BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Sep 18, 2026; 17(9): 125587
Published online Sep 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.125587
Table 1 Kirchhoff et al[36] classification for periprosthetic humeral fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Humeral fracture
Prosthesis stability
Management option
1: TuberositiesS: Stable1-S: Conservative or ORIF
2: SpiralL: Loose2-S: ORIF
3: Oblique3-S: ORIF
4: DistalL: Revision by long stem RSA ± ORIF
Table 2 Differential complication risk in special reconstructive indications relative to primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Context
Complications increased
Representative evidence
Acute PHFs/fracture sequelaeInstability, neurologic injury, intraoperative fracture, revisionNational Joint Registry study: Significantly increased revision risk vs other indications; systematic review of RSA for PHF reporting higher complication/revision rates
Oncologic reconstructionInstability/dislocation (especially with modular endoprostheses and deltoid deficiency)Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of oncologic RSA reconstruction
Revision arthroplastyIntraoperative fracture, infection, re-revisionRegistry data showing stepwise increase in re-revision risk with successive revisions
Table 3 Summary of reverse shoulder arthroplasty complications: Incidence, risk factors, prevention, and management
Phase/complication
Incidence
Key risk factors
Prevention and management
Intraoperative complications
Intraoperative humeral fracture1.4% overall; up to 13.6% in revision RSAOsteoporosis, prior hardware/deformity, narrow canal, revisionHand-reaming, avoid excessive stem impaction; ORIF or long-stem revision if displaced or stem loose
Intraoperative glenoid fracture0.3%-0.4%Long-standing CTA, rheumatoid erosion, AVN, revisionAutograft/allograft with augmented or BIO baseplate, longer central posts/cages, staged grafting in significant loss
Postoperative complications
Prosthetic instability0.24%-4.7%Prior arthroplasty, component malposition, undersized glenosphere, subscapularis deficiency, deltoid/axillary nerve dysfunctionClosed reduction for first-time events; revision (liner exchange, larger/Lateralized glenosphere, subscapularis reconstruction) for recurrent or structural instability
Neurologic injury1%-4%Excessive arm lengthening (> 2-2.5 cm), extensive retraction, glenoid bone graftingLimit distalization, gentle intermittent retraction, tug test, low threshold for neuromonitoring in revisions
Hematoma1%-20%Inferior glenosphere placement, glenosphere medialization, valgus humeral componentMeticulous hemostasis, layered closure, drain use; early evacuation if infection suspected
Early PJI1%-4%Male sex, younger age, prior ipsilateral surgery, diabetes, obesity, immunosuppression, hematomaDAIR with modular exchange and culture-directed antibiotics for acute, well-fixed implants
Glenoid dissociationUncommonIncomplete glenosphere seating, soft-tissue interposition, inadequate impaction forceRim-reamer sizing, verification by pull test and flush radiographic appearance
Long-term complications
Scapular notching50%-70% (medialized RSA) vs < 30% (lateralized)Medialized design, inferior baseplate tilt, glenosphere positioningInferior baseplate overhang/tilt, lateralized glenosphere/humeral geometry; largely observational once established
Aseptic loosening (glenoid/humeral)0.7%-5.7%Baseplate malposition, inadequate screw purchase, glenoid bone loss, cementless fixation in poor boneMeticulous baseplate fixation technique, revision with bone-stock reconstruction when needed
Acromial/scapular spine stress fracture1%-5%Osteoporosis, female sex, rheumatoid arthritis, prior acromioplasty, excessive humeral distalization (> 2.5 mm)Limit humeral distalization, activity modification/bracing for Levy I-II, surgical fixation for type III
Chronic PJI1.4%Cutibacterium acnes, coagulase-negative staphylococci, biofilm formationExtended cultures and biomarkers; single- or two-stage revision individualized to organism virulence and host factors


Write to the Help Desk