Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Radiol. Apr 28, 2017; 9(4): 148-154
Published online Apr 28, 2017. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i4.148
Table 1 Comparison of radionuclide and electronic brachytherapy sources
SourceStrengthsWeaknesses
RadionuclideSmall source Fixed energy spectrum Easy to predict the output at any point in time using half-life Used in combination with EBRT/alone Rapid dose fall-off Lower dose to organs at risk Proven clinical application Well-established protocols and treatment proceduresRadiation leakage – Off condition Radioactive waste – A big concern Frequent source replacement (depends on half-life) Output correction due to source decay Source transportation related radiation accidents Fixed-dose rate and dosimetric properties Limited treatment sites compared to EBRT
Electronic brachytherapyNo radiation leakage in off condition User adjustable energy and current (dose rate) No radioactive waste Source transportation - not an issue Relatively stable output during the life of the X-ray tube Less exposure to staffRelatively large source size Limited treatment sites compared to radionuclide brachytherapy Minimal experience compared to radionuclide-based brachytherapy