The development of clinical diagnostic procedures comprises early-phase and late-phase studies to elucidate diagnostic accuracy and patient outcome. Economic assessments of new diagnostic procedures compared with established work-ups indicate additional cost for 1 additional unit of effectiveness measure by means of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios when considering the replacement of the standard regimen by a new diagnostic procedure. This article discusses economic assessments of PET and PET/computed tomography reported until mid-July 2014. Forty-seven studies on cancer and noncancer indications were identified but, because of the widely varying scope of the analyses, a substantial amount of work remains to be done.

Positron emission tomography is a functional diagnostic imaging technique, which can accurately measure in vivo distribution of a radiopharmaceutical with high resolution. The ability of positron emission tomography to study various biologic processes opens up new possibilities for both research and day-to-day clinical use. Positron emission tomography has progressed rapidly from being a research technique in laboratories to a routine clinical imaging modality becoming part of armamentarium for the medical profession. The most widely used radiotracer in positron emission tomography is 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG), which is an analog of glucose. FDG uptake in cells is directly proportional to glucose metabolism of cells. Since glucose metabolism is increased many fold in malignant tumors, positron emission tomography has a high sensitivity and high negative predictive value. Positron emission tomography with FDG is now the standard of care in initial staging, monitoring the response to therapy and management of lung cancer, colorectal cancer, lymphoma, melanoma, esophageal cancer, head and neck cancer and breast cancer. The aim of this article is to review the clinical applications of positron emission tomography in oncology.

Repeated imaging with positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is associated with cumulative exposure to substantial doses of radiation. Furthermore, PET-CT is an expensive and limited resource in many institutions. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate whether limited PET-CT focused on the initially involved field of view (FOV) at diagnosis, corresponding to an above- or below-the-diaphragm scan, is sufficient for follow-up of patients with Hodgkin (HL) and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). One hundred thirty-one examinations of 44 patients with early-stage (I-II) HL (n = 27) and aggressive NHL (n = 17) who had PET-CT performed as part of their initial staging and at follow-up were analyzed. Regardless of the extent of response to treatment, there was no single case in which the disease progressed outside of the initially involved FOV (0/44, 95% CI 0-0.08). This was true even in cases of disease progression, including in the setting of relapse. Our findings suggest that limited PET-CT analysis of the initially involved FOV in patients with early-stage curable lymphoma may be satisfactory for response assessment.

Two hundred ten patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) were consecutively enrolled in this prospective trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of fluorine-18 ((18)F)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan in initial staging of patients with HL.

All 210 patients were staged with conventional clinical staging (CCS) methods, including computed tomography (CT), bone marrow biopsy (BMB), and laboratory tests. Patients were also submitted to metabolic staging (MS) with whole-body FDG-PET scan before the beginning of treatment. A standard of reference for staging was determined with all staging procedures, histologic examination, and follow-up examinations. The accuracy of the CCS was compared with the MS. Local unit costs of procedures and tests were evaluated. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for both strategies.

In the 210 patients with HL, the sensitivity for initial staging of FDG-PET was higher than that of CT and BMB in initial staging (97.9% vs. 87.3%; P < .001 and 94.2% vs. 71.4%, P < 0.003, respectively). The incorporation of FDG-PET in the staging procedure upstaged disease in 50 (24%) patients and downstaged disease in 17 (8%) patients. Changes in treatment would be seen in 32 (15%) patients. Cumulative cost for staging procedures was $3751/patient for CCS compared to $5081 for CCS + PET and $4588 for PET/CT. The ICER of PET/CT strategy was $16,215 per patient with modified treatment. PET/CT costs at the beginning and end of treatment would increase total costs of HL staging and first-line treatment by only 2%.

FDG-PET is more accurate than CT and BMB in HL staging. Given observed probabilities, FDG-PET is highly cost-effective in the public health care program in Brazil.

