Published online May 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i5.102456
Revised: November 19, 2024
Accepted: March 4, 2025
Published online: May 24, 2025
Processing time: 212 Days and 23.6 Hours
Cervical cancer remains a significant public health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Screening of cervical cancer is crucial because it can detect precancerous changes and early-stage cancer. Regard to the screening methods, combination of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and cytological examination has superior sensitivity and specificity compared to cytology alone. Thus, recent guidelines recommend this combined approach instead of cytology alone to reduced cervical cancer incidence and mortality. By using this combi
Core Tip: The combination of human papillomavirus testing and cytological examination allows for a comprehensive assessment of cervical health, targeting high-risk individuals more effectively. By identifying both human papillomavirus infections and abnormal cell changes, this strategy ensures timely follow-up and intervention for those at increased risk of developing cervical cancer. The study’s results indicate promising detection rates for precancerous lesions, demonstrating that this integrated approach can lead to a more accurate diagnosis and ultimately save lives.
- Citation: Yin C, Li XB. Unlocking early detection: How screening can save lives from cervical cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(5): 102456
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i5/102456.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i5.102456
Cervical cancer is a significant public health challenge worldwide[1,2], especially in low- and middle-income countries where early screening and preventive healthcare is often limited[3-5]. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the primary cause of cervical cancer[6,7], responsible for approximately 70% of cases[8,9]. HPV testing has become an effective screening method, particularly in combination with cytological examination, markedly reduced the incidence and mortality associated with cervical cancer compared to traditional screening methods that rely on cytology (Pap smear) only. Specifically, HPV testing identifies high-risk HPV strains directly linked to cervical cancer[10,11], while cytology detects cellular changes in the cervix that may indicate pre-cancerous or cancerous lesions[12]. Therefore, the rationale behind this combined approach is that while cytology identifies existing abnormalities, HPV testing offers valuable insight into the potential risk of future disease development. By combining these two modalities, we can enhance the accuracy and efficacy of cervical cancer screening programs.
Recently, Zu et al[13] conducted a clinical trial on cervical cancer screening (the trial can be found at https://www.chictr.org.cn/, with the registration number ChiCTR2400090454). The specific screening methods included gynecological examination, vaginal secretion examination, and HPV high-risk type detection. For individuals who test positive for HPV types other than 16 and 18, a cervical cytology examination (ThinPrep cytology test) is performed. For individuals who are positive for HPV16 and 18, as well as those who test positive on the ThinPrep cytology test, a colposcopic examination is conducted. If the results of the colposcopy are abnormal, a histopathological examination is performed subsequently. From 2019 to 2022, a total of 523437 women aged 35-64 participated in the screening. The cost-effectiveness and risks of the screening had been evaluated. Encouragingly, the results demonstrated that combining HPV testing with colposcopy not only increased the detection rates of cervical precancerous lesions and early cervical cancer, but also reduced the associated testing costs[14]. This finding could serve as a promising breakthrough and providing a practical framework that has potential to transform cervical cancer prevention efforts worldwide.
From 2019 to 2022, a total of 523437 women aged 35-64 participated the clinical trial on cervical cancer screening. The findings are noteworthy. Among 523437 screened women, 73313 women tested positive for HPV, with a positivity rate of 14% (73313/523437). Next, detection rate for precancerous lesions and cervical cancer were 0.6% and 0.037%, respectively. The incidence rate was reduced to half during the second examination of the 311212 patients, which is a strong indicator of the program’s success. This suggests that regular screening not only identifies suspicious but also helps in the preventive aspect of healthcare, reinforcing the importance of continued engagement with the population[15-17].
Economically, the study offers valuable insights with its cost-benefit analysis conducted over four years. The average cost for screening at 120 RMB individually (approximately 17 dollars) is reasonable, especially considering the average cost of detecting early cases is 10619 RMB (1500 dollars). The early detection cost coefficient of 0.083 underscores the economic viability of the screening program. By demonstrating that the cost of prevention is significantly lower than the potential costs associated with treating advanced cervical cancer, the study makes a compelling case for investing in screening programs, particularly in regions with limited healthcare resources[18,19]. Moreover, the findings emphasize the importance of education and awareness in enhancing the uptake of screening programs. There is a need for community engagement strategies that inform women about the risks of cervical cancer and the benefits of regular screening. Given that many women may be unaware of HPV’s role in cervical cancer or may not prioritize screening due to economic factors, public health campaigns must address these barriers directly[20,21].
Many women remain unaware of the importance of regular cervical cancer screening and the necessity of HPV vaccination. Public health campaigns should be developed to raise awareness about the role of HPV in cervical cancer and the critical importance of screening for early detection. These campaigns must be culturally sensitive and tailored to address the unique challenges faced by different communities, such as language barriers, stigma, and limited access to healthcare services. By doing so, we can ensure that women are better informed and empowered to take preventive measures[20,22].
