2621 (80.8)4 (15.4)1 (3.8)
Type IV11 (1.1)1110 (90.9)1 (9.1)
Conservative
Type I849488 (57.5)335 (39.5)26 (3.1)
Type II9657 (59.4)36 (37.5)3 (3.1)
Type III21 (50)1 (50)
Type IV0