Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Radiol. May 28, 2021; 13(5): 137-148
Published online May 28, 2021. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v13.i5.137
Table 1 Characteristics of subjects included in study arms A and B and their overlap, n (%)
Study arm A (n = 200)
Study arm B (n = 113)
Overlap C (n = 44)
Frequency
mean ± SD
Frequency
mean ± SD
Frequency
mean ± SD
Gender
Male78 (39.00)38 (30.6)10 (22.73)
Female122 (61.00)75 (66.4)34 (77.27)
Age27.93 ± 8.1325.95 ± 6.2627.11 ± 5.64
< 30 yr154 (77.00)98 (86.7)34 (77.27)
≥ 30 yr46 (23.00)15 (13.3)10 (22.73)
BMI22.56 ± 2.5721.64 ± 2.2421.60 ± 2.67
BMI < 25166 (83.0)103 (91.2)38 (86.36)
BMI ≥2534 (17.00)10 (8.9)6 (13.64)
Alcohol consumption8.17 ± 9.706.73 ± 8.356.22 ± 7.95
None18 (9.00)9 (8.0)9 (20.45)
Less 1/mo28 (14.00)17 (15.0)3 (6.82)
Several times per month106 (53.00)71 (62.8)28 (63.64)
Several times per week48 (24.00)16 (14.2)4 (9.09)
Fasting time3.74 ± 1.844.47 ± 2.804.11 ± 1.65
Spleen length (mm)105.44 ± 14.80105.53 ± 14.16101.66 ± 13.78
Median (min-max)105.50 (61-144)106.00 (65-144)100.50 (75-137)
Spleen depth (mm)35.38 ± 6.1935.28 ± 6.3834.25 ± 5.59
Median (min-max)35.50 (21-56)35.00 (21-56)34.00 (24-48)
Table 2 Location and dispersion measures of shear wave velocity at the spleen measured with the Toshiba Aplio 500 version 5.0 and version 6.0, Siemens S3000, GE Logiq E9, and Philips Epiq 7 devices, n (%)
Study arm A (n = 200)
Study arm B (n = 131)

Upper pole
Middle pole
Lower pole
Upper pole
Middle pole
Lower pole
Toshiba Aplio 500, mean ± SD3.35 ± 0.922.90 ± 0.453.38 ± 0.65 2.34 ± 0.292.48 ± 0.26 2.48 ± 0.28
Median (Min-Max)3.12 (2.20-6.94)2.84 (1.94-4.86)3.36 (1.50-5.92)2.36 (1.42-3.36)2.48 (1.82-3.02)2.45 (1.84-3.25)
Siemens S3000, mean ± SD2.05 ± 0.542.53 ± 0.44 2.53 ± 0.582.39 ± 0.332.63 ± 0.282.49 ± 0.34
Median (Min-Max)2.04 (0.73-3.77)2.49 (1.27-3.73)2.47 (1.39-4.59)2.39 (1.52-3.86)2.62 (1.97-3.36)2.50 (1.53-3.58)
GE Logiq E9, mean ± SD2.20 ± 0.511.86 ± 0.441.53 ± 0.44---
Median (Min-Max)2.23 (1.10-6.26)1.88 (0.71-3.02)1.48 (0.77-2.84)
Philips Epiq 7, mean ± SD1.88 ± 0.401.89 ± 0.382.30 ± 0.87---
Median (Min-Max)1.90 (0.88-3.10)1.91 (0.93-3.12)2.17 (0.99-10.62)
Table 3 Position and stress measurements of shear wave velocities measured with the Toshiba Aplio 500 version 5.0 and version 6.0
Overlap C (n = 44)
Upper pole
Middle pole
Lower pole
Toshiba Aplio 500 V.5.0, mean ± SD3.46 ± 0.52 2.94 ± 0.523.38 ± 1.02
Median (Min-Max)3.45 (2.54-5.13)2.80 (2.27-4.86)3.14 (2.25-6.53)
Toshiba Aplio 500 V.6.0, mean ± SD2.32 ± 0.342.53 ± 0.252.52 ± 0.29
Median (Min-Max)2.36 (1.42-3.36)2.56 (1.85-2.94)2.46 (1.93-3.25)
Table 4 Correlation of the heavy wave velocities of the Toshiba Aplio 500 version 5.0 and version 6.0, GE Logiq E9, and Philips Epiq 7 devices with the Siemens S3000


Siemens S3000


Study arm A (n = 200)
Study arm B (n = 131)
Device
Pole
R value
P value
R value
P value
Toshiba Aplio 500 Lower pole -0.087920.21930.198630.0375
Middle pole 0.136320.05610.134380.1616
Upper pole0.039510.58150.249510.0086
GE Logiq E9Lower pole -0.033070.6446--
Middle pole -0.049410.4905--
Upper pole0.047440.5079--
Philips Epiq 7Lower pole 0.048940.4947--
Middle pole 0.123210.0845--
Upper pole0.33088< 0.0001--