Comparison of DWI and PET/CT in evaluation of lymph node metastasis in uterine cancer

doi:10.4329/wjr.v4.i5.207

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 4, Issue 5

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (6819)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

359

HTML

6156

Figures (1-2)

178

Tables (1-4)

126

Sum=6819

May 28, 2012 (publication date) through Apr 26, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (38)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Radiology

ISSN

1949-8470

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Original Article

World J Radiol. May 28, 2012; 4(5): 207-214
Published online May 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i5.207

Table 1 Overall patient- and region-based diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging and positron emission tomography and computed tomography n (%)

	Sensitivity	Specificity	PPV	NPV	Accuracy
Patient-based DWI (n = 25)	8/9 (88.9)	7/16 (43.8)	8/17 (47.1)	7/8 (87.5)	15/25 (60.0)
PET/CT (n = 25)	4/9 (44.4)	15/16 (93.8)	4/5 (80.0)	15/20 (75.0)	16/25 (64.0)
Region-based DWI (n = 200)	30/36 (83.3)	84/164 (51.2)	30/110 (27.3)	84/90 (93.3)	114/200 (57.0)
PET/CT (n = 200)	14/36 (38.9)	158/164 (96.3)	14/20 (70.0)	158/180 (87.8)	172/200 (86.0)

DWI: Diffusion-weighted imaging; PET/CT: Positron emission tomography and computed tomography; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value.

Table 2 Region-based diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging and positron emission tomography and computed tomography n (%)

	Sensitivity	Specificity	Accuracy
Common iliac LNs
DWI (n = 50)	6/7 (85.7)	22/43 (51.2)	28/50 (56.0)
PET/CT (n = 50)	3/7 (42.9)	41/43 (95.3)	44/50 (88.0)
External iliac LNs
DWI (n = 50)	6/7 (85.7)	22/43 (51.2)	28/50 (56.0)
PET/CT (n = 50)	3/7 (42.9)	41/43 (95.3)	44/50 (88.0)
Internal iliac LNs
DWI (n = 50)	8/10 (80.0)	20/40 (50.0)	28/50 (56.0)
PET/CT (n = 50)	4/10 (40.0)	39/40 (97.5)	43/50 (86.0)
Obturator LNs
DWI (n = 50)	10/12 (83.3)	20/38 (52.6)	30/50 (60.0)
PET/CT (n = 50)	4/12 (33.3)	37/38 (97.4)	41/50 (82.0)

DWI: Diffusion-weighted imaging; PET/CT: Positron emission tomography and computed tomography; LNs: Lymph nodes.

Table 3 Node-based sensitivity of diffusion-weighted imaging and positron emission tomography and computed tomography according to the node size n (%)

Node size (mm)	DWI	PET/CT
1-9	18/24 (75.0)	4/24 (16.7)
10-18	12/12 (100.0)	10/12 (83.3)
Total	30/36 (83.3)	14/36 (38.9)

DWI: Diffusion-weighted imaging; PET/CT: Positron emission tomography and computed tomography.

Table 4 Patient-stage based diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging and positron emission tomography and computed tomography n (%)

	Sensitivity	Specificity	Accuracy
Stage I
DWI (n = 13)	1/2 (50.0)	5/11 (45.5)	6/13 (46.2)
PET/CT (n = 13)	0/2 (42.9)	11/11 (100.0)	11/13 (84.6)
Stage II
DWI (n = 9)	4/4 (100.0)	2/5 (40.0)	6/9 (66.7)
PET/CT (n = 9)	2/4 (50.0)	4/5 (80.0)	6/9 (66.7)
Stage III
DWI (n = 3)	3/3 (100.0)	0/0 (0)	3/3 (100.0)
PET/CT (n = 3)	2/3 (66.7)	0/0 (0)	2/3 (66.7)

DWI: Diffusion-weighted imaging; PET/CT: Positron emission tomography and computed tomography.

Citation: Kitajima K, Yamasaki E, Kaji Y, Murakami K, Sugimura K. Comparison of DWI and PET/CT in evaluation of lymph node metastasis in uterine cancer. World J Radiol 2012; 4(5): 207-214
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v4/i5/207.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v4.i5.207