Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. Aug 15, 2014; 5(3): 322-334
Published online Aug 15, 2014. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v5.i3.322
Current status of predictive biomarkers for neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer
Norihisa Uemura, Tadashi Kondo
Norihisa Uemura, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya 464-8681, Aichi, Japan
Tadashi Kondo, Division of Pharmacoproteomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
Author contributions: Uemura N and Kondo T equally contributed to this study.
Correspondence to: Tadashi Kondo, MD, PhD, Division of Pharmacoproteomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan. takondo@ncc.go.jp
Telephone: +81-3-35422511 Fax: +81-3-35475298
Received: December 25, 2013
Revised: January 27, 2014
Accepted: April 25, 2014
Published online: August 15, 2014
Core Tip

Core tip: To achieve individualization of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancers, predictive biomarkers are urgently needed. Biomarker development using multimodal approaches, including gene expression profiling, single nucleotide polymorphisms, microRNAs, proteomics, immunohistochemistry, serum biomarkers and conventional blood tests, seem promising. Independent validation studies will establish novel prognostic modalities based on molecular biomarkers. Progress of predictive modalities and further studies on the molecular background of patients with a poor prognosis will facilitate the development of new effective therapies for patients resistant to the present neoadjuvant therapy. Prognostic stratification of patients will promote efforts toward novel therapeutic strategies.

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer is the fifth most common cause of cancer-related death for men and the eighth for women worldwide[1]. Despite the use of modern surgical techniques in combination with radio- and chemotherapy, early recurrence is common and the overall 5-year survival rate remains below 40%[2]. Consequently, there is a great interest in multimodal approaches to the treatment of esophageal cancer and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, alone or in combination with chemoradiotherapy (CRT), is becoming the standard approach of care in locally advanced esophageal cancers. Randomized trials of different neoadjuvant therapy protocols have been conducted in patients with locally advanced cancers. Meta-analyses of those randomized trials have revealed only modest survival advantages, except in the case of patients who achieved a complete histopathological response and seemed to highly benefit from a neoadjuvant regimen[3-9]. However, a significant proportion (60%-70%) of treated patients did not respond well to these treatments and experienced severe adverse effects[8,10]. In addition, nonresponsive patients may lose the option of surgical resection after ineffective chemotherapy[11] and the prognosis of nonresponders has been found to be inferior to that for patients treated by surgery alone[12]. While there is an obvious correlation between the response and prognosis, the response to chemotherapy or radiotherapy is variable, even when patients are at the same clinical stage. Thus, an accurate risk stratification of cancer patients for therapy is of paramount importance for avoiding potential morbidity due to ineffective treatment and prevention of further disease progression. With this background, identification of predictive markers would allow accurate risk stratification and individualization of multimodality treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer[13].

In recent years, molecular biomarkers that can predict the response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer have been investigated by using multidimensional approaches. Global expression transcriptomics and proteomics studies allow for simultaneous screening of several thousand molecules and knowledge-based methodologies such as immunohistochemistry are focused on a specific molecule or pathway. These approaches are based on their own unique principles and the performance of predictive molecular biomarkers developed by using each approach seems to be equally promising. Here, we have reviewed the current status of molecular biomarkers predictive for response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer. We have focused on predictive markers that can be used to analyze pretreatment samples such as diagnostic biopsies or serum specimens obtained before neoadjuvant treatment. These biomarkers will help avoid unnecessarily invasive treatments. We have summarized promising candidates for predictive molecular biomarkers in esophageal cancer according to the type of development modality.

MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS FOR RESPONSE PREDICTION