Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Orthop. Sep 18, 2020; 11(9): 380-390
Published online Sep 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i9.380
Table 1 Length unstable femur fractures
Length unstable with FIMN (n = 21)Length unstable with locked IMN, SMP, or external fixator (n = 29)P value
Patient characteristicsAverageMinimumMaximumAverageMinimumMaximum
Sex0.19
Male1727
Female42
Age, yr7.415.211.99.315.812.40.004
Weight, kg27.8110.656.735.1118680.033
Fracture type0.29
Spiral or oblique1618
Comminuted511
Blood loss, mL29.215100981105000.0036
Follow-up duration, mo10.6251.581160.37
Time to weightbearing, d3923603612630.45
ComplicationsNumber (%)Number (%)
Malunion01 (3.4%)
Shortening00
Arthrofibrosis02 (6.9%)
Symptomatic8 (38%)3 (10.3%)
Hardware01 (3.4%)
Changing treatment1 (4.8%)3 (10.3%)
Wound complications00
Decreased ROM
Total9 (42.8%)10 (34.5%)0.55
Minor9 (100%)4 (40%)0.021
Major0 (0%)6 (60%)0.026
Table 2 Femur fractures treated with flexible intramedullary nailing
Length unstable fractures (n = 21)Length stable fractures (n = 45)P value
Patient characteristicsAverageMinimumMaximumAverageMinimumMaximum
Sex0.24
Male1728
Female414
Age, yr7.45.211.98.54.612.80.062
Weight, kg27.810.656.732.11658.50.144
Blood loss, mL29.2510033.952000.57
Follow-up duration, mo10.6251.56.81240.204
Time to weightbearing, d391236029112470.001
ComplicationsNumber (%)Number (%)
Malunion00
Shortening00
Arthrofibrosis00
Symptomatic hardware8 (38%)15 (33.3%)
Changing treatment02 (4.4%)
Wound complications1 (4.8%)1 (2.2%)
Decreased ROM02 (4.4%)
Total9 (42.8%)20 (44.4%)0.805
Minor9 (100%)16 (80%)> 0.15
Major0 (0%)4 (20%)> 0.15