Total hip replacement: A meta-analysis to evaluate survival of cemented, cementless and hybrid implants

doi:10.5312/wjo.v8.i2.192

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 8, Issue 2

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (7267)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-14) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

558

WORD

279

HTML

3911

Figures (1-14)

194

Tables (1-4)

261

Sum=5203

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1077

Download

987

Sum=2064

Feb 18, 2017 (publication date) through Apr 26, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (14)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Orthopedics

ISSN

2218-5836

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Orthop. Feb 18, 2017; 8(2): 192-207
Published online Feb 18, 2017. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i2.192

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Study selection algorithm.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Forest plot of comparison: Cemented vs cementless: Revision of any component due to any reason.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Forest plot of comparison: Cemented vs cementless: Revision of any component due to aseptic loosening.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 4 Forest plot of comparison: Cemented vs cementless: Revision of any component due to infection.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 5 Forest plot of comparison: Cemented vs cementless: Dislocation of any component.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 6 Forest plot of comparison: Cemented vs hybrid: Revision of any component due to any reason.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 7 Forest plot of comparison: Cemented vs hybrid: Revision of any component due to aseptic loosening.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 8 Forest plot of comparison: Cemented vs hybrid: Revision of any component due to infection.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 9 Forest plot of comparison: Cemented vs hybrid: Dislocation of any component.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 10 Forest plot of comparison: Cementless vs hybrid: Revision of any component due to any reason.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 11 Forest plot of comparison: Cementless vs hybrid: Revision of any component due to infection.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 12 Forest plot of comparison: Cementless vs hybrid: Revision of any component due to infection.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 13 Forest plot of comparison: Cementless vs hybrid: Dislocation of any component.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 14 Funnel plot of comparison of revision of any component (A) cementless vs cementless; (B) cemented vs hybrid; (C) cementless vs hybrid.

Citation: Phedy P, Ismail HD, Hoo C, Djaja YP. Total hip replacement: A meta-analysis to evaluate survival of cemented, cementless and hybrid implants. World J Orthop 2017; 8(2): 192-207
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v8/i2/192.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i2.192