Another challenge is the infrastructure and resources required for effective implementation. Healthcare systems must be adequately equipped to handle the logistical demands of dual testing. This includes training healthcare providers to interpret test results, manage follow-up care, and engage in patient education. Additionally, systems must ensure the availability of both HPV testing and cytology in various healthcare settings, including rural and underserved areas. Telehealth and mobile clinics could play a significant role in expanding access to screening, particularly in hard-to-reach populations[23,24].
Financial considerations also play a crucial role in the feasibility of combined HPV testing and cytology strategies. While the costs of HPV testing have decreased in recent years, affordability remains a barrier for many women, particularly in low-income settings. Strategies to subsidize testing, provide free or low-cost screenings, and integrate these services into existing healthcare programs are essential to ensuring equitable access. Public-private partnerships could also facilitate investment in screening infrastructure, making it more accessible to underserved populations[25,26].
In conclusion, the combined strategy of HPV testing and cytology represents a promising advancement in cervical cancer screening. Characterized by enhanced sensitivity, extended screening intervals, and patient risk stratification, this approach can significantly improve early detection rates and outcomes. However, successful implementation requires robust public health initiatives, adequate infrastructure, and financial support to ensure equitable access for all women. Through overcoming these challenges, we can pave the way for a future in which cervical cancer is no longer a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women worldwide. Furthermore, cervical cancer could be eliminated as a public health threat through comprehensive screening strategies and preventive measures[19,27,28].
The authors would like to thank Mrs. Xi-Chen Wang (MSDChina, Shanghai, China) for providing academic information consulting support. The authors would also like to express their gratitude to Professor Kai-Yan Liu (Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou, China) for her editing and proofreading of the manuscript.
1. | Shrestha AD, Neupane D, Vedsted P, Kallestrup P. Cervical Cancer Prevalence, Incidence and Mortality in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19:319-324. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 113] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Swanson AA, Pantanowitz L. The evolution of cervical cancer screening. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2024;13:10-15. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Perkins RB, Guido RL, Saraiya M, Sawaya GF, Wentzensen N, Schiffman M, Feldman S. Summary of Current Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management of Abnormal Test Results: 2016-2020. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021;30:5-13. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in RCA: 41] [Article Influence: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Maluf FC, Dal Molin GZ, de Melo AC, Paulino E, Racy D, Ferrigno R, Uson Junior PLS, Ribeiro R, Moretti R, Sadalla JC, Nogueira-Rodrigues A, Carvalho FM, Baiocchi G, Callegaro-Filho D, Abu-Rustum NR. Recommendations for the prevention, screening, diagnosis, staging, and management of cervical cancer in areas with limited resources: Report from the International Gynecological Cancer Society consensus meeting. Front Oncol. 2022;12:928560. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Pimple SA, Mishra GA. Global strategies for cervical cancer prevention and screening. Minerva Ginecol. 2019;71:313-320. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 34] [Cited by in RCA: 38] [Article Influence: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Narasimhamurthy M, Kafle SU. Cervical cancer in Nepal: Current screening strategies and challenges. Front Public Health. 2022;10:980899. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 18] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Chatzistamatiou K, Moysiadis T, Moschaki V, Panteleris N, Agorastos T. Comparison of cytology, HPV DNA testing and HPV 16/18 genotyping alone or combined targeting to the more balanced methodology for cervical cancer screening. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;142:120-127. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in RCA: 20] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Yang J, Nolte FS, Chajewski OS, Lindsey KG, Houser PM, Pellicier J, Wang Q, Ehsani L. Cytology and high risk HPV testing in cervical cancer screening program: Outcome of 3-year follow-up in an academic institute. Diagn Cytopathol. 2018;46:22-27. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in RCA: 6] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Petry KU. HPV and cervical cancer. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 2014;244:59-62; discussion 62. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 33] [Cited by in RCA: 43] [Article Influence: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Lefeuvre C, Pivert A, Guillou-Guillemette HL, Lunel-Fabiani F, Veillon P, Le Duc-Banaszuk AS, Ducancelle A. Urinary HPV DNA testing as a tool for cervical cancer screening in women who are reluctant to have a Pap smear in France. J Infect. 2020;81:248-254. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in RCA: 13] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Ramautarsing RA, Phanuphak N, Chaithongwongwatthana S, Wit FW, Teeratakulpisarn N, Pankam T, Rodbamrung P, Wijgert JH, Lange JM, Phanuphak P, Sahasrabuddhe VV, Kerr S, Ananworanich J. Cervical and anal HPV infection: cytological and histological abnormalities in HIV-infected women in Thailand. J Virus Erad. 2015;1:96-102. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in RCA: 8] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Xhaja A, Ahr A, Zeiser I, Ikenberg H. Two Years of Cytology and HPV Co-Testing in Germany: Initial Experience. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022;82:1378-1386. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Zu YE, Wang SF, Peng XX, Wen YC, Shen XX, Wang XL, Liao WB, Jia D, Liu JY, Peng XW. New cheaper human papilloma virus mass screening strategy reduces cervical cancer incidence in Changsha city: A clinical trial. World J Clin Oncol. 2024;15:1491-1500. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