The field of convergence technology may be defined as an area of technologic innovation in which multiple devices or functionalities are combined within a single platform in a way that adds functional, operational or economic synergies. Within the field of medical devices, this concept embodies many different types of novel combinations representing syntheses of therapeutic, diagnostic and digital information technologies. In the current era of healthcare reform, such combinatorial technologies will be pressed to demonstrate improvements in comparative effectiveness compared with the use of separate independent components. Moreover, the new more stringent regulatory environment will require much greater levels of pre- and post-market safety reviews conducted under the auspices and authority of the US FDA Office of Combination Products. This branch of the FDA scrutinizes submissions and divides them into drugs, devices and biological products and includes many submissions previously regulated by disparate centers, such as the Center for Devices and Radiologic Health and the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. The field of convergence technologies already amounts to a worldwide market extending to tens of billions of dollars and this article will attempt to summarize some of the key elements of this continued push for added value and more personalized medicine.

PET and PET/CT have changed the diagnostic algorithm in oncology. Health care systems worldwide have recently approved reimbursement for PET and PET/CT for staging of non-small cell lung cancer and differential diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules because PET and PET/CT have been found to be cost-effective for those uses. Additional indications that are covered by health care systems in the United States and several European countries include staging of gastrointestinal tract cancers, breast cancer, malignant lymphoma, melanoma, and head and neck cancers. Regarding these indications, diagnostic effectiveness and superiority over conventional imaging modalities have been shown, whereas cost-effectiveness has been demonstrated only in part. This article reports on the current knowledge of economic evaluations of PET and PET/CT in oncologic applications. Because more economic evaluations are needed for several clinical indications, we also report on the methodologies for conducting economic evaluations of diagnostic tests and suggest an approach toward the implementation of these tests in future clinical studies.

This paper aims to incorporate option values into the economic evaluation of positron emission tomography (PET). The installation of this equipment requires a substantial capital outlay, while uncertainty, especially regarding the possibility of new applications, is relevant, because the evidence available is still insufficient. Treating the number of examinations to provide as a stochastic variable, the cost-effectiveness analysis is extended to include the value of flexibility both with respect to the timing of investment and to the size of the project. The threshold values of the stochastic variable that ensure the cost-effectiveness of a PET scan according to this approach are obtained as a function of the value of the incremental effectiveness.

Positron emission tomography (PET) is an innovative imaging tool. Associated with computed tomography (CT), it allows a better definition for the tumor volume for radiotherapy, compared with CT only. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of PET on resource allocation (costs and savings) and on the choice of the following treatment in radiotherapy.

In 2004 and 2005, 209 patients were enrolled (97 patients with Hodgkin's disease and 112 with non-small cell lung cancer) in a national study conducted in eight hospitals. Two treatment decisions made on the basis of CT only or CT associated with PET, were compared in a prospective study where each subject was his/her own control. The direct medical cost of using PET was assessed by microcosting, using data collected from specific questionnaires. The costs of new tests and the costs and savings associated with changes in the chosen treatment were calculated on the basis of reimbursement rates.

The mean cost of using PET was approximately euro 800 per patient (50 percent for the radionuclide 18F-FDG [2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose]). Radiotherapy treatments were modified for 10 percent of patients with Hodgkin's disease versus 40 percent of patients with lung cancer. Overall, the use of PET induced both increases and decreases in the mean cost per patient: the net effect was a euro 425 and euro 931 cost increase in lung cancer and Hodgkin's disease, respectively.

The use of PET for radiotherapy decision making seems more valuable for lung cancer than for Hodgkin's disease, both in terms of costs and changes in radiotherapy treatment. This result might help policy makers for prioritization.

