Assessment of scapulohumeral rhythm for scapular plane shoulder elevation using a modified digital inclinometer

doi:10.5312/wjo.v3.i6.87

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 3, Issue 6

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (8113)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

827

HTML

6721

Figures (1-3)

362

Tables (1-3)

203

Sum=8113

Jun 18, 2012 (publication date) through Apr 19, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (42)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Orthopedics

ISSN

2218-5836

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Original Article

World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2012; 3(6): 87-94
Published online Jun 18, 2012. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v3.i6.87

Table 1 Humeral elevation increments, mean scapular upward rotation measures, and scapulohumeral rhythm ratios

Shoulder elevation increments	Mean scapular upward rotation (± SD)	Scapulohumeral rhythm
0^o-120^o	35.95 (6.50)	2.34:1
0^o-30^o	0.73 (4.91)	40.05:1
30^o-60^o	10.99 (7.18)	1.73:1
60^o-90^o	8.45 (6.17)	2.55:1
90^o-120^o	15.78 (7.01)	0.90:1
0^o-30^o	0.73 (4.91)	40.05:1
30^o-45^o	5.69 (2.33)	1.64:1
45^o-60^o	5.29 (6.15)	1.83:1
60^o-75^o	3.15 (3.67)	3.76:1
75^o-90^o	5.29 (5.83)	1.83:1
90^o-120^o	15.78 (7.01)	0.09:1

For each shoulder elevation increment mean ± SD were calculated for scapular upward rotation. Scapular rotation was subtracted from each 15, 30, or 120 degree increment to determine glenohumeral contribution to shoulder elevation. Using the glenohumeral and scapular rotation values, scapulohumeral rhythm (glenohumeral:scapular) was calculated for each increment. SD represents standard deviation.

Table 2 Dominant shoulder range of motion and normalized strength

	Active range ofmotion (± SD)	Passive range of motion (± SD)	Normalized strength (%) (± SD)
Flexion	175.86^o (7.04^o)	179.86^o (0.53^o)	19.29 (4.80)
Abduction	179.07^o (1.86^o)	180.00^o (0.00^o)	18.53 (3.90)
Internal rotation	52.43^o (12.11^o)	60.21^o (13.72^o)	17.25 (4.43)
External rotation	107.79^o (7.78^o)	129.14^o (11.95^o)	12.54 (3.37)

Table 3 Multiple comparisons analyzing scapular upward rotation per 30 degree increments of shoulder elevation

Increment₁	Increment₂	Mean difference	Significance	95% confidence interval
0^o-30^o	30^o-60^{o 1}	-10.26	0.001	-17.14; -3.37 -14.60; -0.83 -21.94; -8.17
	60^o-90^{o 1}	-7.72	0.02
	90^o-120^{o 1}	-15.05	≤ 0.001
30^o-60^o	0^o-30^{o 1}	10.26	0.001	3.37; 17.14
	60^o-90^o	2.54	1	-4.35; 9.42
	90^o-120^o	-4.8	0.367	-11.68; 2.09
60^o-90^o	0^o-30^{o 1}	7.72	0.02	0.83; 14.60
	30^o-60^o	-2.53	1	-9.42; 4.35
	90^o-120^{o 1}	-7.33	0.031	-14.22; -0.45
90^o-120^o	0^o-30^{o 1}	15.05	≤ 0.001	8.17; 21.94
	30^o-60^o	4.8	0.367	-2.09; 11.68
	60^o-90^{o 1}	7.33	0.031	0.45; 14.22

One-way ANOVA revealed a statistically significant difference between 30 degree shoulder elevation increments for scapular rotation [F_(3,48)= 12.63, P≤ 0.0001]. Boneferoni t-tests revealed statistically significant differences. ¹for scapular rotation between 30 degree elevation increments.

Citation: Scibek JS, Carcia CR. Assessment of scapulohumeral rhythm for scapular plane shoulder elevation using a modified digital inclinometer. World J Orthop 2012; 3(6): 87-94
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v3/i6/87.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v3.i6.87