14. | Bouvard V, Wentzensen N, Mackie A, Berkhof J, Brotherton J, Giorgi-Rossi P, Kupets R, Smith R, Arrossi S, Bendahhou K, Canfell K, Chirenje ZM, Chung MH, Del Pino M, de Sanjosé S, Elfström M, Franco EL, Hamashima C, Hamers FF, Herrington CS, Murillo R, Sangrajrang S, Sankaranarayanan R, Saraiya M, Schiffman M, Zhao F, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Indave Ruiz BI, Mosquera-Metcalfe I, Lauby-Secretan B. The IARC Perspective on Cervical Cancer Screening. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1908-1918. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 226] [Cited by in RCA: 175] [Article Influence: 43.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Dillon J, Chen L, Melamed A, St Clair CM, Hou JY, Khoury-Collado F, Gockley A, Accordino M, Hershman DL, Wright JD. Patterns of cervical cancer screening among Medicaid beneficiaries. BJOG. 2022;129:1104-1111. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Terada N, Matsuura M, Kurokawa S, Nishimura Y, Tamate M, Isoyama K, Yamazaki S, Shimada H, Suzuki M, Tabuchi Y, Teramoto M, Saito T. Human papillomavirus testing and cytology using physician-collected uterine cervical samples vs. self-collected vaginal samples and urine samples. Int J Clin Oncol. 2022;27:1742-1749. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
17. | Yan X, Shen L, Xiao Y, Wang Q, Li F, Qian Y. Prevalence, characteristics, and distribution of HPV genotypes in women from Zhejiang Province, 2016-2020. Virol J. 2021;18:208. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in RCA: 30] [Article Influence: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
18. | Ginsberg GM, Edejer TT, Lauer JA, Sepulveda C. Screening, prevention and treatment of cervical cancer -- a global and regional generalized cost-effectiveness analysis. Vaccine. 2009;27:6060-6079. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 41] [Cited by in RCA: 41] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Toliman PJ, Kaldor JM, Tabrizi SN, Vallely AJ. Innovative approaches to cervical cancer screening in low- and middle-income countries. Climacteric. 2018;21:235-238. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in RCA: 16] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
20. | Deguara M, Calleja N, England K. Cervical cancer and screening: knowledge, awareness and attitudes of women in Malta. J Prev Med Hyg. 2020;61:E584-E592. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
21. | Taneja N, Chawla B, Awasthi AA, Shrivastav KD, Jaggi VK, Janardhanan R. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice on Cervical Cancer and Screening Among Women in India: A Review. Cancer Control. 2021;28:10732748211010799. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in RCA: 30] [Article Influence: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
22. | Saei Ghare Naz M, Kariman N, Ebadi A, Ozgoli G, Ghasemi V, Rashidi Fakari F. Educational Interventions for Cervical Cancer Screening Behavior of Women: A Systematic Review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19:875-884. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 54] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
23. | Sankaranarayanan R, Anorlu R, Sangwa-Lugoma G, Denny LA. Infrastructure requirements for human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening in sub-Saharan Africa. Vaccine. 2013;31 Suppl 5:F47-F52. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 54] [Cited by in RCA: 62] [Article Influence: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
24. | Dick A, Holyk T, Taylor D, Wenninger C, Sandford J, Smith L, Ogilvie G, Thomlinson A, Mitchell-Foster S. Highlighting strengths and resources that increase ownership of cervical cancer screening for Indigenous communities in Northern British Columbia: Community-driven approaches. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;155:211-219. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
25. | Sawaya GF, Dorismond VG. Avoiding Low-Value Care and Patient Financial Harm in Cervical Cancer Screening. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2023;16:363-364. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
26. | Sicsic J, Krucien N, Franc C. What are GPs' preferences for financial and non-financial incentives in cancer screening? Evidence for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Soc Sci Med. 2016;167:116-127. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in RCA: 8] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
27. | Sawaya GF, Smith-McCune K, Kuppermann M. Cervical Cancer Screening: More Choices in 2019. JAMA. 2019;321:2018-2019. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 69] [Cited by in RCA: 101] [Article Influence: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
28. | Fuzzell LN, Perkins RB, Christy SM, Lake PW, Vadaparampil ST. Cervical cancer screening in the United States: Challenges and potential solutions for underscreened groups. Prev Med. 2021;144:106400. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 37] [Cited by in RCA: 97] [Article Influence: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |