Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Radiol. Jul 28, 2014; 6(7): 502-506
Published online Jul 28, 2014. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i7.502
Table 1 Comparison between the four articles
No of patients (females)Mean ageLVEF acute phaseDiagnostic techniques used for TTCMRI (n)SPECT (n)FDG-PET (n)MIBGTime of follow-up (d)LVEF follow-upMRI follow-up (n)SPECT follow-up (n)FDG-PET follow-up (n)MIBG follow-up (n)
Yoshida et al[10]15 (12)7247.7% ± 6.6%ECG/CAG/EchoCG-201Tl (10)8-90--1--
Feola et al[11]3 (3)75, 340.7% ± 5.1%ECG/CAG/EchoCG3N13 (3)3-9054%333-
Cimarelli et al[12]18 (13)6735% ± 8%ECG/CAG/EchoCG-99mTc (7) or 201Tl (4)15830-18058% ± 6%--62
Rendl et al[13]13 (NR)NR52% ± 13%CAG/EchoCG-99mTc (13)13-6062% ± 13%-NR11-
TOTAL (n)4933739834202