Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Apr 28, 2016; 8(4): 410-418
Published online Apr 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i4.410
Table 1 Parameters of magnetic resonance imaging
ProtocolSequenceRepetitiontime (ms)Echo time(ms)Flip angleSlice thickness (mm)Field of viewMatrixsizeVoxel size (mm × mm)ReconstructedAveragesAcquisition
(°)(AP × RL)voxel sizetime
(mm × mm)(mm × mm)(min:s)
Sagittal T2-weightedFSE300010090 exc.5160 × 160224 × 2160.71 × 0.740.63 × 0.6363:42
(18 echoes)135 refoc.
T1-weightedFSE7001190 exc.5160 × 160400 × 3190.4 × 0.50.4 × 0.434:54
(7 echoes)145 refoc.
T2-weightedFSE300010090 exc.5160 × 160400 × 3170.4 × 0.50.4 × 0.435:48
(17 echoes)145 refoc.
Diffusion weightedSingle-shot EPI25006490 exc.4160 × 14480 × 592.00 × 2.421.25 × 1.24614:02
1 mm gap
dynamic contrast-enhanced3D-FFE4.42.115 exc.5260 × 260128 × 1022.03 × 2.521.02 × 1.0226:37
T2 mapTSE1300N × 3090 exc.5160 × 1602160 × 1601.00 × 1.250.63 × 0.63210:323
(6 echoes)180 refoc.
Table 2 Qualitative determination of index of suspicion
Procedure stepStructure examinedIndex of suspicion assessment
1Assign regionBaseSuperior most margin of prostate to the widest transverse diameter
MidglandWidest transverse diameter to ejaculatory ducts at verumontanum
ApexInferior to midgland
2Peripheral zoneConsider T2 features4: Moderate low signal with mass like appearance
3: Mild low signal with mass like appearance
2: Mild low signal which is focal but not clearly mass like, moderate diffuse low signal
1: Mild low signal, diffuse and/or feathered, linear low signal
0: Normal signal
Consider DWI features4: Definite abnormality (high DWI and low ADC relative to background)
3: Probable abnormality (low ADC)
2: Possible abnormality (mild decrease ADC or increase DWI)
1: Mottled
0: Homogeneous ADC or low DWI
Consider DCE features4: Rapid early enhancement, wash out
3: Rapid early enhancement, remaining strong and prolonged
2: Mild early enhancement, plateau or progressive
1: No early upstroke, progressive enhancement
0: No enhancement
Assign combined score
3Central glandConsider T2 features4: Mass like low T2 signal with invasion into AFMS or peripheral zone/disrupted surgical capsule, irregularly or poorly marginated mass like low T2 signal without a capsule
3: Mass like homogeneous low T2 signal with no capsule, preserved surgical capsule
2: Diffuse heterogeneous signal with intact surgical capsule
1: Encapsulated nodules
0: Normal
4Fibromuscular stromaAssess for presence of disease
5Extracapsular extensionAssess for presence of disease
6Seminal vesiclesAssess for presence of disease
Table 3 Patient’s demographics and disease characteristics at baseline
CharacteristicValue
Age (yr), median (range)65 (51-75)
PSA (ng/mL), median (range)6.4 (1.4-14.3)
Clinical stage, n (% of total)
cT1c20 (87.0)
cT2a2 (8.7)
cT2b1 (4.3)
Gleason score 6 (3 + 3), n (% of total)23 (100%)
% of cores positive per patient, median (range)8.3 (01-58.3)
Density of tumor in positive biopsy cores (% of core), median (range)10 (1-60)
HGPIN, n (% of total)6 (26.1)
PNI, n (% of total)4 (17.4)
LVI, n (% of total)0 (0.0)
Table 4 Prostate cancer visualization with magnetic resonance imaging
n = 23
Number of scans with baseline IOS of:
18
25
33
42
55
Number of follow-up MRI scans, median (range)3 (0-4)
Number of follow-up scans with signs of disease progression3
Number of follow-up scans with changed IOS1