Computed tomography (CT) is currently the most commonly used means for staging malignant lymphoma. 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), FDG-PET/CT fusion, and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) are potential alternatives. The purpose of this study was to systematically review published data on the diagnostic performance of CT, FDG-PET, FDG-PET/CT fusion, and WB-MRI in staging of malignant lymphoma. In addition, technical aspects, procedures, advantages, and drawbacks of each imaging modality are outlined. Three CT studies, 17 FDG-PET studies, and 4 FDG-PET/CT fusion studies were included in this systematic review. The studies were of moderate methodological quality and used different scoring systems to stage malignant lymphoma. CT remains the standard imaging modality for initial staging of malignant lymphoma, while FDG-PET has an essential role in restaging after treatment. Early results suggest that FDG-PET/CT fusion outperforms both CT alone and FDG-PET alone. Data on the diagnostic performance of WB-MRI are lacking. Future well-designed studies, expressing their results according to the Ann Arbor staging system, are needed to determine which imaging modality is most accurate and cost-effective in staging malignant lymphoma.

In spite of the high performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET for the evaluation of lymphoma, inherent limitations of this modality underscore the additional value of PET/CT as an important tool in the assessment of this disease. Accumulating data on the use of PET/CT in lymphoma indicate the contribution of hybrid imaging to improved interpretation accuracy of PET using FDG and CT. Knowledge of the normal and abnormal patterns of FDG-PET/CT imaging and their variability in patients with lymphoma is important to provide a comprehensive clinically significant interpretation that has an impact on patient management and potentially on outcome.

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography (PET) alone, computed tomography (CT) alone, side-by-side reading, and fused images for restaging or follow-up of patients with malignant lymphoma.

Fifty patients with histologically confirmed non-Hodgkin lymphoma underwent an (18)fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG)-PET scan, followed by a CT scan. CT alone, PET alone, side-by-side reading, and fused images were interpreted separately and visually using a five-point grading scale for the following eight regions: cervical, supraclavicular, axillary, mediastinal, para-aortic to iliac, mesenteric, inguinal, and extra-nodal. Diagnostic accuracy was compared on the basis of the final diagnoses determined by histological confirmation and/or clinical course.

For all regions combined, the interpretation of PET alone (sensitivity = 86.1%, specificity = 99.4%, accuracy = 91.0%), side-by-side reading (96.0%, 99.4%, 98.9%), and fused images (98.0%, 99.4%, 99.2%) yielded significantly higher diagnostic performance than that of CT alone (59.4%, 96.1%, 91.0%; P < 0.001). The cervical, supraclavicular, and extra-nodal regions were more accurately diagnosed with PET (P < 0.05), whereas the para-aortic to iliac regions were diagnosed more accurately with side-by-side reading and fused images than with CT alone or PET alone (P < 0.05).

Although fused images are clinically valuable, side-by-side reading showed equivalent performance, whereas the interpretation of PET alone yielded reasonably high diagnostic performance for restaging or follow-up of patients with malignant lymphoma.

[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) is playing an increasing role in the management of both Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, offering potential advantages in the accuracy of disease assessment at a number of points in the management pathway. This review evaluates the current level of confidence in the use of PET technology in (1) initial staging, (2) the assessment of early response to chemotherapy, (3) the assessment of residual masses at completion of initial treatment, (4) follow-up, and (5) radiotherapy planning.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the necessity of 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) after end of treatment in lymphoma patients who had an interim FDG-PET/CT.

In 38 patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) and 30 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) interim PET/CT (intPET) after two to four cycles of chemotherapy and PET/CT after completion of first-line treatment (endPET) were carried out. Cost reduction was retrospectively calculated for the potentially superfluous endPET examinations.

In 31 (82%) HD patients, intPET demonstrated complete remission (CR) which was still present on endPET. The remaining seven HD patients (18%) had partial remission (PR) on intPET. For NHL, 22 (73%) patients had CR on intPET analysis which was still present on endPET. In the remaining eight NHL patients, intPET revealed PR in seven and stable disease in one patient. None of all intPET complete responders progressed until the end of therapy. Thus, of the 196 PET/CT's carried out in our study population, 53 endPET's (27.0%) were carried out in interim complete responders.

