Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2025; 17(6): 107281
Published online Jun 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i6.107281
Published online Jun 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i6.107281
Table 1 Comparison of pericoronary adipose tissue measurement parameters
Measurement parameter | Definition/method | Advantages | Limitations | Clinical applications |
PCAT thickness | Measured as the maximum width of proxi | (1) Simple, quick, and high | (1) Provides only 2D informa | Primarily used for initial evaluation with limited in |
PCAT volume | (1) Attenuation-based segmentation: Calcu | Provides 3D structural information | (1) Lack of standardized mea | Useful for studying PCAT’s 3D structure, but limited clinical application due to lack of standardi |
PCAT density | Directly measures the mean HU value of PCAT | (1) Simple method, appli | (1) Ignores dynamic changes in PCAT; and (2) Influenced by CT imaging parameters | A potential biomarker for inflammation and atherosclerosis, useful for scree |
PCAT attenuation/FAI | Quantifies pericoronary inflammation by correcting the mean CT attenuation of PCAT | (1) Precisely quantifies inflammation; and (2) Highly automated with AI integration | (1) Requires specialized soft | A noninvasive inflamma |
PCAT radiomic features | Leverages AI and deep learning to analyze PCAT texture, morphology, and spatial distribution | (1) Provides more detai | (1) Requires standardized ima | Holds great potential in precision medicine for individualized cardiova |
- Citation: Wang LL, Xiong YB, Feng XY, Liu YY, Su KX, Jiang SY, Wang SY, Zhou L, Li SK, Guo DD, Li R. Computed tomography-based assessment of pericoronary adipose tissue in cardiovascular diseases: Diagnostic and prognostic implications. World J Radiol 2025; 17(6): 107281
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v17/i6/107281.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i6.107281