Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Orthop. Dec 18, 2020; 11(12): 595-605
Published online Dec 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i12.595
Table 1 General patient characteristics

Functional articulating spacer group
Prefabricated spacer group
P value
Number of patients1555
Age (range)66 (58-76)68 (33-88)NS
Gender female825NS
BMI (range)27 (20-35)27 (19-41)NS
BMI > 30313NS
Diabetes 48NS
ASA 1/2/31/11/33/30/22NS
Post-traumatic (fracture)69< 0.05
Months follow-up (range)24 (15-85)51 (13-129)< 0.005
Table 2 Infection characteristics, causative pathogens

Functional articulating spacer group
Prefabricated spacer group
CoNS1018
S. aureus09
S. epidermidis01
Propioni acnes05
E. faecalis22
E. coli01
P. aeruginosa01
H. parainfluenzae01
Corynebacterium02
Aerococcus christensenii01
Group B Streptococcus10
Candida albicans02
Culture negative04
Polymicrobial28
Table 3 Patient reported outcome measure results and comparison of the groups

Functional articulating spacer group
Prefabricated spacer group
P value
Number of patients1555
HOOS total (SD)88 (6) 67 (14)< 0.01
HOOS pain (SD), % PASS92 (6), 54%75 (14), 8% < 0.01
HOOS PS (SD), % PASS85 (6), 15%67 (14), 3%< 0.01
HOOS QoL (SD), % PASS85 (12), 46%56 (21), 5%< 0.01
EQ-5D (SD), % PASS0.90 (0.17), 46%0.69 (0.30), 5%< 0.01
EQ-VAS (range), % PASS85 (65-100), 46%71 (45-85), 3%< 0.05