End-treatment PET/CT is unnecessary if intPET shows CR and the clinical course is uncomplicated. An imaging cost reduction of 27% in our study population could have been achieved by omitting end of treatment FDG-PET/CT in interim complete responders.

The diagnosis of primary cutaneous lymphoma (PCL) is currently based on clinical and histological findings and/or relatively invasive procedures such as bone marrow and fine-needle lymph node biopsies. Although computed tomography (CT) is a noninvasive imaging modality that is widely used for staging in patients with lymphoma, it cannot provide information about malignant cutaneous lesions.

To investigate the usefulness of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) in the management of PCL.

We retrospectively analysed 31 FDG-PET studies in 19 patients with PCL [15 T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and four B-cell NHL]. There were 10 men and nine women (age range 23-84 years, mean +/- SD 54 +/- 16). Eleven FDG-PET studies were performed for initial staging and 20 FDG-PET studies were performed for restaging following therapy. Results of FDG-PET were compared with those of CT. Clinical parameters and/or biopsy results of lesions served as reference for the accuracy of PET and CT in evaluating local and metastatic lesions.

For the initial staging, FDG-PET had a sensitivity of 82% for the evaluation of local disease and 80% for the detection of distant metastasis. The corresponding values for CT were 55% and 100%, respectively. For restaging of cutaneous lymphoma, FDG-PET had a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 92% for local recurrence/residual disease and a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 100% for distant metastasis. The corresponding values for CT were 50% and 83% for local recurrence/residual disease and 100% and 67% for distant metastasis.

FDG-PET has a potential value for initial staging and restaging following therapy in patients with PCL. FDG-PET has higher diagnostic value than CT in the detection both of local disease and distant metastasis.

New oncologic procedures are currently more focused on the biological features of tumors. The ideal objective is the administration of personalized effective treatments for each patient that affects not just the location and spread of disease but also special metabolic characteristics of tumoral cells. Radiologic diagnostic methods are extremely important in the management of the patient for staging, restaging, and evaluation of treatment response, and clinicians are avid for some additional functional and metabolic information. Further, they need more dynamic methods for follow-up. Nuclear Medicine and positron emission tomography (PET) in many cases can meet this requirement, although it is not perfect, at least at the present time. Currently 2-((18)F)fluoro-2-desoxi-D: -glucose positron emission tomography is being widely used for oncologic purposes. Its information can be very useful in abdominal diseases and must be taken into account with the results of radiologic imaging. Thus, many changes in the choice of treatment are seen. However, it is very important to know that sometimes there is a lack of specificity that has to be considered.

To determine the influence and impact of [F]- fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in Denmark.

A standardized questionnaire was sent to the referring physicians of 743 consecutive cases between January 2000 and December 2001. The questionnaire was designed to determine whether and how the results of the FDG PET imaging changed patient management.

The response rate was 71% (524 responded). The distribution of all responding physicians included 26 different specialities. The majority were from haematology (23%), oncology (20%), plastic surgery (17%) and neurology (10%). The primary diagnoses at referral was in the field of oncology (94%), with lymphoma (24%), melanomas (20%), unknown primary neoplasms (13%), nervous system neoplasms (9%), lung cancer (6%) and cancer of the digestive system (4%). FDG PET imaging resulted in a change in the patients' management in 224 cases (43%). Of these, surgery was affected in 88 cases. Chemotherapy was affected in 71 cases and radiation therapy in 54 cases. In patients where the intended plan of management was not changed, 78% of the physicians stated that FDG PET was nevertheless clinically helpful; for example confirmed the diagnosis, helped staging, changed treatment plan or confirmed treatment of choice. Physicians indicated a general satisfaction with FDG PET imaging in 86% of the cases.

This survey-based study indicates that FDG PET imaging has a major impact on patient management, contributing to changes in management in 43% of cases. The present study also demonstrates that referring physicians are generally satisfied with FDG PET imaging in 86% of the cases.

