Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Orthop. Feb 18, 2021; 12(2): 82-93
Published online Feb 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i2.82
Figure 1
Figure 1 Computed tomography 3-dimensional reconstruction of an acetabular fracture.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Computed tomography image: an axial cross-section illustrating a right acetabular fracture. Circled in red is the anonymously assigned coding of the case. All identifying details have been omitted from the test.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Three-dimensional printed models of acetabular fractures.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Mean Kappa rate describing agreement between reviewers regarding the fracture classification and preferred surgical approach using computed tomography and 3-dimensional printed models (mean kappa in circle). A: The fracture classification; B: The preferred surgical approach. CT: Computed tomography; 3-D: Three-dimensional; Fx: Fracture.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Decision change regarding the surgical approach. A: The effect of reviewing the 3-dimensional model; B: Division of the subgroups demonstrates a change in surgical approach in double rates when the classification is also changed.