Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. May 18, 2022; 13(5): 515-527
Published online May 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i5.515
Table 1 Incidence and follow-up of symptomatic contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis in the literature
Ref.
Incidence
Time between slips in mo
Follow-up in mo
Minors score
Greenough et al[57]16 of 61 (26%)NA1NA8 of 16
Hägglund et al[14]32 of 237 (14%)NANA10 of 16
Jensen et al[30]9 of 57 (16%)NA264 (median)9 of 16
Segal et al[23]9 of 13 (69%)14 (mean)37 (mean)15 of 24
Hurley et al[32]61 of 169 (36%)NA34 (mean)10 of 16
Stasikelis et al[49]20 of 50 (40%)10 (mean)34 (mean)13 of 16
Stott and Bidwell[29]56 of 171 (33%)77% < 1224 (mean)7 of 16
MacLean and Reddy[21]9 of 53 (17%)13 (mean)NA6 of 16
Koenig et al[58]12 of 71 (17%)NA60 (mean)9 of 16
Lehmann et al[33]15 of 62 (24%)6 (mean)72 (mean)8 of 16
Baghdadi et al[22]20 of 133 (15%)12 (mean)192 (mean)9 of 16
Kohno et al[59]11 of 65 (17%)NA36 (mean)15 of 24
Phillips et al[60]42 of 132 (32%)NA24 (mean)11 of 16
Bhattacharjee et al[43]10 of 36 (28%)NA36 (mean)15 of 24
Boyle et al[61]45 of 168 (27%)NA44 (mean)11 of 16
Wensaas et al[52]6 of 22 (27%)NA33 (mean)9 of 16
Nowicki et al[24]45 of 496 (9%)NA40 (mean)19 of 24
Herngren et al[37]43 of 201 (21%)NA36 (mean)14 of 16
Balch Samora et al[50]11 of 33 (33%)NA20 (mean)11 of 16
Tucker et al[13]11 of 40 (28%)6 (mean)24 (minimum)10 of 16
Chan et al[62]7 of 43 (16%)11 (mean)18 (mean)9 of 16
Maranho et al[63]70 of 318 (22%)42 (median)18 (minimum)13 of 16
Tomaru et al[64]3 of 34 (9%)NA58 (mean)6 of 16
Swarup et al[28]1077 of 9755 (11%)9 (mean), 88% < 1824 (minimum)8 of 16
Maranho et al[65]40 of 250 (28%)NA49 (mean)14 of 16
Yildirim et al[66]82 of 227 (36%)7 (mean)26 (mean)9 of 16
Total1762 of 12897 (14%)Average: 9 (n = 1250)Average: 46Average: 63%