Positron emission tomography (PET) using (18)F-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) has emerged in recent years as an important tool for the evaluation of lymphoma patients during their course of disease. At diagnosis, FDG imaging is capable of detecting nodal and extra nodal sites of disease and provides accurate staging. FDG-PET is superior to computed tomography, during and at the end of first-line treatment or salvage therapeutic regimens, as a tool for monitoring therapeutic response. PET enables the differential diagnosis of residual viable tumor versus a remnant fibrotic or necrotic mass. PET also provides prognostic data of high clinical significance for both Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Results of this metabolic imaging modality, interpreted in view of the pretherapy risk profile of the individual patient, are predictive of the immediate success of a certain therapeutic strategy, as well as of overall and disease-free survival. PET appears to play also an important role in the detection of lymphoma relapse. Data comparing (67)Gallium scintigraphy and FDG-PET indicate the latter as the functional imaging modality of choice for assessment of lymphoma patients. Preliminary studies show an additional value of fused PET/computed tomography imaging for further improved diagnosis, staging and definition of status of lymphoma.

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a novel functional imaging technique that provides several inherent advantages over conventional nuclear scintigraphy. Several studies have suggested a role for PET using the positron emitter fluorine-18 in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with lymphoma. This review summarizes the existing data evaluating the role of 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-PET in both the staging and follow-up of patients with lymphoma. Most studies of PET involve patients with either Hodgkin's disease or diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. PET detects more disease sites above and below the diaphragm on staging of lymphoma than gallium scintigraphy and may have particular utility in the evaluation of the spleen. Moreover, persistently positive PET scans during and after chemotherapy appear to have a high sensitivity for predicting subsequent relapse. A negative PET scan at the end of therapy provides very favorable prognostic information. Persistently positive PET scans at the end of therapy warrant close follow-up or additional diagnostic procedures, since some of those patients may remain in prolonged remission. Clearly, additional studies, including prospective blinded trials and cost-effectiveness analyses, are warranted to determine which subsets of patients with lymphoma ultimately will benefit from this modality.

Metabolic or molecular imaging with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has emerged as a powerful imaging modality for diagnosis, staging, and therapy monitoring of a variety of cancers. The accuracy of FDG-PET as an imaging tool for the primary staging of lymphoma suffers from the absence of a reference criterion to which all imaging modalities can be compared. For ethical reasons, pathological diagnosis is usually not possible for all of the lesions and abnormalities found. In this article, the current state of the art for staging of primary lymphoma is reviewed and the implications for staging and the impact on patient management discussed. Whole-body PET using FDG is superior to conventional staging, i.e., physical examination, laboratory tests, plain radiography, and CT, by 10-20%. The sensitivity of FDG-PET varies for different regions of the body and appears lowest for infradiaphragmatic disease involvement. Staging with metabolic imaging leads in 10-40% of patients to a change in clinical stage. Highly variable results have been reported on whether up- or downstaging of lymphoma with PET leads to changes in the therapeutic approach for primary lymphoma.

Positron emission tomography (PET) has now gained a place in the management of patients with cancer, including those with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Restaging studies and those addressing the monitoring of response to treatment are especially in focus. Most of the knowledge gained has been achieved with dedicated BGO-based PET technology, but there are a number of developments that will impact on the use of this metabolic imaging technique in the investigation of patients with lymphoma. The challenges ahead are determined by the need for high-quality whole-body imaging associated with increased patient throughput and the need to investigate the role of new labelled ligands. The latter are likely to yield new insights into tumour cell characterisation, tumour behaviour and tumour outcome assessment. The study of new radiolabelled ligands will impose further demands for rapid dynamic data acquisition and accurate tracer quantification. Current and future developments in PET technology range from the use of new detector materials to different detector geometries and data acquisition modes. The search for alternatives to BGO scintillation materials for PET has led to the development of PET instruments utilising new crystals such as LSO and GSO. The use of these new detectors and the increased sensitivity achieved with 3D data acquisitions represent the most significant current developments in the field. With the increasing demands imposed on the clinical utilisation of PET, issues such as study cost and patient throughput will emerge as significant future factors. As a consequence, low-cost units are being offered by the manufacturers through the utilisation of gamma camera-based SPET systems for PET coincidence imaging. Unfortunately, clinical studies in lymphoma and other cancers have already demonstrated the limitations of this technology, with 20% of lesions <15 mm in size escaping detection. On the other hand, the recent development of combined PET/CT devices attempts to address the lack of anatomical information inherent with PET images, taking advantage of further improvement in patient throughput and hence cost-effectiveness. Preliminary studies using this multimodality imaging approach have already demonstrated the potential of the technique. Although the potential exists, certain technical issues with PET/CT require refinement of the methodology. Such issues include organ movement (such as respiratory motion), which strongly influences the image fusion of a rapidly acquired CT scan with the slower acquisition of a PET dataset, and the derivation of CT-based attenuation coefficients in the presence of contrast agents or metallic implants. The application of the technology for radiotherapy planning also poses a number of associated challenges. Finally, the development of dedicated PET systems based on planar detector arrangements with new detector components has the potential to improve clinical throughput by over 100%, but clinical trials using such systems have still to be carried out in order to establish the associated whole-body image quality.

Positron emission tomography is a functional imaging modality that capitalizes on biochemical changes within tumour cells to localize these changes within the body. As a functional imaging tool, unlike an anatomical imaging tool such as CT, it does not require enlargement of lymph nodes affected by disease but does require sufficient numbers of tumour cells to be present with altered biochemical function to visualize these disease sites. These changes are most commonly monitored using a glucose mimic fluorodeoxyglucose which is not only taken up into tumour cells but is trapped within these cells owing to alterations of the hexokinase and dephosphorylase enzymes. This review examines the current role of FDG PET imaging in patients with Hodgkins and Non-Hodgkins lymphoma and also speculates on future roles for this imaging modality.

To compare fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) and gallium scanning with each other and with conventional staging, for patients with Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Fifty patients had PET, gallium scanning, and conventional staging of newly diagnosed or progressive Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Disease sites, stage, and treatment plans were assessed retrospectively.

Positron emission tomography and gallium scanning each upstaged 14% of patients (n = 7). Management was altered by PET in 9 cases (18%) and by gallium scanning in 7 (14%, P = 0.6). Disease was evident in 117 sites in 42 patients. The case positivity rate for conventional assessment was 90%; for PET, 95%; for gallium scanning, 88%; for conventional assessment plus PET, 100%; and for conventional assessment plus gallium scanning, 98%. Site positivity rates for conventional assessment were 68%; for PET, 82%; for gallium scanning, 69% (conventional vs. PET, P = 0.01; conventional vs. gallium scanning, P = 0.9; PET vs. gallium scanning, P = 0.01); for conventional assessment plus PET, 96%; and for conventional assessment plus gallium scanning, 94%. Positron emission tomography and gallium scanning were entirely concordant in 31 patients; in the other 19 patients, PET identified 25 sites missed by gallium scanning, whereas gallium scanning identified 10 sites missed by PET.

In this retrospective study, PET demonstrated a higher site positivity rate than did gallium scanning, with similar case positivity rates. These data support the use of PET in place of gallium scanning for the staging of patients with Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging is increasingly used for the management of patients with cancer. The technique is now well accepted by most physicians as an effective complement to the existing imaging modalities. For many malignancies, PET achieves high sensitivity and specificity. The critical role of this powerful technique is realized increasingly in the day-to-day practice of oncology. This is particularly true for the management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The contribution of PET for the selection of patients eligible for curative treatments in this setting is well established. Convincing data also exist to support the use of PET for evaluating patients with recurrent colorectal carcinoma, for staging and restaging lymphomas, and for diagnosing recurrent thyroid carcinoma in the presence of elevated thyroglobulin and negative 131I scans. Other indications include staging of various recurrent malignancies, such as breast cancer, melanoma, and head and neck and gynecologic carcinomas. Existing data are limited for the determination of the impact of PET in certain malignancies, and further studies, which should include outcome information, will allow clarification of the role of this modality for such indications. Despite the small number of studies specifically designed to assess changes in management plans for some malignancies after performing PET the overall favorable results are encouraging enough at this time to include this modality as an essential element of the practice of modern oncology. Finally, the evolving role of PET imaging as a predictor of response after local or systemic treatment may add a major dimension to the application of this novel technique.

In order to keep subscribers up-to-date with the latest developments in their field, John Wiley & Sons are providing a current awareness service in each issue of the journal. The bibliography contains newly published material in the field of hematological oncology. Each bibliography is divided into 14 sections: 1 Books, Reviews & Symposia; 2 General; Leukemias: 3 Lymphoblastic; 4 Myeloid & Myelodysplastic Syndromes; 5 Chronic; 6 Others; Lymphomas: 7 Hodgkin's; 8 Non-Hodgkin's; 9 Plasmacytomas/Multiple Myelomas; 10 Others; 11 Bone Marrow Transplantation; 12 Cytokines; 13 Diagnosis; 14 Cytogenetics. Within each section, articles are listed in alphabetical order with respect to author. If, in the preceding period, no publications are located relevant to any one of these headings, that section will be omitted.

Gallium-67 scintigraphy (GS) has the ability to provide important diagnostic and prognostic information for the evaluation of patients with lymphoma. GS is superior to morphologic imaging techniques because of its affinity to viable lymphoma cells. The value of GS lies not in the initial diagnosis but primarily in assessing the results of treatment and in the follow-up of patients with lymphoma. Nevertheless, GS has not gained the expected wide acceptance, possibly because of the meticulous technique required and the expertise needed for optimal interpretation. The introduction of positron emission tomography (PET) with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) as a tumor-seeking agent, which provides images of superior quality, may have an impact on the current role of GS in the management of patients with lymphoma. FDG-PET seems to share with GS the advantages of a tumor viability agent. It appears to be more sensitive for detecting nodal and extranodal sites of disease than GS and may have predictive value during and after therapy for lymphoma. These potential clinical and economic advantages of FDG-PET need to be confirmed in systematic, large-scale prospective studies.

Positron emission tomography (PET) is now in routine use in oncology, through the success of metabolic imaging, mainly with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Clear benefit is obtained with FDG PET in the assessment of patients with recurrent or residual disease, especially colorectal cancer and lymphoma. Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with FDG PET is of proven benefit. Staging and restaging of patients with melanoma of stage II or greater is useful, and FDG PET has also been successfully used to investigate single pulmonary nodules. Tumour grading has been assessed, especially in the brain, but an important and emerging indication is the evaluation of tumour response with PET. Rapid decline of FDG uptake has been observed in responsive cancers. Further advances are being made with other fluorine-18-labelled and generator-based PET tracers, the only ones that can be used in units without dedicated cyclotrons.

There is good category II/III evidence that video-laparoscopic staging is valuable in certain gastrointestinal (gastric, esophageal, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary) and intra-abdominal lymphomas, but no category I evidence (based on prospective randomized trials). The evidence available is all retrospective, but of sufficient consistency to indicate that laparoscopic staging adds to the primary (imaging) staging and often alters the clinical stage of the disease and hence the management of the individual patient. The advent of laparoscopic contact ultrasound (LCU) scanning has improved the staging accuracy for pancreatic and hepatobiliary neoplasms. The laparoscopic approach also offers a means of surgical palliation in certain patient groups. However, there are a number of unresolved issues concerning the use of video-laparoscopy. The most important concerns whether staging laparoscopy should be performed immediately before scheduled surgery or as a separate intervention. The cost-efficacy of these two management options needs to be evaluated in prospective studies. In some centres, laparoscopic staging is being conducted by gastroenterologists and hepatologists. This raises issues of safety and ability to undertake certain procedures that may be necessary during the laparoscopic staging.